Release goal: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs

2009-08-17 Thread Andreas Barth
* Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org) [090816 18:11]: [...] After having some discussions on IRC yesterday, I propose the new release goal to get rid of all unneeded *.la-files and emptying dependency_libs otherwise (the second already has a good effect on archive stableness and avoiding funny

Please binNMU eet on all arches

2009-08-17 Thread Albin Tonnerre
eet needs to be rebuilt against the most recent version of eina: nmu eet_1.2.2-1 . ALL . -m 'eina (= eina_0.0.2.062-1)' Thanks, -- Albin Tonnerre signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Perl plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-17 Thread Steffen Mueller
Hi Martín, hi all, Martín Ferrari wrote: On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 14:41, Marc Brockschmidtm...@marcbrockschmidt.de wrote: * Which major upstream releases of perl are expected in the next two years? Which of those are material for Debian stable, which might be a bit flaky? Even if I don't

Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Xfce plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-17 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On dim, 2009-08-16 at 14:41 +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote: As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December 2009, and some developers have noted that their planned changes wouldn't be possible

Re: Perl plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-17 Thread Jeremiah Foster
On Aug 16, 2009, at 16:35, Martín Ferrari wrote: Hi Marc, On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 14:41, Marc Brockschmidtm...@marcbrockschmidt.de wrote: * Which major upstream releases of perl are expected in the next two years? Which of those are material for Debian stable, which might be a bit

Re: rebuild packages b-depending on libclucene-dev

2009-08-17 Thread Fathi Boudra
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Fathi Boudraf...@debian.org wrote: Package: bongoproject Package: bibletime Package: kdebase-runtime Package: soprano Package: strigi Package: sword minus strigi. I'm uploading a new upstream release. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Linux Kernel plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-17 Thread maximilian attems
[adding openvz guys on cc ] On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote: Removal of OpenVZ, Vserver and Xen packages These are large and intrusive patches which require significant upstream effort to adapt to each new kernel version. As a result, they generally lag availability of new kernel

Re: aptitude plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-17 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:41:08PM +0200, Marc Brockschmidt m...@marcbrockschmidt.de was heard to say: Heya, As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December 2009, and some developers have

Re: Linux Kernel plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-17 Thread Faidon Liambotis
Ben Hutchings wrote: Removal of OpenVZ, Vserver and Xen packages These are large and intrusive patches which require significant upstream effort to adapt to each new kernel version. As a result, they generally lag availability of new kernel versions and may take much longer to stabilise,

Re: Mirror team plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-17 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 11844 March 1977, Marc Brockschmidt wrote: Do you have any big changes planned? How much time would they take, and what consequences are there for the rest of the project? Thanks for asking, but luckily the mirror team plans do not affect the release or freeze time. We do have a lot of work

binNMUs due to haskell library uploads

2009-08-17 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, I uploaded haskell-network and haskell-parallel, and there are binNMUs due. Note that the script also cought some packages on ia64 that were built against the old ghc6 before: nmu ftphs_1.0.5-1 . alpha amd64 hppa i386 mipsel powerpc s390 sparc . -m 'Updated dependencies:

Re: Linux Kernel plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-17 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 20:51 +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote: Ben Hutchings wrote: Removal of OpenVZ, Vserver and Xen packages These are large and intrusive patches which require significant upstream effort to adapt to each new kernel version. As a result, they generally lag availability

Re: Linux Kernel plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-17 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:03:40PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 20:51 +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote: From your experience, is there a chance of that happening for 2.6.32? I don't think so. (the version targetted for squeeze I presume?) Given a December freeze,

Re: Linux Kernel plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-17 Thread Faidon Liambotis
Ben Hutchings wrote: Also, I remember reading about an effort on merging dom0 to mailine. From your experience, is there a chance of that happening for 2.6.32? I don't think so. For the record, Xen upstream[1] mentions dom0 support, currently planned for Linux 2.6.32 or 2.6.33 (latest pv_ops

please allow ltsp 5.1.81-2 into testing

2009-08-17 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
ltsp 5.1.81-2 is blocked from migrating into testing, due to the ltsp-client-builder udeb, though this udeb is not used by debian-installer by default, and has no changes since the previous version. it has been in unstable for 9 days without introducing new problems. thanks! live well,