Package: kontact
Version: 4:4.13.1-1
Severity: serious
I experienced an upgrade failure due to a file conflict with korganizer:
Preparing to unpack .../kontact_4%3a4.13.1-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking kontact (4:4.13.1-1) over (4:4.12.4-1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 18:21 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Preparing to unpack .../kontact_4%3a4.13.1-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking kontact (4:4.13.1-1) over (4:4.12.4-1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/kontact_4%3a4.13.1-1_amd64.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite
See also https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333035
where a workaround is described as well.
--
Johan Spee
www.coonsden.com
Eve Ryth in Gisgon na Beal Right
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 13 June 2014 14:37, Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
Hi Tim,
We are looking to get virtuoso updated in Debian. I was referred to
http://wiki.lod2.eu/display/LOD2DOC/Installation+of+a+local+LOD2+stack as
an
alternative source and I see that you have done some work to
On Friday 13 June 2014 09:37:48 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Hi Tim,
We are looking to get virtuoso updated in Debian. I was referred to
http://wiki.lod2.eu/display/LOD2DOC/Installation+of+a+local+LOD2+stack as an
alternative source and I see that you have done some work to update package
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Tim Haynes wrote:
We are looking to get virtuoso updated in Debian. I was referred to
[2]http://wiki.lod2.eu/display/LOD2DOC/Installation+of+a+local+LOD2+stack
as an
alternative source and I see that you have done some work to update
package
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
Hi Tim,
We are looking to get virtuoso updated in Debian. I was referred to
http://wiki.lod2.eu/display/LOD2DOC/Installation+of+a+local+LOD2+stack as an
alternative source and I see that you have done some work to update
On Monday 16 June 2014 11:51:39 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
[snip]
do you see obvious warning points to keep in mind? there seems to be
not that many dependents on virtuoso's components, or am I
misunderstanding?
I don't remember virtuoso's internals, but for example the binaries can not
have
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
do you see obvious warning points to keep in mind? there seems to be
not that many dependents on virtuoso's components, or am I
misunderstanding?
I don't remember virtuoso's internals, but for example the binaries can not
qt4-x11_4.8.6+dfsg-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libqtcore4_4.8.6+dfsg-2_amd64.deb
qtcore4-l10n_4.8.6+dfsg-2_all.deb
libqt4-core_4.8.6+dfsg-2_amd64.deb
libqtgui4_4.8.6+dfsg-2_amd64.deb
libqt4-gui_4.8.6+dfsg-2_amd64.deb
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jun 2014 16:32:57 +
with message-id e1wwzq5-pp...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#747988: fixed in qt4-x11 4:4.8.6+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #747988,
regarding qt4-x11: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.6)
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jun 2014 16:32:56 +
with message-id e1wwzq4-pj...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#741190: fixed in qt4-x11 4:4.8.6+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #741190,
regarding qt4-x11: Improve atomic support on parisc
to be marked as done.
This means that
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On Monday 16 June 2014 12:20:24 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Do you see any dependent packages present in Debian which require those
binaries and would not be compatible somehow with 8.1?
The entire KDE stack needs the exact current version in the
On Monday 16 June 2014 12:20:24 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Do you see any dependent packages present in Debian which require those
binaries and would not be compatible somehow with 8.1?
The entire KDE stack needs the exact current version in the archive. And no,
it is not compatible with
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:10:58 -0300
Source: qt4-x11
Binary: libqtcore4 qtcore4-l10n libqt4-core libqtgui4 libqt4-gui libqt4-network
libqt4-opengl libqt4-script libqt4-scripttools libqt4-sql libqt4-sql-ibase
On Monday 16 June 2014 12:43:25 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Great -- thanks Sune for the feedback. It is just from previous
comments I was not sure if KDE is still relying/using virtuoso.
But if you state so -- must be so.
There is a move away from virtuoso - but the kde stack in stable uses
Package: libqt5serialport5-dev
Version: 5.3.0-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
There is a bug on this version of the Qt serial port library that prevents
opening of ports that do not implement RTS (Request To Send) and DTR (Data
Terminal Ready) -- like /dev/pts/* devices. This
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Sune Vuorela wrote:
Great -- thanks Sune for the feedback. It is just from previous
comments I was not sure if KDE is still relying/using virtuoso.
But if you state so -- must be so.
There is a move away from virtuoso - but the kde stack in stable uses
virtuoso
and
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forwarded 751799 https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-38640
Bug #751799 [libqt5serialport5-dev] libqt5serialport5-dev: Fails to open a port
that do not implement the full feature set
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jun 2014 23:48:34 +
with message-id e1wwgde-0006gf...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#751753: fixed in dns323-firmware-tools 0.7.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #751753,
regarding kontact: upgrade failure due to file conflict
to be marked as done.
This
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 751753
Bug #751753 {Done: Matt Palmer mpal...@debian.org} [kontact] kontact: upgrade
failure due to file conflict
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 751753
Bug #751753 [kontact] kontact: upgrade failure due to file conflict
Bug 751753 is not marked as done; doing nothing.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
751753:
I am trying to get kimpanel to work with my installation but the
documentation and feedback I get from the system (~ zero) makes difficult
to know what is going on.
What I have done:
- Using Debian Jessie with all latest packages updated.
- Installed ibus, ibus-anthy, ibus-mozc,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 751799 pending
Bug #751799 [libqt5serialport5-dev] libqt5serialport5-dev: Fails to open a port
that do not implement the full feature set
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
tag 751799 pending
thanks
[snip]
Hi Giulian!
5.3.1 is scheduled to go out this week, so it's just a matter of waiting a
little more :)
Let's shorten that waiting time ;-)
--
The volume of a pizza of thickness a and radius z can be described by
the following formula:
pi zz a
Lisandro
qtserialport-opensource-src_5.3.0-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
libqt5serialport5_5.3.0-3_amd64.deb
libqt5serialport5-dev_5.3.0-3_amd64.deb
qtserialport5-dbg_5.3.0-3_amd64.deb
qtserialport5-doc_5.3.0-3_all.deb
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jun 2014 03:52:24 +
with message-id e1wwkrc-0002ey...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#751799: fixed in qtserialport-opensource-src 5.3.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #751799,
regarding libqt5serialport5-dev: Fails to open a port that do not implement the
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:09:21 -0300
Source: qtserialport-opensource-src
Binary: libqt5serialport5 libqt5serialport5-dev qtserialport5-dbg
qtserialport5-doc qtserialport5-doc-html
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version:
28 matches
Mail list logo
