On 2024-08-21 19:32:14, Georg Faerber wrote:
> Control: X-Debbugs-CC dswarbr...@debian.org
>
> Hi all,
>
> On 24-08-21 14:52:07, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> Not sure how to proceed here, but here's a debdiff:
>
> Thanks -- there is also #1077694 which asks for more f
ometheus-node-exporter-collectors (0.0~git20230203.6f710f8-1+deb12u2) bookworm; urgency=medium
+
+ * Team upload
+ * Add missing `apt_package_cache_timestamp_seconds` metrics ommitted from previous upload.
+
+ -- Antoine Beaupré Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:46:21 -0400
+
prometheus-node-exporter-col
I have reviewed this patch and it looks sane to me. I have deployed the
updated package on our servers and it is so far running without flaw.
A.
--
There is no cloud, it's just someone else's computer.
- Chris Watterson
00 -0400
+++ needrestart-3.6/debian/changelog 2023-11-15 15:05:37.0 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+needrestart (3.6-4+deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium
+
+ * fix microcode check regression on AMD CPUs (Closes: #1013285)
+
+ -- Antoine Beaupré Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:05:37 -0500
+
needrestar
On 2023-11-29 22:24:25, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 15:36 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> And of course I forgot the debdiff, sorry!
>
> Please go ahead.
Uploaded, thanks for the review!!
--
Science knows still practically nothing about the real nature of
-slinger (3.1-1.1+deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Bug fix: "tlsa can produce invalid records" (Closes: #1053483)
+
+ -- Antoine Beaupré Thu, 05 Oct 2023 10:37:58 -0400
+
hash-slinger (3.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff
On 2021-12-05 16:13:11, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
[...]
> It also seems to sync correctly: I'm testing a full sync now which
> should complete within an hour. So far so good.
And I can confirm a full and/or incremental sync both work fine. All
looks good to me.
--
To understand how
On 2021-12-05 21:30:14, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: bullseye
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org,anar...@debian.org
>
> Hi SRM,
>
> isync in bullseye is affected by CVE-2021-3657[1].
On 2020-04-26 10:46:41, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
[...]
> I will also mention that this has landed in buster ages ago, and no ill
> effects were found there.
I meant bullseye here, sorry.
Any news? :)
a.
--
Striving for social justice is the most valuable thing to do i
On 2020-04-26 15:45:02, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 05:21:21PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> [sorry for the dupe, hit send by mistake :(]
>>
>> On 2019-11-24 12:13:20, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> > On 2019-11-23 18:34:25, Julien Cristau wrote:
On 2019-11-24 12:13:20, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2019-11-23 18:34:25, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 10:40:58AM -0500, Antoine Beaupre wrote:
>>> diff -Nru ganeti-instance-debootstrap-0.16/debian/changelog
>>> ganeti-instance-debootstrap-0.16/debi
[sorry for the dupe, hit send by mistake :(]
On 2019-11-24 12:13:20, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2019-11-23 18:34:25, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 10:40:58AM -0500, Antoine Beaupre wrote:
>>> diff -Nru ganeti-instance-debootstrap-0.16/debian/changelog
&
On 2020-01-31 20:35:55, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 15:13 -0500, Antoine Beaupre wrote:
>> The version of "internetarchive" in Debian has some serious
>> scalability and reliability issues. In particular, it has trouble
>> handling more than 1024
n number and distribution don't look right.
Ah yes, that would be 0.16-6+deb10u1, right?
>> +
>> + * Non-maintainer upload
>> + * add patch to respect linux caps (Closes: #942114)
>> +
>> + -- Antoine Beaupré Fri, 01 Nov 2019 19:01:50 -0400
>> +
>> ga
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
On 2019-05-25 11:27:28, Paul Gevers wrote:
> That isn't available to unblock at the moment.
Oops. Somehow forgot to upload.
> Please upload to unstable and remove the moreinfo tag when it is build
> and installed.
