Re: OCaml *.cmxs files have to go into which package?

2011-07-13 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 13/07/2011 21:48, Ralf Treinen a écrit : > Should *.cmxs files (native plugins for dynamic loading) go into the > libxxx-ocaml or into libxxx-ocaml-dev package? I haved never used them > myself for my projects but, as far as I understand, they may be necessary > just to execute a certain binary.

Bug#633953: ITP: tyxml -- typed XML in OCaml

2011-07-15 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Stéphane Glondu" * Package name: tyxml Version : 1.91 Upstream Author : Thorsten Ohl, Vincent Balat, and others * URL : http://ocsigen.org/tyxml/install * License : LGPL Programming Lang: OCaml D

Bug#634621: ocaml: New upstream version available: 3.12.1

2011-07-19 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 19/07/2011 10:31, Giorgio Marinelli a écrit : New upstream version is available: 3.12.1 We are waiting for a slot from the release team, see [1]. If you need it, there are unofficial packages available at [2]. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633304 [2] http://ocaml.de

Migration to ocamlnet 3.3.5

2011-07-22 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hello, I am planning to upload ocamlnet 3.3.5 to unstable as soon as ocsigen 1.3.4-2 migrates to testing (unless there is a build failure in experimental, but things look pretty good so far [1]). A few reverse dependencies need fixing [2], and all of them are fixed in git, except approx, for

Bug#635170: ITP: ocaml-config-file -- OCaml library for managing configuration files

2011-07-23 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Stéphane Glondu" * Package name: ocaml-config-file Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Maxence Guesdon * URL : http://config-file.forge.ocamlcore.org/ * License : LGPL-2+ Programming Lang: OCaml Description

Bug#615991: ocamlnet: doesn't install documentation from src/netstring/doc

2011-07-23 Thread Stéphane Glondu
tags 615991 + moreinfo thanks ygrek wrote: > src/netstring/doc/INSTALL.xml describes different ways how netstring.cma > can be linked (alas not fully correct, but still). It should be > installed with -dev or -doc package. Is this still relevant with ocamlnet 3.3.5? Cheers, -- Stéphane --

Team-maintained packages with no designated maintainer...

2011-07-23 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hello, I've recently uploaded many packages that needed update. For packages I don't especially care about, I make the updates "Team uploads" and don't spend much time on them. This gives the illusion that the packages are well maintained [0], but they definitely need more care. At least Stefano

Bug#635326: FTBFS with ocamlnet 3.3.5 on bytecode architectures

2011-07-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: src:liquidsoap Version: 1.0.0~beta2.1-3 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, Your package fails to build with ocamlnet 3.3.5 on bytecode architectures (and armel): Relevant part: > E: Error: unit Netsys_pollset_win32 exported in liquidsoap-plugin-lastfm but > already exported by libocamlnet

Bug#635326: FTBFS with ocamlnet 3.3.5 on bytecode architectures

2011-07-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
tags 635326 + patch thanks Le 25/07/2011 09:41, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : > Your package fails to build with ocamlnet 3.3.5 on bytecode > architectures (and armel): > > Relevant part: >> E: Error: unit Netsys_pollset_win32 exported in liquidsoap-plugin-lastfm but >

Bug#635586: ITP: lablgtk-extras -- collection of modules for OCaml/LablGtk2 applications

2011-07-27 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Stéphane Glondu" * Package name: lablgtk-extras Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Maxence Guesdon * URL : http://gtk-extras.forge.ocamlcore.org/ * License : LGPL-2+ Programming Lang: OCaml D

Bug#636019: RFA: galax -- XQuery implementation with static typing

2011-07-30 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hello, Currently, galax has no human maintainers. It is maintained by the Debian OCaml team because of the need of transition coordination, but needs more love and a dedicated maintainer. A potential maintainer should get familiar with [1], and in particular with o

Bug#636021: RFA: pxp -- OCaml library that implements an XML-1.0 validating parser

2011-07-30 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hello, Currently, pxp has no human maintainers. It is maintained by the Debian OCaml team because of the need of transition coordination, but needs more love and a dedicated maintainer. A potential maintainer should get familiar with [1], and in particular with our

Bug#636024: src:ocaml-batteries: FTBFS with camomile 0.8.3-1

2011-07-30 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: src:ocaml-batteries Version: 1.2.2-1 Severity: important Hello, Your package fails to build with camomile 0.8.3-1 (available in experimental). Relevant part of the log: > ocamlfind ocamlc -c -package camomile,num,str -I src -I libs -I testsuite -I > libs/estring -I build/optcomp -I src

Bug#636025: src:galax: FTBFS with camomile 0.8.3-1

2011-07-30 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: src:galax Version: 1.1-8 Severity: important Hello, Your package fails to build with camomile 0.8.3-1 (available in experimental). Relevant part of the log: > /usr/bin/ocamlc -w m -I . -I . -I /usr/bin/../lib/ocaml -I > /usr/lib/ocaml/pcre -I /usr/lib/ocaml/netstring -I /usr/lib/ocaml

