Ingo Jürgensmann left as an exercise for the reader:
> I see many old DDs became inactive or stepped down as a DD in
> the past years, yet not many new DDs joining or being as
> active as the old DDs been in the past
for whatever it's worth, two proto-DDs are waiting on final
DAM keyring
Readers of Debian-project
This is a quiet reminder that debian-project and all Debian mailing lists are
governed by the mailing lists code of conduct and the main Debian code of
conduct.
* Please be considerate of each other: assume good faith and treat each other
with the respect that each
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 10:01:37PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 10:00:16PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>
> Bad form to follow up to myself - but the second list was debian-kernel NOT
> debian-boot
>
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 10:27:42PM +0100, phil995511 -
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 10:00:16PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
Bad form to follow up to myself - but the second list was debian-kernel NOT
debian-boot
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 10:27:42PM +0100, phil995511 - wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Don't you think it would be smart to integrate all the
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 10:27:42PM +0100, phil995511 - wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Don't you think it would be smart to integrate all the updates contained in
> the Backports directory with each new minor update of our favorite OS ? For
> example for the versions 11.3, 11.4, etc ?
>
In my (limited)
Hello,
Don't you think it would be smart to integrate all the updates contained in
the Backports directory with each new minor update of our favorite OS ? For
example for the versions 11.3, 11.4, etc ?
This would make Debian easily compatible with all the new devices
available, without having to
The following changes to the debian-maintainers keyring have just been
activated:
jan.moj...@gmail.com
Full name: Jan Mojžíš
Added key: AADF2EDF5529F1702772C8A2DEC4D246931EF49B
philip.wy...@kathenas.org
Full name: Phil Wyett
Added key: 70A0AC45AC779EFE84F63AED724AA9B52F024C8B
On donderdag 24 maart 2022 10:50:47 CET Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 05:07:06PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > On woensdag 23 maart 2022 14:05:57 CET Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > ¹ of course correlation is not causation, I am not saying the perceived
> > > growth is
On 2022/03/24 15:02, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Dr. Bas Wijnen - 24.03.22, 10:50:47 CET:
There was work to be done. It has been done. The result is that
Norbert was sanctioned. Please accept that and stop pretending that
the debate is still ongoing.
Just one thing: There is no pretending there.
Dr. Bas Wijnen - 24.03.22, 10:50:47 CET:
> There is work to be done. Uneasy work. But important to do,
> nonetheless.
>
> There was work to be done. It has been done. The result is that
> Norbert was sanctioned. Please accept that and stop pretending that
> the debate is still ongoing.
Just one
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 09:50:47AM +, Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
[...]
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 07:23:25AM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 09:01:27PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > In my opinion it seems better to let it be [...]
> I understand this impulse and in
Quoting Dr. Bas Wijnen (2022-03-24 10:50:47)
> This entire thread makes me worry quite a bit about the current state
> of Debian, so I feel the need to respond to several posts in it.
>
> Tl;dr: Debian should be a project where everyone can feel comfortable
> to contribute. That is not possible
This entire thread makes me worry quite a bit about the current state of
Debian, so I feel the need to respond to several posts in it.
Tl;dr: Debian should be a project where everyone can feel comfortable to
contribute. That is not possible if we allow bullying to stand unchallenged.
On Wed, Mar
Hi,
Some clarification is needed:
Wouter Verhelst wrote on 23/03/2022 at 14:45:50+0100:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:35:18AM +0100, Gerardo Ballabio wrote:
>> I actually believe it would be quite problematic if any single DD were
>> allowed to take actions on another contributor based on
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 08:02:56AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> May I remind you that I am NOT banned from the project, but "ONLY"
> demoted to DM!
Yes, indeed; my mistake.
> Since my emails are not delivered to d-p, I ask you to revert your
> statement on d-p, since it is a lie.
No, it is
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 03:45:50PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Norbert was banned from Debian by the people who are delegated to make
> that decision. He was banned from contributing to, and communicating
> with, Debian.
It was pointed out to me (by multiple people) that the last part of this
No CC needed. Thanks.
Pierre-Elliott Bécue - 24.03.22, 00:34:25 CET:
> > I am astonished to see, again, how people here seem to project all
> > badness in the world onto a single former, cause expelled, Debian
> > developer. Especially one with whom I had zero problems with and one
> > who
I was indeed missing the background. As I understand, it all happened
on -private, which I can't read. I actually learned about Norbert's
demotion from DD to DM (which would leave him able to post on Planet)
from a message on -publicity a few weeks ago, and I was completely
unaware that he had
18 matches
Mail list logo
