package release.debian.org
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 687583 + rm - unblock
retitle 687583 RM: altos/1.0.3
thanks
Hi Release Managers,
Please remove altos from testing as per maintainer comment in #676739.
Cheers,
Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi Release Team,
I've been looking into Postfix RC bug #700719. In short, my proposal is to
fix the maintainer field and then unblock the package. Please see my message
in the bug log for
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 06.03.2013 08:09, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I've been looking into Postfix RC bug #700719. In short, my proposal
is to
fix the maintainer field and then unblock the package. Please see my
message
in the bug log for details.
If LaMont is not currently available to
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #702412 [release.debian.org] pre-approval unblock: postfix
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
702412: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702412
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Op woensdag 6 maart 2013 10:16:18 schreef Adam D. Barratt:
It looks like the maintainer field is already fixed in sid, in
2.10.0-1; that is a number of upstream releases more recent than the
current wheezy package, however.
Your last message in #700719 indicates that your inclination
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:20:43PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 12:56 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
+ * Re-enable cluster support. (closes: #697676)
+ * Disable thin support. We lack the thin_check binary and it does not
work
+anyway. (closes: #702163)
Neither
Processing changes file: openssh_5.5p1-6+squeeze4_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1udahh-0002oq...@franck.debian.org
Your message dated Wed, 6 Mar 2013 18:00:18 +0700
with message-id
cacvhrisoin7qrtkh-rt8ojyhpjjhmae0zo6-wrie5mfbcrm...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: unblock: scim-thai/0.1.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #702321,
regarding unblock: scim-thai/0.1.3-2
to be marked as done.
This means
On 05.03.2013 23:10, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
[1] dget -x http://www.barcikacomp.hu/gcs/syslog-ng_3.3.5-3.dsc
A couple of comments:
1/ as you no longer mark the symlinks as conffiles, the cleanup in
syslog-ng-core.postrm is not necessary.
2/ you need to remove the existing conffile
Hi folks,
I'd like to do an upload of a new upstream release of nbd.
I realize that we're pretty deep in the freeze and that now pobably
isn't a very good time to do that anymore. I'd still like that a freeze
exception.
Here's my rationale:
Since the release of NBD 3.2 in July last year, 46
Your message dated Wed, 6 Mar 2013 13:03:47 +
with message-id 20130306130347.gg6...@halon.org.uk
and subject line Re: Bug#692212: unblock (pre-approval): pike7.8/7.8.700-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #692212,
regarding unblock (pre-approval): pike7.8/7.8.700-2
to be marked as done.
This
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:09:50AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I've been looking into Postfix RC bug #700719. In short, my proposal is to
fix the maintainer field and then unblock the package. Please see my message
in the bug log for details.
wheezy has 2.9.3-2.1, sid has 2.10.0-1. Given
Your message dated Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:05:58 +
with message-id 907826f8180c5d71c55d43c83e2a5...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#687583: RM: altos/wheezy
has caused the Debian Bug report #687583,
regarding RM: altos/1.0.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 05:22:25PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 03.03.2013 14:38, Colin Watson wrote:
+openssh (1:5.5p1-6+squeeze4) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * CVE-2011-5000: Fix potential int overflow when using
gssapi-with-mac
+authentation.
Please go ahead; thanks.
OK,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
submitter 676546 anar...@debian.org
Bug #676546 [gobby-0.5] crashes after a random amount of time
Changed Bug submitter to 'anar...@debian.org' from 'Antoine Beaupré
anar...@koumbit.org'
submitter 677268 anar...@debian.org
Bug #677268
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
submitter 622705 anar...@debian.org
Failed to set submitter on 622705: Not altering archived bugs; see unarchive.
submitter 669878 anar...@debian.org
Failed to set submitter on 669878: Not altering archived bugs; see unarchive.
submitter
-=| Slávek Banko, 05.03.2013 17:55:51 +0100 |=-
Dne po 4. března 2013 Moritz Muehlenhoff napsal(a):
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:40:54PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 23:14:51 +0200
Damyan Ivanov d...@debian.org wrote:
Forwarded:
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 03.03.2013, 17:11 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
CC'ing the maintainers+uploader of the affected, plus the reporter for
comments on this. Do any of you feel you would be able to write a patch
for it that could be included in Wheezy or ...?
I don’t think I’ll find
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:06:05 +, Toby Smithe wrote:
On 6 March 2013 05:46, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
In general, sure, improved architecture support is great. During a
freeze however it's often more of a feature and generally won't be as
well tested as
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 13:58:24 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
What are my chances of that being allowed in?
For r0 I would say it's too late. It should still be possible to
include fixes in a subsequent point release.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 13:17 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
1/ as you no longer mark the symlinks as conffiles, the cleanup in
syslog-ng-core.postrm is not necessary.
Removed.
2/ you need to remove the existing conffile symlinks in
syslog-ng-core.preinst so dpkg converts it to non-conffiles on
Le mercredi 06 mars 2013 à 18:53 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 20:49:30 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ekiga. Version
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 20:49:30 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ekiga. Version 3.2.7-6 fixes security RC bug #702282.
The debdiff is attached.
unblock
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package perl
Changes:
perl (5.14.2-19) unstable; urgency=high
.