Bug#636026: src:ocaml-gettext: FTBFS with camomile 0.8.3-1

2011-07-30 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: src:ocaml-gettext Version: 0.3.3-1 Severity: important Hello, Your package fails to build with camomile 0.8.3-1 (available in experimental). Relevant part of the log: > make[2]: Entering directory > `/tmp/ocaml-gettext-0.3.3/libgettext-camomile-ocaml' > ocamlfind ocamlc -package "get

Re: Help sought for compiling guestfs-browser

2011-08-01 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 31/07/2011 21:55, Hilko Bengen a écrit : > [...] (I > have just uploaded libguestfs and various bindings to experimental.) AFAICT, the upstream/1.10.5 tag is missing from the git repository (I assume you are using git-buildpackage?), and the pristine-tar branch is not up-to-date. Also: libgues

Re: Help sought for compiling guestfs-browser

2011-08-02 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 02/08/2011 11:39, Hilko Bengen a écrit : > It compiles with camomile 0.8, but not with 0.7. Are there any plans to > move the newer camomile package to unstable soon? It won't happen before the current ocamlnet cluster [1] (ocamlnet and camomile are entangled via galax) migrates to testing. Bes

Bug#524908: libcairo-ocaml-dev: memory leak in Cairo_bigarray

2011-08-02 Thread Stéphane Glondu
tags 524908 + moreinfo thanks On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:46:03 +0200, Oto Havle wrote: > OCaml programs which create Cairo surfaces via Cairo_bigarray leak memory. > Following test program reproduces the bug. The program allocates many > 100Mb arrays, but explicit garbage collector invocation should k

Bug#524908: libcairo-ocaml-dev: memory leak in Cairo_bigarray

2011-08-02 Thread Stéphane Glondu
tags 524908 - moreinfo tags 524908 + confirmed found 524908 1:1.2.0-2 thanks Le 02/08/2011 21:52, Oto Havle a écrit : > [...] Note that I have 32-bit system. I didn't take this into account, and I can indeed reproduce the bug in an up-to-date i386 sid chroot, with version 1:1.2.0-2. Cheers, --

Bug#524908: libcairo-ocaml-dev: memory leak in Cairo_bigarray

2011-08-03 Thread Stéphane Glondu
tags 524908 + help upstream thanks Le 03/08/2011 08:22, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : [...] Note that I have 32-bit system. I didn't take this into account, and I can indeed reproduce the bug in an up-to-date i386 sid chroot, with version 1:1.2.0-2. By looking a bit deeper, I can observe

Re: [Caml-list] Python and Caml

2011-08-04 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 27/11/2007 18:05, Thomas Fischbacher a écrit : http://nmag.soton.ac.uk/tf/pycaml.html This link is broken. (Note ad Debian developers: this fixes some major memory management bugs that can cause crashes in the original pycaml module which is in Debian, so, ideally, our variant should event

Bug#620838: dh-ocaml: dh_ocaml doesn't depend on -dev packages even when runtime package requires it

2011-08-08 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 04/04/2011 17:16, Sylvain Le Gall a écrit : It should be related to the fact that they don't ship runtime packages (pure ocaml packages). However, the runtime package of liboasis-ocaml contains *.cma libraries that really need the libraries provided by libocamlgraph-ocaml-dev and libfileutils-

Bug#637147: libapache2-mod-ocamlnet: Error loading shared library: /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dllnetsys.so

2011-08-08 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 08/08/2011 21:59, Anders Peter Fugmann a écrit : > Apache fails to start with the follwing errors: > [...] Is this new with 3.3.5-3 ? Can you provide a minimal apache configuration snippet that triggers this error? Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-requ.

Bug#637147: libapache2-mod-ocamlnet: Error loading shared library: /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dllnetsys.so

2011-08-09 Thread Stéphane Glondu
tags 637147 + upstream thanks Le 09/08/2011 22:39, Anders Peter Fugmann a écrit : > I replaced apache2.conf with this: > > LoadModule netcgi_module /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_netcgi_apache.so > NetcgiLoad pcre/pcre.cma > NetcgiLoad netsys/netsys.cma > #NetcgiLoad netstring/netstring.cma > #Netc

Bug#637147: libapache2-mod-ocamlnet: Error loading shared library: /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dllnetsys.so

2011-08-10 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 10/08/2011 10:00, Anders Fugmann a écrit : That solves the problem. Great. May I suggest that the file /etc/apache2/mods-available/netcgi_apache.load provides by the debian package is updated to reflect this. Sure. Done in git. -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-ma

Bug#637360: backtrace() doesn't work on armel

2011-08-10 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: libc6 Version: 2.13-15 Severity: normal Hello, The test suite of ocaml-extunix 0.0.3-1 fails on armel because the following program: #include int main() { void *buffer[100]; return backtrace(buffer, 100); } returns 0. It returns with a non-zero status (3 everywhere I've

