Hi Bill,
Bill Allombert wrote (07 Oct 2013 22:04:21 GMT) :
I am concerned that in the event a package is removed from testing,
the people most interested with restoring the package will miss the
removal, since the package will stay installed on their systems.
I believe there are good chances
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On 2013-10-08 0:21, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
(first off, sorry for being so late. I would understand punting that
until 7.3, etc.)
due to check's being broken (#712140) and netcfg's trying to use its
pkgconfig file in its master branch, netcfg's #717449 is still
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #725748 [release.debian.org] pu: package netcfg/1.108
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
725748: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725748
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #725751 [release.debian.org] pu: package iso-scan/1.43
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
725751: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725751
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On 2013-10-08 0:41, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
here's another tiny update I'd like to see in stable. Due to a simple
error in the state machine, asking the installer to perform a full
search (“2nd pass”) to find an ISO image harder would lead back to
the
1st pass.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Tags: wheezy
Usertags: pu
Please let ejabberd/2.1.10-4+deb7u1 enter Wheezy.
The proposed version is built upon 2.1.10-5 [1] which was
prepared for the first Wheezy point release but missed it by a narrow
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Tags: squeeze
Usertags: pu
Please let ejabberd/2.1.5-3+squeeze2 enter Squeeze.
It fixes just a single security bug [1]: by disabling SSLv2 and weak
cyphers in TLS driver (this bug is itself a clone of [2]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
merge 706209 725790
Bug #706209 [release.debian.org] pu: ejabberd/2.1.10-4+deb7u1
Bug #725790 [release.debian.org] pu: ejabberd/2.1.10-4+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
Merged 706209 725790
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Your message dated Tue, 8 Oct 2013 22:22:07 +0900
with message-id 2013100807.b6b5d1653f3e39c2b76a1...@debian.or.jp
and subject line Re: Bug#706799: pu: net-snmp/5.4.3-3+wheezy1
has caused the Debian Bug report #706799,
regarding pu: net-snmp/5.4.3-3+wheezy1
to be marked as done.
This means
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:25:30 +0100
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 22:15 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 18:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 15:46 +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
It fixes one important
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Bill Allombert wrote:
I am concerned that in the event a package is removed from testing,
the people most interested with restoring the package will miss the
removal, since the package will stay installed on their systems.
Would this be addressed by building some mechanism
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #725751 [release.debian.org] pu: package iso-scan/1.43
Added tag(s) pending.
--
725751: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725751
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 11:55 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2013-10-08 0:41, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
here's another tiny update I'd like to see in stable. Due to a simple
error in the state machine, asking the installer to perform a full
search (“2nd pass”) to
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 11:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2013-10-08 0:21, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
(first off, sorry for being so late. I would understand punting that
until 7.3, etc.)
due to check's being broken (#712140) and netcfg's trying to use its
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #725748 [release.debian.org] pu: package netcfg/1.108
Added tag(s) pending.
--
725748: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725748
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 21:24 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
[21:11] h01ger | adsb: what do you think about uploading debian-edu
1.713 (=jessie + edu0 release version) with chmsee and
debian-edu-config-gosa-netgroup recommends removed? (i mostly ask
because someone
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #725311 [release.debian.org] pu: Getting Debian Edu 7.1+edu0 into the
Upcoming stable point release (7.2)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
725311: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725311
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing changes file: netcfg_1.108+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: iso-scan_1.43+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
severity 662914 serious
thanks
Hi Adam,
On Dienstag, 8. Oktober 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
That happened and, with a short stopover in NEW, debian-edu 1.713+deb7u1
is now in proposed-updates.
yay, thanks!
As per your comments on IRC, slbackup has not been uploaded at this
point, to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear release team,
for the icedove version 3.0.x (and 3.1.x in squeeze-backport) released
with squeeze are some similar bugs opened after the release of squeeze.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 725823 + squeeze
Bug #725823 [release.debian.org] pu: package icedove/3.0.11-1+squeeze15
Added tag(s) squeeze.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
725823:
Processing changes file: debian-edu_1.713+deb7u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-edu_1.713+deb7u1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-edu_1.713+deb7u1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-edu_1.713+deb7u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
Processing changes file: debian-edu_1.713+deb7u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-edu_1.713+deb7u1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: netcfg_1.108+deb7u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Processing changes file: debian-edu_1.713+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vtfav-0003ty...@franck.debian.org
Your message dated Tue, 08 Oct 2013 23:45:06 +0100
with message-id 1381272306.17493.37.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#709865: transition: libosip2
has caused the Debian Bug report #709865,
regarding transition: libosip2
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On 07/10/13 23:04, Bill Allombert wrote:
I am concerned that in the event a package is removed from testing,
the people most interested with restoring the package will miss the
removal, since the package will stay installed on their systems.
This, then, cause stable releases to be missing
Le Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:51:42PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer a
écrit :
I really doubt that possibly interested people will subscribe to all the
packages they are interested in.
Hello everybody,
in one way or the other, there will always be some people who miss the
Processing changes file: netcfg_1.108+deb7u1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vtgwy-0003j3...@franck.debian.org
On Tue, 08 Oct 2013, Geoffrey Thomas wrote:
Would this be addressed by building some mechanism (making tombstone
packages comes to mind, but there are many options) for apt to
prompt to remove packages that were removed in the archive?
It is already addressed by the user-oriented package
Processing changes file: debian-edu_1.713+deb7u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: netcfg_1.108+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: netcfg_1.108+deb7u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi folks,
you aren't crazy (or maybe you are, given the mailing lists you're
reading, but that's another topic), I'm considering 2 uploads this week!
d-i → sid
=
It's been a while since I've been wanting to upload d-i to unstable, but
I failed to look into it until now. I thought it
31 matches
Mail list logo
