Hi Mehdi,
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Le 2015-02-04 09:01, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
it's been two weeks that I have opened this pre-approval request
and I got almost no feedback from the release team (except Neil saying
that he has no answer for me on IRC).
Neil or Niels?
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package suricata
We just uploaded to unstable a new suricata version (2.0.6-2) which
would require another unblock to enter jessie.
This is the debdiff, which was generated
Hi,
Based on #778695, it seems like we still have trigger cycles. At this
point in the freeze, I am afraid it is too late to fix the remaining cycles.
I have asked Johannes if this kind of trigger cycles can be found via
his script. If so, hopefully we can have them eliminated for Stretch,
but
Le 2015-02-18 09:38, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
And if you don't agree, then I would be interested to know what could
bring you the required confidence so that we can gain that status
(maybe adding autopkgtests to reverse dependencies and running
those tests, or stuff like that).
The list of
On 18 February 2015 at 18:01, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:54:04 +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package suricata
We
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:54:04 +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package suricata
We just uploaded to unstable a new suricata version (2.0.6-2) which
would
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2015 19:10:49 +0100
with message-id 20150218181049.ga1...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#778636: unblock: cvsweb/3:3.0.6-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #778636,
regarding unblock: cvsweb/3:3.0.6-8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2015 19:23:13 +
with message-id 1424287393.10789.3.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk
and subject line Re: Bug#778704: unblock: libgtk2-perl/1.2492-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #778704,
regarding unblock: libgtk2-perl/1.2492-4
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2015 19:20:34 +0100
with message-id 20150218182034.gb1...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#771701: (pre-approval) unblock:
bareos/14.2.1+20141017gitc6c5b56-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #771701,
regarding (pre-approval) unblock:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 19:53 -0800, Joe Damato wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org
wrote:
Joe, if you get an ack from the release team on your upload for
libfcgi I can happily sponsor the upload itself.
How do I go
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2015 20:07:06 +0100
with message-id 54e4e2da.7080...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#777649: cgmanager security update for jessie
has caused the Debian Bug report #777649,
regarding unblock: cgmanager/0.33-2+deb8u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #777553 [release.debian.org] pu: package libfcgi/2.4.0-8
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
777553: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777553
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:35:38AM +0800, Steven Capper
steven.cap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
arm64 should be building in -5, so shouldn't the arm64 reverse
dependancies be unaffected?
Under mips, mipsel, and s390x tbb fails to build unit tests due to
missing/incorrect gcc atomics. I have very
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 15:33 +, Colin Watson wrote:
I'd like to upload the following patch to stable-proposed-updates to fix
#778409, which the security team doesn't think warrants a DSA (and
honestly I'd have to agree). Would this be OK? It matches 0.016-24
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libgtk2-perl
The only change it contains is a security fix cherry-picked from upstream,
and the corresponding test case.
I'm in the process of convincing them to
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2015 13:57:47 -0500 (EST)
with message-id alpine.gso.1.10.1502181356210.3...@multics.mit.edu
and subject line Re: release.debian.org: jessie's new kernel breaks
openafs-modules-dkms
has caused the Debian Bug report #778254,
regarding release.debian.org: jessie's new
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #778622 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package vigor/0.016-19+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
778622: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778622
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 08:52:05AM +0100, Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org
wrote:
Could you do a new upload with only the security fix?
I just did so and uploaded 1:1.22.0-9+deb8u1 to t-p-u.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 21:25 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 06:21:05AM +, olivier sallou
olivier.sal...@gmail.com wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org (2015-02-18):
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 08:52:05AM +0100, Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org
wrote:
Could you do a new upload with only the security fix?
I just did so and uploaded 1:1.22.0-9+deb8u1 to t-p-u.
Please push both your jessie branch and tag to
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:34:47 +0100
with message-id 20150218213447.gg1...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#778713: unblock: krb5/1.12.1+dfsg-18
has caused the Debian Bug report #778713,
regarding unblock: krb5/1.12.1+dfsg-18
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:30:50PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
wrote:
Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org (2015-02-18):
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 08:52:05AM +0100, Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org
wrote:
Could you do a new upload with only the security fix?
I just did so
Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org (2015-02-18):
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:30:50PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
wrote:
Please push both your jessie branch and tag to git.
I don't have write access to d-i repos.
Wrong.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 06:21:05AM +, olivier sallou
olivier.sal...@gmail.com wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Please unblock package logol
I have to admit that I
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 18:44:16 +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
On 18 February 2015 at 18:01, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:54:04 +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 23:37:48 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 04:02:51 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
Updated version of debdiff, removing the -O3 change.
The changelog still says build with -O3.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package krb5
Upstream released a patch for CVE-2014-5355, a NULL dereference
or out-of-bounds read in krb5_recvauth(). It is not clear that any
aging is necessary; perhaps
Hi Mehdi,
To me, this bug is critical, because it makes the use of the moldable
jobs feature break the advance reservation feature, and both features
are important to users of OAR.
Moldable jobs are especially used in the case of heterogeneous clusters
(e.g. clusters composed of nodes of 2 or
package: release.debian.org
user: release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags: unblock
severity: normal
x-debbugs-cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Please consider unblocking bind9. It fixes a new security issue.
unblock bind9/9.9.5.dfsg-9
unblock-udeb bind9/9.9.5.dfsg-9
diff -u
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 778492 -moreinfo
Bug #778492 [release.debian.org] unblock: ndisc6/1.0.1-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
778492: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778492
Le Wed Feb 18 2015 at 9:25:56 PM, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 06:21:05AM +, olivier sallou
olivier.sal...@gmail.com wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-CC:
Hi Adam and Andreas,
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 02:10:49PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 22:38 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
I'd like to get a fix into wheezy to avoid dpkg complaining about
modified conffiles if /etc/sudoers is the
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Wouldn't that break the installer? ... since netcfg is installing rdnssd
and network-manager is being installed by default.
I don't see why it would. Yes, rdnssd-udeb is used by netcfg in the
d-i environment but network-manager is not
Hi Adam, hi Joe,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 07:11:22PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 19:53 -0800, Joe Damato wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org
wrote:
Joe, if you get an ack from the release
Am Dienstag, den 17.02.2015, 19:44 +0100 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
Le 2015-02-17 19:06, Daniel Leidert a écrit :
There is an incompatibility with Perl 5.18, which can be fixed by the
patch
added in 3:3.0.6-8. The bug itself has been reported with severity
important.
However the reporter
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu abiword_3.0.1-1 . ALL . experimental . -m Rebuild against libical1a.
libical1 has been renamed to libical1a.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 12:20:43AM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Back in November 2014, Ivo described the solution to have snort and daq
into Jessie (See [1]). Unfortunately, this didn't happen and he was forced
to remove the packages from Jessie, as announced. We understand that the
outcome will
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu gnokii_0.6.31+dfsg-2 . ALL . experimental . -m Rebuild against libical1a.
libical1 is gone ...
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
38 matches
Mail list logo
