Bug#648628: transition: gpsd

2011-12-13 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2011-12-01 20:37, Niels Thykier wrote: block 645105 by 648628 tags 648628 + pending thanks Hi, A little status update on this. gpsd has migrated to testing so we are nearly done now. :) On 2011-11-13 17:04, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: [...] Hi Release Team, gpsd's service library

Bug#651808: pu: package jabberbot/0.9-1+squeeze1

2011-12-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 20:19:29 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: tag 651808 + squeeze confirmed thanks On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 10:57 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: I'd like to get #651621 fixed in squeeze. jabberbot has a race-condition on connect where it sets up its callbacks before setting

Bug#651925: britney: refactor undo code into a method

2011-12-13 Thread Niels Thykier
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: patch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: britney Hi, Attached is a patch that should do that. I have tested it on the britney test suite and live data from 2011-10-19 (reduced to i386 and amd64). That being said, I would

Bug#651940: nmu: koffice_1:2.3.3-2

2011-12-13 Thread Luca Falavigna
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu koffice_1:2.3.3-2 . ALL . -m Rebuild for libpqxx3 transition Please schedule binNMUs for koffice 1:2.3.3-2 to be rebuilt against new libpqxx3 to get rid of libpqxx-3.0 and

potential tiff transition, tiff 4.0.0 strategy

2011-12-13 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
(Please CC me on replies; I am not subscribed to debian-release.) After many moons, it appears that a final, non-beta release of libtiff 4.0.0 is imminent. tiff-4.0.0~beta7 is in experimental, and some 4.0 beta has been in experimental since August, 2009. I recently learned that the tiff 4.0.0

Re: [SRM] Uploading new upstream stable version to Squeeze?

2011-12-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 17:55 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: I have attached a new version of what we plan to upload. It includes a few more fixes backported from the unstable version (look at the end of the changelog), and also a few more fixes from upstream (no new stable version have been

Bug#651925: britney: refactor undo code into a method

2011-12-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 10:03 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: Attached is a patch that should do that. I have tested it on the britney test suite and live data from 2011-10-19 (reduced to i386 and amd64). That being said, I would appreciate a review or two just in case. After a certain amount of

Re: Planning for final lenny point release (5.0.10)

2011-12-13 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 12693 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: From the experience of etch's EOL point release, we'll need a little time to sort out any remaining build issues for security packages after the end of support. The earliest we'd therefore be looking at would be the weekend of 11/12th February.

Bug#651925: britney: refactor undo code into a method

2011-12-13 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2011-12-13 21:03, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 10:03 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: Attached is a patch that should do that. I have tested it on the britney test suite and live data from 2011-10-19 (reduced to i386 and amd64). That being said, I would appreciate a review or

Re: Planning for final lenny point release (5.0.10)

2011-12-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 21:39 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: On 12693 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: From the experience of etch's EOL point release, we'll need a little time to sort out any remaining build issues for security packages after the end of support. The earliest we'd therefore

Bug#651925: marked as done (britney: refactor undo code into a method)

2011-12-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:49:13 +0100 with message-id 4ee7c859.5040...@thykier.net and subject line Re: Bug#651925: britney: refactor undo code into a method has caused the Debian Bug report #651925, regarding britney: refactor undo code into a method to be marked as done. This means

Re: Planning for final lenny point release (5.0.10)

2011-12-13 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 12693 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Does sound fine to me, but do you really want only one week between the end of security and the final point release? Its not much time, should security really push out something that ends up plenty broken... How high THAT possibility is i dont know,

Re: Planning for final lenny point release (5.0.10)

2011-12-13 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 08:53:12PM +, Adam Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 21:39 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: On 12693 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: From the experience of etch's EOL point release, we'll need a little time to sort out any remaining build issues for security

Bug#648628: marked as done (transition: gpsd)

2011-12-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:42:46 +0100 with message-id 4ee7d4e6.6070...@thykier.net and subject line Re: Bug#648628: transition: gpsd has caused the Debian Bug report #648628, regarding transition: gpsd to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Re: Debian artwork for Wheezy

2011-12-13 Thread Valessio Brito
I think the attempt to tender / call for proposal has already happened more than once and did not work very well. My proposal would be the convening of interested people to work under the same concept and proposal. Would not the construction of several themes, all parties could work on a concept

Re: [SRM] Uploading new upstream stable version to Squeeze?

2011-12-13 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 06:41:54PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 17:55 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: I have attached a new version of what we plan to upload. It includes a few more fixes backported from the unstable version (look at the end of the changelog), and also a

Bug#652015: pu: package iotop/0.4-2

2011-12-13 Thread Paul Wise
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ker...@lists.debian.org iotop bug #644616 needs to be fixed in stable because the elevant change in Linux has been added to the 2.6.32 longterm tree, which the Debian Linux