On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:44:05 +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
Hello
I'd like to upload a package that fixes a bug in testing's
quagga_0.99.21-4. I can't upload it via unstable as we have
already 0.99.22 there and neither can I upload it to
stable-proposed-updates as this is still for
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package live-tools
This version supports building a live image on a live system
and fixes an incorrect man page symlink. I have attached a
debdiff with */manpages/*/*
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package live-build
Numerous minor fixes that are nevertheless important for the
release, including wheezy release-specific updates (new wheezy-backports
address scheme,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package live-config
Includes a fix needed for fglrx/nvidia support in unofficial
non-free images.
unblock live-config/3.0.23-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package ejabberd 2.1.10-5.
It fixes one important bug [1] which prevents certain (correct) XMPP
client implementations (namely, the XMPP library used by git-annex)
Le jeudi 25 avril 2013 à 19:47 +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 15:05:47 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
All packages shipping gconf schemas have a Depends on gconf2. It is
generated via dh_gconf which adds gconf2 (= 2.28.1-2) to misc:Depends.
This version is
Le vendredi 26 avril 2013 à 18:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
I think we only need to fix the packages:
* that still have a dh_gconf prerm snippet in squeeze
* AND that don’t have a prerm anymore in wheezy (or that haven’t been
uploaded since squeeze).
Here is the list. Forget those
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 06:55 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
Please unblock package live-build
Numerous minor fixes that are nevertheless important for the
release, including wheezy release-specific updates (new wheezy-backports
address scheme, updated splash screen,
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #706205 [release.debian.org] unblock: live-build/3.0.3-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
706205: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706205
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 06:32 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
Please unblock package live-tools
This version supports building a live image on a live system
Is that a particularly common use case?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #706203 [release.debian.org] unblock: live-tools/3.0.20-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
706203: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706203
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:04:36 +0100
with message-id 1367003076.6056.15.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#706206: unblock: live-config/3.0.23-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #706206,
regarding unblock: live-config/3.0.23-1
to be marked as done.
This
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 706209 = pu
tags 706209 + wheezy
retitle 706209 pu: ejabberd/2.1.10-4+deb7u1
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 15:46 +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
Usertags: freeze-exception
Ah, an easy way to spot people using old versions of reportbug.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
usertags 706209 = pu
Usertags were: freeze-exception.
Usertags are now: pu.
tags 706209 + wheezy
Bug #706209
On 26/04/13 04:05 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Is that a particularly common use case?
We support a few users who do most, if not all of their builds this way.
It may not be common, but it's important for the few users who use it.
Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2013 21:06:15 +0100
with message-id 1367006775.6056.21.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#706203: unblock: live-tools/3.0.20-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #706203,
regarding unblock: live-tools/3.0.20-1
to be marked as done.
This
Am 26.04.2013 19:17, schrieb Josselin Mouette:
Le vendredi 26 avril 2013 à 18:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
I think we only need to fix the packages:
* that still have a dh_gconf prerm snippet in squeeze
* AND that don’t have a prerm anymore in wheezy (or that haven’t been
uploaded
Am 27.04.2013 00:50, schrieb Michael Biebl:
Am 26.04.2013 19:17, schrieb Josselin Mouette:
Le vendredi 26 avril 2013 à 18:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
I think we only need to fix the packages:
* that still have a dh_gconf prerm snippet in squeeze
* AND that don’t have a prerm anymore
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:17:12AM +0400, Alexander Golovko wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi!
Does all prepared changes acceptable for unblock?
debdiff between
Processing control commands:
tag -1 + confirmed
Bug #706047 [release.debian.org] unblock bacula/5.2.6+dfsg-9
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
706047: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706047
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hello,
Wheezy contains my package jquery-jplayer 2.1.0-1, which is affected by a
few security issues which have been recently fixed upstream. One of the
issues is CVE-2013-1942. Two other issues, although important, did not get
a CVE number.
I have backported the patches and created
On 2013-04-27 00:56, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 27.04.2013 00:50, schrieb Michael Biebl:
Am 26.04.2013 19:17, schrieb Josselin Mouette:
Le vendredi 26 avril 2013 à 18:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
I think we only need to fix the packages:
* that still have a dh_gconf prerm snippet in
[adding -release@]
Hi,
a few Multi-Arch: same packages have all their dependencies satisfied,
but are not co-installable because they got binNMUs. A sourceful
no-change upload to rebuild them should restore co-installability.
I've identified 8 source packages where this would help:
bogl
23 matches
Mail list logo
