Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2017 05:38:00 +
with message-id <421db63c-38d1-944c-4892-86d066a59...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#862693: unblock: postfix/3.1.4-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #862693,
regarding unblock: postfix/3.1.4-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2017 05:36:00 +
with message-id <49cf7c61-f9c2-b3da-c7e3-cd13378c1...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#863161: unblock: debconf/1.5.61
has caused the Debian Bug report #863161,
regarding unblock: debconf/1.5.61
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #863085 [release.debian.org] unblock: dante/1.4.1+dfsg-5 [preapproval, RC]
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
863085: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=863085
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Peter Pentchev:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 06:15:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>
>> [...]
>
> Thanks for the quick reply!
>
> The error handler is invoked for systemd services, too - it's part of
> an "invoke-rc.d #SCRIPT# start ||
Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2017 05:36:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#863181: unblock: debirf/0.37
has caused the Debian Bug report #863181,
regarding unblock: debirf/0.37
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package opendmarc
This upload fixes a policy violation about forced conffile removal and I think
we would be better off to have the change in stretch. It isn't only a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package opendkim
This upload fixes a policy violation about forced conffile removal and I think
we would be better off to have the change in stretch. It isn't only a
Dear release team,
any suggestions how to handle this best:
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 02:08:01AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> cdf810f85 distros.conf: update aliases for stretch being released as stable
>
> getting 0.77 with this patch into stretch will also save us from
> applying this in a
Hi Adam,
sorry for the late reply…
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 08:41:30AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Recently I've noticed that a few packages from proposed-updates seem to be
> ending up in a state of "cannot be tested", with logs that suggest an issue
> locating the package.
[...]
> The
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debirf
Version 0.37 contains fixes for #850080 and #833125, both of which
make debirf unusable on debian stretch.
It also includes a few smaller fixes which produce
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock debconf 1.5.61. As explained by Niko in #863071, this
prepares the ground for Perl 5.26, to simplify future stretch -> buster
upgrades.
diff -Nru
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2017 18:30:00 +
with message-id <6ac861e3-d382-e2ae-afe8-92b6c9a73...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#863148: unblock: shadow/1:4.4-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #863148,
regarding unblock: shadow/1:4.4-4.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2017 18:36:00 +
with message-id <51789b79-d452-eb42-41ef-c15b2f6b0...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: unblock: gitlab/8.13.11+dfsg1-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #862384,
regarding unblock: gitlab/8.13.11+dfsg1-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi
Please unblock package shadow
It fixes a regression introduced in the last upload, from the fix for
CVE-2017-2616. If su recieves a signal like SIGTERM, it was not
propagated to the
Quoting Pirate Praveen (2017-05-22 16:10:32)
> On തിങ്കള് 22 മെയ് 2017 06:41 വൈകു, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> ...for the _initial_ packaging work.
>>
>> We are package *maintainers*.
>
> If you have not realized, we are discussing about maintaining an
> existing package. I think you have also
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2017 19:01:47 +0200
with message-id <20170522170147.redtsffem7mww...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#863081: getting crosstool-ng in Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #863081,
regarding getting crosstool-ng in Debian
to be marked as done.
This
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 10:03:00PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 16:19:51 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> > Package: release.debian.org
> >
> >
> > Hello Release team,
> >
> > On getting package `crosstool-ng` in Debian,
> > where ( {unstable|stable|exprimental} )
On 2017-05-22 15:19, Jérémy Lal wrote:
2017-05-22 16:10 GMT+02:00 Pirate Praveen :
On തിങ്കള് 22 മെയ് 2017 06:41 വൈകു,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
...for the _initial_ packaging work.
We are package *maintainers*.
If you have not realized, we are discussing about
style="color:rgb(46,116,181);background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">Hello
there,
2017-05-22 16:10 GMT+02:00 Pirate Praveen :
> On തിങ്കള് 22 മെയ് 2017 06:41 വൈകു, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > ...for the _initial_ packaging work.
> >
> > We are package *maintainers*.
>
> If you have not realized, we are discussing about maintaining an
> existing
On തിങ്കള് 22 മെയ് 2017 06:41 വൈകു, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> ...for the _initial_ packaging work.
>
> We are package *maintainers*.
If you have not realized, we are discussing about maintaining an
existing package. I think you have also not realized the meaning of team
maintained packages. The
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 03:11:56PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > 78 new modules to package. If one person were to work full time, I
> > think about 10-15 days time.
> ...for the _initial_ packaging work.
> We are package *maintainers*.
we are all volunteers here, please don't tell others
Quoting Pirate Praveen (2017-05-22 13:27:35)
> On വെള്ളി 19 മെയ് 2017 03:45 വൈകു, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> There are complications to distributing npm: it depends on a LOT of
>> modules, which means it requires a lot of debian-maintainer time to
>> package, and update.
>
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
salt in jessie is affected by some security issues. Salvatore Bonaccorso
from the security wrote: So we are basically down at
On വെള്ളി 19 മെയ് 2017 03:45 വൈകു, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> There are complications to distributing npm: it depends on a LOT of
> modules, which
> means it requires a lot of debian-maintainer time to package, and update.
https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/Tasks/npm ie, roughly about 78
new
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 06:15:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Peter Pentchev:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a pre-approval request for dante
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 862891 -moreinfo
Bug #862891 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package flightgear/3.0.0-5+deb8u2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thx
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Control: -1 tags -moreinfo
Hi,
Tobias uploaded flightgear-1:2016.4.4+dfsg-3 last Friday (thanks,
Tobias), including the security fix. It already migrated to testing as
well a couple hours ago.
Please proceed with this jessie-pu bug.
Kind Regards
Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Peter Pentchev:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Hi,
>
> This is a pre-approval request for dante to fix a long-standing
> bug that makes the first installation of the dante-server
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #863085 [release.debian.org] unblock: dante/1.4.1+dfsg-5 [preapproval, RC]
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
863085: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=863085
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
30 matches
Mail list logo