Bug#840379: jessie-pu: package bash/4.3-11+deb8u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi Stable release managers, X-Debbugs-CC Matthias Klose if he agrees, or would me to drop in case he would like to do the upload himself. bash in Stable is

Bug#840378: jessie-pu: package openbox/3.5.2-8+deb8u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi Stable release managers, In e.g. environments with a huge amount of groups, openbox is particularly affected by #808138, since openbox did enumerate multiple time all groups at

Bug#837199: marked as done (transition: armadillo)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:34:56 +0200 with message-id <52d03de7-f2a4-daf9-8f69-4ffcc2a6f...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#837199: transition: armadillo has caused the Debian Bug report #837199, regarding transition: armadillo to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#839839: marked as done (transition: x265)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:38:22 +0200 with message-id <15d73c49-3a22-5950-2fe5-856a71f68...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#839839: transition: x265 has caused the Debian Bug report #839839, regarding transition: x265 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#835397: marked as done (transition: superlu)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:36:40 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#835397: transition: superlu soname 4 -> 5 has caused the Debian Bug report #835397, regarding transition: superlu to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#835170: marked as done (transition: protobuf)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:35:41 +0200 with message-id <84dbfb22-26bb-ec99-a4b5-31641c5a4...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#835170: transition: protobuf has caused the Debian Bug report #835170, regarding transition: protobuf to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#834545: marked as done (transition: re2)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:32:36 +0200 with message-id <688586f4-57d0-db24-da18-6ccac6539...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#834545: transition: re2 has caused the Debian Bug report #834545, regarding transition: re2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#828097: marked as done (transition: tidy)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:30:40 +0200 with message-id <8c4d0994-e62d-24e5-bb86-baf550109...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#828097: transition: tidy has caused the Debian Bug report #828097, regarding transition: tidy to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: Re: Bug#819530: transition: icu

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 819530 pending Bug #819530 [release.debian.org] transition: icu Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 819530: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819530 Debian

Bug#827755: marked as done (transition: kdepim-16.04)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:32:05 +0200 with message-id <9f131b03-1b4d-9f11-87a7-f20fdc079...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#827755: transition: kdepim-16.04 has caused the Debian Bug report #827755, regarding transition: kdepim-16.04 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#836799: marked as done (transition: ros-geometric-shapes)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:28:01 +0200 with message-id <24f8f2a2-33a6-9851-0bf6-b5301e3c0...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#836799: transition: ros-geometric-shapes has caused the Debian Bug report #836799, regarding transition: ros-geometric-shapes to be marked as done. This

Bug#836593: marked as done (transition: libonig)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:28:45 +0200 with message-id <49737a8f-f1aa-0e7c-e310-084ee59a2...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#836593: transition: libonig has caused the Debian Bug report #836593, regarding transition: libonig to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#836258: marked as done (transition: chromaprint)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:27:19 +0200 with message-id <1f115a60-3287-f116-d5da-bd7f5366f...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#836258: transition: chromaprint has caused the Debian Bug report #836258, regarding transition: chromaprint to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#833589: marked as done (transition: opencc)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:26:49 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#833589: transition: opencc has caused the Debian Bug report #833589, regarding transition: opencc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#835048: marked as done (transition: libvpx)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:24:25 +0200 with message-id <6f563387-35d8-2afb-fbae-541129827...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#835048: transition: libvpx has caused the Debian Bug report #835048, regarding transition: libvpx to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#833377: marked as done (transition: boost1.61)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:25:23 +0200 with message-id <2a4d11ed-7463-f26d-2eaf-9837e9f17...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#833377: release.debian.org: boost1.61 transition has caused the Debian Bug report #833377, regarding transition: boost1.61 to be marked as done. This means

Processed: Re: Bug#838532: transition: cgal

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 838532 pending Bug #838532 [release.debian.org] transition: cgal Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 838532: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838532 Debian

Bug#837412: marked as done (transition: liblouis)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:23:12 +0200 with message-id <520de57d-3188-9257-83fb-a6dac7e77...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#837412: transition: liblouis has caused the Debian Bug report #837412, regarding transition: liblouis to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#828186: marked as done (transition: rtaudio)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:20:33 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#828186: transition: rtaudio has caused the Debian Bug report #828186, regarding transition: rtaudio to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#833720: marked as done (transition: libzhuyin)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:22:26 +0200 with message-id <245760dc-67c4-90f5-982c-847f31727...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#833720: transition: libzhuyin has caused the Debian Bug report #833720, regarding transition: libzhuyin to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#832805: marked as done (transition: libwebp)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:21:11 +0200 with message-id <2f76cde2-8ea4-c739-d13c-c9ccfcd18...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#832805: transition: libwebp has caused the Debian Bug report #832805, regarding transition: libwebp to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#838625: marked as done (transition: ros-ros-comm)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:17:22 +0200 with message-id <9b8e87a9-58a7-3a40-5334-3990b4b58...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#838625: transition: ros-robot-model has caused the Debian Bug report #838625, regarding transition: ros-ros-comm to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: Re: Bug#836942: transition: glew

