Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
I am reading the cruft report:
https://ftp-master.debian.org/cruft-report-daily.txt
[...]
* source package openjpeg2 version 2.1.0-1 no longer builds
binary package(s): libopenjp3d6
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 04:12:06PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
- procps FTBFS on s390x [1]
The s390x is flaky, sometimes it builds sometimes it doesn't. It's due
to how they (the individual buildds) are setup; they are not consistent.
- open-vm-tools on i386 no longer depends on
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 17:58:03 +1000, Craig Small wrote:
Why did it actually get transistioned? I thought it would stay in sid
and not be put into the frozen set of packages.
sid *is* the frozen set of packages.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 17:58 +1000, Craig Small wrote:
Again, I thought there were gates in the freeze period to stop this very
thing.
The freeze proper hasn't started yet. As previously announced on d-d-a
(multiple times) that will be in November. Those announcements also
mentioned that a
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 09:36 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I am reading the cruft report:
https://ftp-master.debian.org/cruft-report-daily.txt
[...]
* source package openjpeg2 version 2.1.0-1 no longer builds
[...]
The broken Build-Depends (leptonlib)
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #762905 [release.debian.org] transition: openjpeg2 2.1.0
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #762905 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request
On 26/09/14 09:58, Craig Small wrote:
How do you actually revert an upload? It's out there now isn't it?
An upload is reverted by uploading the previous version with a higher version,
e.g. by incrementing the epoch or by using an ugly version such as
1.0+really+0.9.0-1 (where 0.9.0 is what you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Jonathan
On 26/08/14 00:46, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Currently Jessie has version 5.5, and we would anticipate you
shipping 5.6. Only experimental has seen an upload of 5.6. What's
your plan here?
Given the situation with upstream's
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 754988 + pending
Bug #754988 [release.debian.org] transition: libjpeg-turbo
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
754988: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754988
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
May I prepare a package for 0.2.4.24, targeting stable, and upload it for
the
next point release?
Please go ahead.
Thanks, done. It's called 0.2.4.24-1 now.
--
| .''`. **
On 25/09/14 22:22, Hilko Bengen wrote:
Hi,
I made a mistake uploading new versions of bin-prot and type-conv in the
wrong order. Now, libbin-prot-camlp4-dev is not installable because it
depends on libtype-conv-camlp4-dev-vzw02 which was provided by the
previous version of
Processing changes file: bash_4.2+dfsg-0.1+deb7u2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bash_4.2+dfsg-0.1+deb7u2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bash_4.2+dfsg-0.1+deb7u2_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bash_4.2+dfsg-0.1+deb7u2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 16:08 +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
May I prepare a package for 0.2.4.24, targeting stable, and upload it for
the
next point release?
Please go ahead.
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #762587 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package tor/0.2.4.24-1~deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
762587: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=762587
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 04:04:11PM +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
Hello!
2014-09-17 22:57 GMT+03:00 Moritz Mühlenhoff j...@inutil.org:
Has there been any progress? The freeze is coming closer.
Both MySQL 5.6 and MariaDB 10.0 are still only in experimental. The
5.5 versions are in testing
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
This is the same issue as for bin-prot yesterday: The uploaded version
depends on libtype-conv-camlp4-dev-vzw02 which was provided by the
previous version of libtype-conv-camlp4-dev.
nmu
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:57:21AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 01/09/14 02:10, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
We are preparing packages for 5.20.1 (soon to be released upstream, and
with fixes we'd like to include in jessie)
On 2014-09-26 08:58, Craig Small wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 04:12:06PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
- procps FTBFS on s390x [1]
The s390x is flaky, sometimes it builds sometimes it doesn't. It's due
to how they (the individual buildds) are setup; they are not
consistent.
-
Your message dated Fri, 26 Sep 2014 20:42:13 +0100
with message-id 50fee2ddd6f5d974876831ce2ae4a...@hogwarts.powdarrmonkey.net
and subject line Re: Bug#762975: nmu: fieldslib_109.20.03-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #762975,
regarding nmu: fieldslib_109.20.03-1
to be marked as done.
This
Hi,
FFmpeg was recently accepted into the Debian archive by the FTP team.
We plan to upload it to unstable soon, so that it can be part of Jessie.
If you have any concerns about this, now would be a good time to start
discussing them in order to find a solution for Jessie.
Best regards,
[ Not speaking for any team. ]
Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com (2014-09-26):
FFmpeg was recently accepted into the Debian archive by the FTP team.
We plan to upload it to unstable soon, so that it can be part of Jessie.
If you have any concerns about this, now would be a
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:56:08PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[ Not speaking for any team. ]
Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com (2014-09-26):
FFmpeg was recently accepted into the Debian archive by the FTP team.
We plan to upload it to unstable soon, so that it can be
On 26.09.2014 22:55, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:56:08PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[ Not speaking for any team. ]
Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com (2014-09-26):
FFmpeg was recently accepted into the Debian archive by the FTP team.
We plan to
* Andreas Cadhalpun (andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com) [140926 23:24]:
On 26.09.2014 22:55, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:56:08PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[ Not speaking for any team. ]
Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com (2014-09-26):
FFmpeg was
On 26.09.2014 23:28, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Andreas Cadhalpun (andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com) [140926 23:24]:
On 26.09.2014 22:55, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:56:08PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[ Not speaking for any team. ]
Andreas Cadhalpun
Andreas Barth a...@ayous.org (2014-09-26):
That sounds like we should drop libav and release with ffmpeg. Is this
also the opinion of the libav maintainers? Or is there a strong reason
why this is not possible?
Pretty sure transition freeze happened already. Certainly strong enough?
Mraw,
Processing changes file: tor_0.2.4.24-1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tor_0.2.4.24-1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tor_0.2.4.24-1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tor_0.2.4.24-1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Processing changes file: tor_0.2.4.24-1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tor_0.2.4.24-1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tor_0.2.4.24-1_sparc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On 14Sep26:2346+0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Pretty sure transition freeze happened already. Certainly strong enough?
Well, all it means is folks who really want the real
ffmpeg will have to run Sid for at least half a year
or so. I have been for a lot more than that, but my
ffmpeg has not
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 23:28:25 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Or is there a strong reason
why this is not possible?
Yes. The time to do that, if that's what people want to see, is months
ago. Or next year. In any case, it's not going to happen now.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Processing changes file: tor_0.2.4.24-1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xxel7-0007lr...@franck.debian.org
31 matches
Mail list logo
