Re: Bug#641128: tentative upload to stable-proposed-updates [cython]

2011-09-18 Thread Ondřej Čertík
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote: Dear Release team, I wonder would an upload to s-p-u be ok to fix a regression in cython package, which is apparently of importance for some users (who even triaged repository to the specific  commit resolving

Bug#637664: Re: Bug#637664: pu: package tzdata/2011h-0squeeze1

2011-09-18 Thread Youssef Eldakar
On 09/17/2011 07:57 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 16:40 +0200, Youssef Eldakar wrote: On 01/-10/-28163 09:59 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:23 +0400, Eugene Barbashin wrote: [Russian law changes on October 30th] For the record, after some

Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-09-18 Thread Robert Millan
2011/9/17 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:   * Fix net802.11 stack kernel memory disclosure (CVE-2011-2480).     (Closes: #631160)     - 000_net80211_disclosure.diff This looks okay, although I think you meant #631161. Yes, indeed #631161. Your last message in the log there says

Processed: block 637809 with 640346

2011-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 637809 with 640346 Bug #637809 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.14 Was blocked by: 628507 637602 631045 638894 628499 636132 638367 636762 629255 636651 628505 639677 628503 634531 636656 634397 628501 634141 628500 Added blocking

Processed: block 637809 with 640347

2011-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 637809 with 640347 Bug #637809 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.14 Was blocked by: 631045 637602 628507 638894 628499 640346 636132 638367 636762 629255 636651 628505 639677 628503 634531 636656 634397 628501 634141 628500 Added

Bug#637114: pu: package grub2/1.98+20100804-15

2011-09-18 Thread Robert Millan
2011/9/17 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: How much testing have the proposed patches had on Squeeze systems? kfreebsd-9_ada_devices.patch and zfs_packed_la_array.patch have been tested for over a month (both in unstable/wheezy and my squeeze desktop with ZFS).

Bug#637111: pu: package freebsd-libs/8.1-6

2011-09-18 Thread Robert Millan
2011/9/17 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 14:51 +, Robert Millan wrote:   * Move libsbuf.so.0 to /lib (needed by /sbin/zfs and /sbin/zpool).     (Closes: #637100)   * Move libipx.so.2 to /lib (needed by ifconfig). Have the portions of this change which

Re: Gajim 0.13.4-4

2011-09-18 Thread Yann Leboulanger
On 09/17/2011 07:48 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 09:34 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote: I fixed an important functionality bug in Gajim that makes it use 100% CPU when connecting (#634880) [0]. I added a patch (attached) that is already in newer versions of Gajim for months

Re: v86d 0.1.10 for Squeeze?

2011-09-18 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 08:26:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Any chance of debdiffs for stable and oldstable so we can look at possibly getting this resolved in the next point release? (For which the NEW queue will be frozen during the weekend of October 1st). For stable it would be

Bug#641020: pu: package nss-pam-ldapd/0.7.14

2011-09-18 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:42:57PM +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote: I would like to upload a new release of nss-pam-ldapd for squeeze that fixes a few annoying bugs. These are all one or two-line changes that have been available in the development series for some time now. thanks, please go

Bug#637020: pu: package zfsutils/8.1-5

2011-09-18 Thread Philipp Kern
Robert, am Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 03:45:12PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben: 2011/8/8 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org: I presume that it would still unshare the volume prior to umount? Your change seems to contradict the OpenSolaris ZFS documentation[1].  It postulates that automatic

Processed: tagging 641020

2011-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 641020 + confirmed Bug #641020 [release.debian.org] pu: package nss-pam-ldapd/0.7.14 Added tag(s) confirmed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 641020:

Processed: tagging 637020

2011-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 637020 + confirmed Bug #637020 [release.debian.org] pu: package zfsutils/8.1-5 Added tag(s) confirmed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637020:

Re: v86d 0.1.10 for Squeeze?

2011-09-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 16:57 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote: On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 08:26:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Any chance of debdiffs for stable and oldstable so we can look at possibly getting this resolved in the next point release? (For which the NEW queue will be frozen

Re: Gajim 0.13.4-4

2011-09-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 13:29 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote: On 09/17/2011 07:48 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 09:34 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote: I fixed an important functionality bug in Gajim that makes it use 100% CPU when connecting (#634880) [0]. I added a patch

Bug#637114: pu: package grub2/1.98+20100804-15

2011-09-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 637114 + confirmed thanks On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 12:55 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/9/17 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: How much testing have the proposed patches had on Squeeze systems? kfreebsd-9_ada_devices.patch and zfs_packed_la_array.patch have been tested for over

Processed: Re: Bug#637114: pu: package grub2/1.98+20100804-15

2011-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 637114 + confirmed Bug #637114 [release.debian.org] pu: package grub2/1.98+20100804-15 Added tag(s) confirmed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637114:

Re: tentative upload to stable-proposed-updates [cython]

2011-09-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 22:21 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: I wonder would an upload to s-p-u be ok to fix a regression in cython package, which is apparently of importance for some users (who even triaged repository to the specific commit resolving the issue). Patch (see commit below)

Bug#637840: pu: package git/1:1.7.2.5-3

2011-09-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 637840 + confirmed thanks On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 13:55 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 19:33 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: - fast-import: accept no-op feature notes command for frontends use to declare they require an importer able to

Processed: Re: Bug#637840: pu: package git/1:1.7.2.5-3

2011-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 637840 + confirmed Bug #637840 [release.debian.org] pu: package git/1:1.7.2.5-3 Added tag(s) confirmed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637840:

