Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package poppler
This NMU fixes a serious bug #586620 which is blocking migration of xpdf
packages to testing.
unblock poppler/0.12.4-1.1
-- System Information:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:24:04 -0300, Ulises Vitulli wrote:
On 10/08/10 21:46, Julien Cristau wrote:
Please file a serious bug against it documenting why it's not
releasable. I'll add a remove hint.
Cheers,
Julien
Filed, #593429.
Removal hint added, thanks.
Cheers,
Julien
Processing changes file: libapache-dbi-perl_1.07-1+lenny2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oldwb-0001ld...@franck.debian.org
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 22:50:34 +0200, Philipp Schafft wrote:
reflum,
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 13:22 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 09:07:37PM +0200, Patrick Matth??i wrote:
It is not oss-only; roaraudio just fucks up in the current code base if
there is ONLY alsa
On 08/17/2010 10:50 PM, Philipp Schafft wrote:
If this is ok with you we will upload by tomorrow I guess.
Did you see my mail about removing it from testing?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:29:27AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
Well, for upstream support there is: at the bottom of the page. According
to doko sparc32 code generation is unmaintained upstream, and he doesn't
want to step up to maintain it any longer.
Well, that is no less of a problem than
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 23:28:56 +0200, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
Hi team
I would like to ask if there is a possibility to make a freeze exception
for eric_4.4.7-1 which is a bug fix release since version 4.4.6.
The debdiff is attached.
Thanks in advance
Gudjon
[...]
diff -Nru
Hi Adam,
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 04:11:28PM -0400, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, July 29, 2010 10:02, Guido Günther wrote:
I'd like to upload a new version of libvirt to stable fixing two issues:
* CVE-2010-2242: Apply a source port mapping to virtual network
masquerading
reflum,
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 10:27 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 08/17/2010 10:50 PM, Philipp Schafft wrote:
If this is ok with you we will upload by tomorrow I guess.
Did you see my mail about removing it from testing?
Yes. Will answer to it soon. As I said in the original mail the
On Wed, August 18, 2010 10:15, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 04:11:28PM -0400, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
So far as I can see, the fix for this hasn't been applied to the
unstable
packages yet?
libvirt 0.8.3 is in unstable and the testing period is over. It'd didn't
On 08/18/2010 11:53 AM, Philipp Schafft wrote:
Also I don't see a relation between problems in the roaraudio package
and this small bug in muroard package. I just asked for both in a mail
to not need to send too much mails for packages with simular names.
I just wanted to be sure that you
* Betr.: Re: misc unblocks (Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:50:32 +0200):
* Betr.: Re: misc unblocks (Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:10:29 +0200):
On 08/14/2010 08:47 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
tryton-client (1.6.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
tryton-server (1.6.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
Were there any
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 07:49:49PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
Hi Release Team,
There's a problem with SQLite3 3.7.0 in Squeeze.
The version in testing (3.6.23.1-4) was suitable to release. Next major
upstream version (3.7.0) was released, which was uploaded to unstable.
Then freeze
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 19:17:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 16:42 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
It contains several worthwile fixes for Squeeze and
most importantly full fills the new initramfs policy.
please unblock.
A quick question on the diff:
+# Common
On Wed, August 18, 2010 11:28, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 19:17:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
A quick question on the diff:
[...]
So far as I can see, if /sbin/init is present and executable, but $init
is set to something else, then the init which will be executed is not
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 15:42:24 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
diff -u bgoffice-3.0/debian/rules bgoffice-3.0/debian/rules
--- bgoffice-3.0/debian/rules
+++ bgoffice-3.0/debian/rules
@@ -102,6 +102,9 @@
# $WORDLIST is the wordlist filename minus the .*wl.gz extension)
install -d
2010/8/18, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
As I said, my primary concern from a release point of view is whether
there are good reasons for doing the changes now, rather than waiting
for squeeze+1.
