Re: Renaming the Debian Project

On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 02:40:33PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Daniel Pocock writes: > > > c) do you have verifiable references for the other allegations you are > > making about the project founder? It is very inappropriate to post > > things like that without citing some solid evidence, doing

Re: third-party packages adding apt sources

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 04:39:24PM +, Bas Wijnen wrote: > > Hell, teams packaging Mozilla-soft and PostgreSQL are DDs maintaining > > *external archives* because it's easier. > > This indicates that our procedures are too hard. That needs to be fixed. > Maybe people from those teams are readi

Re: Automatic downloading of non-free software by stuff in main

On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 03:27:42AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 01:33:41AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 19:14 -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 12:09:22AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > That's only because it lives in mm

Re: metaphors and feminism

On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 10:22:35PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > Hi Ian > > On 2019/03/30 20:46, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Paul Wise writes ("Re: metaphors and feminism"): > >> Personally I think the phrase "Debian Developer" and the abbreviation > >> DD is a relic of an earlier era when the set of

Re: metaphors and feminism

On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 04:54:04PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Mike Hommey writes: > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 10:22:35PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > > >> So, how about: > > >> DM: Debian Members. Full members of the project that can represent > >

Re: Position Statement to the Dunc-Tanc "experiment"

er, DebConf Organizer If I'd have been aware of this letter before, I'd have asked to be in that list. I fully agree with what Jörg wrote. Mike Hommey, Debian Developer, Mozilla® hater. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Please change the Maintainer: header when forking Debian

On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 09:11:31PM +0100, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've heard too many people complaining about it, so I wrote it down: > > > Feel free to tune the description of the problem, or support this op

Re: Open Letter to Anthony Towns about the d-i mediation ...

On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 03:42:01PM +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:48:14AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > Hi Anthony, > > Well, we had a chat with both Anthony and Sledge the other day, where i > explained my position, and asked for something to happen. I

Re: Open Letter to Anthony Towns about the d-i mediation ...

On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 08:15:30PM +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike, if it is really all my fault and only my fault, please enlighten me on > how to interpret the above exchange. > > How can i be the problem, if i have many times tried to solve it, and was > always rejected ? I

Re: Note to "Did you already MOO today..."

On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 10:35:11AM +0100, Luca Brivio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ([3] is noteworthy too...) Don't forget the classic http://www.clasohm.com/cows/guide1.html Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Use of tokens for access to Debian resources?

On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 06:37:37PM +, Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 03:05:33PM +0100, Mario Lang wrote: > > > In my opinion, RSA tokens are very evil, from an accessibility point of > > view. > > Since you effectively state that only people with working eye-s

Re: Debian Etch Stable.

On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 06:15:03PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 09:11:31AM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: > > Anthony Towns wrote: > > > Personally, I'd say that now would be the time for any anti-payment > > > people to say "we can do this better, and look, we'll prove it"

Re: Debian Etch Stable.

On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 03:32:16PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Given this isn't a "DPL" funding initiative, I think you're way off base. It's not only because you subtly outsourced it. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA

Re: Explications needed...

On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 07:58:34AM +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't you find it a bit hypocrit to have x86 uploads go directly to the > archive, and not allowing even a single day delay which would allow to stop > unclean DD-build-boxes breakage and a clean state, and on the ot

Re: Debian, Iceweasle, Firefox!

On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 09:40:52PM +0100, Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sam, 27 Jan 2007, Piotr Dziubinski wrote: > > Iceweasel and Firefox are a different products, very similar, but different. > > Can YOU please explain me what *important* differences there are? > > If you m

Re: Debian logos and trademarks

On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 07:16:54PM +0100, Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "someone can only use it if we authorize it" Actually, this is not exactly true. *Some* uses of it may require authorization, depending on trademark laws. Note that, for example, if you modify the logo enough t

Re: http://www.us.debian.org/debian.css

On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 06:11:54AM -0800, len lennon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please correct your css: > > http://www.us.debian.org/debian.css > > http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://www.us.debian.org/ > > 673 #leftcol, #navbar, #navbar aProperty > -moz-border-radiu

Re: http://www.us.debian.org/debian.css

On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 07:21:34PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 06:11:54AM -0800, len lennon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Please correct your css: > > > > http://www.us.debian.org/debian.css > > > >

Re: notable Debian contributions in 2006

On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 09:00:20PM +0100, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I guess you missed Aurelien's mail [0]? What about the other distros? > > > > > > Mail not addressed to me is send py people who are not interested

Re: Expulsion process: Sven Luther (aka: why I'm now convinced he needs therapy)

On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:14:22PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sven, will you stop replying -private mails on -project ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Expulsion process: Sven Luther (aka: why I'm now convinced he needs therapy)

On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:54:44PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:14:22PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > S

Re: ideas....

