Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1011272 buster-pu: package
> nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-390xx/390.151-1~deb10u1
Bug #1011272 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-390xx/390.151-1~deb11u1
Changed Bug title to 'buster-pu: package
n
Hi Paul,
Am Thu, May 19, 2022 at 01:07:59PM +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> @tille, removals are work for *us*, they are not free lunch. Please fix the
> package that prevent migration.
There is no clean fix. The packages featuring r-bioc-api-3.15 just need
some new predependencies. These are hang
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
(the same was submitted for buster-pu)
[ Reason ]
The upload of webkit2gtk 2.36 into stable-sec and oldstable-sec
introduced severe accessibility regressions in stable and oldstab
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
(the same was submitted for bullseye-pu)
[ Reason ]
The upload of webkit2gtk 2.36 into stable-sec and oldstable-sec
introduced severe accessibility regressions in stable and oldstab
On 19 May 2022 2:25:23 pm IST, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Am Thu, May 19, 2022 at 01:41:12PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
>>
>> I think we can workaround these anyway by editing the DESCRIPTION file --
>> maybe I'll do so and upload either late in the night today or early morning
>> Tom.
>
>I do n
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 qa.debian.org
Bug #1011268 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: proposes autoremoving
every package(?) when nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470 is RC-buggy
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'qa.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter f
Control: reassign -1 qa.debian.org
On 19-05-2022 12:37, Simon McVittie wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
dkms and nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470 currently have RC bug #1010884
triggering autoremovals (it was closed today, so maybe it will cease to be
relevant soon).
I would expect the only
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Hi,
On 19-05-2022 11:10, Roger Shimizu wrote:
I guess we should choose "testing follows removal automatically".
reassigned.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 19-05-2022 10:55, Andreas Tille wrote:
Am Thu, May 19, 2022 at 01:41:12PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
I think we can workaround these anyway by editing the DESCRIPTION file -- maybe
I'll do so and upload either late in the night today or early morning Tom.
I do not think that editing
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #1011210 [release.debian.org] RM:
android-platform-system-core/1:10.0.0+r36-10 -- ROM; NVIU
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1011210 to the same valu
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #1011271 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-390xx/390.151-1~deb11u1
Bug 1011271 cloned as bug 1011272
> tags -2 = buster
Bug #1011272 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-390x
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: tags -2 = buster
Hi,
I'd like to update nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-390xx/non-free to a new
upstream release fixing some CVEs.
It comes with the
Package: release.debian.org
dkms and nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470 currently have RC bug #1010884
triggering autoremovals (it was closed today, so maybe it will cease to be
relevant soon).
I would expect the only packages affected by this to be packages that
specifically depend on dkms or on
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 3:49 AM Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> Hi Roger,
>
> On 18-05-2022 18:22, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> > This ticket is a follow-up to #100
> > - https://bugs.debian.org/100
> >
> > I marked this ticket with ROM and NVIU, because:
> > - ROM: I'm member of android tools team
> > -
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: minor
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
When a package provides only superficial tests, tracker.d.o page shows
"No test results" "result" for the autopkgtests. This is misleading,
especially since it links to a successful test resu
Hi Nilesh,
Am Thu, May 19, 2022 at 01:41:12PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
>
> I think we can workaround these anyway by editing the DESCRIPTION file --
> maybe I'll do so and upload either late in the night today or early morning
> Tom.
I do not think that editing DESCRIPTION is the prefered w
Am Thu, May 19, 2022 at 09:40:23AM +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertag: britney
>
> Hi,
>
> On 11-05-2022 12:34, Graham Inggs wrote:
> > Yes, please go ahead.
> >
> > Tracker is at:
> > https://release.debian.org/trans
Hi,
On 19 May 2022 1:10:23 pm IST, Paul Gevers wrote:
>Package: release.debian.org
>User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>Usertag: britney
>
>Hi,
>
>On 11-05-2022 12:34, Graham Inggs wrote:
>> Yes, please go ahead.
>>
>> Tracker is at:
>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/r-
Hi
On Thu, 19 May 2022 at 09:45, Paul Gevers wrote:
> There's three package still waiting for an upload, r-bioc-progeny,
> r-bioc-monocle and r-bioc-scater. When is the ETA for those?
In addition, there is r-bioc-grohmm which I happened to notice dropped
off the tracker during the transition.
i.
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertag: britney
Hi,
On 11-05-2022 12:34, Graham Inggs wrote:
Yes, please go ahead.
Tracker is at:
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/r-api-bioc-3.15.html
There's three package still waiting for an upload, r-bi
Your message dated Thu, 19 May 2022 09:29:10 +0200
with message-id <878rqygeux.fsf...@christian.marillat.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#1010660: Acknowledgement (britney: Crash with
RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1010660,
regarding britney: Crash
21 matches
Mail list logo