As Matthias said, the reason is to get the good llvm version installed
when users type
Your message dated Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:49:32 +0200
with message-id 4c6bbabc.9040...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#593147: unblock: tcsh/6.17.02-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #593147,
regarding unblock: tcsh/6.17.02-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:54:52 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Could you please unblock 1.1.1-2, I have only changed packaging. Only
upstream change is a patch to fix manpage (lines starting with dot).
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:52:33 +0200
with message-id 4c6bbb71.1030...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#593435: unblock: poppler/0.12.4-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #593435,
regarding unblock: poppler/0.12.4-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On 08/17/2010 09:36 PM, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
My other questions re: the Uploaders field remain.
If you have changes fixing rc bugs, then you might add this change.
Otherwise, no.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 08:50:46 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi,
please unblock the above version. It fixes a nasty bug regarding dsc
imports (which didn't get reported to the bts though):
* [f63c4ed] git-import-dsc: Don't add superfluous parents to imports on the
Debian branch. Only
On 08/17/2010 08:50 AM, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi, please unblock the above version.
In git-buildpackage-0.5.2/gbp-pq:
+maintainer=$(sed -n -e 's/Maintainer: \+\(.*\)/\1/p' debian/control)
+QUILT_PATCHES=$patches run_git quiltimport --author $maintainer
What happens when the rest of the
Dear release team,
please unblock libvirt 0.7.3-1. The version should have hit the archive
before the freeze got delayed by a couple of days. The upload fixes:
CVE-2010-2242, CVE-2010-2237, CVE-2010-2238, CVE-2010-2239
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:01:31AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Please
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:56:59 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
Please allow wesnoth-1.8 (1:1.8.3-3) to move over to squeeze. The
update now finally contains the unversioned wesnoth and wesnoth-core
packages for transitional purpose (#586291) and to ease upgrades to
later upstream
Hi!
* Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org [2010-08-18 13:26:28 CEST]:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:56:59 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Few questions:
diff -u wesnoth-1.8-1.8.3/debian/branchcheck
wesnoth-1.8-1.8.3/debian/branchcheck
--- wesnoth-1.8-1.8.3/debian/branchcheck
+++
On Wed, August 18, 2010 11:50, Arthur Loiret wrote:
2010/8/18, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
As I said, my primary concern from a release point of view is whether
there are good reasons for doing the changes now, rather than waiting
for squeeze+1.
As Matthias said, the reason is
On Wed, August 11, 2010 03:29, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Diffstat follows, diff attached.
Oops, forgot to attach. Here is the debdiff.
I see that this has been uploaded already. It would have been appreciated
if you'd pinged us about the lack of response rather than
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I see that this has been uploaded already. It would have been appreciated
if you'd pinged us about the lack of response rather than assuming that it
was equivalent to a go-ahead for upload.
Ah, sorry. My thought process was that (1) it is better to get more
testing in
On 08/17/2010 09:20 PM, Nicolas François wrote:
Dear release team,
I'd like to ask for a freeze exception regarding the manpages-fr
package, which produces two arch all binary packages containing
manpages.
Can I trade this unblock with an upload of src:shadow? :) It has 3 RC
bugs tagged
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 01:12:16PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 08/17/2010 08:50 AM, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi, please unblock the above version.
In git-buildpackage-0.5.2/gbp-pq:
+maintainer=$(sed -n -e 's/Maintainer: \+\(.*\)/\1/p' debian/control)
+QUILT_PATCHES=$patches run_git
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:08:53PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 08:50:46 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi,
please unblock the above version. It fixes a nasty bug regarding dsc
imports (which didn't get reported to the bts though):
* [f63c4ed] git-import-dsc:
On 08/12/2010 12:40 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
Possible solutions are:
- Remove the embassy-* packages,
- Upload emboss 6.2 from the snapshots to testing-proposed-updates,
- unblock the emboss and embassy packages from Sid.
