Bug#687492: marked as done (unblock: aptitude/0.6.8.2-1 (pre-approve))

2012-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 10 Nov 2012 07:54:30 + with message-id 1352534070.4531.12.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#687492: unblock: aptitude/0.6.8.2-1 (pre-approve) has caused the Debian Bug report #687492, regarding unblock: aptitude/0.6.8.2-1 (pre-approve) to be

Bug#692879: tpu: package rkward 0.5.7-3

2012-11-10 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: tpu A bug report[1] concerning omissions in debian/copyright was filed against the version of rkward in testing (0.5.7-2). Meanwhile, due to somewhat imperfect communication, I have already

Bug#692879: tpu: package rkward 0.5.7-3

2012-11-10 Thread intrigeri
Hi Thomas, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote (10 Nov 2012 09:25:29 GMT) : For your convenience, I have also prepared a recursive diff between the unpacked and patched source trees of 0.5.7-2 and 0.5.7-3 ([5]). That may be only me nitpicking, but from my humble reviewer point-of-view: - a unified

Bug#691647: unblock: schroot/1.6.4-1

2012-11-10 Thread Roger Leigh
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 08:24:51PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:53:08PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:39:28AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: Please unblock package schroot I have uploaded schroot 1.6.4-1 to unstable. This contains some

Bug#692879: tpu: package rkward 0.5.7-3

2012-11-10 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi! On Saturday 10 November 2012, intrigeri wrote: Files: rkward/qwinhost.cpp.orig rkward/qwinhost.cpp rkward/qwinhost.h.orig rkward/qwinhost.h These paths don't look correct to me. I suggest s,rkward/,rkward/qwinhost/, Good catch, thanks! I have uploaded corrected files (including

Way for package chrony with its RC

2012-11-10 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello release team, hello John, I care about the package chrony: There is a new upstream version in unstable which didn't go into testing before freeze. But for some days there is a RC bug which should be solved. How is the right way to update the testing version? I could create an update of

Bug#692879: tpu: package rkward 0.5.7-3

2012-11-10 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote (10 Nov 2012 11:15:16 GMT) : I have uploaded corrected files (including unified diff, old-new) to the same location as before: http://rkward.sourceforge.net/debian/0.5.7-3/ FWIW, the new changes_0.5.7_2_3.diff looks good to me. (Disclaimer: I'm not part of

Bug#691742: unblock: fs2ram/0.3.12

2012-11-10 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Philippe Le Brouster wrote (31 Oct 2012 10:06:04 GMT) : Le lundi 29 octobre 2012 à 19:04 +, Adam D. Barratt a écrit: As you mentioned above, testing currently has 0.3.10. The relevant diff is thus 0.3.10 to 0.3.12, not from 0.3.11. Here are the information from 0.3.10 to 0.3.12 :

Bug#690949: unblock: torbutton/1.4.6.3-1

2012-11-10 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Jérémy Bobbio wrote (19 Oct 2012 12:45:44 GMT) : Please unblock package torbutton. See #690658: the version currently in Wheezy will simply make Iceweasel crash since the later has been updated. This should not be needed for the stable lifetime of Wheezy, once #690729 is fixed (iceweasel:

Re: Way for package chrony with its RC

2012-11-10 Thread David Prévot
Hi Joachim, Le 06/11/2012 15:06, Joachim Wiedorn a écrit : I care about the package chrony: There is a new upstream version in unstable which didn't go into testing before freeze. But for some days there is a RC bug which should be solved. How is the right way to update the testing version?

Bug#690281: unblock: file-mmagic/1.29-1

2012-11-10 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Adam D. Barratt wrote (13 Oct 2012 15:06:42 GMT) : Old file-mmagic uses deprecated perl syntax, so I want to unblock it. The follwing is diff (really small changes): http://cvs.namazu.org/Subversion/MMagic/trunk/MMagic.pm?r1=286r2=279 (That's the diff from somewhere in between 1.27 and

Bug#683445: One more try

2012-11-10 Thread intrigeri
Hi Anton, Anton Gladky wrote (21 Sep 2012 19:57:04 GMT) : Dear release team, (Disclaimer: I'm not part of the release team.) the license problem of GMSH is resolved [1], the upstream kindly agreed to add a license exception. Please, consider adding this package (version 2.6.1.dfsg-4 in

Bug#691098: marked as done (unblock: mumble/1.2.3-349-g315b5f5-2.1 [pre-approval request])

2012-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:34:26 + with message-id 1352558066.4531.14.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#691098: unblock: mumble/1.2.3-349-g315b5f5-2.1 [pre-approval request] has caused the Debian Bug report #691098, regarding unblock:

Bug#688080: unblock: tomoyo-tools/2.5.0-2012-0414-10

2012-11-10 Thread intrigeri
Hi, (disclaimer: I'm not a member of the release team.) Hideki Yamane wrote (16 Oct 2012 20:03:34 GMT) : On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:45:14 +0100 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: +To enable Tomoyo as the MAC security, please specify parameter to the kernel. +By default, it will

Bug#690281: unblock: file-mmagic/1.29-1

2012-11-10 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 15:12:56 +0100, intrigeri wrote: The upstream ticket corresponding to this issue is https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=74252 It seems to me the actual issue that patch fixes only may impact the test suite of other modules that check for unexpected warnings.

