On 2017-05-27 23:33 Linux User #330250 wrote:
On my Power Mac G5, Motorola 7450 Dual 800 MHz, ...
^^
Sorry, I meant to write Power Mac G4...
Otherwise it makes no sense.
On 2017-05-27 20:46 Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Just for info
Mac-on-Linux/KVM PR works without any problems on my P.A. Semi PA6T PPC64 SMP
CPU.
Yes, the P.A. Semi PA6T is a 64-bit processor (PPC64), so that's why.
On my Power Mac G5, Motorola 7450 Dual 800 MHz, I only get the
/lib/mo
Hi,
mol use only one core ... but in near future you will use all on qemu in kvm smp
Luigi
Da: Linux User #330250
Inviato: sabato 27 maggio 2017 14.16
A: luigi burdo; Joel Rees; PowerPC List Debian
Oggetto: Re: Trying to compile Mac-on-Linux 0.9.72.1 [SOLVED
Just for info
Mac-on-Linux/KVM PR works without any problems on my P.A. Semi PA6T PPC64 SMP
CPU.
Screenshot: https://plus.google.com/115515624056477014971/posts/Au7PD5oTD1T
Download: http://www.xenosoft.de/mol-kvm_0.9.73.0-ubuntu_powerpc.deb
-- Christian
Sent from my iPhone
> On 27.
On 2017-05-18 20:57 luigi burdo wrote:
Hi Kvm -pr is available on PowerPc
im using it on My G5 quad and was working on MacMini G4 too.
... changing point if you will able to run Mol with Os Classic plz let me know
i have issue with classic but i have working MOL with Panter.
https://scontent-
/17159108_10208527105716735_4089104362059567573_o.jpg?oh=cfd6a7a39983c68283f6315d30752e7b&oe=59AFA05C
Thanks
Luigi
Da: Linux User #330250
Inviato: giovedì 18 maggio 2017 13.02
A: Joel Rees; PowerPC List Debian
Oggetto: Re: Trying to compile Mac-on-Linux 0.9.72.1 [SO
said, I willreport back once I have actually tried out mac-on-linux
on this G4 Mac of mine. If it works, that would just be great. I also
plan to try it on my G5 Mac, which should even work better, but I will
need more time for this than for the G4, as I haven't even installed a
working L
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 4:27 AM, Linux User #330250
wrote:
> The SVN version compiled with the KVM option. Testing it is another story,
> but it compiled alright.
If that's successful, I think I want to know about it.
--
Joel Rees
One of these days I'll get someone to pay me
to design a languag
subversion
root@G4QS:/usr/local/src# cd /usr/local/src
root@G4QS:/usr/local/src/mac-on-linux-code# svn checkout
svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/mac-on-linux/code/trunk mac-on-linux-code
root@G4QS:/usr/local/src/mac-on-linux-code# cd mac-on-linux-code
root@G4QS:/usr/local/src/mac-on-linux-code# fakeroot
What I did:
1) Download MOL from
https://sourceforge.net/projects/mac-on-linux/files/mac-on-linux/mol-0.9.72.1/mol-0.9.72.1.tar.bz2/download
and unpack, I used /usr/local/src/ for unpacking.
2) Get dependencies, requirements:
a) apt install build-essential fakeroot devscripts
b
Hello!
I'm trying to compile Mac-on-Linux (MOL) on a current Debian unstable
powerpc system. It hangs and I don't know what's wrong, so HELP is
highly appreciated.
Before you ask: yes, I know that MOL is likely to fail on a recent Linux
system. Anyway, the error doesn'
Mac OS X boots with MoL/"PR" KVM on an AmigaONE X1000 PowerPC (YouTube
video): http://youtu.be/7alchoY6kzY
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/542cf037
On 22.09.14 15:34, v...@comsouth.net wrote:
Does MOL support OS9?
Original message Subject: A new Mac-on-Linux version
with KVM support is available From: Christian Zigotzky To:
debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org CC:
Just for info: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t
Just for info: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2245041
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54201e7e.2060...@xenosoft.de
Hi Rhonda
Thanks for your interest. Please notice that I checked in a fix for this
RC bug into the pkg-mol SVN yesterday. These things remain to be done
before an upload:
- there is one additional translation update in the BTS that I would
like to incorporate.
