Control: reopen -1
On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 03:18 +, Zed Pobre wrote:
> libmodplug (1:0.8.8.4-4) unstable; urgency=high
> .
> * Merge all changes from latest upstream Git repository (0.8.8.4 with
>additional patches), including the following security changes:
>* CVE-2013-42
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #719642 {Done: Zed Pobre } [release.debian.org] pu:
samba/2:3.6.6-6+deb7u1
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fi
Processing changes file: libvirt_0.9.12-11+deb7u3_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vghoc-0006ws...@franck.debian.org
Your message dated Tue, 03 Sep 2013 03:18:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#719642: fixed in libmodplug 1:0.8.8.4-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #719642,
regarding pu: samba/2:3.6.6-6+deb7u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Processing changes file: libvirt_0.9.12-11+deb7u3_armel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vgexn-0006sl...@franck.debian.org
Добрый день!
Далеко не каждому руководителю выгодно содержать собственный штат специалистов
по абонентскому обслуживанию компьютеров. Многие разумно считают, что
эффективнее использовать для таких целей IT-outsourcing.
Меня зовут Андрей, и я
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 706798 with 721577 720801 721047 718125 721164 713276
Bug #706798 [release.debian.org] transition: Libav 9
706798 was blocked by: 694143 720828 694131 694299 720779 720785 721025 720727
720820 692505 720796 693639 693641 692809 720790 72079
Processing changes file: libvirt_0.9.12-11+deb7u3_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vgdmn-0004kf...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: libvirt_0.9.12-11+deb7u3_sparc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vgctl-oi...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: libvirt_0.9.12-11+deb7u3_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vgcff-0006uc...@franck.debian.org
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 18:35 +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
[I don't appear to have Jonathan's mail - and nor do the list archives -
so piggy-backing on Joey's.]
> > We're much longer overdue for oldstable (February) than we are for stable
> > (June); if we stagger them, s
Processing changes file: libvirt_0.9.12-11+deb7u3_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vgcqj-0004yi...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: libvirt_0.9.12-11+deb7u3_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libvirt_0.9.12-11+deb7u3_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libvirt_0.9.12-11+deb7u3_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libvirt_0.9.12-11+deb7u3_kfreebsd-i386.changes
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 01:50:04PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Am 19.08.2013 15:55, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> >
> > >we should start thinking about dates for the 7.2 and 6.0.8 point
> > >releases. Which week-ends in the coming months would work for
> > >ftpmaster,
Hi,
I admit this does not clarify the situation for me. Even if the problem
is at upstream side - if upstream does not care for the problem the
maintainer is in charge to invent a patch. I was just wondering if a
binNMU would do the trick or not. If not I have no idea what to do
because I do no
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 721625 + wheezy
Bug #721625 [release.debian.org] pu: package lvm2/2.02.95-8
Added tag(s) wheezy.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
721625: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721625
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 15:06 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> On the page described the transition to get rid of Ruby 1.8 [1],
> at least two affected packages, apt-listbugs and schleuder, are missing.
>
> Nicolas Dandrimont spotted a mistake in the following regexp:
>
> Bad: .depends ~ /(lib?)ruby
Your message dated Mon, 02 Sep 2013 18:22:28 +0200
with message-id <5224bb44.7070...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#721623: release.debian.org: installer images are not
signed.
has caused the Debian Bug report #721623,
regarding release.debian.org: installer images are not signed.
to be mark
Sorry, just a guess of mine, not something to packagers deal with. It is
maybe something on the source code. See the info about libtool, versioning
system.
2013/9/2 Andreas Tille
> Hi,
>
> I admit I have no idea what you expect me (main Uploader) to do. Please
> explain and I'll try to be as q
Processing changes file: libvirt_0.9.12-11+deb7u3_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vgvsk-0004fy...@franck.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
lvm2 is slightly broken in Wheezy. There is a race condition between
udev and the snapshot removal.
Index: debian/changelog
===
-
Control: tag -1 + pending
On 2013-09-02 09:07, Guido Günther wrote:
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 10:22:01PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 07:34:31PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi,
> I just had a chance to go through my mail backlog and found F
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + pending
Bug #720303 [release.debian.org] pu: package libvirt/0.9.12-11+deb7u2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
720303: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720303
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
Hello,
the installer images (such as released on
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/wheezy/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/)
have SHA and MD5 signatures but no signature whatsoever.
How is one supposed to verify the integrity of the
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 10:22:01PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 07:34:31PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I just had a chance to go through my mail backlog and found Ferenc fixed
> > another crash in libvirtd. An updated debdiff
Hi!
On the page described the transition to get rid of Ruby 1.8 [1],
at least two affected packages, apt-listbugs and schleuder, are missing.
Nicolas Dandrimont spotted a mistake in the following regexp:
Bad: .depends ~ /(lib?)ruby1.8/
which should probably be:
Bad: .depends ~ /(lib)?ruby1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 704032 http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.54.html
Bug #704032 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults 1.54
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.54.html' from
'htt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 704032 with 721544
Bug #704032 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults 1.54
704032 was blocked by: 710083 709576 708802 710082 699575 709577 709570 710081
701336 709578 709579 709251 704045 709248 709861 709254 709575 709574 715474
Processing control commands:
> reassign 721544 libboost-thread1.54.0 1.54.0-2
Bug #721544 [src:performous] performous: FTBFS on ia64, mips(el), s390(x):
/usr/lib/gcc/ia64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../libboost_thread.so: undefined
reference to `boost::atomics::detail::lockpool::get_lock_for(void const
Hi,
I'm not a porter, nor debian maintainer or debian developer, but I'm a
user of Debian mipsel and know how to build packages and debug
arch-related issues. My time is limited but I'll happily contribute a
slice of my time and CPU cycles to help with the mipsel port.
I currently don't have a s
Hi,
I admit I have no idea what you expect me (main Uploader) to do. Please
explain and I'll try to be as quick as possible to do so.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 05:50:12PM -0300, Felipe Castro wrote:
> Maybe a problem with the libtool versioning, I had warned the upst
31 matches
Mail list logo