Bug#690075: unblock: dnsmasq/2.63-4

2012-11-10 Thread intrigeri
tags 690075 + moreinfo thanks Hi Moritz, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote (09 Oct 2012 17:51:26 GMT) : Please unblock package dnsmasq It fixes CVE-2012-3411 unblock dnsmasq/2.63-4 The new upstream version includes quite a few changes that are unrelated to the security fix, which probably partly

Processed: Re: Bug#690075: unblock: dnsmasq/2.63-4

2012-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 690075 + moreinfo Bug #690075 [release.debian.org] unblock: dnsmasq/2.63-4 Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 690075: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690075

Bug#689706: unblock: gpa/0.9.3-1

2012-11-10 Thread intrigeri
tags 689706 + moreinfo thanks Hi, Daniel Leidert wrote (05 Oct 2012 10:50:17 GMT) : So what is your opinion? Can we agree on uploading gpa 0.9.3 to unstable and unblocking this version or do you reject this request? If you agree, I would upload and then downgrade severity of #634930. How

Processed: Re: Bug#689706: unblock: gpa/0.9.3-1

2012-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 689706 + moreinfo Bug #689706 [release.debian.org] unblock: gpa/0.9.3-1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 689706: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689706

Bug#692128: unblock: fonts-liberation/1.07.2-6

2012-11-10 Thread intrigeri
Hi, unblock fonts-liberation/1.07.2-6 Looks good, since the ttf-liberation transitional package ships compatibility symlinks. Cheers, -- intrigeri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#683792: unblock: libseccomp/1.0.0-1

2012-11-10 Thread intrigeri
Adam D. Barratt wrote (04 Aug 2012 09:56:26 GMT) : For the record: the new package is therefore currently in NEW. Still true. Kees Cook wrote: I'd like to have this 1.0.0 version in Debian for easier development work for people wanting to use libseccomp going forward. I am not sure I exactly

Bug#690464:

2012-11-10 Thread intrigeri
Hi, alberto fuentes wrote (20 Oct 2012 13:51:22 GMT) : The nmu is already in unstable ... and according to interdiff, the d output matches what Alberto initially proposed, and about which Julien wrote: Looks ok to me. = adding the hint looks like the way to go: unblock dput/0.9.6.3+nmu1

Bug#692370: unblock: libconfig-model-approx-perl/1.005-1

2012-11-10 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Dominique Dumont wrote (05 Nov 2012 12:43:49 GMT) : unblock libconfig-model-approx-perl/1.005-1 This includes a big amount of boilerplate / format / ordering changes. To review the proposed update, one has to ensure each of these non-minimal changes does not cause any functional change. I

Bug#692873: unblock: epydoc/3.0.1-13

2012-11-10 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
Control: tags 692733 + fixed pending On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 11:37:46PM -0400, David Prévot wrote: Le 09/11/2012 22:31, Kenneth Pronovici a écrit : Please unblock package epydoc. The only change is to remove one outdated file is under the non-free CC-BY-NC-SA license. This closes

Bug#690464: marked as done (unblock: dput/0.9.6.3+nmu1)

2012-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:00:54 +0100 with message-id 509e8846.50...@thykier.net and subject line Re: Bug#690464: has caused the Debian Bug report #690464, regarding unblock: dput/0.9.6.3+nmu1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#692790: marked as done (unblock: icedtea-web/1.3.1-1)

2012-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:57:32 + with message-id 1352566652.4531.15.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#692790: unblock: icedtea-web/1.3.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #692790, regarding unblock: icedtea-web/1.3.1-1 to be marked as done. This

Bug#692873: marked as done (unblock: epydoc/3.0.1-13)

2012-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:58:56 +0100 with message-id 509e87d0.5010...@thykier.net and subject line Re: Bug#692873: unblock: epydoc/3.0.1-13 has caused the Debian Bug report #692873, regarding unblock: epydoc/3.0.1-13 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#692767: unblock: cryptsetup/2:1.4.3-4

2012-11-10 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Jonas Meurer wrote (08 Nov 2012 16:31:14 GMT) : Only easy fixes, documentation and translation updates are included. I have reviewed the diff, and I agree the few proposed changes are easy ones, don't look risky to me, and fix annoying bugs. Thanks. Minor comments follow. diff -Nru

Bug#692128: marked as done (unblock: fonts-liberation/1.07.2-6)

2012-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:03:05 + with message-id 1352566985.4531.16.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#692128: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#692128: unblock: fonts-liberation/1.07.2-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #692128, regarding unblock:

Bug#692767: unblock: cryptsetup/2:1.4.3-4

2012-11-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 18:01 +0100, intrigeri wrote: Jonas Meurer wrote (08 Nov 2012 16:31:14 GMT) : Only easy fixes, documentation and translation updates are included. I have reviewed the diff, and I agree the few proposed changes are easy ones, don't look