I'm ok with the last solution (mainly because emboss was
On 08/18/2010 02:55 PM, Guido Günther wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 01:12:16PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 08/17/2010 08:50 AM, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi, please unblock the above version.
In git-buildpackage-0.5.2/gbp-pq: +maintainer=$(sed -n -e
's/Maintainer: \+\(.*\)/\1/p'
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 15:05:45 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:08:53PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 08:50:46 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
* [e8b6b49] gbp-pq: Use the maintainer of the Debian package as fallback
patch author
Not
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:55:15PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 01:12:16PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 08/17/2010 08:50 AM, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi, please unblock the above version.
In git-buildpackage-0.5.2/gbp-pq:
+maintainer=$(sed -n -e 's/Maintainer:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 13:48:50 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
* Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org [2010-08-18 13:26:28 CEST]:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:56:59 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Few questions:
diff -u wesnoth-1.8-1.8.3/debian/branchcheck
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 16:30:56 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:44:58AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 15:42:24 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
+# Make sure dpkg knows about bg-en.rws too, otherwise the file is not
+# deleted upon
Hi!
* Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org [2010-08-18 15:37:27 CEST]:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 13:48:50 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
* Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org [2010-08-18 13:26:28 CEST]:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:56:59 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Few questions:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 22:06:08 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
Hi all!
The ecl package currently is still affected by [0] -- RC bug caused
by a build failure / embedded copy of libgc. The upload to experimental,
where a new enough libgc is
On 08/16/2010 12:21 PM, Christian Kastner wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to ask for a freeze exception for cron 3.0pl1-114.
Unblocked.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:44:58AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 15:42:24 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
+# Make sure dpkg knows about bg-en.rws too, otherwise the file is not
+# deleted upon remove/purge.
+ debian/aspell-bg/var/lib/aspell/bg-en.rws
Shipping such
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:31:02PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 15:05:45 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:08:53PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 08:50:46 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
* [e8b6b49] gbp-pq: Use the
Julien Cristau writes:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 16:30:56 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:44:58AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 15:42:24 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
+# Make sure dpkg knows about bg-en.rws too, otherwise the file is
not +#
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:39:04PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 16:30:56 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
These files are supposed to be regenerated in postinst by
update-dictcommon-aspell; that's a feature.
Then why is it shipped in the package? Is it just so that
Hi the release team,
Please unblock wl-beta, I have uploaded 2.15.9+0.20100801-2 which
fixes an important bug #593396.
wl-beta (2.15.9+0.20100801-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* debian/patches/30_elmo-folder-open.patch: Fix that elmo database gets out
of sync, patch from upstream.
Hi the release team,
eblook (1:1.6.1-8) unstable; urgency=medium
* debian/patches/30_codeconv-size.patch: Patch to fix codeconv problems
(size_t vs int, etc.), from the upstream mailing list [edict 2711], on
2010-08-15, provided by Kazuhiro Ito. (closes: #593006)
A similar problem
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 19:49:49 +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
While it would be good to have 3.7.0.1-1 in testing, it's still not
suitable to release because of the latter problem. What should I do? I
don't have package version 3.6.23.1-4 anymore and I don't know when this
bug will be
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:36:34PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 11.08.2010 23:16, Neil McGovern wrote:
Hi Matthias,
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner.
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 11:42:42PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
gcc-4.5 should be released with squeeze, at least on amd64 and
On 08/18/2010 04:28 PM, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote:
Hi the release team,
eblook (1:1.6.1-8) unstable; urgency=medium
* debian/patches/30_codeconv-size.patch: Patch to fix codeconv problems
(size_t vs int, etc.), from the upstream mailing list [edict 2711], on
2010-08-15, provided by
Yavor Doganov writes:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:39:04PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 16:30:56 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
These files are supposed to be regenerated in postinst by
update-dictcommon-aspell; that's a feature.
