On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 03:45:42 -0600, Daemon Bernstein wrote:
> I had to keep searching on a search engine to find the archive. Debian's
> website search could not find it.
I was curious and tried …
If I go to https://www.debian.org/ and type "archive" in the search
box at the top right, the first
On Wed, 04 Jan 2023 16:24:56 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 02:45:51PM +0200, to...@ukr.net wrote:
> > Hi! I'm interested in a question about the archive/old versions. The site
> > https://www.debian.org/distrib/archive.en.html states that over time you
> > stop keepin
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 01:28:45 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 21:38 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > I wonder, though -- do we have a Nazi anywhere in the project? Could you
> > point to one?
> Although I really prefer not to have them in the project, its is not the
> Debian pro
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:20:52 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> The screenshots of the YouTube video showing the setup of the Raspberry
> Pi don't look like the normal Debian installer. Also the phrases that
> appear in the screenshots don't seem to appear in any Debian package:
>
> https://codesearch.deb
On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:51:13 +0100, Ulrike Uhlig wrote:
> Is the decision making process clearly documented somewhere?
I don't think so …
> Is the decision making body documented somewhere, i.e. ewhere can I find
> out who is part of the committee? And how can people join this body?
The DebConf
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 21:44:09 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> On 2020/02/18 21:15, Daniel Lange wrote:
> >> […] I think the current DebConf committee
> >> should strongly consider […]
> >> keep the bid decision public as it was in prior DebConfs.
> > We held public review meetings for the DC21 bids
On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 12:22:21 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 9/29/19 12:13 PM, Hector Oron wrote:
> >> Not sure what the problem with LTS is. I thought companies pay for the
> >> extra effort. I think it's a perfectly fine business model.
> > As a very simple summary, companies pay an
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:23:42 +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> We are
> perfectly capable of phasing out obsolete workflows without a
> hammer like a GR (remember dpatch).
Unrelated to the general topic but since you mention it: Yes I
remember dpatch -- it's not phased out, I just encountered it a
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 17:55:03 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 15:51 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Lars Wirzenius writes ("Re: Conflict escalation and discipline"):
> > > This implies to me that, at the least, "anti-harassment" is the wrong
> > > name for a team that deals with
On Thu, 07 Dec 2017 08:16:47 -0500, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
> Restricting the execution of files one downloads or disabling macros on
> word documents you download and open would be a huge security win.
I'm skeptical, at least if this leads to more of the
well-known-and-much-despised "Do you r
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 11:02:51 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Not found nor apparently even linked anywhere on the EFF site, they seem to
> refer to http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=17200
Thanks for digging up this document.
> # Article 13
> #
> # Use of protected content by in
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 23:48:20 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > The Debian Perl Group is planning to hold a sprint at DebCamp in
> > Cape Town.
> The correct URL is of course
> https://wiki.debian.org/Sprints/2016/DebianPerlDebCamp
And here's a brief report from the sprint
Debian Perl Group Rolling Sprint at DebCamp 2015
Introduction
The Debian Perl Group conducted a "Rolling Sprint" during DebCamp 2015 in
Heidelberg from 2015-08-10 - 2015-08-14.
The term "Rolling Sprint" describes an event that extende
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 12:44:39 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> we are short before the release and I wonder how it would be possible to
> contribute to the release notes.
There's a pseudo-package in the BTS for collecting contributions:
http://bugs.debian.org/release-notes
As for formats and repos
On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 20:55:17 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Pocock (2015-02-05 20:06:22)
> > I looked in a search engine for Debian calendar, events and other
> > dates and couldn't really find anything that looked like a structured
> > calendar. These two pages did come up tho
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 07:52:23 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> You constant rants are getting unbearable for me.
Same here.
My email killfile consists of 6 lines.
3 of them are Svante's email addresses.
(Yes, "don't feed the troll" doesn't work. But still. *sigh*)
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Ho
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 22:21:32 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > We actually have a fully federated setup, so something as simple as what
> > Sune did will work:
> > http://pusling.com/blog/?p=274
> In other words: All those people with proper avatars in BTS have setup
> some DNS record on one of the
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 06:52:10 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> You exchange one undefined term against another, but that doesn't
> change the underlying problem, which is, *what* is socially
> disruptive?
[..]
> The whole point is that all these pseudo definitions of normality
> are just fake, fak
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 07:43:32 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Eliseu Cendron Carvalho wrote:
> > So, is there any chance to make Choqok 1.4 available on Debian
> > Wheezy repos?
> Please file a release-critical bug (severity serious) about this issue.
I guess that's #712
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:29:11 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I might be interesting to learn _how_ they started to contribute /
> > got their first package uploaded.
