On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> * Enable bzip2 support for sources, not only for the binary packages.
> I have a patch ready, it's not yet merged. Needs to test if
> anything breaks in stable if we apply it, before we can think about
> it. Worst case it has to wait until w
(reply-to set to debian-devel only)
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, James Vega wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > This DEP is available on the Debian Wiki[1].
>
> "The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where X is a
> counter starting at 1."
>
On Fri, 30 May 2008, Richard Hecker wrote:
> In years past, I would route all email through an employment
> account (I basically lived there anyway and it was the best option
> to assure timely reception and response ;-). In this environment,
> it was common to remind people that vacations could la
On Fri, 30 May 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
> The difference between "using the BTS" and "asking the maintainer" is
> that dropping a patch in the BTS is not asking the maintainer if the NMU
> is welcome.
In http://wiki.debian.org/NmuDep I see things like "Did you give enough
time to the maintainer
On Sat, 31 May 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I.e., it's "for developers", which is not the same thing as "about
> development".
Funnily it got posted in a mail that is named "Misc _development_ news".
:-)
> It's a policy change which should be communicated to the developer body.
[...]
> Does this
On Sun, 01 Jun 2008, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > (hint: how would you place that file there in the first place?)
>
> Ask for a password change. Send your key with ssh-copy-id. Don't change
> your password and lose it. And then try to login wit
Hi,
on the whole I rather agree with Steve's point of view. It's great to see
that ftpmasters are doing thorough checks when they have to check
something but in this case, a simple library transition, they shouldn't
check for licenses and shouldn't refuse the update when the package has
already be
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:28:53 -0300]:
>
> >The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX,
>
> I already objected to this in the past, and I'm loudly objecting again
> now. Some people on IRC shared this objection; I'm
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> The past weeks I had several encounters with the situation that a maintainer
> completely overlooked and NMU and uploaded a newer version without
> acknowledging the previous NMU, thereby reintroducing the problem the NMU
> addressed. This happened t
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> But perhaps we need another mechanism to signal this. Consecutive uploads to
> the same distribution should not cause previously present version entries to
> disappear from the changelog. Maybe the archive can reject an upload that
> misses a changel
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, David Paleino wrote:
> The separation between debian.org and non-free.org is IMHO auspicable. And,
> regarding the concern of RMS about "publicizing" this location... well, we do
> *NOT* mention debian-multimedia.org anywhere, do we? Still, lots of people use
> that.
>
> If we
I was frightened by your message until I realized that it was not your
message but one of Sven… please don't forward messages that you don't
endorse (in particular when it contains wrong claims).
> debian-multimedia.org is not maintained by debian, it is for patent
> encumbered stuff, liable of a
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
> http://cvs.debian.org/ddp/manuals.sgml/release-notes/?root=debian-doc
This link is wrong. DDP uses SVN nowadays.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
--
To UNSUBS
On Mon, 06 Oct 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Oct 2008, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> > Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05/10/2008):
> > > > http://cvs.debian.org/ddp/manuals.sgml/release-notes/?root=debian-doc
> > >
> > > This link is
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> I need information where
> debbugs
Don responded, it moved to bzr: http://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Debbugs
> debian-openoffice
$ apt-cache showsrc openoffice.org | grep Vcs
Vcs-Bzr:
http://bzr.debian.org/pkg-open
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> I think we should go in the opposite direction: massively simplify
> the whole membership thing.
I tend to agree on the description of the situation but I would also add
that we effectively have a trust problem within the project and that any
reform to
Hi,
thanks for your comment. For reference, people might not have noticed but
my initial mail was not only a reply to liw's mail but a real alternative
proposal. BTW, I added some further explanations on my blog:
http://www.ouaza.com/wp/2008/10/27/debian-membership-reform/
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Lu
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > - this process might be too heavy with fine-grained privileges as it would
> > require the intervention of many DD each time we have to grant a right
> > (when trusting the decision of 2 members with special rights would be
> > enough).
>
> That
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 27/10/08 at 16:40 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > - this process might be too heavy with fine-grained privileges as it
> > > > would
> > > > require
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Mon Oct 27 20:28, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Her basic idea is, that in addictive games the first levels of success are
> > easy to achieve and then it gets harder, but only so slowly so that people
> > dont loose motivation. She also manages very we
Hello,
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> and so on. The way I would like to see this idea developing is that it
> starts as an unofficial project, with very simple rules (like, "you
> can vote once for each message ID"), which simply collects the data
> and makes it publicly available
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [ re-ordering the quoted text, anticipating your reply to my post ]
>
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 04:35:43PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > The goal is not (necessarily to) filter the messages that we want to
> > see or not
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:35:14AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > * "Vocal minority" dominates "silent majority" by contributing a
> > disproportionate amount of list traffic, [...]