Then why is it shipped in the
On 08/18/2010 04:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Sounds like we should go back to 3.6.x in testing and sid.
If we go that way, we will have to rebuild some packages [1] (red ones).
[1] http://release.debian.org/transitions/Sqlite3.html
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 17:39:57 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
So, should we proceed with that package the way it is?
I'd rather you didn't introduce that bug in stable (I'm no SRM though).
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Yavor Doganov writes:
Георги Данчев wrote:
I agree, that 'automatically removed by dpkg' games are best to be
avoided for regenerated files, and it is saner to remove them in the
postrm, since now debsums aspell-bg lists these three regenerated
files as FAILED, which is to be expected. I
Георги Данчев wrote:
I agree, that 'automatically removed by dpkg' games are best to be
avoided for regenerated files, and it is saner to remove them in the
postrm, since now debsums aspell-bg lists these three regenerated
files as FAILED, which is to be expected. I failed to catch that, so
On 18.08.2010 16:36, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:36:34PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 11.08.2010 23:16, Neil McGovern wrote:
Hi Matthias,
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner.
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 11:42:42PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
gcc-4.5 should be
Hi. I'm asking for an unblock of barnowl in order to fix a security
problem. Under certain error conditions an attacker or malicious IM
server could potentially exploit the vulnerabilities and run arbitrary
code.
Note that this unblock would move testing from 1.5.1 to 1.6.2. I came
very
Hi Michael,
synaptic 0.70~pre1 was uploaded to unstable a few days ago, do you
consider it a candidate for squeeze? I'm asking because it's one of the
reverse dependencies of libapt-pkg and xapian which both have scheduled
ABI bumps in the near future, so having synaptic out of the way would be
reflum,
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 22:46 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 08/16/2010 09:04 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
There are also no installations in Lenny which may break, just
because this package is quite new in Debian at all, we were just not
100% ready at the time where Squeeze has been
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 04:53:01PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 08/18/2010 04:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Sounds like we should go back to 3.6.x in testing and sid.
If we go that way, we will have to rebuild some packages [1] (red ones).
[1]
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 18:56 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 11:15 -0500, Charlie Smotherman wrote:
[...]
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:15:32 -0500
Charlie Smotherman cj...@cableone.net wrote:
I have prepared a updated version of ampache which fixes RC bugs
#593181, and
On 08/18/2010 07:15 PM, Charlie Smotherman wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 18:56 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 11:15 -0500, Charlie Smotherman wrote:
[...]
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:15:32 -0500
Charlie Smotherman cj...@cableone.net wrote:
I have prepared a updated version of
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 23:26:42 +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote:
Hi the release team,
Please unblock wl-beta, I have uploaded 2.15.9+0.20100801-2 which
fixes an important bug #593396.
wl-beta (2.15.9+0.20100801-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
*
Personally, I'd be comfortable with gcc-4.5 in Squeeze except for this
part:
- the upload will build several runtime libraries from the 4.5
sources. Regression tests did pass for the runtime libs built
from the 4.5 sources and for 4.4 using the runtime libs from
4.5.
This really gives
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 19:12:37 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Personally, I'd be comfortable with gcc-4.5 in Squeeze except for this
part:
- the upload will build several runtime libraries from the 4.5
sources. Regression tests did pass for the runtime libs built
from the 4.5
On 2010-08-18 19:49 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 19:12:37 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Personally, I'd be comfortable with gcc-4.5 in Squeeze except for this
part:
- the upload will build several runtime libraries from the 4.5
sources. Regression tests did
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 18:58 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 08/17/2010 09:16 AM, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
Hi,
shogun fails to build on mipsel (150 minute inactivity timeout
compiling a .cxx file of size 5.6MB:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592748
I also see
On 08/18/2010 08:10 PM, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
your cdbs tip helped, shogun built fine on mipsel on most other archs
now
I'm glad I've been helpful.
https://buildd.debian.org/~luk/status/package.php?suite=unstablep=shogun
Could you please unblock shogun 0.9.3-4 such that it can enter
Hi Adam,
On Friday, 13. August 2010, Jan Wagner wrote:
On Thursday, 12. August 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:12 +0200, Jan Wagner wrote:
php-suhosin (0.9.32.1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
* New upstream version (Closes: #584509)
- Improved random
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 12:21 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
I'd like to ask for a freeze exception for cron 3.0pl1-114. We were
looking to upload this version prior to Debconf, but ran into some
personal time issues.
