Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
unblock bdii/5.2.12-1
Hi!
The bdii package was removed from testing due to an RC bug, together
with the packages that depends on it. The 5.2.12-1 update fixes the RC
bug (bug #663
Hello,
(writting with my release assistant hat on, and cc-ing the release team
accordingly.)
Jason White (29/07/2012):
> It's unrealistic to expect the accessibility to work smoothly in 3.4,
> which will be released with Wheezy. For example, the log-out dialogue
> is not accessible and, so far a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package frontaccounting
Fixes RC bugs #618771 and # 682249.
unblock frontaccounting/2.2.10-3.1
diff -Nru frontaccounting-2.2.10/debian/changelog frontaccounting-2.2.10/debia
On Saturday, July 28, 2012 02:31:50 PM Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 03:39:51 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > As far as I know, the only issue that's come up with the 2.7.3-2 is the
> > urlparse module where they simplified it and dropped some options which
> > gave some package
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mlt
I had to disable the --luma-compress option on mips, so that
building the package does not time out anymore.
With enabled luma-compressing, the luma files are als
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 28/07/2012 15:40, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> Control: tags 682808 + squeeze confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 16:16 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
>> The spip package currently in stable is vulnerable to some security
>> issues (#677290, #672961,
Am Samstag, den 28.07.2012, 14:59 +0100 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 00:39 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Please unblock package libsbsms
> >
> > The new upstream release 2.0.1 contains just one bug fix (found by the
> > Audacity developers). This bug fix touches src/buffer.c
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2012 21:48:09 +0100
with message-id <1343508489.18013.108.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683113: unblock: insighttoolkit/3.20.1+git20120521-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #683113,
regarding unblock: insighttoolkit/3.20.1+git20120521
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package insighttoolkit.
Once again, please unblock insighttoolkit. This last upload fixes an issue with
signalling NaN behavior on gcc 4.7 on i386 platform.
This allowed ru
On 12-07-28 at 04:47pm, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> - this change looks slightly odd:
>
> * Do not run doxygen if it is not installed.
>
> doxygen is in B-D-Indep and only appears to be used when building the
> arch:all -doc package. On that basis, why would it not always be
> installed when re
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 11:06 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Please unblock package xorg-server. 1.12.3 is a bugfix release made
> from upstream's stable branch. The debdiff contains a lot of irrelevant
> changes to autotools/yacc/lex-generated files, which we delete and
> regenerate on build anyw
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 16:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 19:47 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 23:14 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > > A fixed pandoc has been uploaded (1.9.4.2-2)
> [...]
> > Ignoring tests and the Slideous stuff makes it a little
Processing control commands:
> tags 682808 + squeeze confirmed
Bug #682808 [release.debian.org] pu: package spip/2.1.1-3squeeze4
Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed.
--
682808: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682808
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr
Control: tags 682808 + squeeze confirmed
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 16:16 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> The spip package currently in stable is vulnerable to some security
> issues (#677290, #672961, #680118), the last one being pretty nasty…
>
> Having no answer from the security team, I hereby propos
I made a bit of a mess with respect to the emacs metapackage in unstable
and wheezy that I'd like to fix.
The problem is that both emacs23 and emacs24 provide the emacs
metapackage, and of course, at DebConf, Adam pointed out that as soon as
we need updates to emacs23, we'll have a problem.
One
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2012 20:30:03 +0100
with message-id <1343503803.18013.96.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683101: unblock: pyspf/2.0.7-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #683101,
regarding unblock: pyspf/2.0.7-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package pyspf
Fixes RC bug 683098.
unblock pyspf/2.0.7-3
diff -u pyspf-2.0.7/debian/changelog pyspf-2.0.7/debian/changelog
--- pyspf-2.0.7/debian/changelog
+++ pyspf-2.0.7/d
Am 28.07.2012 15:23, schrieb Mike Miller:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:51:06AM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
>> Le Fri, 27 Jul 2012 19:47:41 -0400,
>> I think both should be done as some VPN modules (like nm-strongswan)
>> are already using a full path.