> Good idea. New version, also trying to provide more closed answers to ease the
> analysis, and two questions about future plans
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:08:55 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I feel that, as long-time contributors, we often lack a good view of how
> hard new people find it to get involved in Debian. In order to better
> identify blockers or difficulties that prospective contributors face
> when trying to contr
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:07:43 +, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> Latin is a common root to many current languages, and which I think has
> a completely deterministic pronunciation.
Not really, there are variations both historically/geographically and
nowadays.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_spel
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:29:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > - It applies to all DMs listed as Maintainer/Uploaders. It is not
> >possible to grant upload permission to only a specific DM.
> Isn't that the point of listing a DM in the field? Why would you want to
> list
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:52:30 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > The ftp team wants to change how allowing Debian Maintainers to upload
> > packages works. The current approach with the DM-Upload-Allowed field
> > has a few issues we would like to address:
> Have any of these issues been a problem prac
On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 14:02:02 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> here is a wrap-up (of the wrap-up (of the...)) that Francesca has just
> shared with me based on the last feedback on list.
>
>
> The Debian Project welcomes
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:17:42 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > And I think we are also not open to people who don't share these
> > values, e.g. people with a racist, sexist, ... behaviour.
> While I certainly agree, I think it's best to leave the latter implicit in
> the statement of what we *do* ac
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:25:41 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> And I think we are also not open to people who don't share these
> >> values, e.g. people with a racist, sexist, ... behaviour.
> > Why?
> You can't have an open and welcoming environment if you're open to people
> who work to make the e
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 20:38:39 +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> I can think of another thing that we care about, which I don't see
> mentioned here: "We expect people to be constructive members of the
> community."
Agreed.
And I think we are also not open to people who don't share these
values, e.g. pe
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:29:29 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > I'd rather add a disclaimer/preface at the beginning that says in BIG
> > FRIENDLY LETTERS that DEP5 is only about formatting and doesn't change
> > any requirements (which are [or should be] spelt out in policy).
> It turns out that ther
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:30:48 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Confusing or not, I think this really needs to be addressed. It's *the*
> problem that people are running into in evaluating the format, and there
> is a ton of negative discussion of DEP-5 out there based on the idea that
> it's so much h
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:33:21 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> the machine-readable format for Debian copyright files proposed in
> DEP 5 has been stable for many monthes, is supported by multiple parsers and
> Lintian, and is getting frequently used in new packages (at least from what I
> see
On Wed, 11 May 2011 20:23:36 +0200, Fernando González de Requena wrote:
> So I would like to share it with the debian community. It is written in
> Spanish, so I guess it will not be widely read. Anyway, I would be happy
> with any comments, criticisms, suggestions, ...
> You can download it from
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 19:51:25 +0300, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> Yaroslav Halchenko writes:
> > That is true, but since it doesn't have to be mandatory to use
> > git-copyright-scan, it could simply be a helper for some projects were
> > authors do retain the copyright .
> Exactly. git-copyright
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 12:21:49 +0300, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> Could we compare git log against debian/copyright? git-copyright-scan is
> a proof-of-concept that tries to locate authors that are listed in git
> log but are missing from DEP-5 debian/copyright.
While I'm in favour of making mana
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 22:38:15 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > mendeley (some sort of citing
> > application, if I remember correctly)
> Sadly, Mendeley is not free: http://www.mendeley.com/terms/ (point 4).
> To my knowledge, there is is no direct equivalent of Mendeley in Debian,
> although for t
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 01:41:47 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >In practice, in my experience most packages have exactly the same
> >URL (maybe with one path part more or less) in debian/control,
> >debian/copyright and debian/watch.
> In my experience it can be hard to actually find upstream sourc
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:14:01 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > (Of course, the Source field is also redundant for a great many
> > packages where it would be the same URL that goes in debian/control's
> > Homepage field. IIRC, the hope is that policy is eventually changed to
> > not require the copyrig
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:47:53 +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> The new version of libconfig-model-perl 1.229 is now available in Sid. This
> new version provides a model of DEP-5 updated according to the CANDIDATE
> version. (Among other features [1], like editor/validator for debian/control).
>
On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 20:42:29 +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> As a bonus, Config::Model will be able to migrate copyright files from older
> specification to the new spec.
Very cool!
I'm looking forward to using it.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x864
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:51:59 +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Those who
> already use some revision, such as pkg-perl, should stick to what they
> are using now.
Agreed, and the fact that r135 in svn hasn't changed for some time
(and the development happened somewhere else) was actually helpful for
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 21:38:47 +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On to, 2010-12-16 at 14:08 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > * The link in "For versions, consult the Perl Foundation" doesn't
> > lead to the expected page.
> Can you give a good link?
