Bug#721844: transition: ibus

2013-09-25 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 23:37:51 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: -- package newer upstream using new GObject introspection * ibus-anthy: already in exp by me. Hi, ibus-anthy is currently blocking the transition because of #712575, which the BTS believes affects 1.5.3-3. Is that actually an

Upcoming changes in Tcl/Tk packaging

2013-09-25 Thread Sergei Golovan
Hi fellow developers, I would like to introduce a few significant changes into Debian Tcl/Tk packages. Some of them have quite significant impact on their reverse dependencies which will need a transition, I think. The proposed changes are already in the experimental branch, so anyone could try

Bug#706798: libav 9 porting guide

2013-09-25 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Is there a libav 9 porting guide available somewhere? The 0.8 deprecated (= 9 removed) list (http://libav.org/doxygen/release/0.8/deprecated.html) has suggested replacements for most of them. PixelFormat is now AVPixelFormat, and its entries are similarly renamed:

Re: Upcoming changes in Tcl/Tk packaging

2013-09-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Sergei, (replying to the first part only since it strikes me) Sergei Golovan sgolo...@nes.ru (2013-09-25): 2. Renaming tcl8.5-dev and tk8.5-dev into libtcl8.5-dev and libtk8.5-dev respectively (the latter packages still provide the former as virtual packages to break as few packages as it

Re: Upcoming changes in Tcl/Tk packaging

2013-09-25 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 25.09.2013 10:25, schrieb Sergei Golovan: Hi fellow developers, I would like to introduce a few significant changes into Debian Tcl/Tk packages. Some of them have quite significant impact on their reverse dependencies which will need a transition, I think. The proposed changes are

Re: Upcoming changes in Tcl/Tk packaging

2013-09-25 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-09-25 11:38, Cyril Brulebois wrote: 3. Renaming tcl-dev and tk-dev into libtcl-dev and libtk-dev. Since too many packages have versioned build-dependencies on tcl-dev or tk-dev, I chose to retain tcl-dev and tk-dev packages (as meta-packages which depend on libtcl-dev and

Re: Upcoming changes in Tcl/Tk packaging

2013-09-25 Thread YunQiang Su
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote: Am 25.09.2013 10:25, schrieb Sergei Golovan: Hi fellow developers, I would like to introduce a few significant changes into Debian Tcl/Tk packages. Some of them have quite significant impact on their reverse dependencies

Re: Upcoming changes in Tcl/Tk packaging

2013-09-25 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, On Sep 25, 2013 11:40 AM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote: Am 25.09.2013 10:25, schrieb Sergei Golovan: removing alternatives a lot. But later I'd like to have another transition (switching to 8.6 as default Tcl/Tk version). Do you have numbers what will break with 8.6? Not

Re: Upcoming changes in Tcl/Tk packaging

2013-09-25 Thread Sergei Golovan
Hi Cyril, On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: Hi Sergei, (replying to the first part only since it strikes me) Sergei Golovan sgolo...@nes.ru (2013-09-25): 2. Renaming tcl8.5-dev and tk8.5-dev into libtcl8.5-dev and libtk8.5-dev respectively (the latter

Re: Upcoming changes in Tcl/Tk packaging

2013-09-25 Thread Sergei Golovan
Hi Matthias, On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote: Am 25.09.2013 10:25, schrieb Sergei Golovan: Hi fellow developers, I would like to introduce a few significant changes into Debian Tcl/Tk packages. Some of them have quite significant impact on their reverse

Re: Upcoming changes in Tcl/Tk packaging

2013-09-25 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, On 25 September 2013 14:52, Sergei Golovan sgolo...@nes.ru wrote: There are about 30 packages left which unconditionally depend on tcl8.4 or tk8.4. We have to do some research and find how to port them to 8.5 or 8.6. When I have some free time, I occasionally port this or that package.

