Stop sending this mag to me I did not order this Chris redden 10205 live oak AV
cherry valley ca 92223
Sent from my iPad
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:23:30PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 29.03.2016 um 23:01 schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:03:56PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> >> The Security Team decided to mark the issues in Jessie as no-dsa because
> >> we only ship the servlet API
Am 29.03.2016 um 23:01 schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:03:56PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> The Security Team decided to mark the issues in Jessie as no-dsa because
>> we only ship the servlet API and documentation in this release which
>> can't be affected by security
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 07:38:58AM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
>> Boost 1.58 -> successfully compiled LibreOffice 5.1.2~RC1.
>
> Including the tests?
Ah, checked the build log[1] and the tests were not run this
Hi the new libpng16 is now in new queue, and this made me think about the ben
file.
Affected: .depends ~ /libpng1/
Good: .depends ~ /libpng16/
Bad: .depends ~ /libpng12-0/
this seems bad.
I would do:
title = "libpng16";
is_affected = .build-depends ~ /libpng12-dev/ | .build-depends ~
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 07:38:58AM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
>> Boost 1.58 -> successfully compiled LibreOffice 5.1.2~RC1.
>
> Including the tests?
I did the tests in a chroot, without any shell environmental
El 11/10/15 a las 23:29, Dominic Hargreaves escribió:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 05:45:05PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 16:50 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 01:36:05AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > ndisc6
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 07:38:58AM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
> Boost 1.58 -> successfully compiled LibreOffice 5.1.2~RC1.
Including the tests?
But then again, the broken help on the last transition and the crashes
in some other one before that were not catched by the tests either ;)
Hi Christopher and Nobuhiro, please don't use urgency critical for normal bugs.
This prevents useful testing from unstable users, and might be source of
troubles
for stretch users.
Urgency medium (the default) should have been the best value here.
(high is for security, critical for serious
Hi
Emilio wrote:
> binary-NEW shouldn't be a big deal. Just make sure to upload to experimental.
I triple checked, in 8 hours or so it will finish the deferred queue time.
https://ftp-master.debian.org/deferred/libpng1.6_1.6.20-3_amd64.changes
the changes file looks fine to me:
Distribution:
2016-03-28 14:44 GMT+02:00 Adam D. Barratt :
> On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 14:39 +0200, Mathieu Parent (Debian) wrote:
>> 2016-03-26 18:35 GMT+01:00 Adam D. Barratt :
>> > On Sat, 2016-03-26 at 17:14 +0100, Mathieu Parent wrote:
>> >> tags 816205 +
Neil Williams writes:
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 21:25:26 -0700
> Afif Elghraoui wrote:
>> The package in question, circlator, depends on two
>> architecture-dependent packages that can only build on amd64 and
>> kfreebsd-amd64 currently. The package cannot
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 29/03/16 15:38, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi release team,
>
> libfm-qt bumps its so version from 2 to 3, so we need to do the
> transition
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #819491 [release.debian.org] transition: libfm-qt
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
819491: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819491
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20150422+deb8u3+b1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20150422+deb8u3+b1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20150422+deb8u3+b1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20130613+deb7u3+b1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20130613+deb7u3+b1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20130613+deb7u3+b1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Kurt Roeckx:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:20:43PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> I don't think dlopen(libssl) vs gcc -lssl makes any difference
>> licensing-wise, I suspect either they're both ok or they're both not
>> ok...
>
> I assume the problem is not with Qt itself, but with other
>
17 matches
Mail list logo