Hi Adam,
> I have to admit that I'm not really keen on approving an update which
> consists of "add this tar to the source package". I'm also still not
Understandable.
> sure why the suggestion is to add the changes via such a binary update
> rather than a patch - I appreciate that the changes m
> So, could this bug now be planned to be fixed in 8.4?
I forgot to add - even if we do *NOT* want to fix dvipdfmx, there is
an easy way around, do not use type1 but otf/ttf fonts.
I have advised this to the Russian reporter and done it myself
for all release notes. It is damned easy to choose a
Processing changes file: nginx_1.2.1-2.2+wheezy4_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nginx_1.2.1-2.2+wheezy4_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nginx_1.2.1-2.2+wheezy4_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nginx_1.2.1-2.2+wheezy4_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing c
On 13/02/16 12:17, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2016-02-13 12:07, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> ben is unsure about the state of about openimageio/mips64el,
>> but I cannot see anything "old" (i.e. /6v5/) in the build log.
>
> caused by libopenimageio1.5v5 cruft, so
>
> nmu blender_2.76.b+dfsg0-3 .
Your message dated Sat, 13 Feb 2016 20:43:48 +0100
with message-id <56bf8774.1080...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#814614: nmu: ceph_0.94.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #814614,
regarding nmu: ceph_0.94.5-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Processing changes file: nss-pam-ldapd_0.9.4-3+deb8u1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nss-pam-ldapd_0.9.4-3+deb8u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nss-pam-ldapd_0.9.4-3+deb8u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nss-pam-ldapd_0.9.4-3+deb8u1_i386.changes
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
The sitesummary package in stable is affected by two RC bugs, one giving
uninstallation problems, the other causing hangs in the postinst. The
following patch will solve it. The c
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu ceph_0.94.5-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild with debhelper (>=
9.20151126)."
ceph/experimental was built with a buggy debhelper w.r.t. init.d scripts
handling.
Andreas
Ok, This part of the transition is going well enough, modulo #814183.
As you may know, I switched the mpi-defaults in s390x and x32 to use
openmpi instead of mpich, now that openmpi builds there too.
No the default MPI implementation is the same in all release
architectures, which is nice per se.
On 13/02/16 13:43, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> This binNMU seems to have been missed so far ...
>
> nmu mod-gnutls_0.7.2-2 . ANY . -m "Rebuild against libgnutls30."
Scheduled (plus the sid-only).
Emilio
Your message dated Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:03:27 +0100
with message-id <56bf299f.2080...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#814609: nmu: mbt_3.2.12-1 zeromq3_4.1.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #814609,
regarding nmu: mbt_3.2.12-1 zeromq3_4.1.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:59:49 +0100
with message-id <56bf28c5.4030...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#804246: transition: gsl
has caused the Debian Bug report #804246,
regarding transition: gsl
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu mbt_3.2.12-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuilt against libticcutils2v5."
nmu zeromq3_4.1.4-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against libsodium18."
There were transitions in sid recen
Processing changes file: libgcrypt20_1.6.3-2+deb8u1_allonly.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libgcrypt20_1.6.3-2+deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libgcrypt20_1.6.3-2+deb8u1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libgcrypt20_1.6.3-2+deb8u1_armel.changes
ACCE
This binNMU seems to have been missed so far ...
nmu mod-gnutls_0.7.2-2 . ANY . -m "Rebuild against libgnutls30."
Andreas
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 21:52 +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-01-01 at 17:16 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Apologies for the repeated delay. :-| Please go ahead.
>
> Just when I wanted to wrap this up, another important bug popped up
> with a trivial fix :
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #785053 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package nss-pam-ldapd/0.9.4-3
Added tag(s) pending.
--
785053: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785053
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 16:18 +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> with today's postgresql-9.1 9.1.20-0+deb7u1 security update in wheezy,
> the package version in wheezy is now greater than the one in jessie.
> This no-change (in pl/perl) upload fixes that.
Flagged for acceptan
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #814442 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package
postgresql-9.1/9.1.20-0+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
814442: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814442
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On 2016-02-13 12:07, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> ben is unsure about the state of about openimageio/mips64el,
> but I cannot see anything "old" (i.e. /6v5/) in the build log.
caused by libopenimageio1.5v5 cruft, so
nmu blender_2.76.b+dfsg0-3 . mips64el . -m "Rebuild against libopenimageio1.6."
An
# missed binNMU due to being built/installed late
nmu exactimage_0.9.1-12 . mips64el . -m "Rebuild against libopenexr22 and
libilmbase12."
# failed with ICE, new gcc version is now in sid, so try again
gb gmic_1.6.8-3+b1 . mips64el
ben is unsure about the state of about openimageio/mips64el,
but
Your message dated Sat, 13 Feb 2016 11:59:00 +0100
with message-id <56bf0c74.9080...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#814595: nmu: apertium_3.4.0~r61013-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #814595,
regarding nmu: apertium_3.4.0~r61013-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu apertium_3.4.0~r61013-5 . mips . unstable . -m "Rebuild with
liblttoolbox3-3.3-0v5."
Looks like this was built against the temporarily reinstated
liblttoolbox3-3.3-0.
apertium builds
On Sat, 2016-02-13 at 10:45 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Norbert Preining wrote:
> > Hi everyone, esp release managers
> >
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787759
> >
> > There are two bugs, one is the broken fonts, one is the
> > broken dvipdfmx for t1 fonts.
[
Hi,
Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi everyone, esp release managers
>
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787759
>
> There are two bugs, one is the broken fonts, one is the
> broken dvipdfmx for t1 fonts.
>
> > This mail made me think about the status of this ...
>
> I asked rel
25 matches
Mail list logo