It's been "ACCEPTED" so i presume it will trickle down
+
+ -- Antoine Beaupré Fri, 24 May 2019 10:45:11 -0400
+
+dmarc-cat (0.9.2-3) experimental; urgency=medium
+
+ * fix autopkgtest missing build-tree requirement
+
+ -- Antoine Beaupré Thu, 23 May 2019 14:51:42 -0400
+
dmarc-cat (0.9.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* move test suite to
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Package made it to unstable.
On 2019-04-27 19:47:40, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 12:30:03 -0400 Antoine Beaupre
> wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>>
>> Please unblock package matrix-synapse
>>
>> The package curren
On 2018-12-03 10:44:55, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2018-12-03 15:41:01, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On 2018-12-03 15:32, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>>> So I'll just upload 2.2.4~deb9u1 to stable now?
>>
>> Yes, please. (With the changelog distribution set to "str
On 2018-12-03 15:41:01, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2018-12-03 15:32, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> So I'll just upload 2.2.4~deb9u1 to stable now?
>
> Yes, please. (With the changelog distribution set to "stretch", please.)
Got it, incoming.
--
Arguing for surveillan
On 2018-12-03 15:25:29, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2018-12-03 14:53, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 02:37:03PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> > > This would need to be versioned as 2.2.3+deb9u1.
>>> > But it's exactly the 2.2.4 release published to unstable - why the
>>> > diff
On 2018-12-03 14:37:03, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2018-12-03 14:23, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2018-12-03 08:16:47, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 01:56:11PM -0400, Antoine Beaupre wrote:
>>>
2017-01-24 15:40:35.0
>> -0500
>> +++ monkeysign-2.2.4/debian/changelog2018-06-18 12:18:46.0
>> -0400
>> @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
>> +monkeysign (2.2.4) unstable; urgency=medium
>> +
>> + [ Tobias Rueetschi ]
>> + * false isn't d
ich I couldn't see here).
>>
> That doesn't seem to have happened; closing.
I'm confused. I *did* upload the changes to unstable:
https://tracker.debian.org/news/966367/accepted-monkeysign-224-source-all-into-unstable/
They migrated to testing and everything. I guess I should have ping
On 2018-06-13 16:00:41, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 12:04 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 16:58:34 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>>
>> > 1. ignore the above two extra issues and simply add the patch for
>> > #215
>
On 2017-07-19 11:35:56, Michael Shuler wrote:
> On 07/06/2017 11:13 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>>
>>> For what it's worth, my opinion is that we should attempt to synchronize
>>> certdata.txt (and blac
On 2017-07-21 22:19:20, Philipp Kern wrote:
> My point was that you state what your delta is and essentially boils
> down to attach the diff of what will actually happen to the .deb. I
> think it's generally fine to add new CAs and remove fully distrusted
> ones, instead of saying "it should jus
On 2017-07-20 18:15:00, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 07/17/2017 09:41 PM, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> Let's not jump the gun here. We're not shipping NSS in ca-certificates,
>> just a tiny part of it: one text file, more or less.
>
> Yeah, and the consensus of the world
+++ kedpm-1.0+deb8u1/debian/changelog2017-04-26 20:44:11.0
>> -0400
>> @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
>> +kedpm (1.0+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=high
>> +
>> + * Non-maintainer upload by the Security Team.
>> + * fix information leak via command history file (Closes: #8
On 2017-06-27 21:45:17, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 22:39 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>>
>> Antoine Beaupre (2017-04-30):
>> > diff -Nru kedpm-1.0/debian/changelog kedpm-1.0+deb8u1/debian/changelog
>> > --- kedpm-1.0/debian/changelog 2012-11-3
On 2017-07-19 11:35:56, Michael Shuler wrote:
> On 07/06/2017 11:13 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>>
>>> For what it's worth, my opinion is that we should attempt to synchronize
>>> certdata.txt (and blac
On 2017-07-07 16:02:51, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 03:57:35PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> On 07/06/2017 08:01 PM, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> > In looking at fixing #858539 (blocking WoSign and StartCom, in CC) for
>> > wheezy, I noticed the issue
Hi everyone,
In looking at fixing #858539 (blocking WoSign and StartCom, in CC) for
wheezy, I noticed the issue was also pending in jessie. Furthermore, the
idea originally raised by pabs[1] was to also update the packages for
the latest changes in certdata.txt in wheezy, including the ISRG Root
f
On 2016-12-17 05:34:35, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 14:52:44 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>
>> On 2016-11-24 13:04:21, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:50:27 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> >
>> >> This is a tenta
On 2016-11-24 13:04:21, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:50:27 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>
>> This is a tentative of opening the discussion regarding a more regular
>> update of the youtube-dl package in Debian stable.
>>
> TBH I think this shoul
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
On 2016-11-20 13:15:13, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:50:27AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> Unfortunately, this is a scenario in which providing a small patch to
>> fix the problem is probably impossible. What I would sugges
On 2016-10-03 09:49:42, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
>
> [p-u bugs get closed when the package is in stable, not as part of the
> upload]
Ack, I was wondering too.
> On 2016-10-03 14:26, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2016-10-02 18:05:07, Adam D. Barratt wro
On 2016-10-02 12:40:47, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-10-02 at 12:21 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2016-10-01 13:08:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>> >
>> > On Fri, 2016-09-30 at 11:38 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>
On 2016-10-01 13:08:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Fri, 2016-09-30 at 11:38 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> Attached is a debdiff between the -1 and -1.1 version.
>
> Apparently not.
Sorry.
linkchecker_9.3-1.1.debdiff
Description: Bina
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie patch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
linkchecker, a package to check links in a webpage, suffers from a
serious bug (#839241) which makes it impossible to check any HTTPS
webpage or any page that contains a HTTPS
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Hi,
New developments on the Charybdis front: a patch has been developed
upstream to fix the issue, but it is pretty invasive. They have
basically rewritten the whole GNUTLS backend to make it on par with the
other implementations. It's a good thing: there were memory le
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
On 2016-09-06 09:10:43, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2016-09-06 03:58:44, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On 2016-09-06 1:31, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>>> Turns out this took about three weeks instead of 24h. But 3.5.3 is
>>> released, and I will push
On 2016-09-06 03:58:44, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2016-09-06 1:31, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> Turns out this took about three weeks instead of 24h. But 3.5.3 is
>> released, and I will push the update to unstable now.
>>
>> The situation is a tad more complica
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
On 2016-08-19 18:05:34, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2016-08-19 17:56:29, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 17:35 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>>> TL;DR: Charybdis 3.4 (Jessie) introduces a regression (CertFP broken)
>>> from Cha
On 2016-08-19 17:56:29, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 17:35 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> TL;DR: Charybdis 3.4 (Jessie) introduces a regression (CertFP broken)
>> from Charybdis 3.3 (Wheezy). 7-line patch (atta
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
TL;DR: Charybdis 3.4 (Jessie) introduces a regression (CertFP broken)
from Charybdis 3.3 (Wheezy). 7-line patch (attached) fixes the issue.
Charybdis 3.4 suffers from a regression w
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
This is a tentative of opening the discussion regarding a more regular
update of the youtube-dl package in Debian stable.
Currently, Youtube-dl does not work in stable: it fails to
On 2016-04-08 10:15:02, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 16:15:36 -0400, anarcat wrote:
>
>> It would also make sense NSS is basically part of Firefox, which *has*
>> the same version in all suites.
>>
> That's a weird argument. nss is a library, firefox isn't. Unless
> you're arg
Control: fixed -1 3.4.2-5~deb8u1
On 2015-11-21 12:48:44, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please go ahead.
Done. Forgot to mention this bug report in the changelog though, but it
should end up in the pu queue soon.
I don't have any more wheezy machine to test this so i think i'll just
skip the update on
On 2015-11-19 10:23:38, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-11-15 at 08:08 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2015-11-14 22:42:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>> >
>> > On Sat, 2015-11-14 at 19:32 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>
On 2015-11-14 22:42:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Sat, 2015-11-14 at 19:32 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> Charybdis is unfortunately in very bad shape in stable right now. There
>> was an oversight during the release process that made this
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
Charybdis is unfortunately in very bad shape in stable right now. There
was an oversight during the release process that made this bug not
appear as release critical:
https://b
es sure this package will be easier to support for the
+lifetime of jessie
+* improve error handling again: distinguish different failure cases
+ and clearly transmit GPG errors
+
+ -- Antoine Beaupré Mon, 01 Dec 2014 21:03:56 -0500
+
monkeysign (2.0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
when it rains, it pours... i also would like to add the patch from
#771034:
commit 43b8bc41be45c5f9b734ac239bba8f2ddca60979
Author: Antoine Beaupré
Date: Tue Nov 25 23:26:00 2014 -0500
use the proper index when selecting key to sign (closes #771034)
before this patch, we would
rtions(+), 8 deletions(-)
The above patchset should fix RC bugs #771032 and #770900, along with
GTK UI bugs reported on the mailing list outside of Debian.
I would also like to include a patch that will improve error logging
signicantly and ease my life for the lifetime of jessie:
commit da227d9bc1f
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package liblwpx-paranoidagent-perl
it fixes a "grave" issue (#761635) makes the package basically useless
for SNI hosts.
the diff is trivial:
--- a/lib/LWPx/Protocol/http_p
On 2013-10-07 15:55:26, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (Probably OT as far as the release team is concerned: it might be
> worth filing CVE's against the clients that still support v1 and v2.
> Antoine, do you want to ask the OTR developers what's their take
> on it?)
I wouldn't bother, personnally. I
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
The pre-1.0 versions of the OTR plugin are very broken for all
software (xchat, irssi, etc) and are considered insecure as OTRv1 is
susceptible to downgrade attacks (if my memory is correct).
I
On 2013-03-16, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> Alright, I'll reroll a package targeting only the security issue,
> someone came up with the patch for 2.6.8 in the issue.
That is now done - 2.6.8-2 should hit sid pretty soon.
So please:
unblock smokeping/2.6.8-2
Thanks!
diff -Nru smok
On 2013-03-16, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Sorry, no. No new upstreams, or vague "fixes stuff". Your next quoted
> paragraph should have put you off this already:
>
>> Most of this are bugfixes, the only new feature I can see is the
>> "SendEmail" probe. The debdiff is attached.
>
> I'm open to t
On 2013-03-06, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:45:45PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> Please remove tty-clock. It's got lots of issues that aren't really
>> being worked on (bug #700738). It also has no reverse-dependencies
>> and has yet to be included in a stable releas
I hereby add my voice to the number of people concerned at the state of
Ekiga in Debian. If 4.0 doesn't get unblocked to be shipped in wheezy,
we are going to be releasing a *very* buggy version to the world.
Whereas Ekiga hasn't always shined by its stability, within a few
minutes of using it, I
On 2012-11-12, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 10:04 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> #692936: "No remote address supplied" after a while
>>
>> ... and the 2.0.3-4 upload was performed only for that purpose.
>
> Has there been any response f
th-ldap-2.0.3/debian/changelog2012-06-05 09:59:11.0
-0400
+++ openvpn-auth-ldap-2.0.3/debian/changelog2012-11-12 05:36:50.0
-0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+openvpn-auth-ldap (2.0.3-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Add patch from Antoine Beaupré to fix "No remote address
+
On 2012-10-19, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 11:12 +0200, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> Note that 0.6.2 was released more than a year ago and it would seem
>> wrong to ship wheezy with it. 0.6.3 *was* in place in the archive when
&
On 2012-10-06, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hi Antoine,
>
> You wrote on unblock request 689772 :
>> critical bugs which are bound to be reported against this package once it is
>> shipped with a stable Debian release.
>
> Please consider reporting those critical bugs in the bts. Maybe olsrd should
> be
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package olsrd
olsrd-0.6.3-5 ships OLSRd with hardening flags. It also updates OLSR
to the latest stable version upstream, which fixes critical bugs which
are bound to be repo
> Marking an already closed bug as pending is slightly unusual too, given
> the standard meaning of "an upload will be made soon".
How else should we show bug squashers to not worry about this bug
through metadata (as opposed to spending the 5-10 minutes to look into
it? :)
A.
--
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package smokeping. The NMU done above actually fixes
upgrades from squeeze and therefore a critical bug.
unblock smokeping/2.6.8-1.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: w
69 matches
Mail list logo