On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 11:41:43PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Being paid based on popularity does not alter the fact that some > subset of people are being paid, and others are not, for what could be > equivalent amounts of work done. Such an imbalance would ma

Re: ideas....

On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 02:55:19AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 08:55:25 +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 11:41:43PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: When Debian 4.1 will arrive... will anyone care?

On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 03:17:34PM +1000, Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > why the obsession with backports? > > contrary to popular belief and self-delusion, 'stable+backports' is NO > LONGER STABLE. > > the only 'advantage' to using 'stable+backports' over 'stable+some > packages fro

Re: Another level of agression ?

On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 11:45:31PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 11:03:50AM -0600, Wesley J. Landaker wrote: > > On Sunday 27 May 2007 10:52:49 Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote: > > > Hi Sven, > > > > > > are you part of an organisation called GNAA? > >

Re: Public request that action be taken at whoever abused their technical power to remove me from the kernel team at alioth.

On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:12:19PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:07:06PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070529 13:58]: > > > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:40:55PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote: > > > > Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > Ok, but this w

Re: Public request that action be taken at whoever abused their technical power to remove me from the kernel team at alioth.

On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:17:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Ok, then we come back to the problem of Frans, right, who found it > totally unacceptable that i dared to present myself as DPL, and chose to > hurry to search expulsion supporters to punish me for it ? Sven, could you "slide" back to

Re: Public request that action be taken at whoever abused their technical power to remove me from the kernel team at alioth.

On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:52:03PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:29:50PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:17:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > Ok, then we come back to the problem of Frans, right, wh

Re: What do Open Source Projects need? - part 3

On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 05:52:33PM +0200, Patrick Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/8/07, Joey Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do you want me to cry now like some of your friends, because you > reply to my private email on this list? :) I don't know what you're smoking, but it must

Bug#292330: use UTF-8 by default

On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 11:13:29PM +, Thorsten Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > wouldn't it be possible to at least make the en_US.UTF-8 locale forcibly > generated, so that it can't be deselected by dpkg-reconfigure locales? > > If this one isn't installed, many apps break when I

Bug#292330: use UTF-8 by default

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:48:04AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 05:48:00PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > > also sprach Thorsten Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.06.16.1528 +0100]: > > > That's what I did, but the idea is not to have to do that. (Bes

Re: Bug#292330: use UTF-8 by default

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:09:17PM +, Thorsten Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hommey dixit: > > >> it's not. We could create a neutral.utf-8 locale for sure > > Sounds like a plan. Maybe something short and uppercase, akin to > "C" an

Re: Micros*ft deal

On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 11:03:03AM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El jue, 21-06-2007 a las 21:40 +0200, Robert Millan escribió: > > > > > > I believe our silence says it all, no? If they want to donate us money > > > for no 'carte blanche' back good, > > > > Their do

Re: Planet policy?

On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 01:20:30AM -0400, Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:26:55PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > On Tue, 07 Aug 2007, Joey Hess wrote: > > > Ian could take up pig farming and blog about nothing else, and I'd still > > > consider his posts on top

Re: Planet policy?

On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:32:43AM +0100, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > seriously, when there's something that is not interesting to me on > > planet debian, I just don't read it. Is it that difficult to not read

Re: Updated Debian Maintainers Keyring

On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 10:46:31AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Bas Wijnen wrote: > > I would expect that adding DM-Upload-Allowed should be a concious > > decision which is to be made when a specific person is (about to become) > > a DM and should be allowed to upload this specific package. If I am

Re: linhdd concerns

On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:19:21PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > or we could disallow the override of >= E: errors in lintian, and make > > lintian reboot your computer, fill your gpg with /dev/random bits, and > > install windows over your Debian

Re: Debian Lover from Thailand

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:35:19PM +, Noah Slater wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:12:07PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > 3. Debian does not go quite as far as Stallman would go in such areas as > >removing drivers and binary blobs from the kernel, removing trademarked > >images, and