>
> Note that voting can have a similar drawback -- in that if you've g
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have felt for some time that the low requirement for seconds on General
> Resolutions is something that should be fixed. We are over 1000
> Developers, if you can't find more than 5 people supporting your idea,
> its most probably not worth it
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Anyway 2Q is too much in my opinion. Q would be much more reasonable.
>
> See my reply to Bernd why I think its not.
It seems like most people who responded preferred Q up to now. It might
end up as an amendment otherwise. :)
> > It would be also be
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Robert Millan wrote:
> > This is one of the reasons why the vote was flawed;
>
> Again, if the vote was flawed (I don't think it was, but if the Secretary
> considers it flawed), the right thing would be to cancel it.
The constitution doesn't explicitely allow a vote to be ca
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> In #512780 (http://bugs.debian.org/512780), we've requested the creation
> of a debian-wbadm list to serve as a role address and discussion umbrella
> for the wanna-build team. The full rationale is in the bug report, but
> the bottom line is that we've r
[ Moving to -project ]
Hi,
context: someone proposed a scoring system like this:
> x (= 10?) Important bugs are RC critical
> y (= 25?) Normal bugs are RC critical
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 02:41:46PM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> >
> > Hmmm..
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Ben Finney wrote:
> Manoj seems to be emitting a great deal more typos to Debian forums in
> recent years. Perhaps we should pool together donations for a better
> keyboard for him?
Or he should post less and take the time to review what he
writes... (including the pass where
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> bullshit! we are trading quality for what?
Please don't be so aggressive and leave some time to RM to respond to your
comments before posting more mails
> Or there's something else behind the curtains that it's not being said
> (consciously), like ubu
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Marc Haber wrote:
> In fact, I would prefer if Ubuntu had to change _their_ scheduled to
> accomodate us, if they want to have the advantage of being in sync
> with us. It's _their_ advantage after all, not ours.
I don't mind who changes the date for the other but I really don
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:37:46AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > What we're speaking of is synergy between both distributions. You know the
> > it's the principle behind “the combination of both is worth more that the
&g
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> So let's just freeze late in the early/middle spring of 2010 this time and
> aim
> for Dec 2011 freeze next time. If you disagree with that, please enlighten me
> why Debian needs to rush _this time_. If synchronization is so badly wanted
> for the
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> Both the Etch and Lenny releases did clearly show this, and the success of
> both releases (Etch more than Lenny IMO) is largely thanks to flexible
> starts of the incremental freeze stages.
The staged freeze has been a major pain for anyone working on the
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Ben Finney wrote:
> "Bernhard R. Link" writes:
>
> > * Ben Finney [090818 11:28]:
> > > Perhaps you have a better way of succinct terms to use when
> > > challenging those logical fallacies?
> >
> > I think succinct terms help not at all here. Once there is a succinct
> > te
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
> Also, how about the following addition to the next edition of DeveloperNews?
>
> === debian-devel and ITPs ===
>
> At DebConf9 there was a discussion about making the debian-devel list
> more useful. Towards that end, here is a quick reminder of the
> recom
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Andreas Barth wrote:
> We should definitly continue to support oldstyle booting, at least for
> the time being.
Until what? Missing boot-time dependencies were the only problem that had
to be adressed to fix boot sequence ordering.
Sure administrators will have to learn tweak
y on some
other (unexpected) initialization done by other scripts, i.e. numbers
were wrong and could not be easily fixed. And there's nothing magic in the
dependency based system.
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 08:54:06AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
&
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Russ Allbery writes:
> > Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt writes:
> >> How is calling update-rc.d making our maintainer scripts fragile?
> > It's the things that update-rc.d doesn't support directly that are a
> > problem, like moving start numbers.
>
>
(Put petter on CC, he's probably interested by the patch below)
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Luk Claes schrieb am Monday, den 24. August 2009:
>
> *snip*
> > Why would file-rc not work properly with dependency based booting?
> you know what file-rc is doing? You have a configfile
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
> So, there was a long discussion here after Debconf about the merits or
> lack thereof of a freeze date at the end of this year for a squeeze
> release early next year. My general feeling of the discussion was that
> there was a fair bit of opposition to f
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> critical" bugs. That gave to nice aphorisms like "release when
> ready", but did not really cater to timeliness of the releases.
We are speaking of the freeze date, not the release date.
