On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:50:39AM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
I uploaded g-wrap 1.9.6-2, and it got built on all architectures
(except on ia64, due to a Guile bug, but it has never built on ia64
anyway). I'd like this version to go into Sarge, which currently has
1.9.5-2. Note that even
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 09:44:36AM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
Please, allow the following package uploaded to t-p-u, as requested to
circunvent newer version uploaded to unstable.
Approved, although this upload seems to include a gratuitous addition of a
dpatch build-dependency.
It
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:04:02AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
The check shown below is almost complete (but for a couple of 2.2 patches
and per-arch patches).
I'm asking if mass bug report filing is opportune at this stage.
IMHO patches which cannot be applied to debian
Hi folks,
It looks like the security-fix-only new upstream version of mozilla, 1.7.8,
has blocked again on kazehakase and enigmail (and probably on locale
packages, but I haven't gotten there yet) because the sarge versions of
these packages conflict with mozilla-browser (= 2:1.7.8).
The
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 01:16:50AM -0700, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi folks,
It looks like the security-fix-only new upstream version of mozilla, 1.7.8,
has blocked again on kazehakase and enigmail (and probably on locale
packages, but I haven't gotten there yet) because the
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 10:39:50AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
It looks like the security-fix-only new upstream version of mozilla, 1.7.8,
has blocked again on kazehakase and enigmail (and probably on locale
packages, but I haven't gotten there yet) because the sarge versions of
these
Please remove cantus from testing.
While I don't feel comfortable removing it from the archive altogether
because someone has indicated some interest in adopting it (but that
was a long time ago), it should not ship with sarge. FWIW, cantus3
has just been removed from unstable. Both cantus and
On 10297 March 1977, Frans Pop wrote:
If it is certain that non-US is empty on release date, lets make the text
a bit stronger:
sect1 id=non-usheadingnon-US obsoleted/heading
pFor the releasename; release, all packages that were formerly in the
non-US part of the archive have been moved
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 10:20:18AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Please remove cantus from testing.
While I don't feel comfortable removing it from the archive altogether
because someone has indicated some interest in adopting it (but that
was a long time ago), it should not ship with sarge.
Steve Langasek wrote:
The question is, how can we be proactive about identifying the classes of
changes that do or don't break these packages, so that mozilla can be
checked for compatibility at the time of upload instead of having kazehakase
and enigmail update their conflicts: after the
Mike Hommey wrote:
This time, the version update is supposed to be security only, and not
to break stuff. Thus, theorically, just changing the Conflicts: in the
control file is enough to have these programs depending on
mozilla-browser be able to use the security fix release.
Note that I
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 02:12:56PM +0200, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mike Hommey wrote:
This time, the version update is supposed to be security only, and not
to break stuff. Thus, theorically, just changing the Conflicts: in the
control file is enough to have these
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:41:11AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
- rename the unrar-nonfree package back to unrar
- rename the free unnrar package to unrar-free (it can even be left out
of sarge (version 0.0.1 that is the one year old latest upstream
version...))
- get the non-free package
The version in Sid of mozilla-firefox-locale-all fixes an important bug, as I
failed to include the postint and postrm files for
mozilla-firefox-theme-rtlclassic in the version in sarge (this bug is not in
DBTS, though, as I created the new package as soon as I realised on the
mistake).
This
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:59:26PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi and my kuddos to the Release Team. I'm not an XChat maintainer, rather
a user. This package has been in uploaded in unstable for two weeks now
and it fixes some serious bugs. Here is the changelog:
Sorry, but the diff
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 01:26:46AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Also, I couldn't locate the place where the upstream maintainer changed,
nor the place where MAINT_SEARCH was disabled. (And the diff is a bit
verbose due to changing the path of the diffs - well, I don't mind too
much for
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 02:01:09AM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
Just two sets of translation fixes requiring pushing. Please reset the
urgency on gnome-cpufreq-applet to medium if you feel it won't make it
into to testing in time for Sarge's release.