- Test build linux-modules-extra-2.
Hi!
Sorry for following up late.
* Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-16 04:38:53 ART]:
> * The current version of mol in testing and unstable works with the
> patches from SuSE. So no update to mol or the driver packages is
> needed to fix the RC bug on mol-source.
I am
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-25 07:04:57 CEST]:
>> * Bin Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-24 01:01:17 CEST]:
>> > Bug #460667 ( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=460667
>> > ) reopened.
>
* Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-25 07:04:57 CEST]:
> * Bin Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-24 01:01:17 CEST]:
> > Bug #460667 ( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=460667
> > ) reopened.
>
> Woh, that's good news! I really hope that it can make it into lenny
> still
* Bin Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-24 01:01:17 CEST]:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * The fix needed to be able to build mol kernel modules with the current
> > Debian kernel was rejected by the kernel team. They only accept
> > pachtes a
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a short update on this bug if somebody has more time to work on
> this. I will be only partly available until the begining of august. I
> will be able to respond to mail, but most likely not be able to work on the
>
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:09:04AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Hi, Gaudenz.
>
> Sorry for being MIA, but I'm working on many things now (including
> working on lame and doing things for my own research---if I continue
> this way, I'll be a Mr. Mediocrity Researcher on my own area).
>
> On Jul 1
Hi, Gaudenz.
Sorry for being MIA, but I'm working on many things now (including
working on lame and doing things for my own research---if I continue
this way, I'll be a Mr. Mediocrity Researcher on my own area).
On Jul 16 2008, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Just a short update on this bug if somebody
Just a short update on this bug if somebody has more time to work on
this. I will be only partly available until the begining of august. I
will be able to respond to mail, but most likely not be able to work on the
package.
* The current version of mol in testing and unstable works with the
patc
Hi Rogério
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 07:22:55PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > Debian.
> >
> > -> Unusable kernel modules: This is caused by the removal of
> >handle_mm_fault in recent kernels. To fix this we have to talk to the
> >kernel team to see if they accept the attached patch whi
g up the MOL packages in
> Debian.
>
Maybe we can use suse's solution:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=8CA7A2DFB5204E9-1240-4DAB%40WEBMAIL-MA01.sysops.aol.com&forum_name=mac-on-linux-users
Best regards,
Bin
> -> Unusable kernel modules: This is caused by
Hi, Gaudenz.
On Jun 09 2008, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> The current state of MOL in Debian is broken since quite some time. If
> we want to have MOL in the next release we have to act now!
Yes, Gerfried Fuchs told me about this.
> Currently there are 2 major issues holding up the MOL packages in
Hi
The current state of MOL in Debian is broken since quite some time. If
we want to have MOL in the next release we have to act now!
Currently there are 2 major issues holding up the MOL packages in
Debian.
-> Unusable kernel modules: This is caused by the removal of
handle_mm_fault in rece
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi
The Mac-On-Linux packages are formally team maintained, but actually I'm
the only active maintainer and my time is quite limited. This is why it
took quite long to prepare the long overdue update to support the latest
kernels. I would be glad to welcome
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 09:38, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 4/18/06, Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > Specifically to Sven I was wondering if anyone was still having trouble
> > > compiling the MOL module in Etch. It took trial and error for me all
> > > day, (and about twelve dif
On 4/18/06, Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Specifically to Sven I was wondering if anyone was still having trouble
> > compiling the MOL module in Etch. It took trial and error for me all
> > day, (and about twelve different HowTo's) but I finally got the modules
> > done. The rea
> Specifically to Sven I was wondering if anyone was still having trouble
> compiling the MOL module in Etch. It took trial and error for me all
> day, (and about twelve different HowTo's) but I finally got the modules
> done. The reason I ask Sven is because I read your name on one of the
> mess
Specifically to Sven I was wondering if anyone was still having trouble
compiling the MOL module in Etch. It took trial and error for me all
day, (and about twelve different HowTo's) but I finally got the modules
done. The reason I ask Sven is because I read your name on one of the
messages t
I appologize for leaving this out.
mol-modules-source: 0.9.70-20
currently using debian testing/unstable, with debhelper version 5.0.8
On 12/7/05, Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I recently updated my kernel, and as such I need to update my modules
> > for MOL. I downloaded the sou
> I recently updated my kernel, and as such I need to update my modules
> for MOL. I downloaded the sources for the mol modules and I tried to
> compile but to no avail. Here is the output I get when trying to
Please report the precise version of the mol modules source package.
