On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
Now, to be clear, what nice things would gcc-4.5 bring to our users?
There is a complete list here [0], but those ones are,
Hi Adam,
On Sun, 22.08.2010 at 15:58:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
As I said above, it's unlikely that a package not even in unstable will
get in to squeeze now.
I fully understand, but also thought that the program itself is both
benign and valuable to the
Hi,
I have just uploaded a new version of drush to unstable:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/drush/news/20100822T173214Z.html
This fixes a major usability issue due to a mis-packaging I originally
did (forgot to include a file) described in #588639.
The full diff from 3.1-1 is attached. It
В Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:55:44 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy написа:
The transition monitor shows that order. If the order inferred from
the build-dependencies is incorrect, then there is a problem in your
packages.
There is no problem with the build-dependencies. The only problem is
when a package gets
Hi,
I am one of the upstream developers of the Aegir project and the
maintainer of the Debian package. Some time ago, I have uploaded version
0.3-2.2, which bundles the upstream 0.3 version.
That version is now very old. Nobody uses is in production, and even
though the subsequent releases are
Hi,
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure I understand that bug, how you're planning on fixing it, or
why you need to use setfacl instead of udev-acl as many other devices
nodes already do.
udev-acl is meant for ConsoleKit integration and doesn't do anything for
you
On 08/23/2010 10:34 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
В Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:55:44 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy написа:
The transition monitor shows that order. If the order inferred from
the build-dependencies is incorrect, then there is a problem in
your packages.
There is no problem with the
On 23.08.2010 10:03, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
Now, to be clear, what nice things would gcc-4.5 bring to our users?
There is a
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:41:40AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 23.08.2010 10:03, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
Now, to be clear,
I've just uploaded libgtk2-spell-perl 1.03-5 to fix RC bug #591129. The only
change is adding a missing build-dependency, required by the test suite,
debdiff attached.
--
Chris Butler chr...@debian.org
GnuPG Key ID: 4096R/49E3ACD3
diff -Nru libgtk2-spell-perl-1.03/debian/changelog
On 23.08.2010 12:03, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:41:40AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 23.08.2010 10:03, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200,
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
Now, to be clear, what nice things would gcc-4.5 bring to our users?
There is a complete list here [0], but those ones are,
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:21:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
Now, to be clear, what nice things would gcc-4.5 bring
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:03:05AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
Now, to be clear, what nice things would gcc-4.5 bring to
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:45:35PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:03:05AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Dear Release Team
Please unblock package libdbd-sqlite3-perl
This is a request to unblock libdbd-sqlite3-perl if we can upload it.
Niko Tyni found a patch for the FTBFS in
On 23.08.2010 13:45, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:03:05AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
Now, to be clear, what
On 23.08.2010 13:21, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
Now, to be clear, what nice things would gcc-4.5 bring to our users?
There is a
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:42:42 +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Ping?
#590240 is still open, I thought that was a prerequisite...
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, August 18, 2010 11:50, Arthur Loiret wrote:
2010/8/18, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
This package still needs a bit of work, but not on this
side.
Ah, I'd assumed everything was basically ready to go and just waiting to
be uploaded. How much is a bit of work? One issue I
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 02:02:35PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 23.08.2010 13:21, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
Now, to be
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 02:05:25PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 23.08.2010 13:30, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:21:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Aug
On Sun, August 22, 2010 20:46, Mike Markley wrote:
I've prepared a fix for an outstanding grave bug (#481072) in dk-filter
(the sole binary package from the dk-milter source package). I'd like to
upload it for inclusion into squeeze.
The package hasn't been in squeeze for several months now,
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:14:14PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Hi Michael,
Hi,
sorry for the late reply, I was on vacation for a couple of days.
synaptic 0.70~pre1 was uploaded to unstable a few days ago, do you
consider it a candidate for squeeze? I'm asking because it's one of the
Hi,
On Mon, August 23, 2010 09:32, The Anarcat wrote:
I have just uploaded a new version of drush to unstable:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/drush/news/20100822T173214Z.html
This fixes a major usability issue due to a mis-packaging I originally
did (forgot to include a file) described in
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 02:05:25PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 23.08.2010 13:30, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:21:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Aug
Hi,
FAI version 3.4.0 is sitting in NEW currently:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/fai_3.4.0.html
I'm the release manager of the FAI 3.4 release(s) and asked the FTP
team to let FAI through NEW, Jörg suggested to get approval by the
release team beforehand. Here I am. :)
Some background
Hi,
On Mon, August 23, 2010 09:41, The Anarcat wrote:
In fact, we are very close to getting 0.4 out the door. That release
will be maintained for stability and security fixes, and would be a much
better candidate for Squeeze than 0.3.