> other way: Where timeliness trumps the quality. We also
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> If you're talking about the Ubuntu release team that's up to them. If
> you talk about the Debian release team then I don't think so. A
> proposale is a proposal not a policy.
I don't get your point. How do you go from a proposed freeze date
to a defin
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Sure, if most DDs have just took that mail as a proposal that they can
> safely ignore, the release team should probably be more precise, but I
> doubt the substance will be anything else than what we have now. (I also
> duly notice that the release
Hi
(quoting almost everything on purpose)
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, Tom Feiner wrote:
> stackoverflow.com, which is a website featuring questions and answers on
> a wide range of topics in computer programming, has just offered [1]
> free advertising for open source projects wanting to advertise
> rec
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010, David Paleino wrote:
> while hacking on wicd, I looked at the various DHCP clients we have in
> Debian. I believe that pump could be removed from our archives, but I'm
> sending this mail in case anyone really needs it -- in this case, we keep it
> and I'll just remove suppo
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> This is IMNSHO a serious violation and breach of privacy. It doesn't
IMO it's not. The PTS is like launchpad but for Debian and there you can
see who is subscribed to each package and to each bug:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg
https://bugs.
Hello,
ever since I created the Alioth collab-maint project [1], I have been adding
non-developers to the project so that they can work together with
other DD (sponsors) on a common VCS. 359 requests have been approved since
2005, it currently amounts to 5 to 20 requests every month. The threshold
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
> > Are there volunteers for the task?
>
> I would be willing to volunteer as part of a team. I work with the
> debian-perl team and find that group maintenance and co-operation makes
> things function quite smoothly. I would like to mention I am not a D
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Xavier Oswald wrote:
> > Is there an existing team that could take this responsibility? [2]
> > Are there volunteers for the task?
>
> Why a team ? People volunteers registered as Admin could do the needed job
> right ?
I asked for a team because it would not be unreaso
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:45:32PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > Now I would like to stop dealing with those requests and thus I would like
> > a team of people to replace me.
>
> Do you have a way to know what percentage o
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Why not automatically include all DMs in the collab-maint group?
No objection from me. But I don't know how to map DM to alioth accounts.
> And to drive the idea further, what about a public-maint group that
> everyone with an alioth account can commit
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:45:32PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > Now I would like to stop dealing with those requests and thus I would like
> > a team of people to replace me.
>
> Do you have a way to know what percentage o
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 06/07/10 10:09, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
>
>
> AFAICT, none of this justifies silently removing someone from the NM
> database.
I can't speak for the NM team, but if he was asked to go through DM first
(and that's what I understood), I could under
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Steffen Möller wrote:
> there is a new advent on the Internet horizon which is the social
> micropayment. Regular web users pay in some money and distribute that
> with respect to their clicks in the web. I feel that Debian should
> somehow participate with that, i.e. we s
Hi,
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I admit that I personally can not spend the (spare) time which is needed
> to work on or even lead a project like debian-installer but I would like
> to raise the awareness of people here by showing the figure above that
> especially in freeze time a
Hi Joerg,
thanks for those minutes, they were very interesting. I like that you're
working on integrating more stuff on the main archive. It's definitely
better than to have many separate archives. I do hope backports will be
a suite on the main archive at some point.
I have one comment and a que
Hi,
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Henri Le Foll wrote:
> I have seen that Raphael Hertzog has written a blog entrie about conffile
> so I have created http://wiki.debian.org/Training
This article is more oriented towards users than towards contributors. But
I have other articles that are interesti
Hi,
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
> since a while, we see unsolicted commercial links and images on planet,
> mostly
> about flattr.
This definition does not make it clear what you're targeting.
Can you be more precise? Since I use flattr I wonder if I'm concerned.
I even encourag
Hi,
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Where I personally draw the line is that I'm fairly comfortable with
> Debian-involved people advertising their own services on Planet Debian:
> their own companies, their own consulting services, their own posts, and
> so forth. I would start gettin
Hi,
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> You should be. *IMO* your posts are VERY annoying with the "support my
> work, give me money money money" below them, sometimes very much looking
> to be written just to spread another round of flattr links.
> Might not be the intention, but feels li
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > For some value of "any". Planet has a big audience, articles are seen by
> > more than 3 persons so it's difficult to speak for them.
>
> How do you get that number?