gnome-cpufreq-applet (0.3.1-6) unstable;
On Sunday 22 May 2005 11:51, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10297 March 1977, Frans Pop wrote:
pFor the releasename; release, all packages that were formerly in
the non-US part of the archive have been moved into the regular
archive. If you have any lines referring to non-us in your
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
hplip (0.9.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
Ooops! Version is 0.9.2-*2*, and not 0.9.2-3 as I wrote in the subject :(
Excuse for hplip
* 12 days old (needed 10 days)
* Unblock request by joeyh ignored due to version mismatch: 0.9.2-3
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 04:16:17PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
tsclient (0.132-7) unstable; urgency=medium
Hmm, could you please use the changelog entry for -6 it was uploaded
with? (At least with the correct person, I don't care about funny
remarks ;))
On second thought, approved for
Hello team,
The just uploaded mailutils 0.6.1-3 should go in Sarge as soon as it's
built, as it fixes 4 security vulnerabilities.
Thanks,
Jordi
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG
Hello,
please allow mutt 1.5.9-2 into sarge, it fixes an RC bug (FTBFS) and
contains a translation update.
Changelog entry follows, thanks.
mutt (1.5.9-2) unstable; urgency=high
* Added a missing Build-Depend on mawk. (Closes: #310039)
* Updated the Swedish translation.
Hi,
I've just made an NMU for gkrellm to close the RC-bug #309089. I've only
added a patch to make gkrellm use gnutls instead of (GPL-incompatible)
openssl.
I've been able to get my mail count (it's the only use of ssl in
gkrellm) over imaps and some people told me that they have been able to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
Both RC bugs in clearsilver have been fixed in NMUs (#310073 and
#310231). I can't judge whether the package as a whole is
release-worthy (I don't use it, but there are other non-RC bugs), but
the RC issues are fixed at least.
Regards,
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:20:39PM -0400, Ove Kaaven wrote:
søn, 22,.05.2005 kl. 00.10 -0700, skrev Steve Langasek:
Having four versions of gmime in a stable release means a four-fold increase
in the security team's workload if a security bug is found. (This is true
even if the bug only
Release team,
Please review zaptel 1:1.0.7-4.1 for sarge.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
- Forwarded message from Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 04:19:03 -0700
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 05:26:35PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Both RC bugs in clearsilver have been fixed in NMUs (#310073 and
#310231). I can't judge whether the package as a whole is
release-worthy (I don't use it, but there are other non-RC bugs), but
the RC issues are fixed at least.
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 05:53:26PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 06:28:03AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 04:17:20AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Since yesterday evening, the Kopete version in sarge is no longer able
to log into MSN
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:54:54PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:08:26PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
I uploaded a new upstream (oh well, upstream is me) of cpufreqd. It
fixes 3 memomry leaks and a segfault, changes are really trivial (diff
is included below).
søn, 22,.05.2005 kl. 00.10 -0700, skrev Steve Langasek:
Having four versions of gmime in a stable release means a four-fold increase
in the security team's workload if a security bug is found. (This is true
even if the bug only applies to one version, because the security team still
has to
Hi Chad,
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 02:01:06PM -0500, Chad Walstrom wrote:
tags 309648 pending patch sarge
thanks
Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitted a patch he pulled from
cheetah's CVS upstream repository that fixes this security hole. This
is an RC bug against sarge's version of the
I'm the (previous) maintainer of unrar. Jose Carlos Medeiros has offered to
adopt it.
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 02:36:50PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:41:11AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
- rename the unrar-nonfree package back to unrar
- rename the free unnrar
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 05:09:58PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
I've just made an NMU for gkrellm to close the RC-bug #309089. I've only
added a patch to make gkrellm use gnutls instead of (GPL-incompatible)
openssl.
I've been able to get my mail count (it's the only use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 01:26:46AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Also, I couldn't locate the place where the upstream maintainer changed,
nor the place where MAINT_SEARCH was
Hi,
On Sun, May 22, 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
The question is, how can we be proactive about identifying the classes of
changes that do or don't break these packages, so that mozilla can be
checked for compatibility at the time of upload instead of having kazehakase
and enigmail
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 07:20:52PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 05:09:58PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
I've just made an NMU for gkrellm to close the RC-bug #309089. I've only
added a patch to make gkrellm use gnutls instead of (GPL-incompatible)
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 13:57:06 -0400
Source: fltk1.1
Binary: fltk1.1-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.6-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Aaron M. Ucko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Aaron M. Ucko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
fltk1.1-doc -
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:40:26AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:04:02AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
The check shown below is almost complete (but for a couple of 2.2 patches
and per-arch patches).