For the Arti
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:36:21 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> For DEP5:
> http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5
> - SPDX does not contain the CC0, Expat, nor Perl licenses.
I thought the "Perl" license was removed already? TTBOMK there is no
such thing as a "Perl license", the usual "under the same te
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:54:06 +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> * Add a mention of and link to SPDX to the "License specifications"
> chapter.
>
> ## SPDX
>
> [SPDX](http://spdx.org/) is an attempt to standardize a format
> for communicating the components, licenses a
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 20:12:15 +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> * Should we suggest people keep the upstream copyright statements
> verbatim, including the word "Copyright" or c-in-a-circle or whatever?
> Or should we suggest that they can also shorten them to, say, "2010, J.
> Random Hacker"? I'm fin
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:23:51 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I disagree that this thread is flattr-specific.
/me too.
> It clearly is the most cited example, most likely because is what we all
> have in mind and because Flattr is quite popular these days. Still, I
> don't think anybody is tr
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:53:47 +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> * **`Files`**
>* Required for all but the first paragraph.
> If omitted from the first paragraph,
> this is equivalent to a value of '*'.
>
> Does anyone oppose if I remove the "If omitted..." sentence? I see no
> reason t
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 23:19:48 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> X-Autobuild was a poor choice. My current opinion is that, unless there
> is an interest to parse a specific field, it it better to use existing
> ones, in that case Comment or Disclaimer.
Agreed, Disclaimer should fit the purpose of exp
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:19:21 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >I've fact I've written shell-style patterns free-handedly so far and
> >hoped that they would also be valid for `find' :)
> Did you actually test your expressions with "find -path"?
No, that's what I meant with "hoped" :)
> I discov
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:39:54 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > * Are find -name/-path globs a better idea than .gitignore?
> > * Are shell-style globs the right idea? Should we use Perl regular
> > expressions on the entire pathname instead?
> I think that we can, and should, keep the rest of the
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:18:17 +1200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Does anyone want hash comments to be allowed in debian/copyright? Are
> they useful?
I don't think I've ever used (or wanted to use) them.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:05:23 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> That also lets the rule with License be consistent with the rule for other
> fields, by requiring two leading spaces for any literal text. It also
> means that we would be using essentially the same formatting conventions
> as Description
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:24:07 +1200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> I don't think they're required by Policy or the ftpmasters. At least the
> pkg-perl team is using Maintainer/Upstream-Contact. I don't think they
> use Name/Upstream-Name.
Just as a data point: We are using both (Upstream-)Maintainer an
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 10:09:16 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> gregor herrmann writes:
> > I remember CPAN maintainers (sic!) being interested in the status of
> > their modules in Debian. Without a Maintainer (or whatever) field in
> > d/copyright (or somewhere else but I don&
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:25:39 +1200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On pe, 2010-08-13 at 20:43 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Am I missing some other Debian document somewhere that says we should be
> > providing upstream contact information in debian/copyright?
> There's also the Homapage: field in the p
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:08:07 +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> > You're not required to use it. If you want to improve the format, please
> > make concrete proposals, or at least explain why it is complicated and
> I actually second Bernd's comments. It seems uneccessarily complex and
> so very much ha
On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 19:32:33 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Steve Langasek 2010-07-05 <20100705164805.ga26...@dario.dodds.net>
> > I haven't seen anyone propose a good name that it can be changed *to*.
> > Shouldn't that be the first step?
> It would probably be "New Developer". But before ev
On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 00:14:03 +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Nowadays, we're asking people to become Maintainers so that they can
> become Debian Maintainers and *then* apply to the New Maintainer's
> process so that they can become Debian Developers.
And when their DD account is created they ge
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:11:08 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:35:45AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/10/msg2.html
> > But indeed it's only a proposal at this point. The release team needs
> > to set a date in st
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:17:15 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:47:16PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
[reviews of debian/copyright]
> > You know, there is one set of packages that *usually* passes NEW
> > pretty fast? Thats because they do something similar to that. They
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 09:56:49 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> >> Luk: what do you think yourself?
> > I think having a very limited amount of tweets from people that do not
> > write long blog posts is ok, though if it's not appreciated I'll remove
> > my feed.
> Short blog posts are ok, but one-sent
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:06:11 -0300, Vonlist wrote:
> I written to them so that I want to know that I need to be an authorized
> distributor of Debian.
Please take a look at
http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/info (english) or
http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/info.es.html (español).
Saludos,
gr
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:54:41 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> I have felt for some time that the low requirement for seconds on General
> Resolutions is something that should be fixed. We are over 1000
> Developers, if you can't find more than 5 people supporting your idea,
> its most probably not wo
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:47:41 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> So, are there going to be guide;lines for this voting on emails?