Therefore, my question is: what should we do with Aegir
On Mon, August 23, 2010 11:06, Chris Butler wrote:
I've just uploaded libgtk2-spell-perl 1.03-5 to fix RC bug #591129. The
only change is adding a missing build-dependency, required by the test
suite, debdiff attached.
Unblocked.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
I just uploaded haskell-leksah-server_0.8.0.6-2, which fixes an RC bug in
0.8.0.6-1. The patch is attached.
Greetings.
--
marcot
http://wiki.debian.org/MarcoSilva
haskell-leksah-server_0.8.0.6-2.diff
Description: Binary data
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi again.
Excerpts from Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva's message of Seg Ago 23 10:13:07
-0300 2010:
(...)
I just uploaded haskell-leksah-server_0.8.0.6-2, which fixes an RC bug in
0.8.0.6-1. The patch is attached.
It seems I haven't fixed the bug completely in 0.8.0.6-2, so I uploaded
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:56:55PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, August 23, 2010 09:41, The Anarcat wrote:
In fact, we are very close to getting 0.4 out the door. That release
will be maintained for stability and security fixes, and would be a much
better candidate for
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Julien Cristau wrote:
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
So three solutions IMHO:
i) keep foomatic-filters in lenny-style, with Chris as maintainer
(basically foomatic-* MIA), no update towards Squeeze;
ii) upload foomatic-filters 4.0.5-* with the dpkg-vendor thing
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:46:12PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, August 23, 2010 09:32, The Anarcat wrote:
I have just uploaded a new version of drush to unstable:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/drush/news/20100822T173214Z.html
This fixes a major usability issue due to a
2010/8/23, Pierre Habouzit madco...@madism.org:
It's just that LTO isn't that a compelling reason, it's not 100%
production ready. The plugin infrastructure is though. But you're citing
dragonegg, and last time I checked, you had to patch gcc to export one
more symbol. If you haven't applied
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:15:14AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
libdb5 has been failing to build on mips and mipsel for over 5 weeks,
and apparently nobody cares.
I have multiple packages linked to it which have not been able to move
to testing, should I rebuild them for tpu or can I expect this
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 15:03:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The bug concerns how the prove utility handles testing scripts
directly. Anyway other members of the Debian Perl group will want to
express an opinion.
Did any of them do so and simply fail to Cc -release? :-)
The group
openbsd-inetd (0.20080125-5) unstable; urgency=medium
* Added --oknodo to the init script. (Closes: #592582)
-- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:33:09 +0200
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
--- munin-1.4.5/debian/changelog
+++ munin-1.4.5/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+munin (1.4.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Tom Feiner ]
+ * munin-plugins-extra: conflicts with lenny's munin-node (Closes: #590630)
+ * Bump standards-version to 3.9.1, no changes necessary.
+
+ -- Tom
I am digging deeper but apart from confirming that the issues are real
and fixed by 3.22 I have not got anything yet. I am trying to build what
a patched 3.21 would be and get a more informed opinion but the required
patch does look big to me.
gregor herrmann wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010
2010/8/21 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
We're (finally) getting ready to start this. Can you provide an outline
of the changes you want to get in?
Basically the package which is bumming around in experimental
plus a few bugfixes which are in the pipeline and (hopefully a lot)
of updated
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package fbi. It properly limits the archs to
our Linux based ports (with the exception of s390). (#593400)
The old broken KFreeBSD and Hurd binaries have been removed by
FTP
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:41:12 +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
I am digging deeper but apart from confirming that the issues are
real and fixed by 3.22 I have not got anything yet. I am trying to
build what a patched 3.21 would be and get a more informed opinion
but the required patch does look
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 18:40 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
+ * munin-plugins-extra: conflicts with lenny's munin-node (Closes: #590630)
+ * Bump standards-version to 3.9.1, no changes necessary.