Michael
I recently updated my kernel, and as such I need to update my modules
for MOL. I downloaded the sources for the mol modules and I tried to
compile but to no avail. Here is the output I get when trying to
compile:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/modules/mol$ sudo debian/rules binary-mol-modules
dh_testd
On 9/10/05, Bin Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I could build mol-modules from the mol-modules-source package 10 days
> ago (debian unstable and 2.6.12/13), but now I can't :
>
> --
> AS [x] /usr/
On 9/10/05, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 03:57:16PM +0200, Bin Zhang wrote:
> > 88On 8/10/05, Martin Loschwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > We, Peter De Schrijver and me, hereby announce the intention to take over
> > >
Hello Sven,
On 10/09/2005, you wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 03:57:16PM +0200, Bin Zhang wrote:
>> 88On 8/10/05, Martin Loschwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > We, Peter De Schrijver and me, hereby announce the intention to take
>> > over the Mac on Linux pac
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 03:57:16PM +0200, Bin Zhang wrote:
> 88On 8/10/05, Martin Loschwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We, Peter De Schrijver and me, hereby announce the intention to take over
> > the Mac on Linux packages and maintain them in a sort of packaging group.
&
88On 8/10/05, Martin Loschwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We, Peter De Schrijver and me, hereby announce the intention to take over
> the Mac on Linux packages and maintain them in a sort of packaging group.
>
I could build mol-modules from the mol-modules-source package 10 d
Martin Loschwitz wrote:
> We, Peter De Schrijver and me, hereby announce the intention to take over
> the Mac on Linux packages and maintain them in a sort of packaging group.
package things in a group is a very good idea, many thanks to take care
of MOL.
--
.''
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Martin Loschwitz wrote:
> We, Peter De Schrijver and me, hereby announce the intention to take over
> the Mac on Linux packages and maintain them in a sort of packaging group.
If you feel you need yet another pair of eyeballs, give me a holler.
Michael
We, Peter De Schrijver and me, hereby announce the intention to take over
the Mac on Linux packages and maintain them in a sort of packaging group.
--
.''`. Martin Loschwitz Debian GNU/Linux developer
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 23:54:20 -0400
Matt Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> running sid on a b&w g3...
>
> I have several gigs of mp3's from my old mac on an hfsplus partition
> of a firewire drive. I made these files in MacOS 9.2, in the bad old
> dazs when I didn't run linux a
Hey folks,
running sid on a b&w g3...
I have several gigs of mp3's from my old mac on an hfsplus partition
of a firewire drive. I made these files in MacOS 9.2, in the bad old
dazs when I didn't run linux at home.
Problem is, I can't get any of the GUI mp3 players to recognize these files as
Thank you for your work! Our family is using Mac-on-Linux daily and it works
great!
I found the following problem upgrading from my previous installation of mol:
Lese Datenbank ... 123602 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.)
Entpacke mol-drivers-linux (aus .../mol-drivers
://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian-non-US woody/non-US main contrib non-free
Thanks Jens
christophe barbe suggested apt-setup which has put it back together
again without overwriting your mol source ;-)
I've just installed Mac-on-Linux onto an 8100/80 (NuBus) which is
running Etsushi Kato's mach ker
://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian-non-US woody/non-US main contrib non-free
Thanks Jens
christophe barbe suggested apt-setup which has put it back together
again without overwriting your mol source ;-)
I've just installed Mac-on-Linux onto an 8100/80 (NuBus) which is
running Etsushi Kato's mach ker
At 2:12 pm -0500 19/11/02, christophe barbe wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 06:11:12PM +, Clive Menzies wrote:
However, I now have nothing else in sources.list. Is there a simple
way of recovering the original other than by editing by hand?
apt-setup
Thanks - I should have studied the
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 06:11:12PM +, Clive Menzies wrote:
> However, I now have nothing else in sources.list. Is there a simple
> way of recovering the original other than by editing by hand?
apt-setup
--
Christophe Barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F6
At 1:31 am +0900 20/11/02, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
[ ]
Please update your sources.list accordingly. In addition, there is
deb http://people.debian.org/~jensen woody/
for packages backported to stable and
Apologies for being dumb ;-) but I have screwed up my sources.list
using dselect.
