On 2024-06-18 11:53, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
just some hint to some laptop I consider interesting:
https://frame.work/de/de/blog/introducing-a-new-risc-v-mainboard-from-deepcomputing
It would be good if we would make sure Debian will run on this hardware.
If anyone is willing and able
By far most users in all likelihood do not know that something like even DMARC
exists.
Do not discount them just because you know and can act accordingly.
Cheers
Mike
Am 2. Januar 2024 20:10:27 MEZ schrieb Scott Kitterman :
>
>
>On January 2, 2024 6:04:18 PM UTC, Steven Robbins wrote:
I'm sure it wasn't the intention, but the questions presented in that
survey feel more like they are phishing for specific
people/information than curious about regular activities. It includes
a number of open-ended questions with three text boxes for each,
expecting the user to provide
?
(To the content of your issues: For anyone you contact it would probably
needed to know which desktop environment you use).
Best
Michael
Am 20. November 2022 23:04:05 MEZ schrieb Mattia Rizzolo :
>On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 10:45:15PM +0100, Michael Neuffer wrote:
>> On 11/20/22 22:14, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote:
>> > On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 21:42, G. Branden Robinson
>> > wrote:
>> >
>>
On 11/20/22 22:14, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 21:42, G. Branden Robinson
wrote:
Thank you for, perhaps inadvertently, compelling me to review some of
the content of the package. I can now say that I am certain there is
material of worth in the fortunes-off package and
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 11:12:54AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, 2022-09-16 at 10:13 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
Most people running interactive VMs (e.g., on a desktop with a
graphical console) aren't using Xen, they're using kvm or virtualbox
or just about anything else.
While the number
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 01:54:09PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
On 9/16/22 10:13 AM, Michael Stone wrote:
You have now sent a message about a particular udev issue to debian-user
and I replied with one immediate thought. Some more thoughts: you're
using a fairly obscure configuration.
I
voice is completely nullified
by those ad hominem attacks. And they continue. Michael Stone followed me to
this list and condemned for me asking questions here on this list. There is no
way
*he* considers me a member of the Debian community who has a formal voice as
a Debian user.
Since you've been
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 03:17:03PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
Thanks for this, Andy, I admit I did get caught up in behavior that appears
as trolling.
As you point out, the aforementioned thread only slightly has degenerated
and I think there are some useful discussions in it despite the
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 04:55:28PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
On 2021/04/12 15:37, Michael Stone wrote:
Not true, if someone identifies with fascist doctrine, even if they keep
those views off of the project channels, then they are not welcome here,
no matter where they engaged in those kind
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:56:34PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
On 2021/04/11 01:28, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Although I really prefer not to have them in the project, its is not the
Debian project's task to rule about political believs, opinions, religions,
fetishes and whatever else. But I
such a thing would be available as an official Debian live
cd rescue image.
No debian-live currently includes tools like lvm, for example.
So you depend on a working network setup for rescueing encrypted partitions etc.
Just my 2 cents
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, 26 May 2020 08:13:24 -0400
Sam Hartman wrote:
> Unfortunately, being a member of Debian, I find myself getting stuck in
> the details and think you may have gotten a few things wrong.
>
> * I think that reviewing a file every time the salt changes is too
> frequent.
> It is a sign
like these features (and other subscription refinements)
are available. They sound like they could (possibly) drastically improve how we
communicate, raise concerns, gather consensus, etc.
Cheers,
--
Michael Lustfield
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 12:02:40 +0200
Jonathan Carter wrote:
> [...]
> This thread has had lots of discussion so far and no one has listed a
> single reason against your proposal yet, IMHO if no one is standing in
> your way it's time to just go ahead and do it.
Multiple concerns have been raised
onfident
you're aware of my "requirements gathering" phase. Design has been roughly
discussed and I'm now taking a day to bury myself in documentation. Since I'm
still playing the social distancing game, you can probably guess where my
weekend priorities will be. :)
Cheers,
--
Michael Lustfield
ating away from salsa in the
future, then I wouldn't have any objection, but the voice in the back of my
head is screaming pretty loudly right now.