* [SECURITY] CVE-2013-1667: fix a rehashing DoS opportunity
against code that uses arbitrary user
I'd say, we're almost there
On 06.03.2013 18:45, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 13:17 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
2/ you need to remove the existing conffile symlinks in
syslog-ng-core.preinst so dpkg converts it to non-conffiles on upgrades
Remove those in preinst.
Your message dated Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:46:34 +
with message-id 1362599194.7567.3.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#702454: unblock: perl/5.14.2-19
has caused the Debian Bug report #702454,
regarding unblock: perl/5.14.2-19
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi,
Niko Tyni wrote (06 Mar 2013 18:59:02 GMT) :
* [SECURITY] CVE-2013-1667: fix a rehashing DoS opportunity
against code that uses arbitrary user input as hash keys.
(Closes: #702296)
Thanks for your work.
unblock perl/5.14.2-19
FWIW, I've verified that the attached debdiff
reassign 701936 initscripts
severity 701936 serious
thanks
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 07:50:37AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
retitle 701936 btrfs can't fsck /run/rootdev on boot with sysvinit
severity 701936 important
clone 701936 -1
reassign -1 sysvinit
thanks
works with systemd, it's
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
The current README.Debian is quite old
It gives some advice that will lead to people having a broken system
(e.g. no networking). It describes a procedure for configuring
networking that is completely opposite to what has been described more
recently
On 03/06/2013 09:05 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
1) checkroot.sh creates an invalid /run/rootdev
afaic, this is the only real problem.
2) fsck.btrfs fails to fsck a mounted filesystem
fsck.btrfs won't check a mounted filesystem, even if mounted
read-only. We need to be able to do this, since we
On 2013-02-19 20:21, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 01:39:57PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
[...]
Hi,
Hi,
I finally had some time to work on a new package, with both removing the
extjs library, and fixing the symlink to the library.
Since
Control: retitle -1 unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval)
On 2013-03-06 21:23, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
The current README.Debian is quite old
It gives some advice that will lead to people having a broken system
(e.g. no networking). It
Processing control commands:
retitle -1 unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval)
Bug #702458 [release.debian.org] unblock: xcp-xapi - urgent documentation fixes
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval)' from 'unblock:
xcp-xapi - urgent documentation fixes'
--
702458:
On 06/03/13 21:42, Niels Thykier wrote:
Control: retitle -1 unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval)
On 2013-03-06 21:23, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
The current README.Debian is quite old
It gives some advice that will lead to people having a
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:16:01PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
2) fsck.btrfs fails to fsck a mounted filesystem
fsck.btrfs won't check a mounted filesystem, even if mounted
read-only. We need to be able to do this, since we are running
fsck from the rootfs. We do this for all other
Your message dated Wed, 06 Mar 2013 22:23:15 +0100
with message-id 5137b3c3.1090...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#702285: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #702285,
regarding unblock: vlc/2.0.3-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please remove tty-clock. It's got lots of issues that aren't really
being worked on (bug #700738). It also has no reverse-dependencies
and has yet to be included in a stable release.
Thanks,
On 03/06/2013 09:51 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
3) fsck.btrfs does not support the standard fsck options
easy fixable, but hasn't much to do with the current remaining problem
in sid.
Yes, it does.
no, it does not.
even if fsck.btrfs ignores all required options, it still fails because
of
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 10:41:05PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 03/06/2013 09:51 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
3) fsck.btrfs does not support the standard fsck options
easy fixable, but hasn't much to do with the current remaining problem
in sid.
Yes, it does.
no, it does not.
even
severity 701936 critical
thanks
This is a critical bug. Please do not lower the severity again.
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools
`-GPG Public Key F33D
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package avahi
The main fix is making avahi-daemon compatible with the ifupdown changes
that were introduced in wheezy. Without that, the boot process can be
blocked by
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:45:45PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Please remove tty-clock. It's got lots of issues that aren't really
being worked on (bug #700738). It also has no reverse-dependencies
and has yet to be included in a stable release.
The bug you quote was filed on 16th Feb, and
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
Michael Gilbert wrote:
Subject: RM: tty-clock/1.1-1
I suspect there is an RoQA missing.
Please remove tty-clock. It's got lots of issues
I just see one RC bug at http://bugs.debian.org/src:tty-clock -- the
remaining issues are of severity minor at most.
Processing control commands:
tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #702465 [release.debian.org] RM: tty-clock/1.1-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
702465: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702465
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 702458 + moreinfo
Bug #702458 [release.debian.org] unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval)
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
702458:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 702458 - moreinfo
Bug #702458 [release.debian.org] unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval)
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
tags 702465 + moreinfo
Bug #702465 [release.debian.org] RM: tty-clock/1.1-1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #702465 to
On 2013-03-06, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:45:45PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Please remove tty-clock. It's got lots of issues that aren't really
being worked on (bug #700738). It also has no reverse-dependencies
and has yet to be included in a stable release.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Antoine Beaupré anar...@debian.org wrote:
On 2013-03-06, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:45:45PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Please remove tty-clock. It's got lots of issues that aren't really
being worked on (bug #700738). It also has
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
And this application:
github-backup
I don't have the ability to read or write Haskell, but it would be
very sad to lose github-backup.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
50 matches
Mail list logo