Bug#724592: pu: package ifmetric/0.3-2

2013-09-25 Thread Michael Shuler
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I would like to upload ifmetric_0.3-2+deb7u1 to stable in order to fix #514197 and get this software functional for stable users again. The fix

Processed: tagging 724592

2013-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 724592 + wheezy Bug #724592 [release.debian.org] pu: package ifmetric/0.3-2 Added tag(s) wheezy. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 724592: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724592

Re: Upcoming changes in Tcl/Tk packaging

2013-09-25 Thread Wookey
+++ Sergei Golovan [2013-09-25 12:25 +0400]: Hi fellow developers, I would like to introduce a few significant changes into Debian Tcl/Tk packages. Thank you for doing this work, and for this clear summary. 1. Multiarchifying Tcl/Tk. This means splitting out the libtcl8.5 package with

Re: Upcoming changes in Tcl/Tk packaging

2013-09-25 Thread Sergei Golovan
Hi Wookey, On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote: +++ Sergei Golovan [2013-09-25 12:25 +0400]: Hi fellow developers, I would like to introduce a few significant changes into Debian Tcl/Tk packages. Thank you for doing this work, and for this clear summary. 1.

Processed: Re: Bug#724592: pu: package ifmetric/0.3-2

2013-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tag -1 confirmed Bug #724592 [release.debian.org] pu: package ifmetric/0.3-2 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 724592: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724592 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#724592: pu: package ifmetric/0.3-2

2013-09-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Control: tag -1 confirmed Michael Shuler mich...@pbandjelly.org (2013-09-25): --- ifmetric-0.3/debian/changelog +++ ifmetric-0.3/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +ifmetric (0.3-2+deb7u1) stable; urgency=low + + * Add patch to fix NETLINK: Packet too small or truncated! error. +Thanks

Re: Call for Jessie Release Goals

2013-09-25 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org schrieb: Goals which were accepted for the Wheezy cycle, but did not reach completion, can be carried over for Jessie. However, we require re-submission of those goals (and any that have been discussed up until now - we are starting with a clean slate) to

Re: Call for Jessie Release Goals

2013-09-25 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-09-25 19:02, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org schrieb: Goals which were accepted for the Wheezy cycle, but did not reach completion, can be carried over for Jessie. However, we require re-submission of those goals (and any that have been discussed up until

Re: coin3 testing migration

2013-09-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 20:40 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote: Dear wb-team and ftp-masters, Neither of those teams are responsible for testing migration. As the domain of the URL you quoted indicates, the release team are. I'm copying debian-release on this reply; please direct further responses there.

Re: coin3 testing migration

2013-09-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
2013/9/25 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: However, visp appears not to have any reverse-dependencies in testing, so we could remove visp, age soqt a little and see what happens. On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 21:08 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote: Ok, thanks a lot, Adam, for explanation and

Re: Call for Jessie Release Goals

2013-09-25 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 07:06:37PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: On 2013-09-25 19:02, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org schrieb: Goals which were accepted for the Wheezy cycle, but did not reach completion, can be carried over for Jessie. However, we require

Re: coin3 testing migration

2013-09-25 Thread Anton Gladky
Ok, thanks a lot, Adam, for explanation and apologize for pinging wrong teams, Anton 2013/9/25 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: However, visp appears not to have any reverse-dependencies in testing, so we could remove visp, age soqt a little and see what happens. Adam -- To

Re: coin3 testing migration

2013-09-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 21:18 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote: I think, yes, as visp has much more dependencies to migrate to testing (CC-ing visp-maintainer) and we will finally finish coin3-soqt-pivy-freecad migration. Well, it won't help freecad, due to #617613. Regards, Adam -- To

Re: coin3 testing migration

2013-09-25 Thread Anton Gladky
I think, yes, as visp has much more dependencies to migrate to testing (CC-ing visp-maintainer) and we will finally finish coin3-soqt-pivy-freecad migration. Thanks Anton 2013/9/25 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: 2013/9/25 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: However, visp

Re: Call for Jessie Release Goals

2013-09-25 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-09-25 21:15, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 07:06:37PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: On 2013-09-25 19:02, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org schrieb: Goals which were accepted for the Wheezy cycle, but did not reach completion, can be carried

