On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 03:12:35PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Dear Kurt,
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 09:17:27AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > If on -vote the required amount of seconds have been reached, I
> > will announce that the GR process has been sarted on
> > debian-devel-announce.
>
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 03:46:57PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 03:30:54PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > This isn't something that's happened in the past, what's announced is a)
> > that a GR process has started, b) the various CfVs, and c) the results.
> >
> > I'd be
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 03:30:54PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> This isn't something that's happened in the past, what's announced is a)
> that a GR process has started, b) the various CfVs, and c) the results.
>
> I'd be wary about spamming d-d-a every time there's a new
> amendment/adjustment t
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 03:12:35PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Dear Kurt,
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 09:17:27AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > If on -vote the required amount of seconds have been reached, I
> > will announce that the GR process has been sarted on
> > debian-devel-announce.
>
Dear Kurt,
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 09:17:27AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> If on -vote the required amount of seconds have been reached, I
> will announce that the GR process has been sarted on
> debian-devel-announce.
This is now the case for one GR and one GR amendement. There may
be further ame
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 03:49:28PM +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 14/10/2014 11:58 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> > Isn't the point of posting on debian-devel-announce to increase the
> > visibility and liklihood of seconds in the first place?
>
> Not if you want to help avoid the GR having a ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14/10/2014 11:58 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Isn't the point of posting on debian-devel-announce to increase the
> visibility and liklihood of seconds in the first place?
Not if you want to help avoid the GR having a chance to get up.
A.
-BE
Le Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 08:58:22AM -0400, Miles Fidelman a écrit :
>
> Isn't the point of posting on debian-devel-announce to increase the
> visibility and liklihood of seconds in the first place?
Hi Miles,
according to https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/, the purpose of
that list is
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:32:35PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:30:43PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
I think we should clearly indicate where GRs should be announced.
("Should", I suppose I'm arguing, not "must").
I think we don't need to name th
Hi,
On Dienstag, 14. Oktober 2014, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> I disagree, because I think that the current value for K is sufficiently
> low to make it part of the proponent's responsibility to make sure that
> his proposal gets enough seconds. Again, we're currently talking about
> finding _5_
Le mardi, 14 octobre 2014, 10.54:19 Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 09:17:27AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > If on -vote the required amount of seconds have been reached, I
> > will announce that the GR process has been sarted on
> > debian-devel-announce.
>
> Sure, and that's e
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 09:17:27AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> If on -vote the required amount of seconds have been reached, I
> will announce that the GR process has been sarted on
> debian-devel-announce.
Sure, and that's excellent. It would, though, in my opinion to be good
to announce the prop
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:32:35PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:30:43PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > I think we should clearly indicate where GRs should be announced.
> > ("Should", I suppose I'm arguing, not "must").
>
> I think we don't need to name the place i
On 2014-10-13 21:11, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:30:43PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Whilst researching for a reply to a different post in this thread on
-user (the thread sadly spans at least three lists), I realised that
the constitution doesn
Le lundi, 13 octobre 2014, 16.11:56 Miles Fidelman a écrit :
> Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > FWIW, Constitution §4.2.5 says:
> > (…)
> Ahhh... this is like RFPs and legal announcements - as long as you
> post it somewhere, you're covered. As opposed to requiring posting
> in a highly visible place
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:30:43PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Whilst researching for a reply to a different post in this thread on
-user (the thread sadly spans at least three lists), I realised that
the constitution doesn't say where GRs should be announced, and I
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:30:43PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Whilst researching for a reply to a different post in this thread on
> -user (the thread sadly spans at least three lists), I realised that
> the constitution doesn't say where GRs should be announced, and I
> couldn't find any adv
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:30:43PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I think we should clearly indicate where GRs should be announced.
> ("Should", I suppose I'm arguing, not "must").
I think we don't need to name the place in the constitution. I don't
think we need a hard rule about where the anno
Hi,
Jonathan Dowland writes:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 06:33:49PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
>> You do understand that we have procedured at Debian to handle stuff
>> like GR proposals, right? And that procedure involves posting to
>> debian-vote, so doing that was the right thing to do.
>
> W
Hi -project,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 06:33:49PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> You do understand that we have procedured at Debian to handle stuff
> like GR proposals, right? And that procedure involves posting to
> debian-vote, so doing that was the right thing to do.
Whilst researching for a r
20 matches
Mail list logo
