Bug#833607: nmu: python-mapnik_1:0.0~20160726-1c4a51d-1~exp1 & node-mapnik_3.5.13+dfsg-1~exp1

2016-08-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2016-08-07 at 00:11 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > The wanna-build documentation on release.d.o [0] mentions "If you are > asking for a dep-wait, an additional give-back is not needed", which > seems to be incorrect based on your reply. > > Is the documentation outdated perhaps? >

Bug#833607: nmu: python-mapnik_1:0.0~20160726-1c4a51d-1~exp1 & node-mapnik_3.5.13+dfsg-1~exp1

2016-08-06 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Adam, On 08/07/2016 12:04 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2016-08-06 at 23:47 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >> Please binNMU python-mapnik & node-mapnik in experimental, they need to >> be rebuild with libmapnik-dev (3.0.12~rc1+ds-1~exp2) which depends on >> the correct

Bug#833607: marked as done (nmu: python-mapnik_1:0.0~20160726-1c4a51d-1~exp1 & node-mapnik_3.5.13+dfsg-1~exp1)

2016-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 06 Aug 2016 23:04:50 +0100 with message-id <1470521090.32336.32.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#833607: nmu: python-mapnik_1:0.0~20160726-1c4a51d-1~exp1 & node-mapnik_3.5.13+dfsg-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #833607, regarding nmu:

NEW changes in stable-new

2016-08-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: chromium-browser_52.0.2743.82-1~deb8u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: chromium-browser_52.0.2743.82-1~deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: curl_7.38.0-4+deb8u4_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

Bug#833607: nmu: python-mapnik_1:0.0~20160726-1c4a51d-1~exp1 & node-mapnik_3.5.13+dfsg-1~exp1

2016-08-06 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please binNMU python-mapnik & node-mapnik in experimental, they need to be rebuild with libmapnik-dev (3.0.12~rc1+ds-1~exp2) which depends on the correct libmapbox-variant-dev (from

Bug#827352: jessie-pu: package automake-1.14/1.14.1-4+deb8u1

2016-08-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 11:12 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > On my Debian Jessie machine, I would like to fix a security problem with > automake-1.14 that show up the debsecan report, see > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/automake-1.14

Processed: Re: Bug#827352: jessie-pu: package automake-1.14/1.14.1-4+deb8u1

2016-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #827352 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package automake-1.14/1.14.1-4+deb8u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 827352: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827352 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#833550: jessie-pu: package gnome-maps/3.14.1.2-1

2016-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #833550 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package gnome-maps/3.14.1.2-1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 833550: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833550 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#833550: jessie-pu: package gnome-maps/3.14.1.2-1

2016-08-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 23:14 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > gnome-maps is currently unusable in Jessie. It used the MapQuest provider, > which has closed access to external applications[1]. > > This is already fixed in unstable, see #830842. > > For Jessie, I

Processed: Re: Bug#833575: jessie-pu: package javatools/0.48+deb8u1

2016-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #833575 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package javatools/0.48+deb8u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 833575: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833575 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#833575: jessie-pu: package javatools/0.48+deb8u1

2016-08-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sat, 2016-08-06 at 11:02 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > collectd on security.d.o fails to build on ppc64el, apparently because > java changed its paths there and javatools needs an update. Please go ahead. Regards, Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

2016-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #831335 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 831335: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=831335 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

2016-08-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 00:25 +0200, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2016-07-14 20:06:27 +0200, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Please could we have a debdiff, relative to the current package in > > jessie, in this bug log? (We prefer p-u bugs to be self-contained, and >

Bug#833595: jessie-pu: package nullmailer/1.13-1+deb8u1

2016-08-06 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Dear Release Team, #831813 is an rc-bug in nullmailer, which, for some configurations, keeps username/passwords in the debconf db. I've fixed this in unstable as an NMU; Security

Bug#833589: transition: opencc

2016-08-06 Thread Aron Xu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, I'd like to kick off the opencc transition, which has been in experimental for quite some time. Dependencies: - ibus-libzhuyin: experimental version works - libpyzy: binNMU is

Bug#833575: jessie-pu: package javatools/0.48+deb8u1

2016-08-06 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: javato...@packages.debian.org Hi, collectd on security.d.o fails to build on ppc64el, apparently because java changed its paths there and javatools needs an update.