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 836942 pending Bug #836942 [release.debian.org] transition: glew Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 836942: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=836942 Debian

Bug#836250: marked as done (transition: gloox)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:19:37 +0200 with message-id <5b52e6f4-8a56-179d-20be-dd82cfa8c...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#836250: transition: gloox has caused the Debian Bug report #836250, regarding transition: gloox to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#836942: transition: glew

tags 836942 pending thanks

Bug#815036: marked as done (transition: msgpack-c)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:16:36 +0200 with message-id <8e481c0d-b857-e0ee-028c-9a606caf3...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#815036: transition: msgpack-c has caused the Debian Bug report #815036, regarding transition: msgpack-c to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processed: Re: Bug#838234: transition: readline/readline6

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #838234 [release.debian.org] transition: readline/readline6 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 838234: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838234 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#836996: marked as done (transition: evolution-data-server 3.21.x)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:15:00 +0200 with message-id <8f5f1ed0-6bb3-d43b-d6b4-f190357da...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#836996: transition: evolution-data-server 3.21.x has caused the Debian Bug report #836996, regarding transition: evolution-data-server 3.21.x to be marked

Bug#838234: transition: readline/readline6

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 03/10/16 00:10, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/readline7.html > > Hi, > > On 18/09/16 20:43, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User:

Bug#837630: marked as done (transition: xapian-core)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:15:28 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#837630: transition: xapian-core has caused the Debian Bug report #837630, regarding transition: xapian-core to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processed: Re: Bug#832098: transition: llvm-defaults

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 832098 = confirmed Bug #832098 [release.debian.org] transition: llvm-defaults Added tag(s) confirmed; removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 832098:

Bug#834955: marked as done (transition: x265)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:12:38 +0200 with message-id <831b4628-8e47-13a6-8238-5c461e288...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#834955: transition: x265 has caused the Debian Bug report #834955, regarding transition: x265 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#836917: marked as done (transition: openmpi)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:10:15 +0200 with message-id <9adcb9f9-ee51-94d9-b5ef-22335e19a...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#836917: transition: openmpi has caused the Debian Bug report #836917, regarding transition: openmpi to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#831810: marked as done (transition: libmicrohttpd)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:10:50 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#831810: transition: libmicrohttpd has caused the Debian Bug report #831810, regarding transition: libmicrohttpd to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#840350: jessie-pu: package dbus/1.8.22-0+deb8u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu I've released a new upstream version of dbus which fixes a potential security vulnerability. I don't *think* it's exploitable in Debian oldstable or later, so the security team

Re: [pkg-firebird-general] Uncoordinated firebird transition (closes: Re: Accepted firebird3.0 3.0.1.32609.ds4-3 (source) into unstable)

-=| Rene Engelhard, 07.10.2016 14:53:22 +0200 |=- > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 12:04:06PM +, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > Sorry about that, I needed to be more public about my plans. > > Yeah, that would have been nice. :) > > > Thing is, FB2.5's end of life is planned¹ for 2017, which

Bug#840304: nmu: cudf_0.8-1 libaio-ocaml_1.0.1-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu cudf_0.8-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Recompile with OCaml 4.02.3" nmu libaio-ocaml_1.0.1-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Recompile with OCaml 4.02.3" The transition from 4.01 to 4.02 has

Re: Enabling PIE by default for Stretch

Hi Maximiliano, 2016-10-10 14:21 GMT+02:00 Maximiliano Curia : > ¡Hola Niels! > > El 2016-10-10 a las 05:44 +, Niels Thykier escribió: >> >> Niels Thykier: >>> >>> As brought up on the meeting last night, I think we should try to go for >>> PIE by default in Stretch on all

Re: Enabling PIE by default for Stretch

¡Hola Niels! El 2016-10-10 a las 05:44 +, Niels Thykier escribió: Niels Thykier: As brought up on the meeting last night, I think we should try to go for PIE by default in Stretch on all release architectures! * It is a substantial hardening feature * Upstream has vastly reduced the

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 11:13:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2016-10-09 at 21:12 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > [ adding debian-powerpc ] > > > > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 06:54:44PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > > Niels Thykier schrieb: > > > > If I am to

Bug#840295: Requesting RC exception for stretch for browserified javascript

package: release.debian.org Dear Release Team, As discussed with FTP masters[1], I'd like to request an RC exception for browserified javascript packages already in the archive. Hopefully we'll be able to complete a proper browserification environment in debian for stretch+1 release. Thanks

Fwd: Bug#839226: [PATCH] cups : SSL is vulnerable to POODLE [Jessie]

Re-sending differently, as somehow my MUA messed this sending in some weird way. Original Message Subject: Bug#839226: [PATCH] cups : SSL is vulnerable to POODLE [Jessie] Date: 2016-10-10 10:13 From: Didier 'OdyX' Raboud To: 839...@bugs.debian.org,