Processed: Re: Bug#692767: unblock: cryptsetup/2:1.4.3-4

2012-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tags -1 + confirmed d-i Bug #692767 [release.debian.org] unblock: cryptsetup/2:1.4.3-4 Added tag(s) d-i and confirmed. -- 692767: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692767 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To

Bug#692652: unblock: xcache/2.0.0-3

2012-11-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 09:52 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: Please unblock (just uploaded) package xcache The upload fixes bug #690409 (wrong handling of conffile move), diff of packages is attached. I might be missing something, but why was the file moved in to

Processed: Re: Bug#692652: unblock: xcache/2.0.0-3

2012-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #692652 [release.debian.org] unblock: xcache/2.0.0-3 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 692652: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692652 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#692911: unblock: ca-certificates/20121105

2012-11-10 Thread Michael Shuler
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Please unblock package ca-certificates ca-certificates/20121105 has been uploaded to unstable and includes two important fixes for Wheezy:

Bug#692652: unblock: xcache/2.0.0-3

2012-11-10 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi Dne Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:42:59 + Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk napsal(a): Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 09:52 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: Please unblock (just uploaded) package xcache The upload fixes bug #690409 (wrong handling of conffile move),

Bug#692652: unblock: xcache/2.0.0-3

2012-11-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 18:49 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: Dne Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:42:59 + Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk napsal(a): On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 09:52 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: Please unblock (just uploaded) package xcache The upload

Processed: Re: Bug#692652: unblock: xcache/2.0.0-3

2012-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #692652 [release.debian.org] unblock: xcache/2.0.0-3 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 692652: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692652 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#692911: unblock: ca-certificates/20121105

2012-11-10 Thread intrigeri
tags 692911 + moreinfo thanks Hi, Michael Shuler wrote (10 Nov 2012 17:52:41 GMT) : unblock ca-certificates/20121105 There are multiple instances of: -CKA_TRUST_SERVER_AUTH CK_TRUST CKT_NSS_TRUST_UNKNOWN +CKA_TRUST_SERVER_AUTH CK_TRUST CKT_NSS_MUST_VERIFY_TRUST I guess that was imported

Processed: Re: Bug#692911: unblock: ca-certificates/20121105

2012-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 692911 + moreinfo Bug #692911 [release.debian.org] unblock: ca-certificates/20121105 Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 692911:

Bug#692911: unblock: ca-certificates/20121105

2012-11-10 Thread Michael Shuler
On 11/10/2012 12:23 PM, intrigeri wrote: Michael Shuler wrote (10 Nov 2012 17:52:41 GMT) : unblock ca-certificates/20121105 There are multiple instances of: -CKA_TRUST_SERVER_AUTH CK_TRUST CKT_NSS_TRUST_UNKNOWN +CKA_TRUST_SERVER_AUTH CK_TRUST CKT_NSS_MUST_VERIFY_TRUST I guess that was

Bug#692919: unblock: wicd/1.7.2.4-4

2012-11-10 Thread David Paleino
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package wicd. Latest upload in sid fixes RC bug #692916. Attaching diff to -3 (which was already unblocked recently). I moved the code adding users from debconf's .config to

Bug#692921: Unblock: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-18

2012-11-10 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hello release team, please unblock package capi4hylafax. The updated capi4hylafax 1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-18 fixes two RC bugs about the same issue: * Only suggest package

Bug#692137: unblock(pre-approval): zsnes/1.510+bz2-5

2012-11-10 Thread Etienne Millon
* Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk [121110 21:02]: Thanks. In that case, please go ahead. Done, zsnes_1.510+bz2-5 is now in unstable. Thanks! -- Etienne Millon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#692928: unblock: apt-listbugs/0.1.9

2012-11-10 Thread Francesco Poli (wintermute)
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package apt-listbugs As can be seen with the following command on the public git repository: $ git diff apt-listbugs/0.1.8..apt-listbugs/0.1.9 | filterdiff \

Bug#692928: unblock: apt-listbugs/0.1.9

2012-11-10 Thread intrigeri
tags 692928 + moreinfo thanks Hi, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote (10 Nov 2012 22:37:17 GMT) : unblock apt-listbugs/0.1.9 The request does not help me understand how the proposed update is supposed to meet the current guidelines for freeze exceptions [1]. Please clarify. [1]

Processed: Re: Bug#692928: unblock: apt-listbugs/0.1.9

2012-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 692928 + moreinfo Bug #692928 [release.debian.org] unblock: apt-listbugs/0.1.9 Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 692928:

Bug#692928: unblock: apt-listbugs/0.1.9

2012-11-10 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 00:09:52 +0100 intrigeri wrote: [...] Hi, Hi! Thanks for your very fast reply. Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote (10 Nov 2012 22:37:17 GMT) : unblock apt-listbugs/0.1.9 The request does not help me understand how the proposed update is supposed to meet the current

Re: Bug#692740: unblock: hyperestraier/1.4.13-8

2012-11-10 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, At Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:31:18 +0900, KURASHIKI Satoru wrote: Subject: Bug#692740: unblock: hyperestraier/1.4.13-8 I'm sorry forgetting to add the keyword, this bug is intended as pre approval request (so package itself still don't be uploaded). # I fixed BTS title. regards, -- KURASHIKI