Bug#596622: Fwd: Re: [haXe] haXe source & ocaml library extlib

2011-08-15 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 15/09/2010 22:17, Sylvain Le Gall a écrit : > Your best option right now, is to create a patch that adds the feature > you need (i.e. "the new output_strings functionality"). And submit it to > the BTS of the extlib project. > > http://code.google.com/p/ocaml-extlib/issues/list What the status

Bug#637147: Confirming bug

2011-08-16 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 16/08/2011 16:22, Gerd Stolpmann a écrit : I've chosen a more radical approach for a permanent resolution: The next version of Ocamlnet will support the additional directive NetcgiRequire. It works like "#require" in a findlib-enabled toploop. All the NetcgiLoad directives can then be replaced

Re: ocamlfind byte does not work -- is this a bug?

2011-08-24 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 23/08/2011 22:35, Hilko Bengen a écrit : The OCaml part of febootstrap does not build on architectures without a native code compiler: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=febootstrap&arch=mips&ver=3.8-1&stamp=1314125941 Apparently, OCAMLBEST has been set to "byte" by the AC_PROG_O

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] [patch] Packages ocaml libraries

2011-09-07 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 31/08/2011 17:31, Thomas Goirand a écrit : > I have set debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org as Cc: to this email, in > the hope that the Debian OCaml task force can have a last look on my > work. I'd appreciate comments, and I hope I didn't do mistakes this > time. Please keep in mind that I don

Re: Bug#633304: transition: ocaml

2011-09-07 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 09/07/2011 13:35, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : > OCaml 3.12.1 has been recently released. It is mostly bugfixes. I've > rebuilt all packages that depend on ocaml, and I see no blocker to > update it in Debian. I've planified the migration at [1] (I am > planning to update a

Re: Bug#633304: transition: ocaml

2011-09-16 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On 09/07/2011 05:51 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote: >> OCaml 3.12.1 has been recently released. It is mostly bugfixes. I've >> rebuilt all packages that depend on ocaml, and I see no blocker to >> update it in Debian. I've planified the migration at [1] (I am >> plann

Bug#642706: bin-prot: FTBFS: Command '/usr/bin/ocamlbuild syntax/pa_bin_prot.cma syntax/pa_bin_prot.cmxa syntax/pa_bin_prot.a lib/libbin_prot.a lib/dllbin_prot.so lib/bin_prot.cma lib/bin_prot.cmxa li

2011-09-24 Thread Stéphane Glondu
tags 642706 + unreproducible thanks Le 24/09/2011 19:53, Mònica Ramírez Arceda a écrit : > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > amd64. > [...] I cannot reproduce this. Can anyone else? Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint

Bug#642706: bin-prot: FTBFS: Command '/usr/bin/ocamlbuild syntax/pa_bin_prot.cma syntax/pa_bin_prot.cmxa syntax/pa_bin_prot.a lib/libbin_prot.a lib/dllbin_prot.so lib/bin_prot.cma lib/bin_prot.cmxa li

2011-09-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 25/09/2011 00:00, Eric Cooper a écrit : > I get the same error. Here's what I did to reproduce it. > > $ apt-get source libbin-prot-camlp4-dev > $ cd bin-prot-1.3.1/ > $ DIST=sid ARCH=amd64 git-pbuilder update > $ pdebuild --pbuilder cowbuilder -- --basepath > /var/cache/pbuilder/base-sid-amd

Bug#642706: bin-prot: FTBFS: Command '/usr/bin/ocamlbuild syntax/pa_bin_prot.cma syntax/pa_bin_prot.cmxa syntax/pa_bin_prot.a lib/libbin_prot.a lib/dllbin_prot.so lib/bin_prot.cma lib/bin_prot.cmxa li

2011-09-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
tags 642706 - unreproducible thanks Le 25/09/2011 15:38, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : >> I get the same error. Here's what I did to reproduce it. >> >> $ apt-get source libbin-prot-camlp4-dev >> $ cd bin-prot-1.3.1/ >> $ DIST=sid ARCH=amd64 git-pbuilder update

Bug#642922: regression: "sh -c" change causes FTBFS

2011-09-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
g --- dash-0.5.7/debian/changelog +++ dash-0.5.7/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +dash (0.5.7-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Revert http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.shells.dash/556 + + -- Stéphane Glondu Sun, 25 Sep 2011 19:05:10 +0200 + dash (0.5.7-1) uns

Bug#642835: Bug#642922: regression: "sh -c" change causes FTBFS

2011-09-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
block 642835 by 642922 block 642706 by 642922 severity 642922 serious thanks Le 25/09/2011 19:28, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : > Bugs #642706 (bin-prot FTBFS) and #642835 (sexplib310 FTBFS) can be > fixed by reverting the patch submitted at [1]. I don't understand why. &g

