Bug#981141: transition: gdk-pixbuf binNMUs to drop transitional package

2021-01-26 Thread Simon McVittie
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition The library package libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 was recently (in early December) split into libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 and the deprecated libgdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0-0, with a transitional libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0

Bug#979750: marked as done (transition: skalibs execline s6)

2021-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jan 2021 21:05:02 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#979750: transition: skalibs execline s6 has caused the Debian Bug report #979750, regarding transition: skalibs execline s6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Re: Bug#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye

2021-01-26 Thread Matthias Klose
On 1/26/21 6:53 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 06:30:25PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >> On 1/26/21 5:55 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:36:13PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >> :) note however that "#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye" is

planning to upload binutils 2.35.2

2021-01-26 Thread Matthias Klose
Hi I would like to upload binutils version 2.5.2-1 to unstable later this week. The 2.25.2 release is announced for this weekend ([1]). It imports fixes towards the next stable version. The pending fixes in the package are: * PR27218, memory access violation in dwarf2dbg.c * PR

Re: Bug#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye

2021-01-26 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 06:30:25PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 1/26/21 5:55 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:36:13PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > :) note however that "#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye" is > still > >>> ping, has there been

Re: Bug#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye

2021-01-26 Thread Matthias Klose
On 1/26/21 5:55 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:36:13PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: :) note however that "#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye" is still >>> ping, has there been any progress on this? >> chatting with Moritz from the security team, we

Re: Bug#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye

2021-01-26 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:36:13PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> :) note however that "#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye" is > >> still > > ping, has there been any progress on this? > chatting with Moritz from the security team, we found four options: > 1) Ship a snapshot of

Re: Bug#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye

2021-01-26 Thread Matthias Klose
On 12/2/20 5:42 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 08:40:22AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: >>> Thanks for the upload. >> :) note however that "#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye" is >> still >> open... > > ping, has there been any progress on this? chatting with

Bug#980997: nmu: packages that build-depend on the libsimde-dev header-only library

2021-01-26 Thread Michael R. Crusoe
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 at 09:02, Graham Inggs wrote: > Hi Michael > > On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 11:51, Michael R. Crusoe wrote: > > Please rebuild all packages that build-dep on libsimde-dev so they may > > gain the benefits of the new release. > > Let's schedule these as soon as simde 0.7.2-2 has

Bug#981096: buster-pu: package file/1:5.35-4+deb10u1

2021-01-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 9:21 AM Christoph Biedl wrote: > Problem: The old limit turned out to be too strict, and instead of > avoiding DoS this broke legitimate use of that feature. Also, Paul > Wise (Cc:'ed), asked me repeatedly to backport this to buster, I > trust he has good reason to to so.

Bug#981096: buster-pu: package file/1:5.35-4+deb10u1

2021-01-26 Thread Christoph Biedl
Christoph Biedl wrote... > for the upcoming stable point release, I've just uploaded src:file > ("Recognize the type of data in a file using "magic" numbers") as > version 1:5.35-4+deb10u2. Forgot to sign, to this followup to confirm. Christoph signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#981096: buster-pu: package file/1:5.35-4+deb10u1

2021-01-26 Thread Christoph Biedl
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hello stable release team, for the upcoming stable point release, I've just uploaded src:file ("Recognize the type of data in a file using "magic" numbers") as version

Bug#980087: another case

2021-01-26 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
This time in android-sdk-meta. The tests Depends: adb and android-tools-adb, both of which are not in ppc64el: https://salsa.debian.org/android-tools-team/android-sdk-meta/-/blob/master/debian/tests/control

Bug#980939: marked as done (nmu: xmobar_0.36-2)

2021-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:08:46 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#980939: nmu: xmobar_0.36-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #980939, regarding nmu: xmobar_0.36-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#980997: nmu: packages that build-depend on the libsimde-dev header-only library

2021-01-26 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Michael On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 11:51, Michael R. Crusoe wrote: > Please rebuild all packages that build-dep on libsimde-dev so they may > gain the benefits of the new release. Let's schedule these as soon as simde 0.7.2-2 has migrated to testing. There is an autopkgtest failure on s390x,