Previously Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
I seem to recall one of the Joey's was the original creator of the
channel.
Early inhabitors included igor, che_fox and a few others iirc.
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space
Previously Branden Robinson wrote:
So the people who asked me to leave #debian-devel when I wasn't yet a
developer somehow had a premonition of how much of a pain in the ass I
would become? :)
Yes. We failed in stopping you though :)
Wichert.
--
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 05:14:23PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
In fact there was one rather controversial regular at the time who'd
been rejected as a maintainer.
Who was that? Maybe it will help jog my memory.
Kysh. Elmo, on the other hand, isn't quite as forgettable.
--
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 12:22:15AM +1100, Edward C. Lang wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 05:14:23PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
In fact there was one rather controversial regular at the time who'd
been rejected as a maintainer.
Who was that? Maybe it will help jog my memory.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 02:00:32PM +, Jules Bean wrote:
FWIW, I was not allowed on the #debian-devel channel until I was a
developer either. I think it depended whom one spoke to about it.
I strongly suspect you're right about that.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Suffer
[ Please respect the reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
Hello,
first I'd like to thank the few people who have been constructive and
tried to help instead of denigrating and nitpicking on minor points.
I've decided to withdraw the general resolution proposed 2 weeks ago
about IRC as communication
Previously Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Because the most concerned people (Wichert as #debian-devel's channel
founder and Branden as an operator) didn't want to participate in the
discussion, not even respond to simple questions that would have let us
continue the work.
Fact is that the last 2
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 02:58:05PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
* #debian-devel has always been a channel for Debian development. It
never was a channel restricted to just Debian developers
This simply is not true, as I've said over and over again elsewhere.
Ask the people who were there
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 12:40:07PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
This simply is not true, as I've said over and over again elsewhere.
Ask the people who were there years ago, before you went by the nick
wiggy.
I am one of those people who was there when wiggy was wichert, and
I was told at
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 10:49:02AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
I am one of those people who was there when wiggy was wichert, and
I was told at the time that #dd was *not* restricted to developers.
Who told you that? I was told in ~January 1996 that only developers
were allowed. When I became
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
Now that the original proposer and 4 of the sponsors of this
GR have sent in statements supporting the withdrawal of this proposal,
this GR is now defunct.
manoj
- --
Perhaps the best thing about the future is that it only comes one
Previously Branden Robinson wrote:
This simply is not true, as I've said over and over again elsewhere.
Ask the people who were there years ago, before you went by the nick
wiggy.
I was there when the channel was created actually (ok, maybe 1 or 2
days later).
Wichert.
--
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 09:13:14PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
I also remember it as Wichert describes, and I've been around since
#debian was on a non-opn network.
So the people who asked me to leave #debian-devel when I wasn't yet a
developer somehow had a premonition of how much of a pain
13 matches
Mail list logo
