04.03.2013 00:54, intrigeri kirjoitti:
> "I am not sure due to #688966.
> If midgard2-core is accepted to stable, then php5-midgard2
> might break."
>
> If midgard2-core "might break" another package that's currently in
> testing, then IMHO this should be expressed in terms of binary package
Hi,
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013, intrigeri wrote:
> Given these concerns and the fact time happened to go on flying since
> Julien Cristau expressed these, at this point of the release process,
> I think the only way to ship rebuildd in Wheezy would be to prepare
> a t-p-u upload with only the minimal bug
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 17:49 -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Ok, I updated severity and tags of the bug and uploaded a new version
> to unstable that fixes the issue there.
Thanks.
> I have put the proposed update for testing on mentors.debian.net:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s
Your message dated Mon, 04 Mar 2013 06:14:18 +
with message-id <1362377658.11072.59.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#702206: unblock: graphviz/2.26.3-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #702206,
regarding unblock: graphviz/2.26.3-13
to be marked as done.
This mean
On 02/27/2013 11:11 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 10:18 -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> On 02/27/2013 05:25 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> On 25.02.2013 02:41, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
I'd like to upload a new version of S3QL to
testing-proposed-updates to
fix bug #701350.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package graphviz
Import patch by Steven Chamberlain to fix hangs on kfeebsd (Closes: #701832)
unblock graphviz/2.26.3-13
diff -Nru graphviz-2.26.3/debian/changelog graphv
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 12:04 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 00:45:39 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > Most of the changes are under:
> > debian/patches/features/all/alx/
> > debian/patches/features/all/drm/
> > debian/patches/features/all/fermi-accel/ [deleted]
Hi,
Etienne Millon wrote (24 Jan 2013 21:13:36 GMT) :
> * Niels Thykier [130124 22:11]:
>> Jakub Wilk recommended that I revoked the hint and I understand from
>> the log of #638994 that the patched version has its issues.
> Agreed, I may have rushed a bit on this one. Sorry for the noise.
Any
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 701795 - moreinfo
Bug #701795 [release.debian.org] unblock: otrs2/3.1.7+dfsg1-7
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
701795: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Hi Julien (Danjou),
Julien Cristau wrote (19 Jan 2013 11:28:00 GMT) :
> Why does the source package contain .pyc files?
> Also, the bug log suggests the fix is 2 removed lines, vs
> 48 files changed, 1717 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
> for 0.4.2. I'm not particularly excited by the idea of re
Hi,
Andreas Henriksson wrote (03 Dec 2012 11:43:26 GMT) :
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 02:29:29PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> The thing is, these updated packages mean rather big diffs, and don't
>> seem to close any reported bugs, according to the changelogs. So I'm
>> afraid this isn't a very
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
Adam D. Barratt wrote (09 Nov 2012 20:12:17 GMT) :
> On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 13:11 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
>> (I would also like to question the moreinfo tag put on the bug.
>> Please tell me what info you think is needed.)
> It was added in
> http://bugs.de
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #689698 [release.debian.org] unblock: gupnp/0.10.3-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
689698: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689698
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 692358 unblock php5-midgard2/10.05.7-1
Bug #692358 [release.debian.org] Review php5-midgard2 package
Changed Bug title to 'unblock php5-midgard2/10.05.7-1' from 'Review
php5-midgard2 package'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please con
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #688966 [release.debian.org] unblock: midgard2-core/10.05.7.1-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
688966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688966
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
Piotr Pokora wrote (03 Oct 2012 11:02:22 GMT) :
> Attached.
Thank you, and sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
On http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692358#17
you wrote:
"I am not sure due to #688966.
If midgard2-core is accepted to stabl
Hi,
Niels Thykier wrote (03 Nov 2012 15:53:00 GMT) :
> I think we'd need to see a debdiff to determine if this is acceptable.
> Feel free to filter (e.g. w. filterdiff) autogenerated parts and
> translations (if those appear in the diff). Also if the diff is large,
> please check it actually reac
Your message dated Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:27:18 +
with message-id <1362349638.11072.57.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#701923: unblock: btrfs-tools/0.19+20120328-7.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #701923,
regarding unblock: btrfs-tools/0.19+20120328-7.1
to be mark
Your message dated Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:26:44 +
with message-id <1362349604.11072.56.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#696671: tpu: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u3
has caused the Debian Bug report #696671,
regarding tpu: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u3
to be marked a
Hi Sandro,
Julien Cristau wrote (30 Dec 2012 20:02:57 GMT) :
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:47:28 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> + Also changed the memory allocation of py_ov_read to something simpler
> Why?
>> +- Py_BEGIN_ALLOW_THREADS
>> + retval = ov_read(ov_self->ovf, buff, length,
>> +
Adam D. Barratt (28/02/2013):
> Silly me failed to spot the udeb. Unblocked, but needs the d-i dance.
Dancing,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Adam D. Barratt (28/02/2013):
> Unblocked, but needs a d-i ack.