--
Michael Lustfield
. Is there anything viable
which can be taken from that effort?
Also, please, don't focus on time to deployment. I'll do whatever we need in
order to implement a proper long-term solution. As you may have noticed- I take
my time to plan projects before execution. If anything, this is a change that
should involve more planning than anything else.
--
Michael Lustfield
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:02:53AM +0100, Ansgar wrote:
> the BDS movement, a movement that is uncontroversially seen as
> antisemitic.
Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
een fine-tuned a bit. This would introduce a way to verify that a package is
still very likely to be legally free.
I apologize for the lack of details, but I'm digging in and have some down time
from work. I'd like to make use of that time to just build. :)
Cheers,
--
Michael Lustfield
Maybe we should have a conversation about periodical rechecks, but
packages like rdkit[1] languishing in NEW for almost two months and
counting just because of a new PostgreSQL release is a bit depressing.
Michael
[1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/rdkit_201909.1-1.html
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 05:07:33PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
First of all, all software in Debian must adhere to Debian Free Software
Guidelines. And I can’t find the source code anywhere on your website.
That said - who you seem to use a lot of buzz words and bold claims, but I
would recommend
ner access to a team owning those projects, but still
run into all the same problems
I can provide a much longer list, but it shouldn't be necessary. There are
plenty of reasons why someone would prefer GitHub over other alternatives.
Attempting to force one option only going to further divide our community.
--
Michael Lustfield
The app is unaccessible for blind users fix your mess before adding crap ...
--
Michaël C. Couturier
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 09:56:49AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
The payoff needs to be correspondingly
large to be worth the effort, and I'm just not seeing it.
+1
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 07:31:11PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> This probably has been floating around for some time. IMO, enough time
> so that we start to discuss $subject.
Why is this a GR and not a policy proposal?
Michael
On 31.03.19 11:22, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Mike Hommey:
>
>> That's the primary structural distinction as an effect, but OTOH, the NM
>> process is a rather extensive vetting process.
> Not all Debian Developers went through the NM process. Account
> creation was handled differently in the
Outsider here. Conflict around Norbert's mode of discourse and Ian's
mode of responding to it has clearly been an ongoing problem for
Debian for over five years: https://lwn.net/Articles/575390/ What
tools for resolving this exist now that didn't exist then? If the
answer is "nothing much",
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 03:25:07PM +, Sean Whitton wrote:
On Thu 03 Jan 2019 at 02:47pm GMT, Ulrike Uhlig wrote:
Looks good! I like it.
One tiny thingy based on a remark: I've looked up 'slur' in the
dictionary and 'slander' and 'libel' seem to be synonyms that might be
more widely known.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 03:51:48PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Lars Wirzenius writes ("Re: Conflict escalation and discipline"):
Most of the problems being discussed right now, and in general, seem
to be of the sort where feelings are hurt, but harassment isn't
happening. The situations seem to
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 12:09:22AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
That's only because it lives in mm/shmem.c, not under fs/. It does
support xattrs.
Have you tried it?
Mike Stone
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:53:18AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Unfortunately it would mean that such people would still need some
kind of login on Debian systems, so that they could update the email
forwarding. But it wouldn't have to have the wide powers of an active
DD/DM account.
Unless this
you,
--
Michael
re
> Conservancy for legal advice - specifically whether there is anything
> wrong with this proposed letter.
I would ask the Software Freedom Law Center. The Software Freedom
Conservancy is another umbrella organization similar to SPI.
--
Michael Schultheiss
E-mai
My gut feeling is the Derivatives page should be the page that lists
distros derived from or "children" of Debian. Creating a new page is just
more effort when the hard word has been done already.
On 2 February 2017 at 19:21, Stéphane Blondon
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
Just to chime in with a voice from a regular scientific Debian user:
Whether there is a public or private Debian developers mailing list is
about as relevant to me as the price of cheese on Venus. I honestly
don't feel the community is any more open or closed regardless.