The first changelog entry is slightly misleading, given that it's a
Replaces. :)
Unblocked.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
All the RC bugs seem fixed in darcs-buildpackage, but it doesn't
migrate. It's not clear to me what the problem is, maybe it needs
to be forced in somehow?
Cheers,
Moritz
-- System
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 18:35 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
openbsd-inetd (0.20080125-5) unstable; urgency=medium
* Added --oknodo to the init script. (Closes: #592582)
The package doesn't appear to contain any changes to the init script:
changelog |6 ++
control |2 +-
2 files
[Miriam Ruiz]
Gnash 0.8.8 has just been released today [1]. I think that the big
improvements and the lack of reverse dependencies might make it a
suitable candidate for an exclusion to the freeze. Moving Gnash 0.8.8
to Squeeze won't affect any other package.
It would affect Debian Edu
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Ping?
#590240 is still open, I thought that was a prerequisite...
Yes, indeed, it is. So a new version of acl would be OK for the release
team?
Nathan, what's the status on your end?
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE jbla...@debian.org | Debian,
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:44:57AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 18:36:18 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi release team,
system-config-printer in Squeeze is quiet outdated (1.0.0). I've prepared a
new
upstream version (1.2.3) in experimental some time ago:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 16:00, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote:
I have no idea if this is enough or not; Nicholas and v.nix.is, what
do you think?
I didn't track down what commits exactly were pertinent to fixing
this, I just did a log from 3.21 to the master at the time and picked
all
Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:23:45 +0100
with message-id
1282587825.20979.250.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
and subject line Re: Bug#594098: unblock: darcs-buildpackage/0.5.12.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #594098,
regarding unblock: darcs-buildpackage/0.5.12.2
to be
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 10:53 -0400, The Anarcat wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:46:12PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, August 23, 2010 09:32, The Anarcat wrote:
[...]
The full diff from 3.1-1 is attached. It does include some unrelated
changes (remove an extra licence
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
That said, you could also set good dependencies like what has been
done for OCaml packages for instance and make them not installable
if it doesn't match your criteria
Interesting. Is dh-ocaml the right package to look at?
If it's not too hard, it'll be nice to implement
Please unblock dctrl-tools 2.14.1.
This is a translation update with the following additional changes:
* I changed one string to make it easier to translate. The
included translation updates all incorporate this change.
* I updated Standards-Version with no packaging changes.
* All
Hi Adam, thanks very much for taking a look!
On Aug 21, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 09:17 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
* debian/rules: moving tarball .c files out of the way so swig will
rebuild and ship the .py files. (Closes: #593642)
So far as I
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 21:52 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
Please unblock dctrl-tools 2.14.1.
This is a translation update with the following additional changes:
* I changed one string to make it easier to translate. The
included translation updates all incorporate this
Hi Adam,
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
317 files changed, 12971 insertions(+), 4237 deletions(-)
which is saner but was still a pain to review.
yes I agree.
The changelog suggests that the fix for that bug was simply the addition
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 10:51 -0400, The Anarcat wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:56:55PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, August 23, 2010 09:41, The Anarcat wrote:
In fact, we are very close to getting 0.4 out the door. That release
will be maintained for stability and security
On 08/23/2010 08:33 PM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
That said, you could also set good dependencies like what has
been done for OCaml packages for instance and make them not
installable if it doesn't match your criteria
Interesting. Is dh-ocaml the right package to look at? If
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 592697
Bug #592697 {Done: Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk}
[release.debian.org] unblock: java-common/0.39
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
592697:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 592697 unblock: java-common/0.40
Bug #592697 [release.debian.org] unblock: java-common/0.39
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: java-common/0.40' from 'unblock:
java-common/0.39'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
reopen 592697
thanks
Hi,
thanks for unblocking 0.39 but my upload did not work as expected
because the arch any packages got downgraded on mips. I have
introduced an epoch for the arch any packages now. The upload includes
the switch to openjdk on powerpcsce as discussed at
Hi,
Please consider the following diff for fixing bug #593744, severity
important (not yet uploaded to sid).