AFAICT netcfg is the only consumer on the d-i side, on non-Linux ports
only. isc-dhcp-client-udeb doesn't come with dhcp hooks anyway, and a
better upgrade handling shouldn't hurt anything in d-i; I don't think
there's any objection
Hi,
(Cc'ing all recent uploaders, in the hope that it helps finding an
acceptable solution.)
intrigeri wrote (26 Jan 2013 23:20:14 GMT) :
> This version is not in unstable, so it cannot be unblocked.
> If what you are asking for is a pre-upload approval instead of an
> unblock, then I suggest at
Hi,
any news on this front?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
Your message dated Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:06:50 +
with message-id <1362348410.11072.55.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690611: unblock: gtkhotkey/0.2.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #690611,
regarding unblock: gtkhotkey/0.2.1-5
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 03 Mar 2013 23:06:32 +0100
with message-id <85obf0p28n@boum.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690134: unblock: polyorb/2.8~20110207-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #690134,
regarding unblock: polyorb/2.8~20110207-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On 03.03.2013 22:53, Michael Biebl wrote:
> syslog-ng-core:
> /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/syslog-ng.service
> /etc/systemd/system/syslog-ng.service
>
Oh, and btw, converting the /etc/systemd/system/syslog.service symlink
to a real file named /etc/systemd/system/syslog-ng.service
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (12 Dec 2012 00:51:44 GMT) :
> Adam D. Barratt wrote (12 Nov 2012 17:13:53 GMT) :
>> Why is multi-arch support for this particular library important, at this
>> stage of the freeze? Neither of its reverse-dependencies are currently
>> m-a tagged, nor sound like applications one
Hi!
intrigeri writes:
> Michael Meskes wrote (27 Dec 2012 11:21:56 GMT) :
>>> > Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the
>>> > whole new release?
>
>> Where does fixing the XFS problem differ from fixing the other bugs
>> in 4.01?
>
> As I understand it (and not be
Hi Bdale,
Bdale Garbee wrote (28 Dec 2012 21:42:25 GMT) :
> I don't care if this version promotes to wheezy or not.
Well noted.
> I thought at one point it was a goal to get more hardening done for
> wheezy packages,
Sure it was, and I, for one, do hope that dh compat level >= 9 brings
even mor
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 19:41 +0100, Joachim Reichel wrote:
> could you please let me know whether an upload to t-p-u with the patch
> in bug 700891 is acceptable in this stage of the freeze?
>From a quick look it appears it could be suitable if the upload occurred
soon (although a debdiff of the pr
found 690067 3.3.5-3
thanks
I quickly talked to algernon on IRC and did let him know that the
proposed fix to use real conffiles for the systemd symlinks is not good.
symlinks in .wants directories should never be real files.
That will only cause problems in the future.
Specifically the syslog.se
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 22:04 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I've finally been able to perform some run-time tests with the -5
> udeb, which seems to work fine as far as assisted ciphered LVM is
> confirmed. d-i ACK accordingly.
Thanks; unblock-udeb added.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Hi Georges,
intrigeri wrote (28 Jan 2013 04:08:31 GMT) :
> Hence, I suggest you propose a tentative debdiff of 4.03a-7+deb7u1 for
> t-p-u that would fix the RC bugs only (#687947 at least), or closing
> this bug and maintaining wims through wheezy-backports until Jessie is
> out. I hope the former
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 689822 unblock wims/4.04~dfsg2-1
Bug #689822 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: please accept the package
wims_4.03a-8 into testing-proposed-updates
Changed Bug title to 'unblock wims/4.04~dfsg2-1' from 'release.debian.org:
please
Hi,
Michael Meskes wrote (27 Dec 2012 11:21:56 GMT) :
>> > Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the
>> > whole new release?
> Where does fixing the XFS problem differ from fixing the other bugs
> in 4.01?
As I understand it (and not being a member of the release t
Hi,
Jonathan Nieder wrote (03 Jan 2013 07:31:25 GMT) :
> If I understand correctly then nordugrid-arc was not part of squeeze,
> so stable users are not relying on it yet. In that case I would
> suggest considering providing the package for wheezy through
> wheezy-backports after the release, whi
Hi,
Jonathan Nieder wrote (03 Jan 2013 07:25:58 GMT) :
> Any news? Is the version of bdii currently in tpu the right one for
> wheezy, or are there more updates coming?
Given there's been no feedback from Mattias on this bug since October,
and bdii hasn't been in testing since July, I recommend
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 702195 pre-approval of syslog-ng/3.3.5-3
Bug #702195 [release.debian.org] unblock: syslog-ng/3.3.5-3
Changed Bug title to 'pre-approval of syslog-ng/3.3.5-3' from 'unblock:
syslog-ng/3.3.5-3'
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Andreas Metzler (24/02/2013):
> On 2013-02-24 "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
> > libgcrypt11 1.5.0-4 contains a few small patches fixing RC bugs
> > affecting other packages. I'm happy unblocking it, but can we add
> > it to the unblock-udeb request list please? (Would a single mail
> > with several re
Hi,
Toby Smithe wrote (03 Mar 2013 16:42:59 GMT) :
> It would be really good to have this version 1.3 in wheezy, because
> of the "major nuisance" being fixed, but also because of the fact
> that I've fixed this new package to be buildable and installable on
> kFreeBSD and Hurd.