Re: Call for Jessie Release Goals

2013-09-25 Thread Kees Cook
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:15:43PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 07:06:37PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: On 2013-09-25 19:02, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org schrieb: Goals which were accepted for the Wheezy cycle, but did not reach

Re: coin3 testing migration

2013-09-25 Thread Anton Gladky
2013/9/25 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: Well, it won't help freecad, due to #617613. Yes, I know, but it will hopefully be resolved soon... All these new coin3-soqt-pivy for #617613. Anton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#724619: pu: package mapserver/6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1

2013-09-25 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, As briefly discussed on debian-release@ in the thread starting at [1], I'd like to propose an update of mapserver for wheezy. [1]

Processed: tagging 724619

2013-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 724619 + wheezy Bug #724619 [release.debian.org] pu: package mapserver/6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1 Added tag(s) wheezy. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 724619:

Reminder: Call for Jessie Release Goals

2013-09-25 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
The deadline for submission of release goals for the Jessie cycle is midnight, next Monday 30th September. To propose a goal, you should create a page on the wiki [WIKI] with a short goal description, details of the advocate(s) and how the goal will be achieved. The multi-arch goal [MA-GOAL] from

Bug#723587: release.debian.org: Non-free file in PyOpenCL - new version upload to stable and oldstable

2013-09-25 Thread Tomasz Rybak
Dnia 2013-09-24, wto o godzinie 23:34 +0100, Adam D. Barratt pisze: Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 05:26 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Tomasz Rybak tomasz.ry...@post.pl (2013-09-17): After asking on debian-mentors I was advised that I should also upload DFSG-free

Bug#724619: pu: package mapserver/6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1

2013-09-25 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 + confirmed Hi, On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:38:54PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: + * Migrated to debhelper level 9 and policy bumped to 3.9.3. The former is definitely inappropriate for a stable update; the latter could be included but isn't particularly relevant.

Bug#723587: release.debian.org: Non-free file in PyOpenCL - new version upload to stable and oldstable

2013-09-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 23:44 +0200, Tomasz Rybak wrote: Dnia 2013-09-24, wto o godzinie 23:34 +0100, Adam D. Barratt pisze: The changelog contains a reference to #722014 but does not close it for some reason; please ensure that the BTS metadata is fixed to indicate that the bug is fixed in

Processed: Re: Bug#724619: pu: package mapserver/6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1

2013-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tag -1 + confirmed Bug #724619 [release.debian.org] pu: package mapserver/6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 724619: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724619 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To

Bug#717420: update reSIProcate in stable from 1.8.5 - 1.8.12

2013-09-25 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 01:55:08PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: A lot of that is because the autotools artifacts (e.g. Makefile.in) are quite big and have been regenerated on each release Other things can also be ignored, for example, there are lots of XML files

Processed: Re: Bug#717420: update reSIProcate in stable from 1.8.5 - 1.8.12

2013-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tag -1 + moreinfo Bug #717420 [release.debian.org] update reSIProcate in stable from 1.8.5 - 1.8.12 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 717420: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717420 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#724619: pu: package mapserver/6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1

2013-09-25 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi, On 09/25/2013 11:50 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:38:54PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: In the same commit in the Debian GIS repository --sourcedir=debian/tmp is dropped for dh_install which shouldn't effect the package as debhelper 7 and up already look in this

Bug#724306: Bug #724306: pu: package dpkg/1.16.11

2013-09-25 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 19:47:16 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + confirmed For some reason, this didn't make it to debian-release; that's usually related to attachment size, but they don't seem /that/ big... This has been the case with all my last dpkg requests, I guess

Bug#724306: Bug #724306: pu: package dpkg/1.16.11

2013-09-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 04:46 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 19:47:16 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + confirmed [...] This looks okay overall; thanks. I'm assuming that the changes have been tested on a stable system, particularly the Replaces. Yes. Let