On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 11:45:31PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 11:03:50AM -0600, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
On Sunday 27 May 2007 10:52:49 Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
Hi Sven,
are you part of an organisation called GNAA?
Regardless
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:38:24AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
Andreas Barth wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
17:55:11 svenl waldi: do you know who removed me from the kernel
alioth team ?
17:57:44 waldi nope
No answer yet, and :
18:34:59
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:38:24AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
I can understand the latter. However, maybe it was just a mistake and
waldi didn't want to remove Sven but accidently removed one line too much
or something? He'll probably speak up and explain things.
I already said that I can't
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:38:24AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
I can understand the latter. However, maybe it was just a mistake and
waldi didn't want to remove Sven but accidently removed one line too much
or something? He'll probably speak up and explain things.
I
* Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070528 11:18]:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:38:24AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
I can understand the latter. However, maybe it was just a mistake and
waldi didn't want to remove Sven but accidently removed one line too much
or something? He'll probably
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:17:39AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:38:24AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
I can understand the latter. However, maybe it was just a mistake and
waldi didn't want to remove Sven but accidently removed one line too much
or something? He'll
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070528 12:14]:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:17:39AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:38:24AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
I can understand the latter. However, maybe it was just a mistake and
waldi didn't want to remove Sven but
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070528 12:28]:
It seems that waldi doesn't want to do it, and also not to give any
statement that he wanted to kick you out. I consider this a very bad
behaviour, at least. And not acceptable.
After some more pressure on IRC, your commit access has been
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 12:41:59PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070528 12:28]:
It seems that waldi doesn't want to do it, and also not to give any
statement that he wanted to kick you out. I consider this a very bad
behaviour, at least. And not
Sven Luther wrote:
After some more pressure on IRC, your commit access has been restored.
It is not enough, i want the suspension revoked, since it was a stupid
decision, which has achieved nothing except worsen the situation, and
was taken contrary to the DAMs procedure, and in a shady and
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070528 13:23]:
[...]
Sven, this whole thread is about that your commit access to the kernel
svn repro was revoked without anyone telling you. What then happened is
that the alioth admins published that waldi revoked the access, waldi
refused to comment to it,
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:01:38PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
For the record, i did ask on #debian-kernel, and got no reply, and when
asked, Bastian Blank did say he didn't know who did it, and Stephan
Gran, and Roland Mas, who are admining alioth, know, but don't want to
say.
Hrm, last time
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:03:29PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
After some more pressure on IRC, your commit access has been restored.
It is not enough, i want the suspension revoked, since it was a stupid
decision, which has achieved nothing except worsen the
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:33:28PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070528 13:23]:
[...]
Sven, this whole thread is about that your commit access to the kernel
This whole thread is about me being stopped from doing meaningful debian
technical contribution and
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 05:04:49PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:01:38PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
For the record, i did ask on #debian-kernel, and got no reply, and when
asked, Bastian Blank did say he didn't know who did it, and Stephan
Gran, and Roland Mas, who
Sven, stop it already!
We've seen this several times already.
You're not bringing up anything new.
You're not helping yourself if you continue.
Regards,
Joey
--
It's practically impossible to look at a penguin and feel angry.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 05:40:26PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
Sven, stop it already!
why should i ? The times i stopped, i got punished worse without
provocation ?
We've seen this several times already.
Yes, so, what ? I have seen that if i don't make a fuss over this,
everyone is pretty
Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:03:29PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
After some more pressure on IRC, your commit access has been restored.
It is not enough, i want the suspension revoked, since it was a stupid
decision, which has achieved
On Mon, 28 May 2007, Michael Banck wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:01:38PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
For the record, i did ask on #debian-kernel, and got no reply, and when
asked, Bastian Blank did say he didn't know who did it, and Stephan
Gran, and Roland Mas, who are admining alioth,
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:14:42AM -0700, Richard Hecker wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:03:29PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
After some more pressure on IRC, your commit access has been restored.
It is not enough, i want the
#include hallo.h
* Sven Luther [Mon, May 28 2007, 06:00:36PM]:
You're not bringing up anything new.
And i will repeat it as long as people try to ignore me, and until
Debian stands up and act in a dign and honourable way in this.
You're not helping yourself if you continue.
You mean,
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:16:22PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Sven Luther [Mon, May 28 2007, 06:00:36PM]:
You're not bringing up anything new.
And i will repeat it as long as people try to ignore me, and until
Debian stands up and act in a dign and honourable way
#include hallo.h
* Sven Luther [Mon, May 28 2007, 08:23:52PM]:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:16:22PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
cook this story _again_. You may be right, or not, it is just off-topic.
And beating dead horses won't make you many friends.
Because i am not yet as dead as the
Chris Waters wrote:
The reason for using Toy Story is the historical connection, through
Bruce Perens, between the project and that movie. I'm not aware of
any connection, however remote, between Debian and The Simpsons.
right, additionally if common knowledge that the first seasons of
Daniel Baumann wrote:
right, additionally if common knowledge that the first seasons of
simpsons were created on a proprietary operating system (irix) with
proprietary software.
s/if common knowledge/it's common knowledge/
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562
On lun, 2007-05-28 at 22:37 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
that the first seasons of
simpsons were created on a proprietary operating system (irix) with
proprietary software.
And what does the common knowledge says about the OS used to create toy
story characters?
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To
On Sun, May 27, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
I am now making this request to you as DPL, that you investigate who was
behind this action, and find out why it was done, and that it be
publicly addressed.
Sven, first of all, please restrict your postings to debian-project,
ideally to specific
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
And what does the common knowledge says about the OS used to create toy
story characters?
no clue, i never liked or got interested in toy story.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:05:00PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
I am now making this request to you as DPL, that you investigate who was
behind this action, and find out why it was done, and that it be
publicly addressed.
Sven, first of all,
29 matches
Mail list logo
