On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:57:30PM +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060925 20:55]:
> > I'm hereby requesting an exception for both of these (plus xulrunner).
> > The main reason for this request is that upstream will stop security
> > su
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 06:38:10PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le lun 25 septembre 2006 15:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> > Hi, further to my mail yesterday about the broken dependency of
> > kcontrol on libraw1394-5, please find below a message sent to the
> > libraw1394 maintainer and his
Hello,
The libgnome*-dev packages dropped their .la files:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/libg/libgnomeprint/current/changelog#versionversion2.12.1-5
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/libg/libgnomeprintui/current/changelog#versionversion2.12.1-3
but a few .la files
Hi,
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060925 20:55]:
> I'm hereby requesting an exception for both of these (plus xulrunner).
> The main reason for this request is that upstream will stop security
> support for the 1.8.0 branch (which the current versions of the packages
> are based on) as soon a
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:25:15AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> At a minumum, the patch for tg3 exists and is fully
>> functional: check with [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the version against
er, that's @recycle.lbl.gov
I'm having him send me a copy.
>> the
>> up-to-date kerne
Hi RMs,
As you may or may not know, Firefox 2.0 and Seamonkey 1.1 are due at the
end of october. Thunderbird 2.0, on the other hand is due at the end of
november, beginning of december. While Thunderbird 2.0 would be hard to
get in time for etch (planned for early december), Firefox and Seamonkey
Le lun 25 septembre 2006 15:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Hi, further to my mail yesterday about the broken dependency of
> kcontrol on libraw1394-5, please find below a message sent to the
> libraw1394 maintainer and his answer.
>
> Is there a way to improve coordination amongst Debian maintai
klcc currently in libklibc-dev=1.4.27-1 on amd64 is broken. It
references /usr/local/bin/gcc.
The 1.4.27-1 upload [1] was made on amd64, so it seems to be a problem
with the maintainer setup [2]. Other buildd'ed packages do not exhibit
this problem, and buliding the package from source fixes the
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:04:10AM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> hyperestraier is currently not installable in sid:
> However, build-deps can be satisfied and the package does build. So
> could you please attempt a binNMU ?
Yep, scheduled.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 12:08:56PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> The following packages depend on libdbus-1-2 which is no longer
> available in the archives. Is it possible for these to get binNMUd to
> pull in libdbus-1-3 as their Depends?
> In unstable:
> Package: bluez-pin closes
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 02:04:40PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:09:48PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> >> What can be done to help along the dbus transition?
> > Fixing fontconfig accounts for at least 90% of it :)
> It looks like libdbus (or some package u
11 matches
Mail list logo
