Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl - will both 1.0.x and 1.1.x be in Stretch?

على الأحد 20 تشرين الثاني 2016 ‫23:05، كتب Niels Thykier: > Which source packages are we talking about? gridengine and ori. In the case of gridengine, we have a contributed patch, but it has not been applied upstream or seen more than compile-testing. In the case of ori, upstream's plan is to

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: dbus_1.8.22-0+deb8u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: nbd_3.8-4+deb8u3_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: nbd_3.8-4+deb8u3_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: xwax_1.5-1+deb8u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: xwax_1.5-1+deb8u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: dbus_1.8.22-0+deb8u1_armel.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: dbus_1.8.22-0+deb8u1_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dbus_1.8.22-0+deb8u1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dbus_1.8.22-0+deb8u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: nbd_3.8-4+deb8u3_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: dbus_1.8.22-0+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dbus_1.8.22-0+deb8u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dbus_1.8.22-0+deb8u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dbus_1.8.22-0+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes ACCEPT Processing changes

iptables transition (was Re: Bug#844755: fixed in iptables 1.6.0+snapshot20161117-2)

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 02:00:47AM +, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > Changes: > iptables (1.6.0+snapshot20161117-2) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* [146c602] libxtables: bump from libxtables11 to libxtables12 (Closes: > #844755) As noted in the last Release Update[0], November

Bug#845276: nmu: slepc_3.7.3+dfsg1-2+b1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu slepc on hppa seems to have slipped through the cracks during the hypre 2.11.1 transition nmu slepc_3.7.3+dfsg1-2+b1 . hppa . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libhypre-2.11.1." -- System

Processed: Re: Bug#844695: RM: dotclear/2.6.4+dfsg-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 844695 jessie Bug #844695 [release.debian.org] RM: dotclear/2.6.4+dfsg-1 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #844695 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 844695:

Re: Transition to SQLAlchemy 1.1.x

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, 2016-11-21] > Piotr, any comment on that? I'm done talking with Thomas, it's always either his way or nothing. The one and only reason I uploaded 1.1 to experimental was to make it easier to test Openstack. I completed the "transition" on Friday¹, I didn't even need the

Bug#845254: unblock: win32-loader/0.8.0

Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2016-11-21): > On 21/11/16 23:09, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > As noted in my previous mail, that should be an unblock-udeb instead. ;) > > I guess you have no objections from a d-i RM perspective? Right, sorry; the mail I mentioned was for debian-boot@… 

Bug#845254: unblock: win32-loader/0.8.0

On 21/11/16 23:09, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2016-11-21): >> Please unblock package win32-loader 0.8.0. win32-loader is special in that it >> is always 'block'ed, because it needs manual ftpmaster intervention on >> migration: >> >>> # doesn't actually

Bug#845254: unblock: win32-loader/0.8.0

Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2016-11-21): > Please unblock package win32-loader 0.8.0. win32-loader is special in that it > is always 'block'ed, because it needs manual ftpmaster intervention on > migration: > > > # doesn't actually produce udebs, but blocked RoM (not d-i RM): it gets

Bug#845263: jessie-pu: package w3m/0.5.3-19+deb8u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, the release team, I'd like to update package w3m in jessie to fix multiple security flaws, CVE ID assigned issues and similar issues, managed as no DSA. cf.

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: isenkram_0.18+deb8u1_amd64.changes REJECT Processing changes file: dbus_1.8.22-0+deb8u1_source+all.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: gst-plugins-bad0.10_0.10.23-7.4+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

Bug#840942: jessie-pu: package isenkram/0.18+deb8u1

On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 20:49 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Adam D. Barratt] > > I'm a little confused as to how that package was built, based on the > > result of some of our automated checks. > > I build it using debuild on my jessie laptop. Okay. > > Specifically, debfdiffs of the

Bug#839656: jessie-pu: package xwax/1.5-1+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 17:57 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Control: tag -1 + confirmed > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 04:08:01PM +0100, Daniel James wrote: > > The xwax package in jessie has a Recommends on the ffmpeg package not > > available in Jessie, which is the

Processed: Re: Bug#839656: jessie-pu: package xwax/1.5-1+deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #839656 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package xwax/1.5-1+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 839656: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839656 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#840350: jessie-pu: package dbus/1.8.22-0+deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #840350 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package dbus/1.8.22-0+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 840350: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840350 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#840350: jessie-pu: package dbus/1.8.22-0+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 16:14 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 at 15:10:03 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 21:10 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > > I've released a new upstream version of dbus which fixes a potential > > >

Bug#823517: jessie-pu: package nbd/1:3.8-4+deb8u3

Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 09:29 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 09:06:17AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 06:00:37PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 04:43:46PM

Processed: Re: Bug#823517: jessie-pu: package nbd/1:3.8-4+deb8u3

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #823517 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package nbd/1:3.8-4+deb8u3 Added tag(s) pending. -- 823517: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823517 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#845254: unblock: win32-loader/0.8.0

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package win32-loader 0.8.0. win32-loader is special in that it is always 'block'ed, because it needs manual ftpmaster intervention on migration: > # doesn't actually produce

Bug#840942: jessie-pu: package isenkram/0.18+deb8u1

[Adam D. Barratt] > I'm a little confused as to how that package was built, based on the > result of some of our automated checks. I build it using debuild on my jessie laptop. > Specifically, debfdiffs of the binary package show that isenkram-cli > has lost its prerm and postinst scripts, and

Bug#844684: marked as done (nmu: dolfin_2016.1.0-5)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:03:51 +0100 with message-id <7bdd9dd1-c9fa-6da3-c307-d12d0e209...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#844684: nmu: dolfin_2016.1.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #844684, regarding nmu: dolfin_2016.1.0-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Re: Planning for d-i Stretch Alpha 9

Ben Hutchings (2016-11-20): > On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 04:06 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > [...] > > [Actual question] > > > > I'd like to know whether you already have some kind of planning for the > > next ABI bump(s?) on the linux side, so that we could align further d-i

Re: Transition to SQLAlchemy 1.1.x

Hi, On 18/11/16 13:47, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 11/18/2016 11:05 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >> [Rene Engelhard, 2016-11-18] [...] To sum up: it's IMO really too late for such an upload, and it shouldn't be allowed, unless we don't care about OpenStack in Debian. >>> >>> Yup.