As much as transparency
Hi,
few years back when packaging htcondor I was in touch with the people
running the IT of the German observatory. Their Condor pool ran on Debian.
As far as I know it still does.
Michael
On Feb 12, 2016 09:21, "Daniel Pocock" <dan...@pocock.pro> wrote:
>
&g
ake at other venues as well- I understand they can afford a lot of cake.
Well, they did give away the cake for one reason, to celebrate Debian's
birthday. No idea why this could be bad though.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meske
you have any questions, please let us know. To improve the search
engine visibility of your website, we look forward to hearing from you
after you have had time to read our proposal.
Best Regards,
*Michael Dennis*
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Hello,
I saw backports has been removed as default setting from sources.list in
Jessie RC3. I am very disappointed by this last minute change, without
much discussion so far I know.
The installer's export mode allows you to make a
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Hello,
I saw backports has been removed as default setting from sources.list in
Jessie RC3. I am very disappointed by this last minute change, without
much discussion so far I
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:
Russ == Russ Allbery writes:
Russ There's another alternative to using the CTTE, and my
Russ understanding is that this was generally the method used prior
Russ to the existence of the CTTE, but I'm not sure it's really any
, correct?
If so, did you consider relaxing this requirement for the rollover? I.e.
maybe having 2048 RSA keys signed by (only) old 1024 DSA keys in the
keyring is better than having no key at all for a particular DD?
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 06:33:28PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
AIUI, you need to have at least one(?) additional signature on your new
2048+ RSA key on top of your old DSA key, correct?
I meant on top of the signature from your old DSA key.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
another clear benefit is reduced package cruft.
The only thing that is reduced is the size of the orig tarball.
People do actually do review package source changes (think every
release team unblock, security analysis, etc.), and the
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
You could always use the Files-Excluded field to make uscan remove
those files from the upstream tarball,
Too much work (at least when you are not repacking the tarball for other
reasons) for absolutely no gain.
Not sure how that's a
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
DEP-5 as defined in http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ does not have any
clause allowing us to skip license entries for certain class of files.
In practice, many packages lack entries for autotools generated files
which come with very
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Michael Gilbert writes (Re: Maximum term for tech ctte members):
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
I don't think this achieves the goal of rotating more project members
through the TC.
You could rotate people
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
We could combine both features, though: set a term length of two years,
and then say that people can serve for two terms in succession but then
have to leave the committee for at least one term.
8 seems like it would be near ideal: turnover
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
We could combine both features, though: set a term length of two years,
and then say that people can serve for two terms in succession but then
have to leave the committee for at least one term.
8 seems like it would be near ideal: turnover
-- the hackfest could be
seen as a Debian sprint
- they are addressing important issues, and clearly contribute to Debian
having something to say about such issues
I am planning to allocate 5000 EUR.
Comments?
+1
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Matthew Vernon wrote:
Joey Hess writes:
Russ Allbery wrote:
I think we're still in the middle of our process, which I understand
that a lot of people outside the project find baffling and protracted.
Well, not only outside the project.
The tech ctte has
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
Russ Allbery wrote:
I think we're still in the middle of our process, which I understand
that a lot of people outside the project find baffling and protracted.
Well, not only outside the project.
The tech ctte has always operated in the past
into more actionable items.
Just out of curiosity: What's their definition of freedom anyway?
You don't know what their definition of freedom is, but continue to
assess their religious views? This doesn't look very useful to me.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ
what their definition of freedom is. My question
challenges the valdity of their definition.
I suggest you take that to their forums, then.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
s/Ubuntu/no-name-anymore/
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Jonathan Dowland j...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 12:56:37PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Seems as though Joey is already taking the lead on this:
, then it shows how much a meaning can change when quotes are taken out of
context and then combined.
are you saying that the project is informed because some members are
sure to be subscribed? i do not think that informs the project.
No, I'm only saying that the DPL is informed.
