Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release managers,
please approve the upload of tryton-server_2.2.7-1.
There were several bugfix releases in Tryton, that are out since a considerable
time and thus are well tested. I
Your message dated Mon, 25 Feb 2013 19:58:56 +
with message-id <1361822336.30628.1.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#701132: unblock: openjdk-7/7u3-2.1.6-1 and
icedtea-web/1.3.1-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #701132,
regarding unblock: openjdk-7/7u3-2.1.6-1
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 02:01:09PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Steve Langasek (06/02/2013):
> > Apologies for taking as long as I have to get around to sending this mail.
> Ditto for the reply.
> > I would like to request an unblock of the udev udeb at version 175-7.1.
> >
> > unblock-udeb
On 02/24/2013 04:46 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Even as a filtered diff, that's still a reasonably large set of
> changes. :-(
Sorry about that.
> A few comments / queries:
>
> --- live-tools.orig/bin/live-persistence 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
> +0100
> +++ live-tools/bin/live-persist
Thorsten Glaser schreef op 2013-02-18 14:34:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Hans Spaans wrote:
I saw I quoted the wrong patchset, it should be "Gerrit change
#21606" and I
have the patch now running on multiple installations. But as this
affects the
Well, the patch from BZ#39635 in any case.
Package
On 25.02.2013 13:39, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Adam D. Barratt (18/02/2013):
pixman has a small fix for a security issue (CVE-2013-1591) and a
udeb.
Please could I have an {n,}ack for an unblock-udeb?
No obvious regression spotted in the graphical installer, d-i ack.
Thanks. unblock-udeb adde
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please consider unblocking package dbus-glib:
unblock dbus-glib/0.100.2-1
Versions 0.100 and 0.100.1 were released with outdated generated files in
the doc/ subdirectory of the tarball
Adam D. Barratt (18/02/2013):
> pixman has a small fix for a security issue (CVE-2013-1591) and a udeb.
> Please could I have an {n,}ack for an unblock-udeb?
No obvious regression spotted in the graphical installer, d-i ack.
(Also, feel free to prod me more aggressively when dealing with
securit
Steve Langasek (06/02/2013):
> Apologies for taking as long as I have to get around to sending this mail.
Ditto for the reply.
> I would like to request an unblock of the udev udeb at version 175-7.1.
>
> unblock-udeb udev/175-7.1
>
> This package is a prerequisite for having a useful version
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 14:04:28 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Julien Cristau (18/02/2013):
> > grub2 and lvm2 in sid fix RC bugs, can I haz an ack for their
> > unblock-udebs?
>
> Both look OK to me, ack.
>
Thanks, hints added.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Andreas Metzler (24/02/2013):
> FYI I have uploaded 1.5.0-5 about 30 minutes after 1.5.0-4, it adds
> another important fix. Looks like the upload happened at same time
> as the mirror push, delaying ACCEPT, otherwise there should not have
> been any duplicate work. Sorry.
Just echoing from IRC:
On 25.02.2013 12:58, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Adam D. Barratt (24/02/2013):
I unblocked xorg-server for a kSBD fix to make the recent qt4-x11
security fix work on that platform. Could I have a udeb ack to go
with
it, please?
As expected, no obvious regressions on linux, so d-i ack.
Thanks;
Julien Cristau (18/02/2013):
> grub2 and lvm2 in sid fix RC bugs, can I haz an ack for their
> unblock-udebs?
Both look OK to me, ack.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Adam D. Barratt (24/02/2013):
> I unblocked xorg-server for a kSBD fix to make the recent qt4-x11
> security fix work on that platform. Could I have a udeb ack to go with
> it, please?
As expected, no obvious regressions on linux, so d-i ack.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital sign
Hi,
I can confirm that rebuilding gts (#660492) fixed the build of gerris
(#652258).
Maybe binNMUs of gts on all arches is the right thing for wheezy? All
binary packages are arch specific, except for libgts-doc which can be
kept as is. (But another sourceful upload would have a similar effect.)
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Please unblock and bump the urgency of package pktstat.
It fixes security issue CVE-2013-0350; #701211: left over debug code caused
both a temp file race and information leak.
unblock
16 matches
Mail list logo
