على الأحد 20 تشرين الثاني 2016 23:05، كتب Niels Thykier:
> Which source packages are we talking about?
gridengine and ori. In the case of gridengine, we have a contributed
patch, but it has not been applied upstream or seen more than
compile-testing. In the case of ori, upstream's plan is to dr
Processing changes file: dbus_1.8.22-0+deb8u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nbd_3.8-4+deb8u3_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nbd_3.8-4+deb8u3_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xwax_1.5-1+deb8u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xwax_1.5-1+deb8u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.8.22-0+deb8u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.8.22-0+deb8u1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.8.22-0+deb8u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.8.22-0+deb8u1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nbd_3.8-4+deb8u3_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: x
Processing changes file: dbus_1.8.22-0+deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.8.22-0+deb8u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.8.22-0+deb8u1_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.8.22-0+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes f
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 02:00:47AM +, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> Changes:
> iptables (1.6.0+snapshot20161117-2) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* [146c602] libxtables: bump from libxtables11 to libxtables12 (Closes:
> #844755)
As noted in the last Release Update[0], November 5th
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
slepc on hppa seems to have slipped through the cracks during the
hypre 2.11.1 transition
nmu slepc_3.7.3+dfsg1-2+b1 . hppa . unstable . -m "Rebuild against
libhypre-2.11.1."
-- System Inf
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 844695 jessie
Bug #844695 [release.debian.org] RM: dotclear/2.6.4+dfsg-1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #844695 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
844695: h
[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, 2016-11-21]
> Piotr, any comment on that?
I'm done talking with Thomas, it's always either his way or nothing.
The one and only reason I uploaded 1.1 to experimental was to make it
easier to test Openstack. I completed the "transition" on Friday¹,
I didn't even need the wh
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2016-11-21):
> On 21/11/16 23:09, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > As noted in my previous mail, that should be an unblock-udeb instead. ;)
>
> I guess you have no objections from a d-i RM perspective?
Right, sorry; the mail I mentioned was for debian-boot@… there, I was
statin
On 21/11/16 23:09, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2016-11-21):
>> Please unblock package win32-loader 0.8.0. win32-loader is special in that it
>> is always 'block'ed, because it needs manual ftpmaster intervention on
>> migration:
>>
>>> # doesn't actually produce udebs, but block
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2016-11-21):
> Please unblock package win32-loader 0.8.0. win32-loader is special in that it
> is always 'block'ed, because it needs manual ftpmaster intervention on
> migration:
>
> > # doesn't actually produce udebs, but blocked RoM (not d-i RM): it gets
> > # handled by t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi, the release team,
I'd like to update package w3m in jessie to fix multiple security
flaws, CVE ID assigned issues and similar issues, managed as no DSA.
cf. https://security-tr
Processing changes file: isenkram_0.18+deb8u1_amd64.changes
REJECT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.8.22-0+deb8u1_source+all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gst-plugins-bad0.10_0.10.23-7.4+deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gst-plugins-bad0.10_0.10.23-7.4+deb8u1_arm64
On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 20:49 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Adam D. Barratt]
> > I'm a little confused as to how that package was built, based on the
> > result of some of our automated checks.
>
> I build it using debuild on my jessie laptop.
Okay.
> > Specifically, debfdiffs of the binar
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 17:57 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + confirmed
>
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 04:08:01PM +0100, Daniel James wrote:
> > The xwax package in jessie has a Recommends on the ffmpeg package not
> > available in Jessie, which is the c
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #839656 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package xwax/1.5-1+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
839656: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839656
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #840350 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package dbus/1.8.22-0+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
840350: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840350
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 16:14 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 at 15:10:03 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 21:10 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > I've released a new upstream version of dbus which fixes a potential
> > > security
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 09:29 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 09:06:17AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 06:00:37PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 04:43:46PM +02
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #823517 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package nbd/1:3.8-4+deb8u3
Added tag(s) pending.
--
823517: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823517
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package win32-loader 0.8.0. win32-loader is special in that it
is always 'block'ed, because it needs manual ftpmaster intervention on
migration:
> # doesn't actually produce
[Adam D. Barratt]
> I'm a little confused as to how that package was built, based on the
> result of some of our automated checks.
I build it using debuild on my jessie laptop.
> Specifically, debfdiffs of the binary package show that isenkram-cli
> has lost its prerm and postinst scripts, and t
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:03:51 +0100
with message-id <7bdd9dd1-c9fa-6da3-c307-d12d0e209...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#844684: nmu: dolfin_2016.1.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #844684,
regarding nmu: dolfin_2016.1.0-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Ben Hutchings (2016-11-20):
> On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 04:06 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> [...]
