Re: xlibs-dev removal and RC bug fun

2006-01-09 Thread David Martínez Moreno
El sábado, 7 de enero de 2006 23:53, Kevin B. McCarty escribió: Looks like xlibs-dev is now officially gone, which instantly creates a hell of a lot of RC (FTBFS) bugs that will manifest the next time rebuilds are attempted of xlibs-dev Build-Depending packages. (Maybe someone on the X team

Re: xlibs-dev removal and RC bug fun

2006-01-09 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
David Martínez Moreno wrote: El sábado, 7 de enero de 2006 23:53, Kevin B. McCarty escribió: Looks like xlibs-dev is now officially gone, which instantly creates a hell of a lot of RC (FTBFS) bugs that will manifest the next time rebuilds are attempted of xlibs-dev Build-Depending packages.

-doc packages for removed software

2006-01-09 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi, casually browsing the rc bug list, I noticed that while ploticus has been removed from testing, ploticus-doc still is in there[1]. Obviously it's not too useful to ship etch with ploticus-doc if the main package isn't included. Is there a (recommended) way to fix this? Filing an RC blocker

Re: non-free firmware

2006-01-09 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 07:00:00PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote: On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 06:24:34PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:35:40PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:58:16PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at

Re: xlibs-dev removal and RC bug fun

2006-01-09 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 05:53:26PM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: Looks like xlibs-dev is now officially gone, which instantly creates a hell of a lot of RC (FTBFS) bugs that will manifest the next time rebuilds are attempted of xlibs-dev Build-Depending packages. (Maybe someone on the X team

Re: non-free firmware in the linux kernel

2006-01-09 Thread Sven Luther
Hi all, I am cross posting to debian-release and debian-boot, since this will affect them too. On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:04:45AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: Hi, at least I lost track a bit, so this mail is basically a question to bring me up to speed. Ok, we had a long discussion on

Re: non-free firmware in the linux kernel

2006-01-09 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:03:13PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: I think everyone agrees that a) is not a possibility. Both b) and c) require a non-negligible amount of work, altough b) is less work than c), but c) is the better solution, and also to the best of my knowledge the one which upstream