Hi,
since my preliminary Mac-on-Linux packages are in fact getting an
appreciable number of hits, I just wanted to tell everybody that the
relevant line has been changed from
deb http://people.debian.org ~jensen/binary-powerpc/
to
deb http://people.debian.org/~jensen sid/
Please update
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 02:36:06PM +0200, Francois Taiani wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm using mac-on-linux (aka mol) 0.9.6x [x={1,2,3}] with a 2.4.18
> kernel, and MacOS 9.0.4, and I'm experiencing some deadlock troubles I
> don't fully understand:
>
> Now
Hi,
Francois Taiani writes:
> Would anybody have experienced any such thing
Not me.
> and could advice me some start of a solution ?
It appears that your problem is not related to Debian, so you may want
to ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards, Jens.
--
J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe!
Le veux
Hi everyone,
I'm using mac-on-linux (aka mol) 0.9.6x [x={1,2,3}] with a 2.4.18
kernel, and MacOS 9.0.4, and I'm experiencing some deadlock troubles I
don't fully understand:
Now and then MacOS freezes, and the only escape is to brutally force mol
to quit under Linux. This
Hi,
Mark Brown writes:
> There's been some discussion on the topic on -devel in the past.
I'd hate to replicate this discussion here. Can you narrow `on
-devel' down to a date range, or a subject header, or whatever so I
can read up on this?
Regards, Jens.
--
J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 01:29:39AM +, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Mark Brown writes:
> > I'd question having the dependancy in the first place, though -
> > nothing else with similar needs (lm-sensors for example) does that
> > and it is unhelpful if one doesn't wish to use kernel-package.
> You
Hi,
Mark Brown writes:
> > perhaps mol-modules-source should also provide "mol-modules"?
> I'd question having the dependancy in the first place, though -
> nothing else with similar needs (lm-sensors for example) does that
> and it is unhelpful if one doesn't wish to use kernel-package.
You ha
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 11:02:33PM +0100, Nik wrote:
> perhaps mol-modules-source should also provide "mol-modules"?
Have you taken a look at the result of using mol-modules-source? The
package produced is what's needed to satisfy the dependancy, not the
sources for the modules.
I'd question h
Hi,
Nik writes:
> i consider it a bug that mol depends on mol-modules,
This does make sense to me. mol is not functional without its modules.
> and the packages which provide this are modules for 2.2.18 + 2.2.19
> kernels
Actually, I narrowed this down to 2.2.19 only. It only makes sense to
> > failing that, download the source, and compile everything.. ,.
>
> Please. If a Debian package fails in any way, you should file a bug
> against it, so the maintainer (in the case of mol, yours truly) can
> fix it.
ok, sure. thanks for the reminder :)
in this case, i consider it a bug that m
Hi,
Nik writes:
> > I'm wanting to install Mac-On-Linux on my potato system
> doesnt this work ->
> apt-get install mol
No, this doesn't work. mol is in sid and woody, but not in potato.
I'm not running a powerpc system with potato, so a backport would be a
>
> doesnt this work ->
> apt-get install mol
Not for potato, I think.
Michael
> I'm wanting to install Mac-On-Linux on my potato system at work. The
> problem is, the downloads are in RPM format. I tried using alien to
> convert them to .deb, but I get an error message saying that the major
> number must be <= 3, or something like that.
doesnt t
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Paul F. Pearson wrote:
> I'm wanting to install Mac-On-Linux on my potato system at work. The
> problem is, the downloads are in RPM format. I tried using alien to
> convert them to .deb, but I get an error message saying that the major
> number must be &
I hope this isn't a newbie question. I've looked around for a while and
just can't find the answer.
I'm wanting to install Mac-On-Linux on my potato system at work. The
problem is, the downloads are in RPM format. I tried using alien to
convert them to .deb, but I get an error
Hi,
Michel Dänzer writes:
> The modules-source package doesn't work for me. At first, make
> failed because the Makefile contained two instances of $(SMAKE)
> instead of $(MAKE). Fixed that
Fixed, together with two more occurences of $(SMAKE).