Bug#845156: jessie-pu: package monotone/1.1-4+deb8u2

Control: tags -1 + confirmed On 2016-11-21 7:41, Markus Wanner wrote: On 11/21/2016 08:33 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: You uploaded a source package to the security archive, which was then built. So, no, it's not a binary NMU. It was another Markus Oops, sorry. [...] Please consider

Processed: Re: Bug#845156: jessie-pu: package monotone/1.1-4+deb8u2

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #845156 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package monotone/1.1-4+deb8u2 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 845156: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=845156 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#840942: jessie-pu: package isenkram/0.18+deb8u1

On 2016-11-20 20:03, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Jonathan Wiltshire] Please go ahead. Thank you. I uploaded the new package a few minutes ago. I'm a little confused as to how that package was built, based on the result of some of our automated checks. Specifically, debfdiffs of the

Processed: Part of the OpenSSL transition

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 827061 by 844870 844838 844800 844018 843852 Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 827061 was blocked by: 828415 828447 828474 828479 828618 828441 828511 828420 828597 828368 835549 828551 828254 828412 828297 828599 828312

Processed: Merge duplicates

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 828572 844845 Bug #828572 [src:tkrat] tkrat: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Bug #844845 [src:tkrat] tkrat: FTBFS: osdep.c:445:40: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'X509 {aka struct x509_st}' 827061 was blocked by: 828393

Processed: Merge duplicates

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 844909 libssl1.1 Bug #844909 [src:python-trollius] python-trollius: FTBFS: Tests failures Bug reassigned from package 'src:python-trollius' to 'libssl1.1'. No longer marked as found in versions python-trollius/2.1~b1-4. Ignoring request

Bug#833865: jessie-pu: package youtube-dl/2014.08.05-1+deb8u1

retitle 840839 youtube-dl: please package new upstream version 2016.11.18 thanks On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 02:23:42PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > The thing is, at this point I doubt anybody can even *use* the version > in jessie: youtube doesn't work and while there are other sites > supported,

Processed: python-keystoneclient FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Processing control commands: > retitle -1 python-keystoneclient FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Bug #844928 [src:python-keystoneclient] python-keystoneclient: FTBFS: Tests failures Changed Bug title to 'python-keystoneclient FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0' from 'python-keystoneclient: FTBFS: Tests

Processed: Merge duplicates

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 844931 libssl1.1 Bug #844931 [python3.5] python-dugong: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p 3.5 returned exit code 13 Bug reassigned from package 'python3.5' to 'libssl1.1'. Ignoring request to alter found versions

Bug#844684: nmu: dolfin_2016.1.0-5

On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 09:54 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 18/11/16 05:01, Drew Parsons wrote: > > > > dolfin doesn't seem to have gotten identified for autobuild against > > the new versions of swig and boost.  Please binNMU. > > > It is built against boost 1.62, and I don't see any

Bug#844887: marked as done (nmu: libgff_1.0-1)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:07:09 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#844887: salmon: FTBFS: ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output has caused the Debian Bug report #844887, regarding nmu: libgff_1.0-1 to

Bug#823517: jessie-pu: package nbd/1:3.8-4+deb8u3

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 09:06:17AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 06:00:37PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 04:43:46PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > There is a forward-compatibility bug in nbd-client <= 3.9, in that

Bug#844887: salmon: FTBFS: ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 20:40:14 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Control: reassign -1 release.debian.org > Control: severity -1 normal > Control: retitle -1 nmu: libgff_1.0-1 > Control: affects -1 src:salmon > Control: user release.debian@packages.debian.org > Control: usertag -1

Bug#845095: marked as done (nmu: aspectc++_1:2.1-2)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2016 09:59:03 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#845095: nmu: aspectc++_1:2.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #845095, regarding nmu: aspectc++_1:2.1-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#844684: nmu: dolfin_2016.1.0-5

On 18/11/16 05:01, Drew Parsons wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > dolfin doesn't seem to have gotten identified for autobuild against > the new versions of swig and boost. Please binNMU. > > nmu

Processed (with 1 error): Merge duplicates

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 828595 844877 Bug #828595 [src:voms] voms must (build-)depend on libssl1.0-dev Bug #828595 [src:voms] voms must (build-)depend on libssl1.0-dev Marked as found in versions voms/2.0.14-1. Added tag(s) sid and stretch. Bug #844877

Processed: python-keystonemiddleware FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Processing control commands: > retitle -1 python-keystonemiddleware FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Bug #844936 [src:python-keystonemiddleware] python-keystonemiddleware: FTBFS: Tests failures Changed Bug title to 'python-keystonemiddleware FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0' from 'python-keystonemiddleware:

Bug#823517: jessie-pu: package nbd/1:3.8-4+deb8u3

Hi, On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 06:00:37PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 04:43:46PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > There is a forward-compatibility bug in nbd-client <= 3.9, in that it > > incorrectly merges two flags fields when sending flags to the kernel. >