Bug#827781: jessie-pu: package lxc/1:1.0.6-6+deb8u3

2016-06-20 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu After init 1.34 dropped the `Essential: yes` bit, debootstrap will produce systems that by default do not have /sbin/init (as intended). This makes, however, lxc from jessie not able

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

2016-06-20 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi all, Quoting Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2016-06-20 20:52:32) > On 20/06/16 20:17, Anton Gladky wrote: > > Dear release team, > > > > I am not sure, whether I ask the question, using > > the correct address. If I am not right, please redirect > > me. > > > > Two of my packages (liggghts and yade)

Bug#827755: transition: kdepim-16.04

2016-06-20 Thread Maximiliano Curia
On Monday, 20 June 2016 18:48:29 CEST Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 20/06/16 16:44, Maximiliano Curia wrote: > > The kdepimlibs binary components were all renamed in the new source > > package > > (kf5-kdepimlibs), so it doesn't really need to be addressed in this > > transition, but packages

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

2016-06-20 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 20/06/16 20:17, Anton Gladky wrote: > Dear release team, > > I am not sure, whether I ask the question, using > the correct address. If I am not right, please redirect > me. > > Two of my packages (liggghts and yade) are waiting to > be build on build servers due to unsatisfied dependency > wi

Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

2016-06-20 Thread Anton Gladky
Dear release team, I am not sure, whether I ask the question, using the correct address. If I am not right, please redirect me. Two of my packages (liggghts and yade) are waiting to be build on build servers due to unsatisfied dependency with the following note: = liggghts build-depends

Bug#827755: transition: kdepim-16.04

2016-06-20 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 20/06/16 18:48, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 20/06/16 16:44, Maximiliano Curia wrote: >> Now that the qt transition is over, we would like to start pushing kdepim to >> unstable. This should address the auto transitions: Additionally: Did you test-rebuild the rdeps? Are there any known

Bug#827755: transition: kdepim-16.04

2016-06-20 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 20/06/16 16:44, Maximiliano Curia wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi, > > Now that the qt transition is over, we would like to start pushing kdepim to > unstable. This should address the auto tra

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-20 Thread Witold Baryluk
in theory it should be easier to port applications to ppc64el, especially software that is not maintained by Debian (like various commercial or not packaged apps and libraries), because it makes a little bit more similar to x86 and amd64. Power8 hardware isn't terribly expensive (and there are alre

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-20 Thread alexmcwhirter
On 2016-06-20 10:29, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On 06/20/2016 04:15 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 04:11:32PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Well, we just did a full archive rebuild of "ppc64" to be able to support ppc64 on the e5500 cores by disabling AltiVe

Bug#827755: transition: kdepim-16.04

2016-06-20 Thread Maximiliano Curia
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, Now that the qt transition is over, we would like to start pushing kdepim to unstable. This should address the auto transitions: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ako

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 06/20/2016 04:15 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 04:11:32PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> Well, we just did a full archive rebuild of "ppc64" to be able to >> support ppc64 on the e5500 cores by disabling AltiVec, didn't we? > > Well it is getting there. The

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 06/20/2016 04:05 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > Also I suspect many users of 64 bit capable freescale chips > (e5500 and e6500 cores) are running 32 bit powerpc since they > don't have enough ram to actually really gain anything > from going to 64 bit, and the ppc64 port isn't done yet. Well, we

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-20 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 04:11:32PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Well, we just did a full archive rebuild of "ppc64" to be able to > support ppc64 on the e5500 cores by disabling AltiVec, didn't we? Well it is getting there. -- Len Sorensen

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-20 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 08:35:02PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > Do they implement the ISA required by the existing Debian port? Yes. The only ones that don't are the Freescale 85xx and P10[12]x chips, which are powerpcspe due to using the e500 core. All the 83xx and 82xx chips which are still

Re: sspace: arch:all package with missing i386 dependencies

2016-06-20 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Many thanks Emilio! Cheers Sascha On 20/06/2016 12:41, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 20/06/16 12:01, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: >> Hi Emilio, >> similarly to circulator, ariba and others, I have another Perl-based tool packaged which depends on something missing on i386:

Bug#827177: transition: qtbase-opensource-src

2016-06-20 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Thanks a lot! -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/

Re: sspace: arch:all package with missing i386 dependencies

2016-06-20 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 20/06/16 12:01, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > Hi Emilio, > >>> similarly to circulator, ariba and others, I have another Perl-based tool >>> packaged which depends on something missing on i386: >>> >>>sspace/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: bowtie >>> >>> Would it be possible to force sspace as wel

Bug#827291: transition: libpodofo

2016-06-20 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:07:42PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Go ahead. ta, uploaded. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Lau

Bug#827177: marked as done (transition: qtbase-opensource-src)

2016-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2016 13:07:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#827177: transition: qtbase-opensource-src has caused the Debian Bug report #827177, regarding transition: qtbase-opensource-src to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#827291: transition: libpodofo

2016-06-20 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 14/06/16 19:50, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 14/06/16 19:08, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libpodofo.html >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: transitio

Processed: Re: Bug#827291: transition: libpodofo

2016-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #827291 [release.debian.org] transition: libpodofo Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 827291: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827291 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Re: sspace: arch:all package with missing i386 dependencies

2016-06-20 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi Emilio, >> similarly to circulator, ariba and others, I have another Perl-based tool >> packaged which depends on something missing on i386: >> >>sspace/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: bowtie >> >> Would it be possible to force sspace as well as discussed before? >> If you need any more infor