Re: NMU versioning

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:32:34AM +0200, Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James Vega wrote: > > "The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where > > X is a counter starting at 1." > > I have found that NMUing native source packages is a bit tricky, as in, > what is the con

Re: NMU versioning

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 01:01:53PM +0200, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Bastian Blank [Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:55:23 +0200]: > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:16:28PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > > * Mike Hommey [Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:54:59 +0200]: >

Re: transfering files between *.debian.org hosts (was: people.debian.org to move to ravel)

On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 03:01:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 06:48:57PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > + once we have a krb realm we could maybe also use it for other > > > stuff like all those web services that require logins. How > > >

Re: giving @debian.org mail addresses to voting contributors

On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 02:07:16AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > >> Why not @people.debian.org ? It represents pretty good what thoses > >> eventual "contributors" would: the _people_ who make Debian. > > In fact, I've already argued in this thread that @whatever.debian.org > > will need neverth

Re: The Unofficial (and Very Simple) Lenny GR: call for votes

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 07:32:40PM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 05:37:33PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > f2276370-dfd7-45db-92d5-2da0c179c569 > > [ ] Choice 1: Delay Lenny until know

Re: Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use (was Re: Point to semi-official backported packages?)

On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Paul Wise [Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:35:44 +0900]: > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > (And yes, I know about backports.d.n; maybe I'll get 'round to submitting > > > or maintaining stuff there at some poi

Re: Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use

On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 12:19:31PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Adeodato Simó wrote: > > Okay. Well, I’ve just put Daniel (owner of {git,backports}.debian.net) > > on CC > > Thank you for making me aware of it, I've read through the thread now. > > To summarise, there appears to be two seperate

Re: DEP: commit rights to dep repositories on alioth

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 10:37:59PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:56:54PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius a écrit : > > Currently, the dep project on alioth (which can be used to host DEP > > texts on $VCS) allows commits by any DD, but not guest accounts. The > > question has aris

Re: DAM and NEW queues processing

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 01:32:14AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Steve Langasek wrote: > >> Ok - then I guess my problem is that the list of names included in > >> these is so non-notable (and is empty most weeks anyway...) that it > >> doesn't register

Re: DAM and NEW queues processing

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:48:42PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Julien BLACHE wrote: > > Frans Pop wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > >> I can appreciate that, but is it unreasonable to expect the FD to at least > >> send a simple overview (list of names) of who have been accepted in the > >> project d

Re: DAM and NEW queues processing

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:35:30AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 01:32:14AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > >> Don Armstrong wrote: > >>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Steve Langasek wrote: > >>>> Ok - then I guess

Re: DAM and NEW queues processing

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:01:40PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > Steve McIntyre wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 07:42:15AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:48:42PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > >>> No need for that. Read debian-ne

Re: DAM and NEW queues processing

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:28:04AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 06:02:11PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > I think it's clear from the copyright files already in the archive > > and that are accepted daily by ftpmaster that listing the individual > > files is unnecessar

Re: Debian redesign

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:51:04PM +0200, Werner Baumann wrote: > Some examples from debian_redesign and why I'm worried: > deb_redesign-talk7.jpg shows a proposal for the Debian home page. It > starts with "what is debian?" and ends with "all of it free." (in > bold). At the moment at http://www.d

Re: Export Control of Debian OS

On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 09:29:23PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > PS: It will be nice to have some page for these issues on our web so > these FAQ can be addressed properly without making us liable. Translated in various languages would be a nice addition. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia

Re: DEP-5: query about possible inheritance of License:

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 09:18:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 08:40:34AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Having a mantadory Files: field was strongly opposed on debian-devel > > AFAIK the opposition was from people who opposed the machine-readable > copyright format al

Re: Google AdSense for Debian

On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 08:39:28AM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > On Thursday 04 February 2010 01.43:23 Paul Wise wrote: > [...] > > I'd like to suggest this thread be moved to debian-project to get some > > input from a larger part of Debian. > > Ok. > > Here's what this is about: > > +++ >

Re: PTS subscription exposure

On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:40:20AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Alright, let's also expose list subscriptions along the same reasoning. > Again, this is not your job to judge which lists I would be interested > in. Any subscriber of a mailing list on alioth can see who is subscribed to the mail

Re: Squeeze, firmware and installation

On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 08:33:24AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On jeu., 2010-05-06 at 21:16 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > If there really was a need for it, such images would already exist. > > > > They do already exist and are labelled "*Ubuntu." > > > >

Re: re-organizing dvd

On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 10:47:34AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 02:29:32PM +0530, V.Krishn wrote: > >Hi, > >I have been using Debian for couple of years. > >I was wondering if forthcoming release dvds could be re-organized. > >Like: > >DVD 1 - Desktop with apps ( I think b

Re: What is annoying in the flattr buttons?

