On Mon, Feb 25, 2008, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> >At the various conferences I attended I have paid much attention to
> > how other distributions and FOSS projects were promoting their work, and
> > despite us often having t-shirts, stickers and posters like the others,
> > we really miss a few t
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * martin f krafft
>
> | also sprach Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.02.24.1316 +0100]:
> | >I also would like to spend some Debian money on a contest, similar to
> | > the FreeBSD logo contest [2], to creat
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008, Tobias Rundström wrote:
> Sorry about the confusion, we are just a happy bunch of debian
> advocates that happens to have a shell machine. I put the paypal
> donation link up for the users on the machine to use for new spare
> parts. If you find it offensive I will remo
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
> Anyone got more info?
>
> Cc'ing leader (for debian trademark) and Allweb (for webserver).
Thanks. For your information (the network is FreeNode):
13:24 -!- sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] has joined #xmms
13:24 -!- Topic for #xmms: HAPPY 10TH ANNIVERSARY || http:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Again: Information about facts the DPL is complaining about should
> > be regarded as important enough to make people feel that they have
> > some relevance for the project and thus should be shared amongst
> > people those who should know it (inclus
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007, Leo costela Antunes wrote:
> I know I'm fighting against the natural tide here, but just I'm trying
> to stop a possible flamewar before it starts, if at all possible, so
> couldn't this issue (of which I have no particular knowledge) be
> addressed in a somewhat different pa
Hi James,
I hope that your current guilt-o-meter status will allow you to
sympathise with your fellow developers and their current feelings,
because I wouldn't enjoy an e-mail like this one either.
It has come to a point where quite a few people I like and respect
are considering leaving
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
> Could you please explain in what way the addition of a single person to the
> existing team (Phil already was DSA, even if not yet in the adm group) is
> going to resolve all the huge and structural communication problems between
> team members that we h
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007, Robert Millan wrote:
> Since every GNU/Linux distributor seems to be positioning with regards to
> possible patent deals with Microsoft, I thought we could do the same.
>
> Actually, it's totally unthinkable that a non-profit organization could do
> this kind of deal, in whi
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> You make another point, which is interesting, but which actually when
> carried to its logical conclusion ends up being in support of Range
> Voting over Condorcet. If you continue with the logic asking what
> happens when Range Voting voters vo
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
> Rough translation follows. Anyone willing to authenticate?
> Feb 06 13:47:31 That from sam is timely
To be fair, "voll daneben" is closer here to "off the mark".
--
Sam.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007, Patrick Frank wrote:
> Feb 06 13:39:38 Tolimar, http://sam2007.zoy.org/
> Feb 06 13:39:51 Tolimar, ich habe so ein Gefühl, daß Sven
> darauf reagiert
Sven told me on February 25th in front of several other DDs that he
was going to vote for me. Mein Gott, was für eine Rea
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007, Patrick Frank wrote:
>> **, you suck.
>> I desperately hope Debian will recover from these months.
>> PS: Please go see a psychologist. Really.
>
>Such public statements are not surprising since Sam Hocevar
>was el
On Thu, May 31, 2007, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> I don't like it at first read, but you may provide examples of
> situations where such a procedure could be useful. In particular, just
> determining "who's right" doesn't help much. As for determining what
> punishments are plausible, isn't this
On Tue, May 29, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:13:02PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> >But you are not asking for justice, you are asking for revenge and
> > retalation. And as long as I am the project leader there shall be no
> > revenge or retalatio
On Tue, May 29, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:14:23AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > > then so be it, debian is better off without such persons whose behaviour
> > > will only hurt the proj
On Tue, May 29, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> then so be it, debian is better off without such persons whose behaviour
> will only hurt the project again one way or another, and should not be
> encouraged.
These are words of pure wisdom, thank you. Empathy would be the next
step to enlightenment.
On Sun, May 27, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> I am now making this request to you as DPL, that you investigate who was
> behind this action, and find out why it was done, and that it be
> publicly addressed.
Sven, first of all, please restrict your postings to debian-project,
ideally to specific
On Fri, May 11, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> >Please, Sven. There is already one thread about you in -vote where
> > you are already copiously posting and that people are acutely following.
> > I therefore suggest restricting your interventions to that thread.
>
> Sam, please tell me, what in t
On Fri, May 11, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 07:56:09PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> > THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT YOU PLEASE. PLEASE LEAVE.
>
> Then please comment on the second part of my post, and stop making it an
> attack on me instead. You are as much responsible of w
[moving to -project as I should have done with my original message]
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> >Matt Taggart proposed that dpkg developers meet in person during a
> > dpkg summit[9] to talk about future dpkg development. The meeting would
> > be sponsored at least by Debi
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> > we only use hashes in the tally sheet for leader elections?
>
> Or in other words: I 100% of the votes regarding persons, we have a
> secret vote.
Not quite 100%. A DPL recall vote is about a person.
Cheers,
--
Sam.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> Bonsoir
Ah, please. Don't reply to spam.
Sam.
--
echo "creationism" | tr -d "holy godly goal"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> just to clarify my point: I am all for critical feedback,
> preferably in a friendly and constructive manner. To read it on a
> public mailinglist constitutes both a waste of bandwidth (as
> hundred of people who are not involved in your personal
> i
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> I would ask you on behalf of debian to not run for office for
> those reasons.
Wow, on behalf of Debian?
> [1] when asked about who you would vote for you stated publicly
> that you would not think that I was a good candidate and you
> would rat
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I'm seeking for a source of the 3D swirl that was used for instance at
>
> http://www.wordit.com/catalog/images/debian_swirl_mousepad.jpg
>
> prefered as SVG graphics if available, bug reasonable resolution
> (800x600) PNG might do as well.
It
(Not speaking on behalf of the Debian project)
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007, Cognaxon wrote:
> we would like to donate our free small program called
> "WSQ viewer" (for Linux) to be distributed with Debian
> CD/DVD. The short description of the program is here
> http://www.cognaxon.com/index.php?page
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If one considers appointing a DSA nagging assistant instead, then of
> > course it's not worth doing! It seems to be miss the point, though.
> > The problem is insufficient communication, not insufficient
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:38:05AM +0100, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> > 1. Paying Debian Developers seems to make (some of) them completely
> > humorless, everything is taken a hundred percent seriously, as if the
> > dollars in their pockets droped their
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 11:59:24AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > One thing you could do is to end *NOW* the experiment,
>
> Can you please roughly outline what is going to happen when the
> experiment is continued until its scheduled end, and what's going
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Personally, I'd say that now would be the time for any anti-payment
> people to say "we can do this better, and look, we'll prove it", and make
> up their own target date for etch, and demonstrate how much energy and
> effort can be mustered just by hav
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006, Drew Parsons wrote:
> I appreciate that I have simplified the grey nuances for the sake of
> establishing my point about the results of the experiment, but please be
> advised it is in no way a straw-man characterisation [1].
>
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/20
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> * Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> > Please take into account that the second part of my mail is only an idea,
> > that it's in no way perfect. I know it looks like public delation and so
> > on. I'm looking forward for ideas to improve th
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> And it is properly implemented as a web-based NNTP client. I've no
> idea why people insist on reimplementing NNTP badly, complete with
> client lock-in, in these forum things.
Animated GIF emoticons.
--
Sam.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> It would be good to have all keys in the Debian keyring in a strongly
> connected set, i.e., so that there is a signature path from every key to
> every other key in the keyring.
There must be connected groups amongs the keys not in the biggest
gro
35 matches
Mail list logo