Bug#642935: ocaml-md5sums: Can't exec "ocamldumpapprox": No such file or directory

2011-09-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
tags 642935 + pending thanks Le 25/09/2011 21:19, Jonathan Nieder a écrit : > + [ Jonathan Nieder ] > + * debian/control: add Breaks against versions of dh-ocaml that > +relied on the ocaml{dumpapprox,plugininfo,byteinfo} tools. > [...] > Breaks: > + dh-ocaml (<< 1.0.0), > ocaml-interp (<

Bug#642730: matita: FTBFS: Error: Files /usr/lib/ocaml/http/http_mt.cmxa and /usr/lib/ocaml/netstring/netstring.cmxa make inconsistent assumptions over interface Neturl

2011-09-26 Thread Stéphane Glondu
reassign 642730 src:ocaml-http severity 642730 important affects 642730 src:matita retitle 642730 ocaml-http: should use dh-ocaml 0.9 thanks Le 24/09/2011 21:32, Mònica Ramírez Arceda a écrit : > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > amd64. > [...] >> Error: Fi

Bug#641462: unison: New uptream version 2.40.63

2011-09-27 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 28/09/2011 02:50, Michael Moorman a écrit : > Going to bump this bug. I've been needing to maintain a PPA version of > Unison 2.40 to keep track with the version of my fileserver. Due to > unison's annoying inability to sync between different minor revisions, I > repackaged the latest Ubuntu rev

Re: DM Application of Nicolas Dandrimont

2011-09-28 Thread Stéphane Glondu
>> obus, ocaml-usb, ocsigen and js-of-ocaml). >> >> My GnuPG key 0x66475AAF is signed by Debian Developers, including >> Stéphane Glondu, Enrico Zini, and others. >> >> I look forward to becoming a Debian Maintainer. >> > > I strongly supp

Accepted ocaml-http 0.1.4-4 (source amd64)

2011-09-29 Thread Stéphane Glondu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:56:58 +0200 Source: ocaml-http Binary: libhttp-ocaml-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.1.4-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers Changed-By: Stéphane Glondu

Re: regression: "sh -c" change causes FTBFS

2011-10-05 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 26/09/2011 22:44, Jonathan Nieder a écrit : >> I beg to differ. ocamlbuild uses libc's system(), it would be insane to >> change that. It seems that darcs is also affected. There might be also >> more packages affected... > > Got it --- I'll prepare an upload reverting the "sh -c" patch. > > M

Re: regression: "sh -c" change causes FTBFS

2011-10-06 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On 10/05/2011 11:51 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > It seems that darcs failure was unrelated. I digged a bit more, and > found some suspicious code in ocamlbuild: > > http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=5371 > > I still don't understand why this corner case is trigge

Re: regression: "sh -c" change causes FTBFS

2011-10-06 Thread Stéphane Glondu
[CC-ing debian-devel to get more opinions] On 10/06/2011 04:07 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> ocamlbuild's logic is definitively incorrect, but I'm not sure if dash's >> new behaviour is correct. "bash -c" doesn't skip fork() when a >> redirection is set up, I guess for a reason. "dash -c" should p

Re: E: camlidl-doc source: no-human-maintainers

2011-10-08 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 08/10/2011 17:07, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : > given my lazy attempt to get out of various Uploaders fields of 1.5 > years ago has failed, I'm (slowly) going through packages that I haven't > been maintaining for a while and do that. > > I'm writing to you because I've just done so with cam

Bug#642706: bin-prot: FTBFS: Command '/usr/bin/ocamlbuild syntax/pa_bin_prot.cma syntax/pa_bin_prot.cmxa syntax/pa_bin_prot.a lib/libbin_prot.a lib/dllbin_prot.so lib/bin_prot.cma lib/bin_prot.cmxa li

2011-10-16 Thread Stéphane Glondu
merge 642706 642835 severity 642706 important reassign 642706 ocaml-nox found 642706 3.12.0-7 retitle 642706 ocamlbuild: questionable job control forwarded 642706 http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=5371 affects 642706 src:bin-prot src:sexplib310 thanks Le 16/10/2011 13:04, Jonathan Nieder a é

Re: camlidl and shared library.