> On /., when one moderates, there are clear labels: troll, off-topic,
> flamebait, etc.
I think labels or tags would indeed be useful to have a structured
way
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:24:06 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [ Still, I found quite telling that I can't remember your acronyms
> without looking again at your mail, while I still remember the
> names proposed in Joerg's mail.
For me it's exactly the other way round, but I guess referring
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:16:01 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > Debian Contributor
> > > --
> > > Debian Maintainer
> > > -
> > > Debian Member
> > > -
> > > Debian Developer
> > >
> > Now, regarding your proposal itself, I agree wit
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:14:59 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:33:28PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Developer Status
> >
> Hi all, thanks for this proposal.
I'd also like to thank Ganneff (and whoever contributed to the
concept) for their effort, an
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:12:01 -0200, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> > I have a problem with non-technical persons voting on technical
> > issues, or issues having technical implications for the developer
> > body. I have even more of a problem with non-technical persons leading
> > a technical project.
[.
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:45:36 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> I am ongoing to start a new OnlineStore selling Debian DVDs and CDs
> beside other things. Sinde I want to donate a part of the sales price
> to the Debian Project I am running into some troubles.
> I need and organisation where
On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 18:45:12 +0200, Shams Fantar wrote:
> - I don't understand why it doesn't exist a official planet for debian
> users and a official planet for debian administrators. Do you have
> responses ?
Take a look at http://wiki.debian-community.org/planets/
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`
On Fri, 18 May 2007 22:09:56 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
[training the "next generation"]
> > I'm not following the Linux community closely; do you think there are
> > points Debian could adopt or learn from?
I try to summarize (hopefully correctly) your points:
> With Linux, I think it helps a
On Fri, 11 May 2007 08:33:01 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > I've documented the Alioth team and I'll probably continue doing something
> > > similar for some other teams that I know quite well.
> > I hope you do that for the Debian Perl Group so that I don't have to
> > learn the wiki stuff
On Thu, 10 May 2007 23:14:32 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Debian doesn't have that luxury, and I don't know
> > what, if anything, we can effectively do at a project organization level
> > to accomplish a similar goal.
> What about doing something like that ?
> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams
L
On Thu, 10 May 2007 13:42:37 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> There are other things
> >> that *are* signs of fundamental deficiencies in the project,
> > Would you mind to elaborate on this point, I'm really interested in
> > your opinion.
> The biggest problem with most open source / free softwar
[cc and reply-to/m-f-t [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 10 May 2007 12:32:26 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> There are other things
> that *are* signs of fundamental deficiencies in the project,
Would you mind to elaborate on this point, I'm really interested in
your opinion.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`.
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:47:24 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> I don't have numbers to prove anything here, but I'm sure any pkg-perl
> [1] member will join me recommending Niko Tyni [2].
As a (non-DD) member of the Debian Perl Group I whole-heartedly
second this proposal; Niko is doing a great job in
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:52:12 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > (Just a note - my S2 boundary isn't really arbitrary, it's basically a
> > > function of the quorum.)
> > (Point taken but it's still a deliberate decision to say
> > count($members_of_soc_ctte)=round(Q).)
> (I was just correcting the ad
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:46:10 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > Do you think it's likely for it to go on for more than one repetition?
> > I've no real idea but it might lead to a dead end. And having
> > infinite nominations/elections because there are e.g. "only" 10 and
> > not 16 persons seems to
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:42:50 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > + If there are fewer than S2 candidates
> > > + at the end of the nomination period, then the nomination period is
> > > + extended for two further weeks, repeatedly if necessary.
> > > + If "None Of The Above" wins the election, or i
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 03:32:52 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> + If there are fewer than S2 candidates
> + at the end of the nomination period, then the nomination period is
> + extended for two further weeks, repeatedly if necessary.
[..]
> + If "None Of The Above" wins the election, or if fewer tha
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 11:29:21 +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> > Why? Because not only my personal experience in NPOs but also the
> > scientific literature on this subject show that a mix of paid staff
> > and volunteers in an organization/project leads to
> > disagreement/conflicts;
> This is not a
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:10:32 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Thanks for presenting your thoughts.
I'm going to make a few remarks on a meta level:
> - Debian shouldn't do funding of Debian work for various reasons,
> that add up to it not having the support of the developer body
[..]
>
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:11:49 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Steve McIntyre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061016 11:09]:
> > If people have to pay something for them (even
> > something really cheap), then they're more likely to take an interest.
> Depending on the event, we ask for money (unless someone i
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 03:33:28PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, how did the probe emails some time ago manage to
> > *not* locate the subscriber address that generates the bounces? None
> > of them bounced?
> Looks like the CR system is quite selective in whom it bothers. I am a
83 matches
Mail list logo