Michael
--
Michael
sincerely hope that other non-public aspects receive all due
scrutiny as well.
don't you?
You might want to search for those in the publicly available archives.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 08:39:00PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
On 03/09/13 19:14, Michael Meskes wrote:
Right and we already have a debian-consultants mailing list, don't we?
Yes, and that list is also struggling, so why fork it?
Because the list may be struggling because its definition is too
, too.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
not be able to deliver what's
needed. Why shouldn't they ask for help from competitors, because after all
it'll help their own business as well.
could you elaborate on this, to help me understand?
(2) Michael Meskes posted in the bugthread:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650082#85
working part time? What if a company has
to lay of staff - will they be removed from the list if they drop beyond
10?
No, at least no immediately. :)
There is no definitive answer for this. Let's try collecting a group first,
before getting into those details.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael
to join such a list.
Fine with me.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU
to said mailing list.
Of course I'm also available for questions and comments.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com
VfL Borussia
Could it be possible to know what theses contain and what they didn't ?
Michaël Caron Couturier http://protocol.by/EntraideNet
2013/5/12 Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 01:24:26AM -0400, michael caron couturier wrote:
7 dvds aren't in the official site for ftp/http
7 dvds aren't in the official site for ftp/http/torrent, however jigdo has
them, when did they will be release as I need them ???
Michaël Caron Couturier http://protocol.by/EntraideNet
users a choice?
https://checkout.google.com/seller/npo/
--
Kind regards,
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Becky,
Just a heads-up that I've published this one.
Cheers,
Michael
On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 12:59:28 +0200
Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx secret...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
The winner of the election is Lucas Nussbaum.
His term will start on April 17th, 2013.
The details
Thorsten Glaser t...@debian.org writes:
I’ve been seeing this on d-d-changes for a while now. Please explain,
otherwise I’m going to call for an binNMU (on every binary you uploaded)
before wheezy is released, since we obviously cannot trust these bina‐
ries and they’re not exactly leaf
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 13054 March 1977, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Is dak is present in a “released” state somewhere? Do other people use
those releases? Meaning, should we ask for a CVE for this?
No, no and no.
We have git. We have people use that, thats for
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
It's my understanding that this is a result of a debianqueued bug, not dak
it's self.
It's unlikely other people are using it, IMHO
That's making another assumption and isn't provable or disprovable.
Even it is somehow true now, future
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Enrico Zini wrote:
Recklessly exposing too much information outside the context in which it
was published can in some cases turn people away from contributing. If
ohloh were actually being taken seriously by people in my professional
circle, I would probably
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
The benefit is that we have a legal tool against someone doing something
nasty with our name. Which is nice to have, but doesn't come for free.
It's hard to quantify as well: the benefit is for a future situation of
which we do not know
important
content in it and many other users might as well.
Having a button left/right of the Getting Started section might be
more visible.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 05:08:52PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
If I could get a copy of the Secretary's running source code I could
also change it so that options were lettered rather than numbered.
That would be /much/ less
I think the debian multimedia site is gotten hacked.
http://www.demudi.org
It displays some japanese (?) advert for DVD backups now.
Please would someone be able to forward to the responsible people.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 1:21 AM, dE . wrote:
Hi.
I was wondering about the 2 year release cycle of Debian and it's
adaptability on the Desktops.
If you want something with a faster release cycle, there is always
testing, which is updated four times a day.
If you want something slightly more
-access, but arxiv.org has the PDF
http://arxiv.org/pdf/.5251
Michael
--
Michael Hanke
http://mih.voxindeserto.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
frequently
frustrated people from #ubuntu tried to sneak in to get support by
claiming to run testing, cause the support in #d was much better.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
might want to check that with him.
Thanks for the note.
Michael
--
Michael Hanke
http://mih.voxindeserto.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org
=1247454
I find the social and technical dynamics of Debian fascinating -- I'm
sure I'm not alone. By exposing prior research on the project more
prominently we might be able to encourage further research and maybe
learn something from it.