I realise this has already been unblocked, but fwiw...
* debian/control:
On 08/18/2010 08:31 PM, Nicolas François wrote:
More seriously, I need to find what would be the preferred next shadow
release:
[1] Prepare an upstream release and a Debian package based on it
[2] Package the current upstream trunk (this is mostly ready but must be
tested, and I need to
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 20:48 +, Jan Wagner wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Friday, 13. August 2010, Jan Wagner wrote:
On Thursday, 12. August 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:12 +0200, Jan Wagner wrote:
Which is the upstream change which fixes #584509? The description above
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 21:50 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
For the special case of release 1.6.1:
Release 1.6 contained some heavy rewrites and cleanup of version 1.4.
Unfortunately there was lost just one really important functionality of 1.4 in
1.6.0, which made unluckily this release almost
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package dynare,
it contains only debconf translation updates. Changelog below:
dynare (4.1.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/po/da.po: new Danish debconf
Hi Mehdi,
On Aug 16, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 08/15/2010 09:33 PM, Jan Dittberner wrote:
Hello,
Adrian Glaubitz (CCed) prepared an upload for kcemu (debdiff
attached) to fix #592978, a FTBFS on kfreebsd and hurd-i386. Would
you unblock the package if I'd sponsor the
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 19:21 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Am 17.08.2010 00:17, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 13:46 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
mlt:
$ diff -Naur mlt-0.5.6/ /home/me/Coding/mlt/ --exclude=.git|diffstat
[...]
27 files changed, 391 insertions(+), 309
Hi,
yesterday, I uploaded a new package of roundup which fixes this
problem, reported against upstream:
http://issues.roundup-tracker.org/issue2550665
Kind regards,
--Toni++
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 15:43 +0100, nicho...@periapt.co.uk wrote:
The differences between 3.21 and 3.22 are more substantial. From
what I can see however the area of the bug was being worked on almost
right up until the release. In other words it looks to me as if the
patch forms a
Version 4.5-1 of approx, which I just uploaded to DELAYED/1, fixes two
important bugs (#589937 and #593428). Each fix is only one line.
Please consider allowing it into testing during the freeze. Thank you.
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 21:52 +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
yesterday, I uploaded a new package of roundup which fixes this
problem, reported against upstream:
http://issues.roundup-tracker.org/issue2550665
Thanks for the update.
There's also a packaging change which wasn't mentioned in the
[Adam D. Barratt, 2010-08-17]
Let me know if you'd like to correct any or all of those in a -14
upload, otherwise I'll just unblock -13.
please unblock it. It's fixed in bzr, but we'll wait for more changes
before uploading...
--
Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:08:34PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 08/18/2010 08:31 PM, Nicolas François wrote:
More seriously, I need to find what would be the preferred next shadow
release:
[1] Prepare an upstream release and a Debian package based on it
[2] Package the current
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 22:40 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
[Adam D. Barratt, 2010-08-17]
Let me know if you'd like to correct any or all of those in a -14
upload, otherwise I'll just unblock -13.
please unblock it. It's fixed in bzr, but we'll wait for more changes
before uploading...