Yep, I think doing both is sensible and
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 16:21:10 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 16:03:46 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'd like to see lua5.1/5.1.5-4 can be unblocked so I c
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 11:59:07 +0200, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:18:29PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 17:51:56 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > > Nope, 1.16.5. I'd like to see that to get a view as to why 1.16.5 was
> > > broken. Once we've managed to
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 11:45:37 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 12:40 +0200, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Oh, and also, I want to see a specific ack/nack from the SRMs for:
> > --- dpkg-1.16.4.3/debian/source/options 2012-06-09 14:32:05.0 +
> > +++ dpkg-1.16.8/debian/so
On 28.07.2012 18:25, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I can see that they're changes from upstream. I can't see what the
> changes actually are because the diff is basically "remove the entire
> file and add it back".
Ah, ok.
It seems someone changed all line endings from unix to windows.
I attached the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package tuareg-mode
This upload fixes serious bug #681823 that made upgrading tuareg-mode from
squeeze to wheezy fail when emacs24 is installed.
Diff with the previous vers
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 18:22:01 +0200, Christian Welzel wrote:
> On 28.07.2012 14:53, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > What's typo3/contrib/extjs/resources/resources.jsb, and what's the
> > rewrite of that file about? Same with
> > typo3/sysext/em/res/js/ux/filter/*
>
> These are changes from upstr
On 28.07.2012 14:53, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> please unblock typo3-src 4.5.17+dfsg1-1 from freeze. It is a
>> upstream bugfix only release and contains a fix that prevents the
>> backend of the CMS to work properly if the build-in js/css
>> compressor is acitivated. There are no packages that depe
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 17:29 +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> Please unblock package freevo
>
> I just found out I overlooked a RC bug in freevo; I uploaded corrected
> version 1.9.2b2-4 ; see attachments; please provide exception.
The RC bug appears to have been introduced in -3, which has consequently
Hi Julien, and others,
On 12-07-28 at 01:33pm, Julien Cristau wrote:
> For a request like this, if it takes more than 5 minutes to process
> it's a waste of our time. Having a clear changelog helps avoid that,
> as does not arguing or getting on your high horse when asked
> clarification quest
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Depends: vlc libav (not considered)
>
> The new libav does not have an unblock request ttbomk and from a quick
> look at the diff I'm not prepared to unblock it without at least some
> discussion (there are changes which don't appear
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package freevo
I just found out I overlooked a RC bug in freevo; I uploaded corrected
version 1.9.2b2-4 ; see attachments; please provide exception.
unblock freevo/1.9.2b2-
(resent due to rejection due to 8-bit data in headers)
Philipp Schafft writes ("Re: Please grant freeze exception for RoarAudio
related packages"):
> On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:58 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 15:51:15 +0200, Philipp Schafft wrote:
> >
> > > Will you be
Just to be clear...
2012/7/28 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo :
> We've all been spending more time on this that this package
> really deserves.
I'm also including you (Philipp) in this group, for the P-a-s file and
these e-mails; as well as other debian-release folks who looked at it.
So please,
2012/7/28 Philipp Kern :
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 02:02:47PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> These changes that you mention, were introduced the 26th of April for
>> 0.3.1-2, well before the release, without any bug report being
>> submitted since then. This is what it's already au
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 19:47 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 23:14 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > A fixed pandoc has been uploaded (1.9.4.2-2)
[...]
> Ignoring tests and the Slideous stuff makes it a little happier to look
> at, although it's still larger than I'd like. Un
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 00:44 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> VLC 2.0.3 is a bug fix release of upstreams 2.0.x maintanence branch.
> It contains a bunch of fixes.
Expanding on that would have been useful...
> You can review them in our git repository [1]. There are many changes
> to extras/package/
Thank you Niels -- I am reporting that I have filed those bug
reports and closed #679315 (succeeded upon re-build)
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > ants
> >
> > [...]
> > FTBFS atm on mips, mipsel, s390 imho due to insufficient resources
> >and might be tricky to make the
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:31:10 +0100
with message-id <1343485870.18013.61.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683082: unblock: postgresql-common/134
has caused the Debian Bug report #683082,
regarding unblock: postgresql-common/134
to be marked as done.
Thi
Hi Steve,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 20:26:36 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Yes, it's a judgement call, I'd agree. My thinking is that (a) it's
> already building on all architectures (low risk) and (b) has somewhat
> better support for GCC 4.7 and (c) it's Boost :-)
>
Could providing updated b
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 18:27 +1000, Alexander Zangerl wrote:
> Please unblock package vmware-manager
>
> the version in unstable fixes rc bug #680481,
> which is a file name conflict between the
> packages vmm and vmware-manager: both
> provide a program named vmm, and the man page is
> causing the
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:05:22 +0100
with message-id <1343484322.18013.55.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683079: unblock: awesome/3.4.13-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #683079,
regarding unblock: awesome/3.4.13-1
to be marked as done.
