Hi,
just to repeat: If you want to do the poppler transition, it is *your*
task to check:
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061005 21:22]:
- In any case, shouldn't we carefully check all affected packages,
whether they FTBFS and whether they still work? This would IMO
require a
Le mardi 10 octobre 2006 à 07:18 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe a écrit :
On 10/8/06, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Just today mike emmel fixed the boom bug, it should technically
possible switching to GTK+ 2.10.x.
Repeating this
clone 364749 -1
retitle 364749 Unclear license statement: LPPL or GPL?
retitle -1 Includes non-free files
thanks
Dear release team, dear Ohura-san,
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Die, 22 Aug 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
* add correct license statement into the copyright file
clone 364749 -1
retitle 364749 Unclear license statement: LPPL or GPL?
retitle -1 Includes non-free files
thanks
Dear release team, dear Ohura-san,
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Die, 22 Aug 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
* add correct license statement into the copyright file
clone 364127 -1
retitle 364127 contains non-free logos
# the original will be closed by my NMU
thanks
Dear Release Team,
this is an other incarnation of the pgf bug I just wrote about. The
very same non-free logos are included in the beamer orig.tar.gz, and
likewise it's license oscillated
On 10/10/06, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current plan is to ship GNOME 2.14 in etch [1]. This was a hard
decision to make, but we prefer shipping a rock-solid and polished 2.14
version rather than a buggy 2.16 version with which Ubuntu is having
many issues.
[1]
Guillem Jover writes (Re: How are things going?):
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 22:35:33 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Carry on :-)
Ok, there has been one last commit to svn, and I'd like approval
before the planned upload for today. Attached the diff. And here's
both changelogs entries.
I'm
Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
I paste here the last instance of the draft proposal by the debian kernel
team
[1]. Well, mostly me and Frederik, with direct input from Manoj, and
[reflecting
assorted comments from others, Steve and Anthony being the most prominent
ones.
Please review this,
If my analysis/understanding is correct, icu, xerces27, boost, and
parrot will need to be hinted into etch together but this is not yet
possible because boost and parrot have other issues right now that
prevent them from moving over. Is this correct? As icu maintainer,
is there anything I have
Hi,
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
Actually, I'm a bit confused at how openoffice.org migrated to testing
without ICU.
I temporarily built with internal icu (2.6!).
The next upload will have it built agianst system (and 3.6) again, i
didn't feel comfortable rushing the rwrite of a hiughe patch
Jay Berkenbilt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I'm a bit confused at how openoffice.org migrated to testing
without ICU.
Never mind.they reverted to the much older internal ICU because of
compatibility problems with icu 3.6.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hi,
madduck as the maintainer asked me to drop a note here:
Please remove thinkpad and tpctl from testing (bugs #392235 and
#392239), summary below.
thinkpad (source package) kernel modules do not seem to compile with
linux 2.6.18. This renders both thinkpad and tpctl (command line
interface to
12 matches
Mail list logo