2011-10-16 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 16/10/2011 20:02, Romain Beauxis a écrit : > I have thus commited a branch "shared" to camlidl which does the following: > * Patch upstream to build dllcamlidl.so > * Split binary packages in 3: > - camlidl: binary > - libcamlidl-ocaml: runtime files > - libcamlidl-ocaml-dev: dev files >

Bug#645669: Fails to build on armhf

2011-10-17 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 17/10/2011 20:10, Loïc Minier a écrit : > This is a tracking bug to note that ocamlgsl needs porting on armhf; it > currently fails to build with: [...] It doesn't build on armel either... Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Re: RFS: ocaml-fdinfo

2011-10-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 25/10/2011 16:00, Nicolas Dandrimont a écrit : > I'm Cc:'ing the OCaml Team which may be interested in your package. I'll > try to take a look tonight, unless someone beats me to it. Thank you for bringing this to our attention. >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ocaml-fdinfo". >> >

Bug#646705: Several dozen *.unison.tmp-bad scattered about my file syste

2011-10-26 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On 26/10/2011 14:17, clayton wrote: > I have about 2G of files in my home directory, which I generally sync > multiple times per week. Scattered throughout this 2G, dated > throughout the life of this installation, are more then 40M of files named > *.unison.tmp-bad, ie. > > ../.miro/.unison.sq

Re: Plasma

2011-11-02 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 02/11/2011 21:13, Gerd Stolpmann a écrit : > First, Plasma needs an absolutely recent version of ocamlnet, i.e. > 3.4.1. I couldn't find a repository with it. I've just updated it (in Debian unstable). > Second, there is the question how to get it into Debian. The dpkg is no > problem for me a

Accepted coq 8.3.pl2+dfsg-2 (source all amd64)

2011-11-02 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Maintainers Changed-By: Stéphane Glondu Description: coq- proof assistant for higher-order logic (toplevel and compiler) coq-theories - proof assistant for higher-order logic (theories) coqide - proof assistant for higher-order logic (gtk interface) libcoq-ocaml - runtime libraries for Coq

Re: Plasma

2011-11-03 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 03/11/2011 22:15, Gerd Stolpmann a écrit : > 1. The part of ocamlnet using cryptokit is missing (i.e. netmech-scram) > 2. The part of ocamlnet using camlzip is missing (i.e. netzip) > 3. I wonder why the *.netdb files are in libocamlnet-ocaml-dev and not >in libocamlnet-ocaml, because there

Bug#647593: RM: ocamlgsl [mips mipsel] -- ROM; broken on architectures with double-word alignment requirement

2011-11-04 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, Please remove the binary packages of ocamlgsl on mips and mipsel. They are probably broken, and ocamlgsl does no longer build with OCaml 3.12.1 and they block the OCaml transition. Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-mai

Re: Removal of orpie

2011-11-06 Thread Stéphane Glondu
> will ocamlgsl on mips and mipsel be fixed sometime, so orpie will > be available on those architectures again? Actually, ocamlgsl compiles with no error when the #error directive is commented out. There is a "make test" target, but it uses an unknown "fort" command... and even so, the test-suite

Bug#627132: New "-custom" binary generation breaks stack backtraces

2011-11-15 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On 05/24/2011 11:41 AM, Stéphane Glondu wrote: >> The "strip"ping problem that appeared to motivate the new embedding >> process had never bothered us, so another suitable workaround from our >> perspective would be if there was a way to disable the >> new "

Re: [OCAML 6/7] Create 2 ocaml packages, libxen-ocaml-4.1 and libxen-ocaml-dev.

2011-11-15 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On 11/15/2011 04:04 PM, Jon Ludlam wrote: > +Package: libxen-ocaml-@version@ > +Architecture: any > +Section: libs > +Depends: ocaml-base-nox-${F:OCamlABI}, ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, > ${ocaml:Depends} > +Provides: ${ocaml:Provides} > +Description: OCaml libraries for controlling Xen >

Re: [OCAML 6/7] Create 2 ocaml packages, libxen-ocaml-4.1 and libxen-ocaml-dev.

2011-11-15 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On 11/15/2011 04:04 PM, Jon Ludlam wrote: > +/usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dll*_stubs.so* > +/usr/lib/ocaml/xenlight/META > +/usr/lib/ocaml/xenlight/*.cma > +/usr/lib/ocaml/xenbus/META > +/usr/lib/ocaml/xenbus/*.cma > +/usr/lib/ocaml/xenctrl/META > +/usr/lib/ocaml/xenctrl/*.cma > +/usr/lib/ocaml/xenstore

Bug#627132: New "-custom" binary generation breaks stack backtraces

2011-11-15 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 16/11/2011 00:07, Stephen McCamant a écrit : > So my personal opinion is that the original bug isn't really "fixed", > but it's close enough that I think it would be within your > maintainer's discretion to declare it so. Or alternatively this feels > somewhat like a "help" or "wontfix" situatio

Accepted ocaml-http 0.1.5-1 (source amd64)

2011-11-19 Thread Stéphane Glondu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:59:35 +0100 Source: ocaml-http Binary: libhttp-ocaml-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.1.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers Changed-By: Stéphane Glondu

Bug#649439: New upstream version

2011-11-20 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 20/11/2011 23:53, Erik de Castro Lopo a écrit : > Package: libcairo-ocaml-dev > Version: 1:1.2.0-2+b1 > Severity: normal > > There is a new upstream version (3.5) available here: > > http://forge.ocamlcore.org/projects/cairo/ It is not the same upstream. They don't even look related. Whi

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] [PATCH 6/7] Create 2 ocaml packages, libxen-4.1-ocaml and libxen-4.1-ocaml-dev.