Feedburner statistics. But I was wrong, it's not that many. That numbers
includes
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I'm not particularly happy with the 'flattr this' buttons either. My
> main problem is that I find quite difficult to avoid interpreting them
> as DMUP violations, specifically about DMUP point "don't use Debian
> Facilities for private financia
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> My next question for you (assuming you accept that a discussion on this
> list is enough to decide on this matter---I personally do) is whether
> you find that my summary of this thread, given in my former post, is
> fair or not.
I don't know o
Hi,
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
> since a while, we see unsolicted commercial links and images on planet,
> mostly
> about flattr.
So it's now clear that this thread is only about flattr buttons. Quite a few
people explained that they are (at varying level) annoyed by them. I woul
Hi,
(I'm hert...@d.o and not b...@d.o)
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> What Can I Post On Planet?
[...]
> - Be very careful including material from external sites (ie, not your
>own blog/domain). The occasional picture from elsewhere is fine, but
>anything that can be (or i
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> It's not begging in a sense that someone IS doing some work. It's more
> like "use this thing that I produced, and if you want, you can reward
> me with a few cents". There simply is nothing distasteful about that.
> In fact, I find it courage
Hi Jörg,
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Compared to my last post about this meeting, we did rework our agenda a
> little bit, so it currently reads like the stuff I paste below. We
> guarantee nothing from it, but we try to at least have a few short words
> about each. Well, a report
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> multi-arch implementation, see
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/02/msg00504.html
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:44:46PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Compared to my last post about this meeting,
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Jose Luis Rivas wrote:
> If is proposed to GR as it is written now, I will most probably vote
> against it too. I thought the diversity statement was to let everybody
> know they were welcome to work in the project, not that they have to
> think in certain way nor we will have
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012, Enrico Zini wrote:
> I love how this is increasing in awesomeness as it is decreasing in
> size.
Indeed.
> I feel like suggesting two minor patches, labor limae if anything:
>
> s/contributions to Debian/contributions/
> s/expertise in other areas/expertise in other areas,
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Paul Wise wrote:
> > The source package control files and some of their derivatives are
> > currently
> > used to document the URL of the home page of the work that is packaged
> > ("upstream"). However, this approach is hard to extend to other
> > information
> > descri
Hi,
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013, LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 11:33:39AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > mergechanges is responsible for the differences you're seeing:
> > dpkg-source is run (yes, on an ubuntu system), and then binaries are built
> > on a system that is running sid, both a
On Tue, 03 Sep 2013, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:12:12AM +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I didn't really understand your proposal, it was missing the "What?"
> > section. What do you intend to change apart from the description of
> > the debian-companies list?
>
> It is not just
Hi,
On Sat, 04 Jan 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I've given some thought to this myself, and came up with the following
> ideas. Some of them are probably really bad ideas, but let's try to
> brainstorm a bit:
I don't find them bad. At least from the POV of view of a DD and of a
service mainta
On Mon, 06 Jan 2014, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois writes ("Re: Updating the Policy Editors delegation"):
> > Have you seen some mistakes that would help us (or at least me)
> > understand which problems you're {thinking of,anticipating}?
>
> I think the biggest problem isn't that the polic
On Mon, 06 Jan 2014, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes:
>
> > This is all very well but I think de jure they aren't a delegated team,
> > and the distinction is defined in the constitution. This is not
> > trivially bypassable, because a delegated team is one who derives their
> > powers
Hi,
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> So, first things first, I would welcome your feedback on the TO
> criterias[1]. Soft deadline: 2014-02-01.
> [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DPL/TrustedOrganizationCriteria
I didn't find anything really problematic in the criteria, at least not
w
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> - [bgupta] work with SPI to enable donations via paypal
Note that Debian France has planned to setup that for the Debian project.
It would be a small change on this page:
https://france.debian.net/galette/plugins/galette-plugin-paypal/paypal_form.php
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > 2) the alternative is that they give up on the idea, or host it
> >themselves, which makes it harder to work collaboratively on the
> >service, and results in services that have a single maintainer (or
> >none, in the end).
>
> How does h
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote:
> Unfortunately I have a problem with the renaming of my pet service
> Buildd.Net on https://wiki.debian.org/Services. I added my service as
> BuilddNet and it got renamed to "UnofficialBuilddNet". Although it's
> true that it's an unofficial servic
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote:
> In fact it doesn't duplicate an existing service. Its focus is
> different than the buildd.d.o site.
The site says “These pages are intended to show additional information to
http://buildd.debian.org or more exactly it is basically the same
informatio
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Ian Jackson wrote:
> It can increase security because it can make operations more
> convenient at the same level of security, and because people trade off
> convenience for security.
