On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:56:28PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 07:46:42PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
The initial upload of libcapplet 1:1.5.11-12 failed to build on alpha,
arm, i386, and mipsel because of a
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051206 14:59]:
PS: One thing $random volunteer could do would be patching wanna-build
to Dep-Wait automatically for the obvious cases.
Auto-Dep-Wait works for some months now.
Cheers,
Andi
Aparently not
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:56:28PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 07:46:42PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
The initial upload of libcapplet 1:1.5.11-12 failed to build on
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:10:57PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Please allow discover1{,-data} packages to migrate to testing when the
timeframe ends. Current version has some nice bugfixes.
Hints added, thanks.
The parted update needs Joey to drop the hint he currently has for the old
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, buildd admins are responsible for fixing buildd problems. *Porters* are
responsible for *ensuring their port is a viable release candidate*. Given
that one of the release criteria is keeping up with unstable, porters most
definitely *are*
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 16:39, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
Twinkle is uninstallable on sid right now:
it depends on kdelibs4c2, but kdelibs4c2a is replacing
that package.
Giuseppe,
I'm pretty sure we are awaiting a binNMU from the release team for twinkle,
per:
* Mark Purcell [Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:45:46 +]:
Hi Mark,
digikam
digikamimageplugins
This two have been requested already, so should happen soon. (They
were being postponed a bit to let libkipi and libkexif get compiled in
all arches.)
twinkle
Now for the messy one. There are two
7 matches
Mail list logo