2011-11-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On 11/25/2011 05:17 PM, Bastian Blank wrote: >> +Depends: ocaml-base-nox-${F:OCamlABI} > > Why is this not generated? It should be. >> +Depends: ocaml-findlib (>= 1.1) > > Same. This is not a library, but a command-line tool, "ocamlfind". It's a kind of pkg-config for OCaml libraries. It can p

Re: [PATCH 6/7] Create 2 ocaml packages, libxen-4.1-ocaml and libxen-4.1-ocaml-dev.

2011-11-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 25/11/2011 21:49, Jon Ludlam a écrit : > +GENCONTROL_ARGS := -VF:OCamlABI="$(OCAML_ABI)" This should not be needed. It seems that you actually never answered: does dh_ocaml actually generates the dependency to ocaml-*-$ABI ? > + dh_install --sourcedir=$(DIR) $(OCAML_DLL_DIR)/* If there

Re: New ocaml packages

2011-12-07 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 07/12/2011 15:20, Jonathan Ludlam a écrit : > Note that this package depends upon libxen-ocaml, which hasn't been > uploaded yet, although it is committed in the repository. Which repository? Can you post an URL to a .dsc somewhere, so that we can build it easily? -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: Bug#651131: dh-ocaml: debhelper sequence cannot be used with additional options

2011-12-08 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 07/12/2011 21:21, Євгеній Мещеряков a écrit : > Here is the patch that: > 1. Add dh_ocamlclean with the same code as dh_ocamlinit -d > 2. Adds a deprecation warning for dh_ocamlinit -d, in case if someone > uses it without dh or cdbs > 3. Uses dh_ocamlclean instead of dh_ocamlinit -d in a

Re: New ocaml packages

2011-12-09 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On 12/09/2011 08:42 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > There already are ocaml bindings for libuuid1: > [...] > Package: libuuidm-ocaml-dev These are not bindings. > Not knowing your source does your uuid do something different, something > more? Could they be merged? Same question here. Cheers

Accepted coq 8.3.pl3+dfsg-1 (source all amd64)

2011-12-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Maintainers Changed-By: Stéphane Glondu Description: coq- proof assistant for higher-order logic (toplevel and compiler) coq-theories - proof assistant for higher-order logic (theories) coqide - proof assistant for higher-order logic (gtk interface) libcoq-ocaml - runtime libraries for Coq

Bug#641462: Unison 2.40.63...

2012-01-08 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hello, I've just uploaded Unison 2.40.63 to experimental. I haven't tested it extensively myself; please do and report success/failure. It seems that the documentation is broken. I haven't investigated much. Help would be appreciated. I've also uploaded a unison2.32.52 package to unstable (it is

Accepted coq 8.4~beta+dfsg-1 (source all amd64)

2012-01-12 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Maintainers Changed-By: Stéphane Glondu Description: coq- proof assistant for higher-order logic (toplevel and compiler) coq-theories - proof assistant for higher-order logic (theories) coqide - proof assistant for higher-order logic (gtk interface) libcoq-ocaml - runtime libraries

Accepted coq 8.4~beta+dfsg-1 (source all amd64)

2012-01-12 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Maintainers Changed-By: Stéphane Glondu Description: coq- proof assistant for higher-order logic (toplevel and compiler) coq-theories - proof assistant for higher-order logic (theories) coqide - proof assistant for higher-order logic (gtk interface) libcoq-ocaml - runtime libraries

Re: 2 coq emacs modes

2012-01-13 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 13/01/2012 14:01, Hendrik Tews a écrit : > 1) leave the situation as is > People not using Proof General will hopefully not install Proof > General and therefore don't see the problem. That would be my choice (least effort :). If people are bothered by PG, they can uninstall it or override

Accepted coq 8.4~beta+dfsg-2 (source all amd64)

2012-01-14 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Maintainers Changed-By: Stéphane Glondu Description: coq- proof assistant for higher-order logic (toplevel and compiler) coq-theories - proof assistant for higher-order logic (theories) coqide - proof assistant for higher-order logic (gtk interface) libcoq-ocaml - runtime libraries

Accepted coq 8.4~beta+dfsg-2 (source all amd64)

2012-01-14 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Maintainers Changed-By: Stéphane Glondu Description: coq- proof assistant for higher-order logic (toplevel and compiler) coq-theories - proof assistant for higher-order logic (theories) coqide - proof assistant for higher-order logic (gtk interface) libcoq-ocaml - runtime libraries

Accepted coq 8.4~beta+dfsg-3 (source all amd64)

2012-01-15 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Maintainers Changed-By: Stéphane Glondu Description: coq- proof assistant for higher-order logic (toplevel and compiler) coq-theories - proof assistant for higher-order logic (theories) coqide - proof assistant for higher-order logic (gtk interface) libcoq-ocaml - runtime libraries

