Olá ,
Este programa não permite a visualização de mensagens formatadas (com cores,
imagens e links), portanto solicitamos que você copie o texto abaixo, e cole no
campo "Endereço" do seu navegador.
http://emkt.joaopauloeeduardo.com.br/emkt/tracer/?1,270155,48a59818,133d
Para garantir que nossas
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
As always on OOo upstream version bumps... (:-() we need a bin-NMU for
openoffice.org-voikko:
nmu openoffice.org-voikko_3.1.1-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against openoffice.org
3.2.1"
toge
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 03:32:26PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Would it be possible to upload a minimal version only carrying the security
> > patch to testing-security?
>
> Possible, yes. I'd like to avoid that, though if possible.
> It would need a rebuild, whereas I can upload -11 as
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 09:17:58PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > * debian/rules:
> > - fix variable to not add kfreebsd-i386 to OOO_MONO_ARCHS twice but
> > to actually add it to OOO_MOZILLA_ARCHS
Yes. (What you mentioned is debian/control regenerated with this)
Grüße/Regards,
Re
[ -release readers: the original, including the diff, can be found at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2010/06/msg1.html ]
On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 12:48 +, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I could have uploaded 1:3.2.1-11 to sid just it won't go into testing
> due to http://bugs.debian.org/cg
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:12, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> My idea was to have the j-a-c-k (jackd2) package provide the non-virtual
>> package libjack0, just like today. I didn't think it was important
>> which libjack implementation apps build against, and this seemed the
>> easiest / least disrup
On Saturday 05 June 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 23:41 +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > Please review apr/1.2.12-5+lenny2 for inclusion in lenny:
> This was accepted a couple of days ago, as you no doubt noticed.
>
> It's now built almost everywhere, although the alpha buil
On So, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:26:38 (CEST), Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:43:33 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
>> On So, Jun 06, 2010 at 00:15:54 (CEST), Julien Cristau wrote:
>>
>> > Your proposal talked about introducing a libjack-jackd2-0 and a
>> > libjack0-0
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 03:32:26PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> (and it fixes some other important stuff, too, as you see in the changelog.
> No XML signing support *only* on kfreebsd-i386 is, umm, bad. Same as
> dependency
> differences because of the bashisms...)
Oh, and -10 contains the
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 03:22:36PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Would it be possible to upload a minimal version only carrying the security
> patch to testing-security?
Possible, yes. I'd like to avoid that, though if possible.
It would need a rebuild, whereas I can upload -11 as-is already
(a
Hi,
* Rene Engelhard [2010-06-06 14:49]:
> same procesdure like last time. A few dasys (here: 2) before security
> disclosure something happens[1] which blocks sid->testing migration
> (and thus the security fix) for unknown time.
>
> I could have uploaded 1:3.2.1-11 to sid just it won't go into
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 22:43:24 +1000, Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Sunday 06 June 2010 22:31:01 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Please don't upload yet.
> >
> > The big issue here is that we can't currently build kdebase-runtime on
> > hppa, due to kde4libs FTBFS there (see #561203).
>
> Adam,
>
> No
On Sunday 06 June 2010 22:31:01 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please don't upload yet.
>
> The big issue here is that we can't currently build kdebase-runtime on
> hppa, due to kde4libs FTBFS there (see #561203).
Adam,
No problem waiting, my motivation is to clear a standing issue with slow
writing
On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 19:28 +1000, Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 June 2010 07:53:23 Mark Purcell wrote:
> > The following transition is proposed:
> >
> > exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9
>
> As there don't appear to be any problems/ objections.
>From my side, that was partly because
On dim., 2010-06-06 at 12:54 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Hmhm, sorry for the duplicates, updated list:
>
> Following list should work:
>
> nmu orage 4.6.1-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against updated xfce4-panel shlibs"
> nmu remmina-xfce 0.7.3-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against updated xfce4-panel
> s
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hey,
now that we have xfce4-panel 4.6.2 in testing, would it be possible to
schedule binNMUs of depending packages so they pick the << 4.7.0 shlib?
Following list should work:
nmu orage 4
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 11:35:14 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> The kfreebsd-amd64 build failed with:
>
> cd
> /build/buildd-insighttoolkit_3.18.0-2+b1-kfreebsd-amd64-iid6cj/insighttoolkit-3.18.0/Build/Wrapping/CSwig/Java
> && /usr/bin/javac -classpath
> /build/buildd-insighttoolkit_3.18.0-2+b
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 19:10:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> As a hopefully acceptable compromise, I've binNMUed it on i386 and
> kfreebsd-amd64. That would give attempts on two-thirds of the available
> architectures and, assuming no other issues, a complete set of builds.
>
The kfreebsd-am
On Tuesday 01 June 2010 07:53:23 Mark Purcell wrote:
> The following transition is proposed:
>
> exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9
As there don't appear to be any problems/ objections. I intend to upload to
unstable this week.
BinNMU requests to follow.
Mark
signature.asc
Description: T
Hi Reinhard,
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:43:33 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On So, Jun 06, 2010 at 00:15:54 (CEST), Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > Your proposal talked about introducing a libjack-jackd2-0 and a
> > libjack0-0.118+svn3796 package, AIUI. I don't understand why the
> > current lib
On So, Jun 06, 2010 at 00:15:54 (CEST), Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 16:09:53 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 15:36, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> > So I have a few questions about this plan:
>> > - if all implementations of libjack are binary-compatible, th
21 matches
Mail list logo