Bug#637020: pu: package zfsutils/8.1-5

2011-09-18 Thread Robert Millan
2011/9/18 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org: please use version 8.1-4+squeeze1 and target stable.  Otherwise ACK, please go ahead. Uploaded, thanks. Btw, is there any guideline on when to use X.Y+squeezeZ and then to just increment Y? I notice that both schemes are used. -- Robert Millan --

Bug#638190: pu: package shelldap/0.2-1+squeeze1

2011-09-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 638190 + confirmed thanks On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 19:56 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Please find attached the proposed debdiff without the Recommends addition. It takes upstream patch but with the discussed change to use an eval block, and a require instead of use. Thanks. Assuming

Processed: Re: Bug#638190: pu: package shelldap/0.2-1+squeeze1

2011-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 638190 + confirmed Bug #638190 [release.debian.org] pu: package shelldap/0.2-1+squeeze1 Added tag(s) confirmed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 638190:

[Fwd: Re: Gajim 0.13.4-4]

2011-09-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Yann Leboulanger aste...@lagaule.org wrote, Sun, 18 Sep 2011 19:32:50 +0200 On 09/18/2011 05:47 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Please could you provide a debdiff against the current stable package (i.e. debdiff $stable.dsc $new.dsc) for a final check? Sure. It's attached Thanks. I'd generally

Re: [Fwd: Re: Gajim 0.13.4-4]

2011-09-18 Thread Yann Leboulanger
On 09/18/2011 07:38 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Yann Leboulangeraste...@lagaule.org wrote, Sun, 18 Sep 2011 19:32:50 +0200 On 09/18/2011 05:47 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Please could you provide a debdiff against the current stable package (i.e. debdiff $stable.dsc $new.dsc) for a final check?

Bug#637114: pu: package grub2/1.98+20100804-15

2011-09-18 Thread Robert Millan
2011/9/18 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 12:55 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: kfreebsd-9_ada_devices.patch and zfs_packed_la_array.patch have been tested for over a month (both in unstable/wheezy and my squeeze desktop with ZFS). raid_number_uniqueness.patch and

Processed: tagging 640922, tagging 641155, tagging 636945, tagging 633460, tagging 637114, tagging 633475 ...

2011-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 640922 + squeeze Bug #640922 [release.debian.org] pu: package eglibc/2.11.2-10 (Was: Bug#639897: Please don't check /proc/mounts) Added tag(s) squeeze. tags 641155 + squeeze Bug #641155 [release.debian.org] pu: package

Bug#637664: Re: Bug#637664: pu: package tzdata/2011h-0squeeze1

2011-09-18 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 06:57:01PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 16:40 +0200, Youssef Eldakar wrote: On 01/-10/-28163 09:59 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:23 +0400, Eugene Barbashin wrote: [Russian law changes on October 30th] For the record,

Re: request to upload update-inetd 4.38+nmu1+squeeze1

2011-09-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 20:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 11:03 +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 07:33:47PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote [edited]: On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 22:22 +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: update-inetd parses successfully

Bug#637020: pu: package zfsutils/8.1-5

2011-09-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 637020 + pending thanks On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 18:51 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/9/18 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org: please use version 8.1-4+squeeze1 and target stable. Otherwise ACK, please go ahead. Uploaded, thanks. I've marked the package for acceptance at the next

Bug#637114: pu: package grub2/1.98+20100804-15

2011-09-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 637114 + pending thanks On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 21:20 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/9/18 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 12:55 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: kfreebsd-9_ada_devices.patch and zfs_packed_la_array.patch have been tested for over a month (both

Bug#641020: pu: package nss-pam-ldapd/0.7.14

2011-09-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 641020 + pending thanks On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 17:05 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:42:57PM +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote: I would like to upload a new release of nss-pam-ldapd for squeeze that fixes a few annoying bugs. These are all one or two-line changes that

Processed: Re: Bug#641020: pu: package nss-pam-ldapd/0.7.14

2011-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 641020 + pending Bug #641020 [release.debian.org] pu: package nss-pam-ldapd/0.7.14 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 641020:

Processed: Re: Bug#637020: pu: package zfsutils/8.1-5

2011-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 637020 + pending Bug #637020 [release.debian.org] pu: package zfsutils/8.1-5 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637020: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637020

Processed: Re: Bug#637114: pu: package grub2/1.98+20100804-15

2011-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 637114 + pending Bug #637114 [release.debian.org] pu: package grub2/1.98+20100804-15 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637114:

Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-4)

2011-09-18 Thread Ben Hutchings
I intend to upload a new version of linux-2.6 to unstable tomorrow. This will include upstream stable update 3.0.4 and various other bug fixes. It should not involve an ABI bump. Let me know if there is anything this should wait for. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Power corrupts. Absolute power is

stable-proposed-updates: considering cpufrequtils

2011-09-18 Thread Mattia Dongili
Hi Release Team, I'm wondering if it's worth updating cpufrequtils in Squeeze to the current version in testing/unstable. There are a couple of fixes that are worth considering in there and namely: fixing support for linux 3.0 (some modules have been moved and broke assumptions in cpufrequtils

Re: request to upload update-inetd 4.38+nmu1+squeeze1

2011-09-18 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:03:06PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote [edited]: The upload happened, and I've flagged the package for acceptance at the next dinstall. great, thanks Adam! -- Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2011-09-18 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: zfsutils_8.1-4+squeeze1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: nss-pam-ldapd_0.7.14_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: update-inetd_4.38+nmu1+squeeze1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

Re: Upcoming Point Releases

2011-09-18 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 10:33 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:27:55 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 23:59 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: I believe we're now ready to do the kernel update, having got most of the security fixes done separately. I'm