I have not fixed the two other outstanding issues: no debian/source/format
and not-quite-up-to-date standards version. If you would like them fixed in
this release, I'm happy to do so in
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 14:27:00 +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:14:14PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Hi Michael,
Hi,
sorry for the late reply, I was on vacation for a couple of days.
synaptic 0.70~pre1 was uploaded to unstable a few days ago, do you
consider
Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:53:13 +0200
with message-id 4c72edc9.7000...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#594115: RM: kfreebsd-7/7.3-7 (testing)
has caused the Debian Bug report #594115,
regarding RM: kfreebsd-7/7.3-7 (testing)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 15:36:50 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 02:28:37PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Assuming that my explanations are satisfactory, did you want to see a
new diff for placing the configure options into a variable?
I went ahead and
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 19:06 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
2010/8/21 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
We're (finally) getting ready to start this. Can you provide an outline
of the changes you want to get in?
Basically the package which is bumming around in experimental
plus a few
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:06:56AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
is going to succeed even if configure doesn't. Should probably use
something like
mkdir $(TMPBUILD_MIT)
cd $(TMPBUILD_MIT) \
LDFLAGS=$(LDFLAGS) -L/usr/lib/mit-krb5 -Wl,-z,defs \
Hi there,
those are the minutes of Monday's IRC meeting at #debian-release.
1) What will be the release architectures for squeeze?
- sparc will be kept as a release architecture for now. The gcc code
generation code which moved to v9/32bit has taken place in Nov 2009.
There will be
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The primary issue I can see is that the Xapian transition overlaps with
the apt transition. Both are in turn currently blocked by the fact that
aptitude FTBFS on s390.
As mentioned on IRC, we're running the apt and xapian transitions
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 07:40 +1000, Mark Purcell wrote:
Please remove egoboo from squeeze, it is currently incompatible with
egoboo-data and neither are really release quality.
Does leaving egoboo-data in testing on its own make any sense, or should
both be removed?
Regards,
Adam
--
To
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 22:41 +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
So, what do you think is still missing? What would we need to
communicate
as a disclaimer to the users if releasing kFreeBSD in this state?
[...]
With my DSA hat on I have to
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 22:23 +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
thanks for unblocking 0.39 but my upload did not work as expected
because the arch any packages got downgraded on mips. I have
introduced an epoch for the arch any packages now. The upload includes
the switch to openjdk on powerpcsce as
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 00:57, Miriam Ruiz mir...@debian.org wrote:
* 100% of all YouTube videos should work. If you have problems,
delete all YouTube cookies and refresh.
Wow! So I'll finally get rid of flashplugin-nonfree?
--
blog: http://tshepang.tumblr.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:46:05 +0100
with message-id
1282603565.21871.1177.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
and subject line Re: Bug#594097: unblock: fbi/2.07-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #594097,
regarding unblock: fbi/2.07-5
to be marked as done.
This means that
[sorry pkg-geany-team for the resend, but -release discarded the message with
the attach]
Hello RMs,
Geany upstream released a bugfix release with some big bugs fixed that I think
is worth including in Squeeze.
Said bugs are:
- An infinite loop in Markdown lexer
- A segfault on Tools-Reload
Okay a sleepless might so I have some conclusions.
First of all any patched version needs to be based off 3.21 not 3.20
because the jump from 3.20 to 3.21 is really small and only affects test
files.
I extracted patch files for the suggested git commits. The total line
count is 492 though I
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package nipype
0.3 release (present in squeeze atm) was the first release in 0.3 series and
upstream followed it up shortly with two bugfix releases:
Release 0.3.1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package psychopy
1.61.03 is a bugfix release on top of upstream 1.61.02.
1.61.02.dfsg-2 (present in squeeze atm) already contained major fixes from
1.61.03, and
Dear release team,
I am the maintainer of the inkscape vector graphics program and SVG editor.
The inkscape project finished the release of version 0.48.0. The public
announcement happened yesterday. During the last week, I prepared a package
which was uploaded to experimental by my sponsor Guido
80 matches
Mail list logo
