On 2003-10-12 06:03:03 +0100 Alfie Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How do you know that Manoj didn't read them?
Because I put a couple kilobytes of new stuff in my second message
[...]
I think that it is considerably more likely that Manoj read them and
just doesn't think you answer his requ
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 01:26:40AM -0400, Alfie Costa wrote:
> "There is no class problem" sniffs the aristocrat, "only a noisy
> rabble problem."
There's no "rabble" here, just one lone noisy paranoid who insists on
annoying a bunch of hardworking people with irrelevent minutia, and
then starts
prova
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 10:58:30PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > Charitable organisations have to fulfill a particular set of rules; like
> > being educational, helping the homeless, that sort of thing.
> True, but generally that list isn't exclusive --
AIUI, in .au the purposes have to cove
M. Urlichs politely asks:
> I hesitate to say this, but please actually listen to "Please do not
> reopen this bug unless you have anything new to add"
Well sorry, but I DO listen, I just don't agree. Probably you think the
request was so self-evidently sensible, that it'd be impossible to rea
On 11 Oct 2003, at 12:33, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How do you know that there's nothing new in messages you HAVE NOT
> > READ?
> > That's blacklisting.
>
> How do you know that Manoj didn't read them?
Because I put a couple kilobytes of new stuff in my second message (second
afte
6 matches
Mail list logo