This means th
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
unblock postgresql-common/134
Hello release team,
I have uploaded version 133 and 134 of postgresql-common which fixes
two really important bugs which should go into Wheezy, as well as som
reflum,
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:58 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 15:51:15 +0200, Philipp Schafft wrote:
>
> > Will you be so kind and allow uploads for aroarfw, ckport, muroard and
> > vclt-tools?
> >
> You don't need our permission for uploading, so go ahead.
Oh. I'm
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 00:39 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Please unblock package libsbsms
>
> The new upstream release 2.0.1 contains just one bug fix (found by the
> Audacity developers). This bug fix touches src/buffer.cpp and
> src/buffer.h [1]. All other changes are just visual clutter and ha
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:59:55 +0200
with message-id <20120728135955.go17...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#682467: unblock: blist/1.3.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #682467,
regarding unblock: blist/1.3.4-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package awesome
This is a new release upstream with only a short list of bug fix. The main
important one is to fix an important usability regression (see #681364).
unblock a
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 15:51:15 +0200, Philipp Schafft wrote:
> Will you be so kind and allow uploads for aroarfw, ckport, muroard and
> vclt-tools?
>
You don't need our permission for uploading, so go ahead.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Saturday, July 28, 2012 03:37:16 PM Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 00:55:52 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Please unblock package blist
> >
> > Fi
On Saturday, July 28, 2012 02:31:50 PM Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 03:39:51 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > As far as I know, the only issue that's come up with the 2.7.3-2 is the
> > urlparse module where they simplified it and dropped some options which
> > gave some package
flum,
Small background: I left the Debian project because of the
CELT/Opus/mumble/RoarAudio case. Because of Ron's bad timing all of this
falls into the freeze interval. I'm very sorry about this.
Some time ago I asked if I should file O or RM bugs for my packages. You
told me that you have no pr
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:44:36 +0200
with message-id <20120728134436.ga19...@spike.0x539.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#682827: nmu: libgeier0_0.13-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #682827,
regarding nmu: libgeier0_0.13-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
On Saturday, July 28, 2012 02:30:36 PM Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 03:39:51 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > As far as I know, the only issue that's come up with the 2.7.3-2 is the
> > urlparse module where they simplified it and dropped some options which
> > gave some package
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:43:31 +0200
with message-id <20120728134331.gm17...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#682468: unblock: python-colorama/0.2.4-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #682468,
regarding unblock: python-colorama/0.2.4-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means
On Saturday, July 28, 2012 02:14:04 PM Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 03:39:51AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > My recommendation is that you unblock python2.7, but increase the age
> > requirement to 30 days (it's at 14 righ now) and that you also unblock
> > linkchecker (#682603
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 00:55:52 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package blist
>
> Fixed RC bug #681583
>
Would it be better to remove it instead? Before the fix
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 15:02:12 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> The first one became a release goal AFAICS.
>
Reference?
> The second and the last were not enough, but are needed to fix the RC
> bug AFAICS.
>
Can you be more specific please?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signa
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:51:06AM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Le Fri, 27 Jul 2012 19:47:41 -0400,
> Mike Miller a écrit :
>
> > On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:44:13AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > > Am 28.07.2012 00:31, schrieb Mike Miller:
> > > > Just happened to spot this, sorry if I'm i
Hi,
Neil McGovern wrote:
> dpkg-1.16.8/dpkg-deb/main.c
> -" -h|--helpShow this help message.\n"
> -" --versionShow the version.\n"
> +" -?, --help Show this help message.\n"
> +" --versionSho
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 02:02:47PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> These changes that you mention, were introduced the 26th of April for
> 0.3.1-2, well before the release, without any bug report being
> submitted since then. This is what it's already authorised to migrate
> in the u
2012/7/28, Philipp Kern :
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 11:58:28AM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
> wrote:
>> I would like to ask an unblock to sdl-stretch/0.3.1-3.
>>
>> There's an unblock already for sdl-stretch/0.3.1-2 because it was in
>> unstable before the freeze, but -2 failed to build in
On 07/28/2012 02:57 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 14:42:46 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
>> On 07/28/2012 02:35 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> The changes in -2 are out of scope for the freeze IMO.
>>
>> Can you be more specific please?
