kowari:~# hdparm -t /dev/hd{a,g}{,}
/dev/hda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 152 MB in 3.02 seconds = 50.33 MB/sec
/dev/hda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 152 MB in 3.02 seconds = 50.33 MB/sec
/dev/hdg:
Timing buffered disk reads: 120 MB in 3.02 seconds = 39.74 MB/sec
/dev/hdg: Timing bu
Hello
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 02:03:46AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 01:49:59AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Luk Claes [Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:08:15 +0200]:
> > > Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > | Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > |>I have built the package in
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
>> Is there any plan to get GIMP 2.0 into Sarge ? It's been trying to
>> enter testing for *months* now, and is now blocking quite a few
>> packages.
>
> Yes. As long as no one uploads it unnecessarily, gimp should follow
> librsvg2 and libexif into
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 04:01:35PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> John Summerfield wrote:
>
> >Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> >>>fwiw I noticed something very like this between 2.2 and 2.4 when 2.4
> >>>was new: 2.2 was faster on my Pentium system. I think it was a
> >>>earlier version of the same c
Dear customer!
We updated our programs list, and now we offer you more new software items
Visit our full catalog and check new software titles here:
http://www.softbetterone.info/?booklet
With best regards,
Product Manager
Dominic Oconnor
Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> > I tracked the problem even further. Here is what I/we (Ulrich and I) did:
> >
> > * Compiled binutils 2.14.90.0.7-8 without the hppa-patch invented in
> >2.14.90.0.7-6.
> > * Compiled pwlib,
> > * Compiled openh323
> > * and compiled GM with that
Hi Martin,
> I tracked the problem even further. Here is what I/we (Ulrich and I) did:
>
> * Compiled binutils 2.14.90.0.7-8 without the hppa-patch invented in
>2.14.90.0.7-6.
> * Compiled pwlib,
> * Compiled openh323
> * and compiled GM with that version of binutils.
>
> This compile
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 11:33:25AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > Christoph Ulrich Scholler wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu Aug 26, 2004 at 12:03:53 +0200, I wrote:
> > > > As you suggested, I'll try to recompile both PWLib and openh323 with
> > > > binut
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> clamav is not part of the base system, does not have any binaries of
> priority standard or higher, and does not depend on KDE. For now,
> please upload your changes to sid only with medium or high urgency, and
> we can probably push it through t
Steve Langasek wrote:
We depend on the experts (the kernel team) for the information we need
in order to make good decisions -- or better, to help *you* make good
decisions.
Based on this thread and other discussions, I understand that the
current 2.4.26 packages are unsuitable for release beca
Hi Stephen,
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 01:12:11PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> I just saw the release status update on devel-announce (thanks for
> theat, BTW), and I had a question about it. I have gotten two
> translation related bug reports about clamav, and I would like to see
> these closed bef
Clint uploaded a new version to unstable a few days ago which should
probably also move to testing. Can someone please review and possibly
push it?
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Warning: I am not a DD yet thus I am speaking on my own behalf only.
* Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-28 13:12:11 -0400]:
> I need to upload to testing-proposed-updates, rahter than sid,
Exactly.
> and then also upload a regular package to sid, so that sid users also
> see the
Hello all,
I just saw the release status update on devel-announce (thanks for
theat, BTW), and I had a question about it. I have gotten two
translation related bug reports about clamav, and I would like to see
these closed before sarge releases. My understanding is that if I am to
do so, I need
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 05:15:40PM +0200, Pierre Machard wrote:
> it seems that the following hint need to be apply:
> "easy orbit2cpp/1.3.9-1 libbonobomm1.3/1.3.8-2.1"
Hint added.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
John Summerfield wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
fwiw I noticed something very like this between 2.2 and 2.4 when 2.4
was new: 2.2 was faster on my Pentium system. I think it was a
earlier version of the same chipset.
Here are results on 2.6.7-1-k7:
/dev/hda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 108 MB i
On 2004-08-27 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 09:39:59AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > Package: debootstrap
[...]
> > One of sarge's goals was to try to get rid of libgnutls10 and use
> > libgnutls11 instead. However debootstrap does not install it for sarge
>
Hi,
it seems that the following hint need to be apply:
"easy orbit2cpp/1.3.9-1 libbonobomm1.3/1.3.8-2.1"
Thanks to nutmeg for the advice,
--
Pierre Machard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org
GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0
Hi,
I am request help for building qt-x11-free on ARM as well, so finally
it would enter Sarge. My strongest opinion for requesting it is not that
it stalls a lot of package[1], but _it has two security fix that Sarge
does not have_ at the moment. See the changelog[2] for 3:3.3.3-4:
qt-x11-free (
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040828 12:38]:
> IMHO, the following packages should be pushed to testing. I'm however
> not 100% sure if this really works in all cases, or if ftp-master is
> needed sometimes (and also, IMHO the best solution would be to apply
> the invent-patch to britney).
>
Dear customer!
We updated our programs list, and now we offer you more new software items
Visit our full catalog and check new software titles here:
http://www.softbetterone.info/?reave
With best regards,
Product Manager
Gina Abraham
Hi,
IMHO, the following packages should be pushed to testing. I'm however
not 100% sure if this really works in all cases, or if ftp-master is
needed sometimes (and also, IMHO the best solution would be to apply
the invent-patch to britney).
Cheers,
Andi
force freeguide/0.8-1
# Section: contrib
I wanted to drop a quick thank you for the update and state that
with mails like this, I feel very comfortable with you guys handling
the release. It really feels like we are working as a team.
Keep it up!
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 11:24:12AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 09:25:20PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:58:06PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > > There was no final decision if we ship 2.4.27 with sarge.
> > I wonder what needs to happen to
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 11:24:12AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 09:25:20PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:58:06PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > > There was no final decision if we ship 2.4.27 with sarge.
> >
> > I wonder what needs to happen
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 09:25:20PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:58:06PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > There was no final decision if we ship 2.4.27 with sarge.
>
> I wonder what needs to happen to have a formal d-k decision.
> Do other subgroups of Debian have a m
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:58:06PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> There was no final decision if we ship 2.4.27 with sarge.
I wonder what needs to happen to have a formal d-k decision.
Do other subgroups of Debian have a mechanism for this? Maybe we
need a designated person or persons who can
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 11:30:27PM +0100, peter green wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joey Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 27 August 2004 22:59
> > To: debian-release@lists.debian.org; debian-boot@lists.debian.org;
> > debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: [
28 matches
Mail list logo