Michael
--
Michael Hanke
http://mih.voxindeserto.de
to be able to read it in order to
form a personal opinion.
--
Michael Hanke
http://mih.voxindeserto.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110714142237
by licensing issues.
Comments?
Michael
--
Michael Hanke
http://mih.voxindeserto.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110714155731.GA27647@meiner
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:57:31AM -0400, Michael Hanke wrote:
1. Create CategoryPublication
We might want to further categorize publications whenever the number
gets large enough to justify that work.
Done.
2. Create PublicationTemplate
That has an outline of all
of EUR 59716.21, adding up to the above net loss of EUR
34584.57.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110624184031.ga19
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Michael Fogg wrote:
will debian in future releases use gnome 2.32 becuse gnome 3s fallback mode
just is not gnome 2.32.
i know it takes a lot to maintain gnome 2 but will you please keep it in the
system.
even if you dont maintain gnome 2 at lest keep
will debian in future releases use gnome 2.32 becuse gnome 3s fallback mode
just is not gnome 2.32.
i know it takes a lot to maintain gnome 2 but will you please keep it in the
system.
even if you dont maintain gnome 2 at lest keep it in the system.
i really dont care if gnome 2 gets maintained
On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 11:57:43 -0700 Yacin Belmihoub wrote:
Hi there, I would just like to know how to recompile Debian
netinstaller, I really need help for this. Thx and hopefully you can help me
:)
$ sudo apt-get build-dep debian-installer
$ apt-get source debian-installer
$ cd
Hello! I noticed that recently all the Format lines in the DEP5
examples changed to http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/;. But there is
still one Format line in the spec that uses the old svn URL. Below is a
tiny patch to fix that.
However... I'd also just like to clarify what the plan is for
The spec is frustratingly vague when it comes to files in the public
domain. The current version of the spec only mentions it once, to say
that the Copyright field should note that there are no copyright
holders. No guidance is given for the License field and there are no
example stanzas of a
the link.
Michael
--
GPG key: 4096R/7FFB9E9B Michael Hanke
http://mih.voxindeserto.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101125133722.ga9...@meiner
to
the Debian project.
Michael (on behalf of the NeuroDebian team)
[-1] http://neuro.debian.net
[0] http://www.sfn.org
[1] http://www.sfn.org/am2010
[2] http://www.debwrt.net
[3] http://neuro.debian.net/_files/brochure_debian-neurodebian.pdf
[4]
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-exppsy
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:27:08 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
| It's more like use this thing that I produced, and if you want, you
| can reward me with a few cents. There simply is nothing distasteful
| about that.
You don't think so. I do. One of the reasons is it
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:56:18 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep...@gmail.com writes:
Anyways, you should not complain when someone asks you to give them
money, even if it results in you feeling guilty for not complying.
I respectfully disagree. Depending on the
* Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 09:29:02PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
I talked to my titanpad colleagues, the redirect of
titanpad.debian.net to debian.titanpad.com should be possible from
our POV and we would support this. The redirect itself needs
* Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 07:04:28PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
we (as in the backports team) alway use titanpad.com which is run by a
fellow dd and a friend of him.
Cool, I've used it already but I didn't know it was run by a fellow DD.
How
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:23:30 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On tiisdei 14 Septimber 2010, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
So, for the past years we have had x.0.y with growing `y' for point
releases, and skiping to (x+1).0.0. And the zero in the middle carries
no meaning anymore.
It also doesn't do
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:12:15 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 15/09/2010 16:27, Michael Gilbert wrote:
I was thinking about this overnight, and I think dropping .0 does
actually make a lot of sense for marketing/publicity purposes. A
release announcement along the lines of The Debian
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:25:25 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Hi,
We have carried a major.minor scheme as a release numbering scheme
since the Early Days, but it has lost relevance basically since Sarge
(3.1 - But by the time it was finally released, some discussion was
made whether Sarge should
1 - 100 of 405 matches
Mail list logo