>>
> Specifically I mean the open-vm-tools 2
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 09:29:09PM +0900, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Ah, gcc-4.4 will stay? That's an option which should work, yes.
Yep, it will. See for instance [1].
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-superh/2012/04/msg1.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 14:42:46 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 07/28/2012 02:35 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > The changes in -2 are out of scope for the freeze IMO.
>
> Can you be more specific please?
>
Specifically I mean the open-vm-tools 2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-2
upload, with this changelog
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:26:36 +0200, Christian Welzel wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> please unblock typo3-src 4.5.17+dfsg1-1 from freeze. It is a upstream
> bugfix only release and contains a fix that prevents the backend of
> the CMS to work properly if the build-in js/css compressor is
> acitivat
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Dear release team,
(this bug submission is following my message [1] on debian-release@, to
make sure my mail will not get inadvertently overlooked in the
surrounding sea of unbl
On 07/28/2012 02:35 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 13:51:31 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3 was uploaded to fix an RC bug in
>> the
>> package (#679886). It has now aged for 11 days without problems discovered.
>>
>> It
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 11:58:28AM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> I would like to ask an unblock to sdl-stretch/0.3.1-3.
>
> There's an unblock already for sdl-stretch/0.3.1-2 because it was in
> unstable before the freeze, but -2 failed to build in kfreebsd-i386
> and thus it never
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2012 14:34:26 +0200
with message-id <20120728123426.gf17...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#681196: unblock: tryton-proteus/2.2.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #681196,
regarding unblock: tryton-proteus/2.2.2-4
to be marked as done.
This means that y
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 13:51:31 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hi,
>
> open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3 was uploaded to fix an RC bug in
> the
> package (#679886). It has now aged for 11 days without problems discovered.
>
> It must be noted that wheezy now contains -1. -2 was uploa
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 03:39:51 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> As far as I know, the only issue that's come up with the 2.7.3-2 is the
> urlparse module where they simplified it and dropped some options which gave
> some packages a bit of trouble. It appears jwilk did a systematic sweep for
> p
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 03:39:51 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> As far as I know, the only issue that's come up with the 2.7.3-2 is the
> urlparse module where they simplified it and dropped some options which gave
> some packages a bit of trouble. It appears jwilk did a systematic sweep for
> p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 680676
Bug #680676 [release.debian.org] unblock: busybox/1:1.20.0-5
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
680676: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680676
Debian B
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:11:37PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> For the record: the package has built everywhere, will be ready for
> testing tomorrow, and I just successfully ran the postgresql-common
> integration tests against this version in sid.
>
> Can this be considered, please?
Unblocked,
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 03:39:51AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> My recommendation is that you unblock python2.7, but increase the age
> requirement to 30 days (it's at 14 righ now) and that you also unblock
> linkchecker (#682603) and I'll NMU pegasus-wm, createrepo, and gwibber, file
> fore unb
* Betr.: " Re: Bug#681196: unblock: tryton-proteus/2.2.2-3" (Sat, 28 Jul 2012
11:15:41 +0200):
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:11:14 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > P
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 681196
Bug #681196 {Done: Julien Cristau } [release.debian.org]
unblock: tryton-proteus/2.2.2-4
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #681196 to the same values
previously set
> thx
>
End of message, stopping proces
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2012 13:59:36 +0200
with message-id <20120728115936.ga17...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#682402: unblock: libxml2/2.8.0+dfsg1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #682402,
regarding unblock: libxml2/2.8.0+dfsg1-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2012 13:53:34 +0200
with message-id <20120728115334.gb17...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#682392: unblock: tap-plugins/0.7.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #682392,
regarding unblock: tap-plugins/0.7.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Hi,
open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3 was uploaded to fix an RC bug in the
package (#679886). It has now aged for 11 days without problems discovered.
It must be noted that wheezy now contains -1. -2 was uploaded before the
freeze and got an automatic unblock already. Its changes have b
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 10:49:55 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock packages hunspell-en-us and openoffice.org-dictionaries.
> Trivial fix for (admittedly minor) bug #6
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 20:55:27 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Is the noise of the non-crucial changes so problematic (a.k.a.
> unpleasing) that the release team considers the current package
> unsuitable for getting an exception from the freeze?