Your message dated Wed, 18 Aug 2010 23:36:48 +0200
with message-id 4c6c5270.8080...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#593505: unblock: dynare/4.1.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #593505,
regarding unblock: dynare/4.1.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
This upload fixes RC bug #591600, by deleting RC-buggy postinst/prerm
scripts which are nowadays handled by a dpkg trigger. No other
significant changes have been made to this upload.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 08/18/2010 11:47 PM, Jo Shields wrote:
This upload fixes RC bug #591600, by deleting RC-buggy
postinst/prerm scripts which are nowadays handled by a dpkg trigger.
No other significant changes have been made to this upload.
Is it already uploaded or an intent to upload? I don't see it
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 23:51 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 08/18/2010 11:47 PM, Jo Shields wrote:
This upload fixes RC bug #591600, by deleting RC-buggy
postinst/prerm scripts which are nowadays handled by a dpkg trigger.
No other significant changes have been made to this upload.
Is it
On 08/18/2010 08:54 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 12:21 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
I realise this has already been unblocked, but fwiw...
Indeed - thanks!
* debian/control:
- Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.1 (no changes needed)
- Added Pre-Depends for
* Betr.: Re: misc unblocks (Wed, 18 Aug 2010 20:40:55 +0100):
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 21:50 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
For the special case of release 1.6.1:
Release 1.6 contained some heavy rewrites and cleanup of version 1.4.
Unfortunately there was lost just one really important
The group definitely knows about the issue. What other information
apart from opinions would be of use?
Quoting Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 15:43 +0100, nicho...@periapt.co.uk wrote:
The differences between 3.21 and 3.22 are more substantial. From
what
Hi,
Squeeze currently has version 1.0.4-1 of the Cherokee webserver. This
version suffers from a series of SSL/TLS problems (worst of all is
that it just won't work with Firefox).
I am uploading version 1.0.8-1 - Upstream's release notices since
1.0.4 include:
1.0.5
- NEW: Much better UTF-8
Dear Debian release team,
I'm Remko 'Rubidium' Bijker, the release manager of (upstream) OpenTTD.
I've got good contact with the Debian package maintainer of OpenTTD;
he has actually read and commented on this before sending it to you.
As I am not the Debian package maintainer the diffs and
Le Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 03:20:54PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
Nevertheless, there is an issue with embassy-phylip:
embassy-phylip | 3.69-1 | testing/non-free | source, amd64,
ia64, mips, mipsel, s390, sparc
embassy-phylip | 3.69-1 | unstable/non-free | source, ia64,
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
Shipping such a file in the package means it'll get emptied every time
the package in re-installed or upgraded. That sounds wrong.
This is weird, but the aspell packages have been doing this for quite some
time, long enough that there's an explicit
Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org writes:
On 08/17/2010 08:50 AM, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi, please unblock the above version.
In git-buildpackage-0.5.2/gbp-pq:
+maintainer=$(sed -n -e 's/Maintainer: \+\(.*\)/\1/p' debian/control)
+QUILT_PATCHES=$patches run_git quiltimport --author
Russ Allbery writes:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
Shipping such a file in the package means it'll get emptied every time
the package in re-installed or upgraded. That sounds wrong.
This is weird, but the aspell packages have been doing this for quite some
time, long enough
Processing changes file: smarty_2.6.20-1.3_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: lxr-cvs_0.9.5+cvs20071020-1+lenny1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Would this fix be appropriate for squeeze, or should I hold off?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586459
The bug's probably not important since the circumstances involved are
likely to be rare, but the consequences are fairly severe.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb
On 08/18/2010 11:47 PM, Jo Shields wrote:
This upload fixes RC bug #591600, by deleting RC-buggy postinst/prerm
scripts which are nowadays handled by a dpkg trigger. No other
significant changes have been made to this upload.
Unblocked.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 21:19 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
Thanks, please ping us again when the package is accepted to get the
unblock.
Both cvsd 1.0.19 and nss-pam-ldapd 0.7.8 are now both in unstable.
Translations for nss-pam-ldapd are coming in now. Is there a date before
which you prefer to
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