> make: *** /usr/src/modules/mol/buildtools: No s
Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Please note that there is no mol-modules package any more. Instead, I
> have built two packages mol-modules-2.2.19 and mol-modules-2.4.8
> against the respective kernel sources (2.4.8 is actually
> 2.4.8-pre4-ben0 or somesuch). Do let me know whether you find them
> usef
Hi,
with the semi-official release of version 0.9.60 two days ago, I have
built new packages for Mac-on-Linux and uploaded them to klecker. To
apt-get them, use
deb http://people.debian.org ~jensen/binary-powerpc/
deb-src http://people.debian.org ~jensen/source/
Please note that there is no
> properly do to unresolved symbols. specifically MUNGE_CONTEXT. Also,
> only molsymglue1.o inserts properly. mol.o doesn't insert after I
> insert molsymglue1.o either.
>
> I'm currently running the BK development kernel. 2.4.7-pre6.
Use the MOL source from MOL CVS. See the discussion on the s
7;t work, and I still
have unresolved symbols errors...
Russell
On Friday 20 July 2001 00:03, Rob Latham wrote:
> Marshal Wong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I've been trying to get Mac-on-Linux running on my PowerBook prismo.
> > I've compi
Hi,
Rob Latham writes:
> recent rsync's of mol have the fixes, but i don't know when such a
> version will hit debian.
Shortly after it is released by Samuel.
In the meantime, you may try your luck with the packages by Jonas
Smedegaard at
deb http://debian.jones.dk/debian/local sid misc
AFAI
Marshal Wong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Hello!
>
> I've been trying to get Mac-on-Linux running on my PowerBook prismo.
> I've compiled the modules, but I can't insert the mol.o module
> properly do to unresolved symbols. specifically MUNGE_CONTEXT. Also,
> on
Hello!
I've been trying to get Mac-on-Linux running on my PowerBook prismo.
I've compiled the modules, but I can't insert the mol.o module
properly do to unresolved symbols. specifically MUNGE_CONTEXT. Also,
only molsymglue1.o inserts properly. mol.o doesn't insert after I
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 02:47:20PM -0700, Tovar wrote:
> this isn't foolproof since MacOS does allow the user to move or rename
> the System\ Folder to whatever/wherever the hell they feel like it,
> though i have known very few who actually do that.
>
> Yes, indeed, beware of that.
this isn't foolproof since MacOS does allow the user to move or rename
the System\ Folder to whatever/wherever the hell they feel like it,
though i have known very few who actually do that.
Yes, indeed, beware of that. I've been naming my System Folder's with
its version number bac
mol --loadonly
>
> to the rc.local file.
I'm sorry but my mol does not have this option:
----snip---
schw-zimmer8:/home/fabian# startmol --loadonly
=
Mac-on-Linux 0.9.57
(C) 1997-2001 Samuel Rydh <[EMAI
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 03:33:03PM +0200, Samuel Rydh wrote:
>
> The startmol script has a --loadonly option which does the trick
> for you. Just add
>
> startmol --loadonly
>
> to the rc.local file.
we don't wear red hats here, there is no such file on a debian
system. please read /etc/
>> Now I have it and I'm very impressed. Mol seems to be really fast and stable
>> but what is bothering me is, that I have to start it as root. In an earlier
>> version I could load the kernel modules in an init scrips and was then able
> to start mol as regular user.
>
>I found that loading 'mols
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Fabian Jakobs wrote:
> Now I have it and I'm very impressed. Mol seems to be really fast and stable
> but what is bothering me is, that I have to start it as root. In an earlier
> version I could load the kernel modules in an init scrips and was then able
> to start mol as reg
Am Donnerstag, 26. April 2001 18:30 schrieb Philippe Lelédy:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Fabian Jakobs wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 26. April 2001 11:17 schrieb Jens Schmalzing:
> > > Hi,
> >
> > "Ihr Computer kann mit der Systemsoftware auf diesem Startvolume nicht
> > starten. Installieren Sie bitte die
> I had the same problem with trying to run Classic under MacOSX. I
> looked in http://discussions.info.apple.com and found a link to the
> following TechNote:
>
> http://til.info.apple.com/techinfo.nsf/artnum/n106277
>
> It's a problem if you have MacOSX installed on UFS. Maybe the same fix
> w
Hi,
Ethan Benson writes:
> in this case presuming you ask the user via debconf where thier
> macos partition is and you manage to copy the ROM over yourself, and
> be sure to remove it on package removal (--purge?) then /usr/lib/mol
> would be fine.