>
> I honestly did not consider that "noise"
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2012 13:26:38 +0200
with message-id <20120728112638.gp10...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#682268: unblock: foremost/1.5.7-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #682268,
regarding unblock: foremost/1.5.7-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 12:40 +0200, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Oh, and also, I want to see a specific ack/nack from the SRMs for:
> --- dpkg-1.16.4.3/debian/source/options 2012-06-09 14:32:05.0 +
> +++ dpkg-1.16.8/debian/source/options 2012-07-19 12:27:34.0 +
> @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:59:07AM +0200, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:18:29PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 17:51:56 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > > Nope, 1.16.5. I'd like to see that to get a view as to why 1.16.5 was
> > > broken. Once we've managed
On 2012-07-05 18:09, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Hi Release Team,
>
Hi,
> [...]
>
> ants
>
> [...]
>
> FTBFS atm on mips, mipsel, s390 imho due to insufficient resources
>and might be tricky to make them build reliably
>
What is keeping this package out is the fact there it FTBFS
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 00:40:43 +0200, Hector Romojaro wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: freeze-exception
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
>
> Hi Relase Team!
>
> Please unblock package dotlrn.
On 2012-07-28 11:48, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package sparkleshare
>
> Release 0.9.0 (and the -1 package) has a bug in its status icon code
> that causes it to
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2012 11:59:15 +0200
with message-id <5013b7f3.3010...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#683063: unblock: sparkleshare/0.9.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #683063,
regarding unblock: sparkleshare/0.9.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:18:29PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 17:51:56 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Nope, 1.16.5. I'd like to see that to get a view as to why 1.16.5 was
> > broken. Once we've managed to have a look at that, it may give a clue as
> > to if it's worth rev
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package sparkleshare
Release 0.9.0 (and the -1 package) has a bug in its status icon code
that causes it to disappear and reappear instead of showing an
animation (which also
Le Fri, 27 Jul 2012 19:47:41 -0400,
Mike Miller a écrit :
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:44:13AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Am 28.07.2012 00:31, schrieb Mike Miller:
> > > Just happened to spot this, sorry if I'm intruding, but how about
> > > fixing RC bug #681737 in this release? It's an eas
Hi Boris,
I'm just looking at the changelog here, in case you're still interested
in doing this.
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 22:11:13 +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
> diff -Nru awffull-3.10.2/debian/changelog awffull-3.10.2/debian/changelog
> --- awffull-3.10.2/debian/changelog 2012-01-01 11:16:10.00
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 21:42:40 +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> I ask for a freeze exception for qpxtool version 0.7.1.002-6.
>
> I have prepared few QA uploads. But unfortunately not all of them were
> sponsored before freeze [1].
>
> This update of the package does not fix a
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 21:29:08 +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> I ask for a freeze exception for lightspeed version 1.2a-9.
>
> I have prepared few QA uploads. But unfortunately not all of them were
> sponsored before freeze [1].
>
> This update of the package does not fix any
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 12:11 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> Please unblock package tryton-proteus. The -3 upload fixes the #680817 FTBFS,
> revealed by a Lucas-powered rebuild.
So far as I can see, that bug doesn't apply to the version of
tryton-proteus in wheezy:
$ egrep -ir dateutil tryton-prote
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2012 11:15:41 +0200
with message-id <20120728091541.gg10...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#681196: unblock: tryton-proteus/2.2.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #681196,
regarding unblock: tryton-proteus/2.2.2-4
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2012 10:09:51 +0100
with message-id <1343466591.18013.45.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683044: unblock: rhythmbox/2.97-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #683044,
regarding unblock: rhythmbox/2.97-2.1
to be marked as done.
This mean
Adding the w3af maintainer to recipients.
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 09:55:50 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > Have you tested the reverse dependencies with the new
> > > version (seems to be svn-workbench, svn-load, , ibid,
>
> There's no reply from w3af maintainer so I've investig
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2012 11:01:42 +0200
with message-id <5013aa76.1050...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#683052: unblock: pgbouncer/1.5.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #683052,
regarding unblock: pgbouncer/1.5.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2012 08:41:17 +
with message-id <20120728084117.gc6...@master.debian.org>
and subject line RM: python-cdb -- RoM; licensing issues
has caused the Debian Bug report #675762,
regarding RM: python-cdb -- RoM; licensing issues
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
tag 681196 - moreinfo
thanks
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:11:14 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Please unblock package tryton-proteus. The -3 upload fixes the #68081
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package python2.7
On balance, I think it's better to accept the newer python2.7 than not. I'm
finally motivated to file this bug (instead of randomly hoping jcristau will
fe
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
