Processing changes file: libreoffice_4.3.3-2+deb8u4_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: eglibc_2.13-38+deb7u10_all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: eglibc_2.13-38+deb7u10_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: eglibc_2.13-38+deb7u10_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: eglibc_2.13-38+deb7u10_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing
Hi!
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 20:34:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Apologies for the delays in getting back to you. Please go ahead.
No problem! Uploaded now too.
Thanks,
Guillem
Hi!
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 20:36:32 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
>
> On Sun, 2016-03-27 at 12:07 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 18:07:46 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2016-03-21 at 16:36:16 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
simple jessie-pu for poppler, just fixed in unstable, which fixes
CVE-2015-8868; attached debdiff.
I guess I need to do binary uploads in (old-)stable, right?
Thanks,
--
Control: block -1 by 822565 822569 822572
Hello!
The FTBFS bugs for the libical2 transition has now been filed
including trivial patches for all of them.
(Waiting for libical to get through binary-NEW and then likely
follow up with an arm build fix before removing the moreinfo tag.)
Regards,
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 822565 822569 822572
Bug #797074 [release.debian.org] transition: libical2
797074 was not blocked by any bugs.
797074 was blocking: 797003
Added blocking bug(s) of 797074: 822569, 822572, and 822565
--
797074:
On Friday, April 22, 2016 06:32:15 PM Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 06:52:45PM -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > Please accept ledgersmb_1.3.47-1~deb8u1 for the next Jessie point release.
> > It resolves the issues with the current version of
Your message dated Mon, 25 Apr 2016 11:33:12 +0200
with message-id <571de458.30...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#822540: nmu: libapache2-mod-qos_11.25-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #822540,
regarding nmu: libapache2-mod-qos_11.25-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On 25/04/16 10:59, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:34:57AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
>> Dear Sergey,
>>
>> This bug could have been easily avoided.
>>
>> please make sure that you *always* build on an updated system; even better
>> use tools like pbuilder or sbuild or like to
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:53:28PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Could you add Closes for appropriate bugs please?
Sure, new debdiff attached.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:34:57AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Dear Sergey,
>
> This bug could have been easily avoided.
>
> please make sure that you *always* build on an updated system; even better
> use tools like pbuilder or sbuild or like to *ensure* that you have the latest
> packages
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Maintainer obviously not built on an up-to-date system.
nmu libapache2-mod-qos_11.25-1 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild against libpng1.6"
Dear Sergey,
This bug could have been easily avoided.
Your message dated Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:40:25 +0200
with message-id <571dbbd9.2080...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#822531: nmu: swftools_0.9.2+git20130725-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #822531,
regarding nmu: swftools_0.9.2+git20130725-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
swftools correctly build-depends on libjpeg-dev, but the amd64 version
(coming from the binary upload by the maintainer) depends on libjpeg8.
Rebuilding in a clean up-to-date environment
15 matches
Mail list logo
