Your message dated Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:25:04 +0200
with message-id <20130626062504.gi5...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#711557: RM: python-eggtrayicon/2.25.3-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #711557,
regarding RM: python-eggtrayicon/2.25.3-12
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:12:51 +0200
with message-id <20130626061251.gh5...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#709042: transition: girara
has caused the Debian Bug report #709042,
regarding transition: girara
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:31:35 +0100
with message-id <1372192295.14421.10.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#713798: nmu: check_0.9.10-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #713798,
regarding nmu: check_0.9.10-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:52:09 +0200
with message-id <20130625195209.gf5...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#708248: transition: json-c
has caused the Debian Bug report #708248,
regarding transition: json-c
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 16:23 +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >* Work around Debian Bug #712530 (Closes: #708307)
>
> Thanks! Is that work-around suitable for a stable update as well?
That's presumably this:
--- e2fsprogs-1.42.5/debian/
On 06/26/2013 12:27 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I am currently working on a 1.9.x upload for sid. It's not ready
> (some lintian complaints that I agree with and want to fix). Would
> you prefer to get this fix through the above process before I upload,
> then?
Hi Ben,
Thanks a lot for the quick rep
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 14:05:47 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Ansgar Burchardt writes:
>
> > As the package builds Multi-Arch: same binaries, it might be useful to
> > rebuild
> > it on the other architectures (or at least on amd64) as well.
>
> I believe we now have changelog.Debian.$arch.gz
Ansgar Burchardt writes:
> libvibrant6/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libpng15-15 (>= 1.5.2-1)
Oops. I was using my usual library-transition chroot, which I'd
evidently forgotten to reset since using it to test compatibility with
libpng 1.5.x; sorry about that. Thanks for pointing it out!
> As
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 03:36:42AM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:19:03AM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>> >> Dear wanna-build team,
>> >>
>> >> Please give ba
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 03:36:42AM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:19:03AM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> >> Dear wanna-build team,
> >>
> >> Please give back 0ad on amd64 on a buildd other than barber (i.e.
> >> retr
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:19:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Hi Ben Pfaff, Jesse Gross, the release team, and others,
>>
>> Mehdi found out the upstream bug fix for this, and I incorporated it as
>> a patch for the Wheezy version. The patch
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:19:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi Ben Pfaff, Jesse Gross, the release team, and others,
>
> Mehdi found out the upstream bug fix for this, and I incorporated it as
> a patch for the Wheezy version. The patch applied cleanly, and we have
> tested it, it really fix
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 14:05:13 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> It looks like ncbi-tools6 was built in an unclean environment:
>
> libvibrant6/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libp
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 13:58:51 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> Please schedule a binNMU for njplot to make it pick up libvibrant6 instead of
> libvibrant6a.
>
> nmu njplot_2.4-
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:17:48 +0200
with message-id <20130625151748.gy5...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#714073: nmu: slurm-drmaa_1.0.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #714073,
regarding nmu: slurm-drmaa_1.0.6-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:18:34 +0200
with message-id <20130625151834.gz5...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#714068: nmu: netexpect_0.20-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #714068,
regarding nmu: netexpect_0.20-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:17:11 +0200
with message-id <20130625151711.gx5...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#714065: nmu: bbpager_0.4.7-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #714065,
regarding nmu: bbpager_0.4.7-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> | weasel@alkman:~$ ldd /sbin/fsck.ext3 | grep -i usr
> | libunwind.so.7 => /usr/lib/libunwind.so.7 (0x20080019c000)
>* Work around Debian Bug #712530 (Closes: #708307)
Thanks! Is that work-around suitable for a stable update as w
Hi Ben Pfaff, Jesse Gross, the release team, and others,
Mehdi found out the upstream bug fix for this, and I incorporated it as
a patch for the Wheezy version. The patch applied cleanly, and we have
tested it, it really fixes the bug as we expected. We now use the
attached patch in production.
I
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:10:41AM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> Just one of the packages (bino) in that list seems to be affected
> directly by this transition and fails to build because of that.
> Others packages (12), instead, FTBFS but with no glew dependency.
Update: after a quick rebuild
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Please schedule a binNMU to build slurm-drmaa against libslurm25.
nmu slurm-drmaa_1.0.6-2 . ALL . -m "Build against libslurm25."
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
It looks like ncbi-tools6 was built in an unclean environment:
libvibrant6/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libpng15-15 (>= 1.5.2-1)
Please schedule a binNMU to get rid of that dependency.
nm
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Please schedule a binNMU for njplot to make it pick up libvibrant6 instead of
libvibrant6a.
nmu njplot_2.4-2 . armel armhf mips s390 s390x sparc . -m "Rebuild against
libvibrant6."
Ansgar
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Please schedule a binNMU for netexpect to make it pick up the new wireshark
libraries.
nmu netexpect_0.20-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libwireshark3, libwsutil3,
libwiretap3."
Ansgar
--
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
libbt was a transitional package for libbt0 and dropped in the most recent
upload of blackbox. However bbpager still depends on it.
Please schedule a binNMU to make it pick up the new packag
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:19:03AM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>> Dear wanna-build team,
>>
>> Please give back 0ad on amd64 on a buildd other than barber (i.e.
>> retry until some other buildd takes it).
>
> I understand that the issue is in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
I'm filing this bug for a new transition of glew package.
On August 6, 2012 the 1.9.0 actual stable version has been released by
upstream.
On August 13, 2012 a first
27 matches
Mail list logo