That's what I had in mind. As for the details
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:27:43AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Or make a Debian package of MacOS and put it in non-free? :-)
as funny as that sounds its actually possible (not legally), though
not very practical since it would be at least a 100MB package.
mol works quite fine running
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 10:55:29AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> My first guess was /var, but since it is some sort of configuration setting, I
> think it belongs in /etc. The idea is that you can backup your configuration
> by
> backing up /etc. Hmmm... this stil doesn't backup yout list
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Ethan Benson wrote:
> there is also the issue of MacOS upgrades, if MacOS is upgraded and
> its ROM replaced it will crash the next time mol is run since it deals
> with mismatched ROMs very poory.
>
> ultimatly the user just has to know about this and how to deal with it
>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 10:54:07AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Geert Uytterhoeven writes:
>
> > > IMO the default molrc should look for the rom in
> > > /usr/local/lib/mol/something
>
> > Is that Debian compliant? I'd expect the rom to be in /etc/mol/.
>
> If I understand the FHS Se
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 10:32:24AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > > IMO the default molrc should look for the rom in
> > > /usr/local/lib/mol/something
> >
> > Is that Debian compliant? I'd expect the ro
Hi,
Geert Uytterhoeven writes:
> > IMO the default molrc should look for the rom in
> > /usr/local/lib/mol/something
> Is that Debian compliant? I'd expect the rom to be in /etc/mol/.
If I understand the FHS Section 4.4 correctly, putting the MacOS ROM
image under /usr/lib/mol is fine. After a
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 10:32:24AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > IMO the default molrc should look for the rom in
> > /usr/local/lib/mol/something
>
> Is that Debian compliant? I'd expect the rom to be in /etc/mol/.
i don't know what policy reall
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Ethan Benson wrote:
> IMO the default molrc should look for the rom in /usr/local/lib/mol/something
Is that Debian compliant? I'd expect the rom to be in /etc/mol/.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lot
Fabian> Am Donnerstag, 26. April 2001 11:17 schrieb Jens Schmalzing:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just finished some very preliminary version of the promised
>> Mac-on-Linux packages and put them into incoming. They should
>> appear
Fabian> Installation and config
Hi,
Ethan Benson writes:
> the mol packages didn't come with a MacOS ROM did they?
Of course not.
Regards, Jens.
--
J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe!
Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz je pézqbpbe le djuz tqtaj!
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 06:30:08PM +0200, Philippe Lelédy wrote:
> I had the same problem, and solved it easily:
>
> your ROM is not comptatible with your MacOS
>
> Remind that for MOL the ROM is read from Linux filesystems and for
> native MacOS it is read from MacOS filesystem.
>
> So copy-st
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Fabian Jakobs wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 26. April 2001 11:17 schrieb Jens Schmalzing:
> > Hi,
>
> "Ihr Computer kann mit der Systemsoftware auf diesem Startvolume nicht
> starten. Installieren Sie bitte die für diesen Computer notwendige
> Systemsoftware"
> neustart
>
> My t
Hi,
Fabian Jakobs writes:
> Installation and configuration went fine for me but MacOS won't
> boot.
Unfortunately, it is still highly unlikely that your system will boot
MacOS via Mac-on-Linux right after installation. You have to do a
fair amount of configuration by hand, mo
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Fabian Jakobs wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 26. April 2001 11:17 schrieb Jens Schmalzing:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just finished some very preliminary version of the promised
> > Mac-on-Linux packages and put them into incoming. They should appear
>
Hi,
Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> You don't allow access to the .dsc file - is that on purpose?
No, out of stupidity. Should be fixed.
Regards, Jens.
--
J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe!
Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz je pézqbpbe le djuz tqtaj!
On 26 Apr 2001, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> I've just finished some very preliminary version of the promised
> Mac-on-Linux packages and put them into incoming. They should appear
> in sid within hours, and in woody after the usual quarantine period.
> In the meantime, you can get
Am Donnerstag, 26. April 2001 11:17 schrieb Jens Schmalzing:
> Hi,
>
> I've just finished some very preliminary version of the promised
> Mac-on-Linux packages and put them into incoming. They should appear
Installation and configuration went fine for me but MacOS won't b
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