Accepted coq 8.4~beta+dfsg-3 (source all amd64)

2012-01-15 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Maintainers Changed-By: Stéphane Glondu Description: coq- proof assistant for higher-order logic (toplevel and compiler) coq-theories - proof assistant for higher-order logic (theories) coqide - proof assistant for higher-order logic (gtk interface) libcoq-ocaml - runtime libraries

Bug#656307:

2012-01-18 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 18/01/2012 11:28, Romeyke, Andreas a écrit : > After upgrading Debian Squeeze to Testing, our ocaml based project does not > compile anymore, > because something is wrong now with sexplib. > > We got the message "Error: Unbound value string_of_sexp". > > With sexplib from Squeeze, all will com

Re: [Caml-list] [ANNOUNCE] otags reloaded 3.12.1 for OCaml 3.12.1

2012-01-18 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 18/01/2012 10:01, Hendrik Tews a écrit : > better late than never: I would like to announce the first > release of otags reloaded for OCaml 3.12. It is available at > > http://askra.de/software/otags/ > > Otags reloaded generates tags tables for emacs and vi/vim. > > Note that otags (by d

Re: [Caml-list] [ANNOUNCE] otags reloaded 3.12.1 for OCaml 3.12.1

2012-01-19 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 18/01/2012 14:51, Hendrik Tews a écrit : > This is the old version, which I took over from Monin and > Alvarado and which was based on old Camlp4 of 3.09. I purposely > inserted special guards in that version to ensure that it would > only compile with OCaml 3.09. But some Debian folks removed t

Re: ocsigenserver_2.0.2b+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2012-01-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 20/01/2012 22:15, Luca Falavigna a écrit : > some files are licensed GPLv2+, please mention that in copyright file. If you are talking about polytables.ml* and ocsigen_cache.ml*, it was an upstream error, see: http://ocsigen.org/darcsweb/?r=ocsigenserver.dev;a=commitdiff;h=20120123103126-d035

Re: [Caml-list] [ANNOUNCE] otags reloaded 3.12.1 for OCaml 3.12.1

2012-01-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 20/01/2012 16:25, Hendrik Tews a écrit : > a first version of the otags package is at > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/otags > > I would of course be glad if one of you could have a look at it. It looks like a hostile takeover, and you cannot do that without the maintainer's agreement

Re: [Caml-list] [ANNOUNCE] otags reloaded 3.12.1 for OCaml 3.12.1

2012-01-26 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 26/01/2012 11:24, Hendrik Tews a écrit : >It looks like a hostile takeover, and you cannot do that without the >maintainer's agreement unless the package is orphaned. > > No, no hostility intended. It was only that at first, I didn't > see your reply from January 19 (because it was deb

Re: Debian policy regarding debian/ upstream directory

2012-01-30 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 26/01/2012 08:36, David MENTRE a écrit : >> Moreover, I saw that the debian/ repository is also part of the upstream >> tarball. Keep in mind that it is completely ignored by Debian tools with >> the 3.0 (quilt) format (only the one from .debian.tar.gz is taken into >> account), which is a good

Re: [Caml-list] [ANNOUNCE] otags reloaded 3.12.1 for OCaml 3.12.1

2012-01-30 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 28/01/2012 10:17, Hendrik Tews a écrit : >> a first version of the otags package is at >> >> http://mentors.debian.net/package/otags > > I have updated the package on mentors. I believe I fixed all the > issues. [...] Please do not put the versioned dependencies to camlp4-extra

Re: camlp4-extra (<< 3.13) [was ... otags reloaded 3.12.1 ...]

2012-01-30 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 30/01/2012 23:58, Hendrik Tews a écrit : > [...] I can even install this package in > Squeeze alongside ocaml 3.11.2. Then its an easy exercise to > produce a segmentation fault with otags. The same could happen > when ocaml 3.13 enters Debian. OK. Then "camlp4-extra (<< 3.13)" is probably not

Re: camlp4-extra (<< 3.13) [was ... otags reloaded 3.12.1 ...]

2012-01-31 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 31/01/2012 09:36, Hendrik Tews a écrit : >I know camlp4 depends on Dynlink >nonetheless, which I currently consider a bug in upstream >ocaml. > > Is there a bug number for this? I said "currently", because I haven't (yet) taken the time to investigate and understand it myself... t

Re: camlp4-extra (<< 3.13)

2012-01-31 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 31/01/2012 12:44, Hendrik Tews a écrit : > What is the status dynlink.cmxa on armel? It doesn't exist. There has been a discussion in [1] about that. Retrospectively, maybe I would advocate a dummy implementation of dynlink.cmxa everywhere... something like raising an exception, but definitely

