Sven Luther wrote:
The DSA team does not add random machines. There is no ppc64 port,
there is no need for ppc64 machines, there are powerpc build daemons
and there's a powerpc porter machine which is not overloaded. Thus,
no need for more machines, thus no more machines will be added.
Hi there -
I've got a G3 Powerbook Pismo with a problem
similar to this post:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2003/04/msg00609.html
Wifi card lights go off, can't type anything,
mouse usually still works, audio cuts, and
sometimes X crashes.
Etch, and now Lenny 2.6.8-powerpc
floating
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 08:31:22AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
The DSA team does not add random machines. There is no ppc64 port,
there is no need for ppc64 machines, there are powerpc build daemons
and there's a powerpc porter machine which is not overloaded. Thus,
Sven Luther wrote:
But basically, you are telling me that i should take my server, and fork
debian. Well, i guess given how i have been handled lately, i am
seriously considering this. The debian infrastructure guys probably need
some serious competition in order to be kept agile :)
If you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello to Debian-PowerPC,
it's 20 day to go until the buildd for the debian powerpc port gets
disconnected.
To the people in charge: Please make your decision soon. To be able
to make the transit in time and to stop the discussion about it.
Hi,
On Friday 11 May 2007 09:50, Ralf Saalmüller wrote:
it's 20 day to go until the buildd for the debian powerpc port gets
disconnected.
Yes, we know. But this has nothing to do with those powerpc64 machines
discussed in this thread.
regards,
Holger
pgpnMHEwZu69A.pgp
Description:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:27:01AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
But basically, you are telling me that i should take my server, and fork
debian. Well, i guess given how i have been handled lately, i am
seriously considering this. The debian infrastructure guys probably need
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:03:48AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 11 May 2007 09:50, Ralf Saalmüller wrote:
it's 20 day to go until the buildd for the debian powerpc port gets
disconnected.
Yes, we know. But this has nothing to do with those powerpc64 machines
discussed in
Sven Luther wrote:
Ok, where is the debian powerpc64 machine, which is needed for the
multiarch powerpc port ?
Where is the official multiarch powerpc port that needs a Debian
powerpc64 machine?
Well, there is andreas jochens pure-ppc64 effort eating loads of space on
alioth for
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:30:55AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Ok, where is the debian powerpc64 machine, which is needed for the
multiarch powerpc port ?
Where is the official multiarch powerpc port that needs a Debian
powerpc64 machine?
Well, there is
Hi all,
although this thread is not mega-friedly, I think that it gives the
opportunity to ask to the powerpc porters and buildd admins their
opinion on wether Debian needs a G5 machine or not.
One first argument is that G5 is faster, and that it is not because the
current buildd was not
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:02:26AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:30:55AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Ok, where is the debian powerpc64 machine, which is needed for the
multiarch powerpc port ?
Where is the
Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:30:55AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Ok, where is the debian powerpc64 machine, which is needed for the
multiarch powerpc port ?
Where is the official multiarch powerpc port that needs a Debian
powerpc64
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 06:34:31PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Hi all,
although this thread is not mega-friedly, I think that it gives the
opportunity to ask to the powerpc porters and buildd admins their
opinion on wether Debian needs a G5 machine or not.
Notice that the augsbourg
Joey Schulze schrieb am Friday, 11. May 2007 um 09:27:01 +0200:
|Where is the official multiarch powerpc port that needs a Debian
|powerpc64 machine?
First you need the computer, then you can start
porting.
Alles Gute
Helmut H. Franke
--
Joey Schulze schrieb am Friday, 11. May 2007 um 11:02:26 +0200:
|Sven Luther wrote:
| On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:30:55AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
| Sven Luther wrote:
| Ok, where is the debian powerpc64 machine, which is needed for the
| multiarch powerpc port ?
|
|Where is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can ship it within the continental US. Please let me know if
you're interested. CC me, in case I've fudged the headers on this;
I no longer read debian-powerpc.
Not to derail an otherwise stimulating and acrimonious
| Why not ?
|
|Because the sky is not violet today.
What a rediculous, senseless answer!
Unbelieveable bad! I never did expect things like
this in a project like debian. You seriously
should think about your positions.
/lurk rant
Oh thanks a lot, guys! Popping back into -powerpc to
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 06:23:34PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
Oh thanks a lot, guys! Popping back into -powerpc to check what's new, and
it's the same old flaming and name-calling. Sheesh. I'm just glad Dan
doesn't read -powerpc anymore. Asking a simple but rather important
question, and
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 06:34:31PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
But I have another concern. In my experience, some debian source
packages do not build on G5 running the Debian powerpc port because
their ./configure scripts get confused by the ppc64 string in the
uname output. Depending on how
Hi Sven, hi all,
First of all, sorry for mixing discussions about buildd relocation and
usability buildds with the ppc64 string in their uname for building
the powerpc port in the future. I have now separated the threads
accordingly. Good luck to Voltaire in his trip.
Le Fri, May 11, 2007 at
21 matches
Mail list logo