A debdiff would h
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
thanks
Hi Release Team,
There are several important, RC bugfix over syslog-ng/3.3.5-2 in Wheezy.
First is virtual console differences between Linux and kFreeBSD[1]. It's
tty10 on
Processing changes file: xen_4.0.1-5.8_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xen_4.0.1-5.8_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debia
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 702193 -moreinfo
Bug #702193 [release.debian.org] RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7
Bug #690461 [release.debian.org] RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7
Bug #694975 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Wheezy-ignore tag for
freecad and netgen
Remove
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 702193 690461 694975
Bug #702193 [release.debian.org] RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7
Bug #690461 [release.debian.org] RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #702193 [release.debian.org] RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7
Added
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Due to unresolved license question (#617613), please, remove the package
from testing.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'exp
Hi release team,
could you please let me know whether an upload to t-p-u with the patch
in bug 700891 is acceptable in this stage of the freeze?
It's not a FTBFS bug since that header file is not used during building
of the (compiled) library (most of CGAL is generic template code). But
other sof
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 11:50:50 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
> Severity: normal
>
> As was brought up recently, owncloud is anticipated to be a nightmare
> security-wise during wheezy's lifetime:
> http:
Your message dated Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:50:49 +
with message-id <1362333049.11072.48.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#702001: unblock: opendnssec/1:1.3.9-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #702001,
regarding unblock: opendnssec/1:1.3.9-5
to be marked as done.
This
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
opendnssec/1:1.3.9-5 is now in unstable.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87obf0idb3@eisei.43-1.org
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #702001 [release.debian.org] unblock: opendnssec/1:1.3.9-5
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #702001 to the same tags previously set
--
702001: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702001
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@
Dear debian-release,
(I am CC'ing my sponsor, Tobias, and I am not subscribed to the list,
so please CC me in responses.)
I maintain the `musescore' package, and upstream have just made a new
release to fix some bugs; at their release notes[0], they write,
"Two bugs causing a major nuisance and
Hi Haskell Group,
looks like for a change we have some real development work, or have to
drop haskell-tls-extra from wheezy (which would also remove large chunks
of yesod):
Am Sonntag, den 03.03.2013, 10:53 +0100 schrieb Niels Thykier:
> On 2013-03-03 10:07, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > Please cons
Package: release.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #702001
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Yet another version :(
$ diffstat opendnssec_1.3.9-5.debdiff
changelog | 12
control | 26 ++
libhsm
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Moritz Muehlenhoff asked me to take care of a minor security issue (a
potential post-authentication DoS in some configurations;
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-5000). I don'
Control: retitle -1 openjdk-6 should not be released with jessie
Control: tag -1 + wheezy-ignore
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 14:08:44 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Op donderdag 28 februari 2013 21:35:09 schreef Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> > So we should proceed with providing backports for openjdk in the
Op donderdag 28 februari 2013 21:35:09 schreef Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> So we should proceed with providing backports for openjdk in the future.
>
> If Matthias keeps the Debian/Ubuntu packaging in a state that it's easily
> buildable on squeeze/wheezy for ojdk6 and for wheezy on ojdk7 I think
> we sh
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please ack upload to tpu to fix some bad decisions. It basicly reverts
the removal of clvm, which produced an outcry. Also it disables thin
provisioning support again, as it is neither usabl
Your message dated Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:18:30 +0100
with message-id <20130303111830.gc5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#702109: unblock: crystalhd/1:0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #702109,
regarding unblock: crystalhd/1:0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19-9
to be marked
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 00:45:39 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Most of the changes are under:
> debian/patches/features/all/alx/
> debian/patches/features/all/drm/
> debian/patches/features/all/fermi-accel/ [deleted]
> debian/patches/features/all/iguanair/
> debian/patches/feat
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 702115 unblock: libsocialweb/0.25.20-3.1
Bug #702115 [release.debian.org] libsocialweb/0.25.20-3.1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: libsocialweb/0.25.20-3.1' from
'libsocialweb/0.25.20-3.1'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
On 2013-03-03 10:07, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
> Severity: normal
>
> Please consider removing haskell-tls-extra. The security backport
> caused a regression that pretty much completely breaks the package
> (
Your message dated Sun, 03 Mar 2013 10:45:14 +0100
with message-id <51331baa.4090...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#702153: Please tag #699301 and #699304 wheezy-ignore
has caused the Debian Bug report #702153,
regarding Please tag #699301 and #699304 wheezy-ignore
to be marked as done.
Thi
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:31:40 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 21:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:21:29 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 20:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:16:08 +, Adam D.
package: release.debian.org
severity: normal
Bugs #699301 and #699304 are about non-free sRGB files. #699305,
#699306, etc.about the same issue recently got marked wheezy-ignore. I
believe these bugs should get the same treatment.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ..
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please consider removing haskell-tls-extra. The security backport
caused a regression that pretty much completely breaks the package
(#701593), and the upstream bug log seems to indicate a lack
66 matches
Mail list logo