Re: [Caml-list] [ANNOUNCE] otags reloaded 3.12.1 for OCaml 3.12.1

2012-01-31 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 31/01/2012 16:44, Hendrik Tews a écrit : > I managed now to build the package from a git repository with > git-buildpackage. Shall I push my changes back to your otags git > repository or shall I wait a bit with that? You can. Actually, it is easier (for me) to review from the git repository. P

Re: [Caml-list] [ANNOUNCE] otags reloaded 3.12.1 for OCaml 3.12.1

2012-02-06 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 01/02/2012 13:53, Hendrik Tews a écrit : > I pushed otags-3.12.1.99-2 now to the otags git repository. [...] Good. I will upload it soon. > [...] I got > 3 "Mail delivery failed" emails in response. Is this normal? It happens sometimes. Nothing to worry about (I think). >> but where does

Re: [Caml-list] [ANNOUNCE] otags reloaded 3.12.1 for OCaml 3.12.1

2012-02-06 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 06/02/2012 11:42, Hendrik Tews a écrit : > Hold on! I would just like to know if the packaging is OK from > your point of view. [...] It is. > [...] If it is I will release upstream 3.12.2 and > prepare a 3.12.2 package. This way I can incorporate necessary > changes directly in the upstream v

Bug#659002: ocaml-nox: ocaml-compiler with mysterious effects if somewhere a comment with open quotation, example (* 3" *)

2012-02-16 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 15/02/2012 16:44, Andreas Romeyke a écrit : >> File "brackets.ml", line 3, characters 0-2: >> Error: Comment not terminated >> >> I believe it's an OCaml feature, that strings inside comments >> must be terminated (but I cannot find it in the manual). > That would be a very strange featu

Re: close #362188 ?

2012-02-27 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Version: 3.11.2-2 Le 27/02/2012 16:03, Hendrik Tews a écrit : > I suggest to mark bug #362188 as fixed. The problem is not > present in stable and testing anymore. OK. It's done with this mail. Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Bug#467563: camlp5 strict mode?

2012-02-28 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 28/02/2012 09:21, Hendrik Tews a écrit : > I just noticed that camlp5 from Debian cannot compile hol-light, > because the latter requires a strict camlp5 (with configure -strict). > Has it ever be considered adding a Debian package for a strict > camlp5? See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr

Bug#467563: camlp5 strict mode?

2012-02-29 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 28/02/2012 23:16, Hendrik Tews a écrit : > I looked at how camlp5 is compiled and I believe to build > transitional _and_ strict camlp5 executables and libraries from > one source package will require quite a bit of work. The reason > is that the names of executables and libraries are hardcoded

Bug#467563: camlp5 strict mode?

2012-02-29 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 29/02/2012 10:01, Hendrik Tews a écrit : >What about the library? > > You mean camlp5.cma and its variants? They differ between strict > and transitional modes and their name is hardcoded in the > Makefile as well. There might be some objects which are > identical, eg. /usr/lib/ocaml/camlp5

Bug#467563: camlp5 strict mode?

2012-02-29 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 29/02/2012 10:03, Pierre Boutillier a écrit : > I'm sorry but I do not see an answer to that question in the thread: Why > do we keep a camlp5 in transitionnal mode ? This is a good question that I've been thinking about. > For packages, Coq and ledit support strict mode. The only remaining >

Bug#467563: camlp5 strict mode?

2012-02-29 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 29/02/2012 11:23, Pierre Boutillier a écrit : > ssreflect and aactactics are OK > > ulex does NOT depend anymore on camlp5 since v1.0: > CHANGES: > 1.0 > * Update to the new Camlp4 and to ocamlbuild (release for OCaml 3.10 >only), by Nicolas Pouillard. Err... we were talking about

Bug#661716: ocaml: adapt testsuite/tests/asmcomp/i386.S for hurd-i386

2012-02-29 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 29/02/2012 18:04, Pino Toscano a écrit : > the asmcomp tests fail to link on hurd-i386, because the "call_gen_code" > symbol is missing. > The problem is that in testsuite/tests/asmcomp/i386.S the #define's that > are enabled for hurd are wrong. Using the linux_elf ones (just also it > is done i

Bug#661775: FTBFS with ocamlnet 3.5.1

2012-03-01 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: src:approx Version: 3.5-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hello, approx fails to build from source with ocamlnet 3.5.1: > /usr/bin/ocamlopt -c -warn-error A -I +netstring -o url.cmx url.ml > + /usr/bin/ocamlopt -c -warn-error A -I +netstring -o url.cmx url.ml > File "url.ml", line 1, char

Bug#467563: camlp5 strict mode?

2012-03-01 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 01/03/2012 13:51, Hendrik Tews a écrit : >There are other reverse build-dependencies: matita, ssreflect, >geneweb... and maybe others (transitively). Someone has to test. > > ulex0.8 does not build with a strict camlp5: > > ocamlc -a -o pa_ulex.cma -pp 'camlp5o pa_extend.cmo q_MLas

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >