HI,
On 23-12-2023 23:09, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 04:01:39PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
I was told to contact you in order to unblock src:spring for testing. At the
moment tracker.debian.org shows that: "spring-javaai/arm64 has unsatisfiable
dependency". This is a bi
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 04:01:39PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I was told to contact you in order to unblock src:spring for testing. At the
> moment tracker.debian.org shows that: "spring-javaai/arm64 has unsatisfiable
> dependency". This is a bit confusing because spring builds only binar
Processing control commands:
> forcemerge -1 1057891
Bug #1056222 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
debian-edu-artwork/2.12.3-2~deb12u1
Bug #1057891 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
debian-edu-artwork/2.12.3-3~deb12u1
Added tag(s) pending.
Merged 1056222 1057891
> retitle -1 boo
control: forcemerge -1 1057891
control: retitle -1 bookworm-pu: package debian-edu-artwork/2.12.4-1~deb12u1
thanks
Hi,
I've just uploaded debian-edu-artwork/2.12.4-1 to unstable and expect that we'd
want to at least update in bookworm to this. However I'm not sure which debdiff
you'd like to see,
Hi,
I was told to contact you in order to unblock src:spring for testing. At the
moment tracker.debian.org shows that: "spring-javaai/arm64 has unsatisfiable
dependency". This is a bit confusing because spring builds only binary packages
for arch all, i386 and amd64. I don't see any real issues th
Hello,
I'm Ratchanan Srirattanamet, and I'm a "maintainer" of the QtWebEngine
for Ubuntu Touch (I usually pull from Debian unstable and add our
patches). As such, I have a few insights and ideas regarding this.
On 07-12-2023 18:49, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> If this is deemed inappropriate for
Helmut Grohne writes:
> I incline to agreeing with the scenario you depict. This can reasonably
> happen. I also think that David made a good case for it being unlikely
> to manage oneself into the buggy situation that way. And then the
> consequence is that you lost some possibly important files
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 wolfssl
Bug #1059358 [release.debian.org] transition: wolfssl
Added indication that 1059358 affects wolfssl
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-wolfssl.html
Bug #1059358 [release.debian.org] transition: wolfssl
Set Bug forwarded
Package: release.debian.org
Control: affects -1 wolfssl
X-Debbugs-Cc: wolf...@packages.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Severity: normal
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-wolfssl.html
wolfssl is available in experim
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 09:25:06PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's time to set a date for 12.5 (taking account of the emergency .4) and
> 11.9. I expect this to be the penultimate update for bullseye before LTS.
>
> Please indicate availability for:
>
> Saturday 3rd February (
10 matches
Mail list logo