I'm asking if mass bug report filing is opportune at
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:35:59AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:04:02AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
The check shown below is almost complete (but for a couple of 2.2 patches
and per-arch patches).
I'm asking if mass bug report filing is opportune at
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 09:51:47AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Release team,
Please review zaptel 1:1.0.7-4.1 for sarge.
Approved
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 09:08:34PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
On 2005-05-19 Steve Langasek wrote:
Thus BDB support could now complete been removed as luckily support for
BDB was not present on most architectures, disabled by default and
being warned at startup for a while now and
This release fixes #309937, an important bug that *might* be on the
borderline of grave (there's some user data loss, or at least something
that could be taken that way). I *fully* understand if you feel this is
just too late for this sort of fix; alas, it was only found on Friday.
I thought I'd
Hey Lawrence,
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:02:26AM -0400, Lawrence Walton wrote:
* New upstream release
This package is necessary to sync up with evolution 2.0.4,
Evolution and evolution-exchange should match up, and the 2.0.4
package fixes many bugs.
Closes #299504
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 09:27:42PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
I've just uploaded binutils 2.15-6 to unstable. This fixes #308625,
an RC security bug. The only change from 2.15-5 (in testing and
unstable) is:
* 123_bfd_overflow_fix.dpatch: new patch from Alan Modra to fix BFD
Hi,
I uploaded a new revision of somaplayer which fixes #309093 (RC) and
#297963 (FTBFS on amd64).
I simply sponsored this upload, the actual work was done by the
maintainer, Riccardo Setti [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Please CC: him on
replies.
Thanks.
ciao,
ema
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 01:00:53AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 09:27:52AM +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
Adalbert Dawid wrote:
Package: libgphoto2-2
Version: 2.1.5-5.0
Followup-For: Bug #308290
Indeed, after installing the three debs everything works fine
Il giorno sab, 21/05/2005 alle 21.12 -0700, Steve Langasek ha scritto:
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:15:20AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
Hi all,
I need help solving a licence issue with sarg. Tonight I found that sarg
upstream sources contain a font file that may not be free (Verdana.TTF).
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:42:30AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
I need to upload a new orig.tar.gz and don't know how to do that for
sarge.
You will need to upload a fixed package to testing-proposed-updates
since the version in unstable differs from the one in testing.
Which part do you
Steve Langasek writes:
Hi Matthias,
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:52:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Content-Description: message body text
I'm proposing the following updates for gcc-3.3 for testing:
gcc-3.3 (1:3.3.5-13) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
* Disable running the
* src/translator_ca.h: Revert accidental conversion to unicode.
Patch by Maximiliano Pin (closes: #309913).
the patch can be found in the bug report. The encoding was correct in
1.4.1 and is corrected in 1.4.3. Although one source file is affected,
the changes are limited to the message
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:22:46AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
* Rename icu-doc to icu21-doc. icu-doc is built by the icu28 package
as well.
patch at #310127.
Approved.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the last architecture did build 3.4.3-13 ten days before, no new
problems were reported.
gcc-3.4 (3.4.3-13) unstable; urgency=medium
* Don't call dh_shlibdeps on 64bit libraries (closes: #307625).
same fix as for gcc-3.3, may or may not be relevant on an updated
buildd.
* Append the GCC
Not sure, if that's RC, at least it enables one specific ISDN card to
work with capi4hylafax. I am unable to test this card myself. The bug
fix has been confirmed by another user.
capi4hylafax (1:01.02.03-11) unstable; urgency=medium
* Patch fixing c4h for Eicon cards (Sergio Chersovani):
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:39:55AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Not sure, if that's RC, at least it enables one specific ISDN card to
work with capi4hylafax. I am unable to test this card myself. The bug
fix has been confirmed by another user.
capi4hylafax (1:01.02.03-11) unstable;
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 02:08:48PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
The question is, how can we be proactive about identifying the classes of
changes that do or don't break these packages, so that mozilla can be
checked for compatibility at the time of upload instead of having kazehakase
and
55 matches
Mail list logo