> > [Actual question]
> >
> > I'd like to know whether you already have some kind of planning for the
> > next ABI bump(s?) on the linux side, so that we could align further d-i
> > releases accordingl
Hi,
On 18/11/16 13:47, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 11/18/2016 11:05 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>> [Rene Engelhard, 2016-11-18]
[...]
To sum up: it's IMO really too late for such an upload, and it shouldn't
be allowed, unless we don't care about OpenStack in Debian.
>>>
>>> Yup. Trans
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On 2016-11-21 7:41, Markus Wanner wrote:
On 11/21/2016 08:33 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
You uploaded a source package to the security archive, which was then
built. So, no, it's not a binary NMU.
It was another Markus
Oops, sorry.
[...]
Please consider 1.1-4+d
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #845156 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package monotone/1.1-4+deb8u2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
845156: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=845156
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On 2016-11-20 20:03, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Jonathan Wiltshire]
Please go ahead.
Thank you. I uploaded the new package a few minutes ago.
I'm a little confused as to how that package was built, based on the
result of some of our automated checks.
Specifically, debfdiffs of the binar
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 by 844870 844838 844800 844018 843852
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828415 828447 828474 828479 828618 828441 828511 828420
828597 828368 835549 828551 828254 828412 828297 828599 828312
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 828572 844845
Bug #828572 [src:tkrat] tkrat: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
Bug #844845 [src:tkrat] tkrat: FTBFS: osdep.c:445:40: error: dereferencing
pointer to incomplete type 'X509 {aka struct x509_st}'
827061 was blocked by: 828393 82829
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 844909 libssl1.1
Bug #844909 [src:python-trollius] python-trollius: FTBFS: Tests failures
Bug reassigned from package 'src:python-trollius' to 'libssl1.1'.
No longer marked as found in versions python-trollius/2.1~b1-4.
Ignoring request t
retitle 840839 youtube-dl: please package new upstream version 2016.11.18
thanks
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 02:23:42PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> The thing is, at this point I doubt anybody can even *use* the version
> in jessie: youtube doesn't work and while there are other sites
> supported,
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 python-keystoneclient FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
Bug #844928 [src:python-keystoneclient] python-keystoneclient: FTBFS: Tests
failures
Changed Bug title to 'python-keystoneclient FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0' from
'python-keystoneclient: FTBFS: Tests failures'.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 844931 libssl1.1
Bug #844931 [python3.5] python-dugong: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: pybuild --test -i
python{version} -p 3.5 returned exit code 13
Bug reassigned from package 'python3.5' to 'libssl1.1'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions
On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 09:54 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 18/11/16 05:01, Drew Parsons wrote:
> >
> > dolfin doesn't seem to have gotten identified for autobuild against
> > the new versions of swig and boost. Please binNMU.
> >
> It is built against boost 1.62, and I don't see any s
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:07:09 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#844887: salmon: FTBFS: ld: final link failed:
Nonrepresentable section on output
has caused the Debian Bug report #844887,
regarding nmu: libgff_1.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 09:06:17AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 06:00:37PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 04:43:46PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > There is a forward-compatibility bug in nbd-client <= 3.9, in that
On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 20:40:14 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 release.debian.org
> Control: severity -1 normal
> Control: retitle -1 nmu: libgff_1.0-1
> Control: affects -1 src:salmon
> Control: user release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Control: usertag -1 binnmu
>
> On Sat, No
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2016 09:59:03 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#845095: nmu: aspectc++_1:2.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #845095,
regarding nmu: aspectc++_1:2.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
On 18/11/16 05:01, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> dolfin doesn't seem to have gotten identified for autobuild against
> the new versions of swig and boost. Please binNMU.
>
> nmu dolfin_20
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 828595 844877
Bug #828595 [src:voms] voms must (build-)depend on libssl1.0-dev
Bug #828595 [src:voms] voms must (build-)depend on libssl1.0-dev
Marked as found in versions voms/2.0.14-1.
Added tag(s) sid and stretch.
Bug #844877 [src:vo
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 python-keystonemiddleware FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
Bug #844936 [src:python-keystonemiddleware] python-keystonemiddleware: FTBFS:
Tests failures
Changed Bug title to 'python-keystonemiddleware FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0' from
'python-keystonemiddleware: FTB
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 06:00:37PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 04:43:46PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > There is a forward-compatibility bug in nbd-client <= 3.9, in that it
> > incorrectly merges two flags fields when sending flags to the kernel.
>
45 matches
Mail list logo