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 07:35:03AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote: > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:22:54PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:44, Russ Allbery wrote: > > >> Michael Gilbert writes: > > >>> Raphael has every right to attem

Re: revenue sharing agreement with DuckDuckGo

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:46:25AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:26:18 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli > wrote: > ... > > I welcome feedback on this matter, > > I already install DDG as default search engine on any (Linux or Windows) > user that lets me fiddle with their setup, s

Re: revenue sharing agreement with DuckDuckGo

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:16:52PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > On 03/27/2012 10:39 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > On 12-03-27 at 10:26am, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > >> Dear Project Members, > >> thanks to the introductions by Mike Hommey, as Iceweasel maintainer

Re: revenue sharing agreement with DuckDuckGo

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:33:37PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:46:25AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > > On the other hand, I suppose there's some tiny chance that Google will > > be offended, and reduce sponsorship of DebConf, or be less willing to > > give us GSoC p

Re: DDG

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 01:20:24PM +0300, vangelis mouhtsis wrote: > And how can i avoid to have DDG as default search URL on my iceweasel? > I think thats not fair enough. It is not the default. Except if you hit bug #665817. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debia

Re: Proposed MBF - mentions of the word "Ubuntu"

On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 10:36:49PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Contrary to how this has been represented by the Mozilla > community since then, it was never a question of a trademark license per > se.) Not only by the Mozilla community. By just about everyone. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: VA Linux / Sun Wah Linux to push Debian in China/Japan

Osamu wrote: > Currently, Debian is seriously weak on easy Asian language support. > Fonts, IM, ... > > One of the problem is we do not have enough available developers. > > We have hard time finding sponsor with time and skill for IM packages > even if some non-DD prepare package. It would pro

Re: Reforming the NM process

On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:32:54PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think the DM concept should end the sponsorship idea. But I do > like to have a clear indication in the changelog of who sponsored who. > It's a pain to have to use gpg to discover who sponsored the uplo

Re: Should this be how i am supposed to act in mailing list discussions ?

On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 10:49:51PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, i will try to play nice, and do as everyone asks from me, We will see if > it works : > > 1) I have asked the DPL to mediate this issue, with as far as i can see very > little effect, except it seems to me t

Re: Should this be how i am supposed to act in mailing list discussions ?

On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 11:33:15PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 11:19:18PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 10:49:51PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > 2) on april

Re: Should this be how i am supposed to act in mailing list discussions ?

On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 11:54:14PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Some thoughts about email conversation ... Here i am having a public > discussion with Mike. He says something, and i reply, we are having a > discussion. It is normal that this brings longer threads, and even

Re: Debian-based miniVDR violates GPL (FYI)

On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 10:43:40AM +0200, Ciuca, Josephine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > I just wanted to let you know about a GPL violation in the distribution > miniVDR, a distribution based on Depian with so-called GPL licensed > patches (www.minivdr.de). They refuse to share the sour

Re: Call for a new DPL mediation ... This will be the only thread i will reply to in the next time about this issue.

On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:53:18PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - AFAIK he hasn't ever abused his d-i commit rights (when he had them) Just for the record, he may have not abused his d-i commit rights but did abuse his d-k svn admin rights. Mike -- To UNSUBSC

Re: Call for a new DPL mediation ... This will be the only thread i will reply to in the next time about this issue.

On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 10:43:35PM -0700, Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 09:12:15PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:53:18PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -

Re: Call for a new DPL mediation ... This will be the only thread i will reply to in the next time about this issue.

On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 12:53:00PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 20 June 2006 11:49, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > > * cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060620 11:02]: > > > judging from that Sven was definately in the wrong, of course that log

Re: Why Ubuntu is different, was: Minutes of an Ubuntu-Debian discussion that happened at Debconf

On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 08:49:14PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cooperating (like in tight cooperation) with Ubuntu is IMHO possible > iff on each packages, there is a period during when no distro has any > backlog wrt the other. Meaning that excepting some customization