>
> For example, it would be possible to have one key for email encryption
> and a different (
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > - Wrap your lines at 80 characters or less for ordinary discussion. Lines
> > longer than 80 characters are acceptable for computer-generated output
> > (e.g., ls -l).
> > - Do not send automated out-of-office or vacation messages.
> > - Do not send
Hi Solveig,
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, Solveig wrote:
> I can write specific amendments, if somebody is willing to sponsor them :)
Please do. I tend to agree with what Steve said. It doesn't hurt to have a
list of "don't" but this should not replace the "inspirational" part of the
CoC.
Cheers,
--
Rap
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> The danger of having a list of "do not"s is that people will do
> something which is not on the list, and then point to it and say "see,
> it's allowed by the code of conduct" when pointed out that they're being
> a dick.
It's quite common to have an s
Le Sat, Jun 10, 2000 at 05:12:11PM +1000, Anthony Towns écrivait:
> The general resolution to abolish non-free is flawed in a number of ways.
Great. I completely share your opinion.
That's my second mail in this tread. I wish everybody could do like me ...
the thread can't be followed unless yo
Le dimanche 20 mars 2005 à 12:45 +0100, Sven Luther a écrit :
> Hello,
Hi Sven,
> This is an attempt to do a vancouver-counter proposal in such a way that would
> be acceptable to all, including the folk who was at the vancouver meeting.
> Please be resonable when we post here, refrain from agres
Le lundi 11 avril 2005 à 10:17 +0200, Andreas Schuldei a écrit :
> The point in this is to find out if the social reforms i was
> trying to initiate are worth pursuing anyway or if people think
> debian is good (enough) like it is in this regard.
The problem is that you're not alone, most of the c
Le Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 06:20:39PM +1000, Anthony Towns écrivait:
> Is that all there is, or is there some way of actually getting a list
> of current tasks and such too, or is it a write-only system? Is that
> actually being used? (At least during the bugsquash parties, I've mostly
> seen the /top
Le Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 09:16:10PM +0200, Josip Rodin écrivait:
> On related note, I think bug(1) and reportbug(1) should emphasize _less_ on
> the severity value of the bugs. It's clearly something that the average user
> shouldn't even know about, and something that the developer needs to address
[ Please recpect the reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
Hello dear developers,
I'm proposing this general resolution as a results of recent events that
some of you may have followed. I'm looking for 5 sponsors.
Please do not discuss this general resolution without a reflexion time.
And please read wh
Le Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 11:35:42AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog écrivait:
Here is some help for understanding the general resolution.
> - all #debian-* channels on OpenProjects should be open to everyone
> except #debian-private which is for registered debian developers only
> (the ac
Le Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 12:07:52PM +0100, Peter Makholm écrivait:
> > Can we as an open projects really accept more closed forums? How many
> > private places can we have and still say that the development of the
> > debian distribution is an open project?
> >
> > debian-private is allready filled
[ Please respect the reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
Hello,
first I'd like to thank the few people who have been constructive and
tried to help instead of denigrating and nitpicking on minor points.
I've decided to withdraw the general resolution proposed 2 weeks ago
about IRC as communication cha
Le Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 11:38:06AM +0100, Nicolas SABOURET écrivait:
> Hi,
Hi,
> To sum up, I think we could :
> 1. "close" all lists.
> 2. propose a user interface with automatic search in the archives.
Well, as far as spam is concerned, some measures are being taken. Test
of spamassassin is go
Le Thu, May 02, 2002 at 10:05:06AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo écrivait:
> - Debian Best Packaging Practices
>
> This item is vague. I assume we're talking about tips and developer
> materials not contained in policy?
Yes. It may also include things moved away from policy ... when the
distinction bet
Le Fri, May 03, 2002 at 12:24:23AM -0700, Grant Bowman écrivait:
> Sounds like a chapter on "Debian Teams", I like this concept. While you
> may get a chapter co-maintainer, it would be good to clearly assign
> responsibility for content to a representative from each team. If you
> provide an exa
Le Thu, May 02, 2002 at 10:05:06AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo écrivait:
> Unfortunately I do not yet have any other co-maintainers --
> volunteers, anyone?
I'm volunteering. I'm going to spend some time on it but I really wish
you could propose a new structure before I start filling the gaps.
Cheers,
-
Le Sat, May 04, 2002 at 04:50:16PM +0200, RIBNITZ Robert écrivait:
> You can join Debian at
>
> http://nm.debian.org/newnm.php
>
> Kind regards
This is not a good response. He's looking if he can help, and how he can
help. You're just explaining him how to get a Debian developer, but he
first n
101 - 200 of 267 matches
Mail list logo
